Relational possibilities for women leaving prison: renewed hope for inclusion and belonging

References

• Allspach, A. (2010). Landscapes of (neo)-liberal control: The transcarceral spaces of federally sentenced women in Canada. Gender, Place and Culture, 17(6), 705–723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bui, H. N., & Morash, M. (2010). The impact of network relationships, prison experiences, and internal transformation on women’s success after prison release. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 49(1), 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Carlton, B., & Segrave, M. (Eds.). (2013). Women exiting prison: Critical essays on gender, post-release support and survival. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, S. (2004). Social relationships and health. American Psychologist, 59, 676–684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comack, E. (1996). Women in trouble: Connecting women’s law violations to their histories of abuse. Halifax: Fernwood Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Covington, S. (2008). The relational theory of women’s psychological development: Implications for the criminal justice system. In R. T. Zaplin (Ed.), Female offenders: Critical perspectives and effective interventions (pp.  113–131). Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Daly, K. (2007). Qualitative methods for family studies and human development. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Dodge, M., & Pogrebin, M. R. (2001). Collateral costs of imprisonment for women: Complications of reintegration. The Prison Journal, 81(1), 42–54.
   Google Scholar
• Fortune, D., & Arai, S. M. (2014). Rethinking community within the context of social inclusion as social justice: Implications for women after federal incarceration. Studies in Social Justice, 8(1), 79–107.
   Google Scholar
• Fortune, D., Thompson, J., Pedlar, A., & Yuen, F. (2010). Social justice and women leaving prison: Beyond punishment and exclusion. Contemporary Justice Review, 13(1), 19–33.
   Google Scholar
• Girshick, L. B. (2003). Abused women and incarceration. In B. H. Zaitzow & J. Thomas (Eds.), Women in prison (pp. 95–117). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Hannah-Moffat, K. (2000). Reforming the prison: Rethinking our ideals. In K. Hannah-Moffat & M. Shaw (Eds.), An ideal prison? critical essays on women's imprisonment in canada (pp. 30–40). Halifax, NS: Fernwood Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hannah-Moffat, K. (2001). Punishment in disguise. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maidment, M. R. (2006). Doing time on the outside: Deconstructing the benevolent community. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• McKnight, J. (1995). The careless society: Community and its counterfeits. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Morash, M., & Robinson, A. L. (2002). Correctional administrators’ perspectives on gender arrangements and family-related programming for women offenders. Marriage & Family Review, 32(3), 83–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, P., & Young, D. (2006). Challenges for formerly incarcerated women: A holistic approach to assessment. Families in Society. The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 87, 359–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Brien, P. (2001). Making it in the “Free World”. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Opsal, T., & Foley, A. (2013). Making it on the outside: Understanding barriers to women’s post‐incarceration reintegration. Sociology Compass, 7(4), 265–277.
   Google Scholar
• Orford, J., Velleman, R., Copello, A., Templeton, L., & Ibanga, A. (2010). The experiences of affected family members: A summary of two decades of qualitative research. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 17(1), 44–62.
   Google Scholar
• Pedlar, A., Arai, S., Yuen, F., & Fortune, D. (2018). Community re-entry: Uncertain futures for women leaving prison. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pedlar, A., Arai, S. M., & Yuen, F. (2007). Media representation of federally sentenced women and leisure opportunities: Ramifications for social inclusion. Leisure/Loisir, 31, 255–276.
   Google Scholar
• Pollack, S. (2007). I’m just not good in relationships’: Victimization discourses and the gendered regulation of criminalized women. Feminist Criminology, 2(2), 158–173.
   Google Scholar
• Pollack, S. (2008). Locked in, locked out: Imprisoning women in the shrinking and punitive welfare state. Retrieved from http://www.flintbox.com/technology.asp?page=3420
   Google Scholar
• Richie, B., Freudenberg, N., & Page, J. (2001). Reintegrating women leaving jail into urban communities: A description of a model program. Journal of Urban Health, 78(2), 290–303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richie, B. E. (2001). Challenges incarcerated women face as they return to their communities: Findings from life history interviews. Crime and Delinquency, 47(3), 368–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scroggins, J. R., & Malley, S. (2010). Reentry and the (unmet) needs of women. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 49(2), 146–163.
   Google Scholar
• Shantz, L., Kilty, J. M., & Frigon, S. (2009). Echoes of imprisonment: Women’s experiences of “successful (re) integration”. Canadian Journal of Law & Society/La Revue Canadienne Droit Et Société, 24(1), 85–106.
   Google Scholar
• Task Force on Federally Sentenced Women (TFFSW), (1990). Creating choices: The report of the Task Force on Federally Sentenced Women. Ottawa, ON: Solicitor General of Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, J., & Frisby, W. (2010). Addressing inadequate leisure access policies through citizen engagement. In H. Mair, S. M. Arai, & D. G. Reid (Eds.), Decentring work: Critical perspectives on leisure, development, and social change (pp. 35–58). Calgary, AB: University of Calgary Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thoits, P. A. (1995). Stress, coping, and social support processes: Where are we? What next? Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 35, 53–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Manen, M. (1997). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. London, ON: Althouse Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wertz, F. J. K. Charmaz, K., McMullen, L. M., Josselson, R., Anderson, R., & McSpadden, E. (2011). Five ways of doing qualitative analysis: Phenomenological psychology, grounded theory, discourse analysis, narrative research and intuitive inquiry.. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Western, B., Braga, A. A., Davis, J., & Sirois, C. (2015). Stress and hardship after prison. American Journal of Sociology, 120(5), 1512–1547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuen, F., Arai, S. M., & Fortune, D. (2012). Community (dis)connection through leisure for women in prison. Leisure Sciences, 34(4), 281–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuen, F., Thompson, J., & Pedlar, A. (2006). Engagement in leisure: A restorative justice approach to working with incarcerated women. Restorative Directions Journal, 2(1), 22–35.
   Google Scholar
• Zehr, H. (1990). Changing lenses (Vol. 114). Scottdale, PA: Herald Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zehr, H. (2014). The little book of restorative justice. New York, NY: Good Books.
   Google Scholar