Improving PCK of Chemical Equilibrium in Pre-service Teachers

References

• Abell, S. (2007). Research on science teacher knowledge. In S. Abell & N. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research in science education (pp. 1105–1150). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, D., Thames, M., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59, 389–407. doi: 10.1177/0022487108324554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergquist, W., & Heikkinen, H. (1990). Student ideas regarding chemical equilibrium. Journal of Chemical Education, 67, 1000–1003. doi: 10.1021/ed067p1000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilgin, I. (2006). Promoting pre-service elementary students' understanding of chemical equilibrium through discussions in small groups. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4(3), 467–484. doi: 10.1007/s10763-005-9015-6
   Google Scholar
• Boone, W., & Rogan, J. (2005). Rigour in quantitative analysis: The promise of Rasch analysis techniques. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and technology Education, 9(1), 25–38.
   Google Scholar
• Davidowitz, B., & Rollnick, M. (2011). What lies at the heart of good undergraduate teaching? A case study in organic chemistry. Chemical Education Research and Practice, 12, 355–366. doi: 10.1039/c1rp90042k
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Education. (2000). Norms and standards of educators. Pretoria. Retrieved 5 November 2012 from www.education.gov.za
   Google Scholar
• Geddis, A. (1993). Transforming subject-matter knowledge: The role of pedagogical content knowledge in learning to reflect on teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 15, 673–683. doi: 10.1080/0950069930150605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geddis, A., & Wood, E. (1997). Transforming subject matter and managing dilemmas: A case study in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13(6), 611–626. doi: 10.1016/S0742-051X(97)80004-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, P. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jüttner, M., & Neuhaus, B. (2012). Development of items for a pedagogical content knowledge test based on empirical analysis of pupils' errors. International Journal of Science Education, 34(7), 1125–1143. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2011.606511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane, M. (2006). Validation. In R. L. Brennan (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed., pp. 17–64). Washington, DC: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Kind, V. (2009). Pedagogical content knowledge in science education: Perspectives and potential for progress. Studies in Science Education, 45(2), 169–204. doi: 10.1080/03057260903142285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loughran, J., Berry, A., & Mulhall, P. (2004). In search of pedagogical content knowledge in science: Developing ways of articulating and documenting professional practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(4), 370–391. doi: 10.1002/tea.20007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature sources and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Newsome & N. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 95–132). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Mavhunga, E., & Rollnick, M. (2011). The development and validation of a tool for measuring topic specific PCK in chemical equilibrium. Paper presented at the ESERA Conference, Lyon, France.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. (2002). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Messick, S. (1989). Meaning and values in test validation: The science and ethics of assessment. Educational Researcher, 18(2), 5–11. doi: 10.3102/0013189X018002005
   Google Scholar
• Moran-Ellis, J., Alexander, V., Cronin, A., Dickinson, M., Fielding, J., Sleney, J., & Thomas, H. (2006). Triangulation and integration: Processes, claims and implications. Qualitative Research, 6(1), 45–59. doi: 10.1177/1468794106058870
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, P. (2008). Teaching for understanding: The complex nature of pedagogical content knowledge in pre-service education. International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1281–1299. doi: 10.1080/09500690802186993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson, P., & Loughran, J. (2012). Exploring the development of pre-service science elementary teachers' pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23, 699–721. doi: 10.1007/s10972-011-9239-y
   Google Scholar
• Park, S., Jang, J.-Y., Chen, Y.-C., & Jung, J. (2011). Is pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) necessary for reformed science teaching? Evidence from an empirical study. Research in Science Education, 41, 245–260. doi: 10.1007/s11165-009-9163-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S., & Oliver, J. S. (2008). Revisiting the conceptualisation of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals. Research in Science Education 38, 261–284. doi: 10.1007/s11165-007-9049-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rollnick, M., Bennett, J., Rhemtula, M., Dharsey, N., & Ndlovu, T. (2008). The place of subject matter knowledge in pedagogical content knowledge: A case study of South African teachers teaching amount of substance and chemical equilibrium. International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1365–1387. doi: 10.1080/09500690802187025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAIRR. (2011). South Africa Survey 2010/2011: Education. Johannesburg: South African Institute of Race Relations.
   Google Scholar
• SAIRR. (2012). Unemployment: Progress at last, maybe fast facts. Johannesburg: South African Institute of Race Relations.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. doi: 10.3102/0013189X015002004
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tyson, L., Treagust, D. F., & Bucat, B. (1999). The complexity of teaching and learning chemical equilibrium. Journal of Chemical Education, 76(4), 554–557. doi: 10.1021/ed076p554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Driel, J. H., & Graber, W. (2002). The teaching and learning of chemical equilibrium. In J. Gilbert, O. De Jong, R. Justi, D. Treagust, & J. Van Driel (Eds.), Chemical education: Towards research-based practice (pp. 271–292). London: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Veal, W. R., & Makinster, J. G. (1999). Pedagogical content knowledge taxonomies. Electronic Journal of Science Education,3(4), 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, B. D. (1996). Reliability and separation. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 9, 472. Retrieved 11 October 2012 from www.rasch.org/rmt/rmt94n.htm
   Google Scholar