Discerning justice: clarifying the role of procedural and interactional justice in restorative conferencing

References

• Ahmed, E., & Braithwaite, J. (2005). Forgiveness, shaming, shame and bullying. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 38(3), 298–323. https://doi.org/10.1375/acri.38.3.298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed, E., Harris, N., Braithwaite, J., & Braithwaite, V. (2001). Shame management through reintegration, Cambridge studies in criminology. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, G. C., Hyatt, J. M., Angel, C. M., Strang, H., & Sherman, L. W. (2015). Are restorative justice conferences more fair than criminal courts? Comparing levels of observed procedural justice in the reintegrative shaming experiments (RISE). Criminal Justice Policy Review, 26(2), 103–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403413512671
   Google Scholar
• Batchelor, D. (2017). Restoring choice: The relationship between offense seriousness, intervening time, and victims’ responses to the offer of restorative interventions. Victims & Offenders, 12(2), 205–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2014.1000557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bies, R. J., & Tripp, T. M. (1996). Beyond distrust: ‘Getting even’ and the need for revenge. In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 246–260). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Bies, R. J. (2001). Interactional (in)justice: The sacred and the profane. In J. Greenberg & R. Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organizational justice (pp. pp. 89–118). Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bies, R. J. (2015). Interactional justice: Looking backward, looking forward. In R. S. Cropanzano & M. L. Ambrose (Eds.), The oxford handbook of justice in the workplace (pp. pp. 89–107). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bouffard, J., Cooper, M., & Bergseth, K. (2017). The effectiveness of various restorative justice interventions on recidivism outcomes among juvenile offenders. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 15(4), 465–480. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204016647428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, shame, and reintegration. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, J. (2002). Restorative justice and responsive regulation. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Colquitt, J. A., Greenberg, J., & Zapata-Phelan, C. P. (2005). What is organizational justice? A historical overview. In J. Greenberg & J. A. Colquitt (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice (pp. 3–56). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H., & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 425–445. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.425
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dzur, A. W., & Olson, S. M. (2004). The value of community participation in restorative justice. Journal of Social Philosophy, 35(1), 91–107. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9833.2004.00218.x
   Google Scholar
• Garvey, S. P. (2011). Alternatives to punishment. In J. Deigh & D. Dolinko (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the philosophy of criminal law (pp. 493–520). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gerkin, P. M. (2012). Who owns this conflict? The challenge of community involvement in restorative justice. Contemporary Justice Review, 15(3), 277–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/10282580.2012.707423
   Google Scholar
• Gerlsma, C., & Lugtmeyer, V. (2018). Offense type as determinant of revenge and forgiveness after victimization: Adolescents’ responses to injustice and aggression. Journal of School Violence, 17(1), 16–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2016.1193741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodstein, J., & Butterfield, K. D. (2015). Restorative justice. In R. S. Cropanzano & M. L. Ambrose (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of justice in the workplace (pp. 523–538). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gujarati, D. N. (2003). Basic econometrics. McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, N. (2006). Reintegrative shaming, shame, and criminal justice. Journal of Social Issues, 62(2), 327–346. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2006.00453.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, N., Walgrave, L., & Braithwaite, J. (2004). Emotional dynamics in restorative conferences. Theoretical Criminology, 8(2), 191–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480604042243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, H., & Daly, K. (2003). Youth justice conferencing and reoffending. Justice Quarterly, 20(4), 725–764. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820300095681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegtvedt, K. A. (2018). Justice frameworks. In P. J. Burke (Ed.), Contemporary social psychological theories (pp. 54–80). Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hipple, N. K., Gruenewald, J., & McGarell, E. F. (2014). Restorativeness, procedural justice, and defiance as predictors of reoffending of participants in family group conferences. Crime & Delinquency, 60(8), 1131–1157. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128711428556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jost, J. T., & Kay, A. C. (2010). Social justice: History, theory, and research. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., pp. 1122–1165). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Karp, D. R. (2001). Harm and repair: Observing restorative justice in Vermont. Justice Quarterly, 18(4), 727–757. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820100095081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenney, J., & Clairmont, D. (2009). Using the victim role as both sword and shield: The interactional dynamics of restorative justice sessions. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 38(3), 279–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241608322814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurki, L. (1999, September). Incorporating restorative and community justice into American sentencing and corrections. Sentencing and Corrections. US Department of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? In K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, & R. H. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 27–55). Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Long, J. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, T. F. (1999). Restorative justice: An overview. Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Masterson, S. S., & Tong, N. (2015). Justice perception formation in social settings. In R. S. Cropanzano & M. L. Ambrose (Eds.), The oxford handbook of justice in the workplace (pp. 291–308). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCold, P. (2004). What is the role of community in restorative justice theory and practice? In H. Zehr & B. Toews (Eds.), Critical issues in restorative justice (pp. 155–172). Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• McCold, P., & Wachtel, B. (1998). Restorative policing experiment: The Bethlehem Pennsylvania police family group conferencing project. Community Service Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• McGarrell, E. F. (2001). Restorative justice conferences as an early response to young offenders. US Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
   Google Scholar
• McGarrell, E. F., & Hipple, N. K. (2007). Family group conferencing and re-offending among first-time juvenile offenders: The Indianapolis experiment. Justice Quarterly, 24(2), 221–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820701294789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGarrell, E. F., Olivares, K., Crawford, K., & Kroovand, N. (2000). Returning justice to the community: The Indianapolis juvenile restorative justice experiment. Hudson Institute Crime Control Policy Center.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, S., & Hefner, M. (2015). Procedural justice for victims and offenders? Exploring Restorative justice processes in Australia and the US. Justice Quarterly, 32(1), 142–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2012.760643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mugford, S. (2003). The butterfly’s wing, bread pudding, and justice: The relevance of complexity theory to ADR processes. Mediation Newsletter, 9, 20–21. https://www.slideshare.net/stephenkmugford/butterfly-paper
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, K., & Harris, N. (2007). Shaming, shame, and recidivism. British Journal of Criminology, 47(6), 900–917. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azm037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rossner, M., & Bruce, J. (2016). Community participation in restorative justice: Rituals, reintegration, and quasi-professionalization. Victims & Offenders, 11(1), 107–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2015.1125980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saulnier, A., & Sivasubramaniam, D. (2015). Effects of victim presence and coercion in restorative justice: An experimental paradigm. Law & Human Behavior, 39(4), 378–387. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000130
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheuerman, H. L. (2018). Understanding shame: examining how justice and emotions operate in the context of restorative justice. Sociology Compass, 12, e12561. doi: 10.1111/soc4.12561
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheuerman, H. L., & Keith, S. (2015a). Implications of court versus conference: the relationship between perceptions of procedural justice and shame management. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 26, 156–182.
   Google Scholar
• Scheuerman, H. L., & Keith, S. (2015b). Supporters and restorative justice: how does the intersection between offenders, victims and the community influence perceptions of procedural justice and shaming. Restorative Justice: An International Journal, 3, 75–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheuerman, H. L., & Matthews, S. K. (2014). The importance of perceptions in restorative justice conferences: the influence of offender personality traits on procedural justice and shaming. Justice Quarterly, 31, 852–881.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman, L. W., Braithwaite, J., Strang, H., & Barnes, G. C. (2001). Reintegrative Shaming Experiments (RISE) in Australia, 1995-1999 [Computer file]. ICPSR version. University of Maryland [producer], 2000. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Sherman, L. W., Strang, H., Angel, C., Woods, D., Barnes, G. C., Bennett, S., & Inkpen, N. (2005). Effects of face-to-face restorative justice on victims of crime in four randomized, controlled trials. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1(3), 367–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-005-8126-y
   Google Scholar
• Sherman, L. W., Strang, H., Barnes, G. C., Braithwaite, J., Inkpen, N., & Teh, -M.-M. (1998). Experiments in restorative policing: A progress report on the Canberra reintegrative shaming experiments (RISE). Centre for Restorative Justice, Research School of Social Sciences, Australian National University.
   Google Scholar
• Strang, H., Barnes, G., Braithwaite, J., & Sherman, L. (1999). Experiments in restorative policing: a progress report on the Canberra Reintegrative Experiments (RISE). Australian National University.
   Google Scholar
• Strang, H., Sherman, L., Angel, C. M., Woods, D. J., Bennett, S., Newbury-Birch, D., & Inkpen, N. (2006). Victim evaluations of face-to-face restorative justice conferences: A quasi-experimental analysis. Journal of Social Issues, 62(2), 281–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2006.00451.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strang, H., Sherman, L. W., Woods, D., & Barnes, G. (2011). Experiments in restorative policing: Final report on the Canberra reintegrative shaming experiments (RISE). Centre for Restorative Justice, Research School of Social Sciences, Australian National University.
   Google Scholar
• Stylianou, S. (2003). Measuring crime seriousness perceptions: What have we learned and what else do we want to know. Journal of Criminal Justice, 31(1), 37–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2352(02)00198-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sykes, G. M., & Matza, D. (1957). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. American Sociological Review, 22(6), 664–670. https://doi.org/10.2307/2089195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 115–191). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R., Sherman, L., Strang, H., Barnes, G. C., & Woods, D. (2007). Reintegrative shaming, procedural justice, and recidivism: The engagement of offenders’ psychological mechanisms in the Canberra RISE drinking-and-driving experiment. Law & Society Review, 41(3), 553–586. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2007.00314.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umbreit, M. S., Vos, B., Coates, R. B., & Armour, M. P. (2006). Victims of Severe Violence in Mediated Dialogue with Offender: The Impact of the First Multi-Site Study in the U.S. International Review of Victimology, 13(1), 27–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/026975800601300102
   Google Scholar
• Wenzel, M., Okimoto, T. G., Feather, N. T., & Platow, M. J. (2008). Retributive and restorative justice. Law and Human Behavior, 32(5), 375–389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-007-9116-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenzel, M., Okimoto, T. G., Feather, N. T., & Platow, M. J. (2010). Justice through consensus: Shared identity and the preference for a restorative notion of justice. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(6), 909–930. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zehr, H. (2002). The little book of restorative justice. Good Books.
   Google Scholar