Influences on the task-setting practices of geography teachers: orientations and curriculum contexts

References

• Béneker, T., & van der Vaart, R. (2020). The knowledge curve: Combining types of knowledges leads to powerful thinking. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 29(3), 221–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2020.1749755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. (1975). Class, codes and control. Volume 3. Towards a theory of educational transmissions. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. (1999). Vertical and horizontal discourse: An essay. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20(2), 157–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425699995380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity. Theory, research, critique (revised edition). Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Biddulph, M., Bèneker, T., Mitchell, D., Hanus, M., Leininger-Frézal, C., Zwartjes, L., & Donert, K. (2020). Teaching powerful geographical knowledge – A matter of social justice: Initial findings from the GeoCapabilities 3 project. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 29(3), 260–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2020.1749756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. B. (1993). From theory to practice: A cognitive systems approach. Higher Education Research and Development, 12(1), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436930120107
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. B. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32(3), 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bladh, G. (2020). GeoCapabilities, Didaktical analysis and curriculum thinking – Furthering the dialogue between Didaktik and curriculum. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 29(3), 206–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2020.1749766
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, C. (2010). Why geography teachers’ subject expertise matters. Geography, 95(3), 143–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/00167487.2010.12094297
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, C. (2016). Teacher subject identity in professional practice: Teaching with a professional compass. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, W., & Chan, D. (2004). Bootstrap Standard Error and Confidence Intervals for the Correlation Corrected for Range Restriction: A Simulation Study. Psychological Methods, 9(3), 369–385. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.9.3.369
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutch Education Council. (2013). Een smalle kijk op onderwijskwaliteit [A small view on quality of education.]. Onderwijsraad.
   Google Scholar
• Field, A. (2018). Discovering satistics using IBM SPSS Statistics (5th ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gess-Newsome, J. (2015). A model of teacher professional knowledge and skill including PCK: Results of the thinking from the PCK Summit. In A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen & J. Loughran (Eds.), Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp. 28–42). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goepel, J. (2012). Upholding public trust: An examination of teacher professionalism and the use of teachers’ standards in England. Teacher Development, 16(4), 489–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2012.729784
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2023). Visible learning: The sequel. A synthesis of over 2,100 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, K. W. (Ed.). (2021). Lernaufgaben im Geographieunterricht. In Sieben Phasen zur Schüleraktivierung. [Learning tasks in Geography Lessons. Seven Phases to activate Students]. Westermann,
   Google Scholar
• IGU CGE. (2016). International charter on geographical education.
   Google Scholar
• Jansen, T., & Möller, J. (2021). Teacher judgments in school exams: Influences of students’ lower-order-thinking skills on the assessment of students’ higher-order-thinking skills. Teaching and Teacher Education, 111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidman, G., & Papadimitriou, F. (2012). Content analysis of international research in geographical and environmental education: 18 years of academic publishing. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 21(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2012.639152
   Google Scholar
• Klein, H. (2010). Die neue Kompetenzorientierung: Exzellenz oder Nivellierung? [The new competence orientation: Excellence or levelling?]. Zeitschrift Für Die Didaktik Der Biowissenschaften, 1, 15–26.
   Google Scholar
• Koo, T., & Li, M. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause, U., Béneker, T., & van Tartwijk, J. (2022a). Higher order thinking by setting and debriefing tasks in Dutch geography lessons. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 12(10), 1516–1517. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe1201000
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause, U., Béneker, T., & van Tartwijk, J. (2022b). Thinking skills in geography textbook tasks of North-Rhine Westphalia and the Netherlands. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 31(1), 69–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2021.1885248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause, U., Béneker, T., van Tartwijk, J., & Maier, V. (2021a). Curriculum contexts, recontextualisation and attention for higher-order thinking. London Review of Education, 19(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.14324/LRE.19.1.24
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause, U., Béneker, T., van Tartwijk, J., Uhlenwinkel, A., & Bolhuis, S. (2017). How do the German and Dutch curriculum contexts influence (the use of) geography textbooks? Review of International Geographical Education Online, 7(3), 235–263.
   Google Scholar
• Krause, U., Budke, A., & Maier, V. (2021b). Understanding of developing and setting tasks in geography lessons by German and Dutch student teachers. Education Sciences, 11(2), 63. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11020063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuckartz, U. (2014). Mixed methods. Methodologie, Forschungsdesigns und Anlyseverfahren [Mixed Methods. Methodology, research designs and anlysis procedures]. Springer Fachmedien.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, D., Solem, M., & Tani, S. (2015). Achieving human potential through geography education: A capabilities approach to curriculum making in schools. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 105(4), 723–735. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2015.1022128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, R., & Bourke, T. (2019). Assessment in geography education: A systematic review. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 28(1), 22–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2017.1385348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N.G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 95–132). Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Mehren, M., & Mehren, R. (2020). Über die Tiefenstrukturen des (Geographie-)Unterrichts. [About the deep structure of (geography) lessons.]. Praxis Geographie, 50(4), 4–9.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, D., Hanus, M., Béneker, T., Biddulph, M., Leininger-Frézal, C., Zwartjes, L., & Donert, K. (2022). Enhancing teachers’ expertise through curriculum leadership – Lessons from the GeoCapabilities 3 Project. Journal of Geography, 121(5–6), 162–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2022.2149838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2016). Netherlands 2016: Foundations for the future. In Reviews of National Policies for Education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264257658-en
   Google Scholar
• Papadimitriou, F., & Kidman, G. (2012). Statistical and scientometric analysis of international research in geographical and environmental education. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 21(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2012.639153
   Google Scholar
• Rieu, A., Leuders, T., & Loibl, K. (2022). Teachers’ diagnostic judgments on tasks as information processing – The role of pedagogical content knowledge for task diagnosis. Teaching and Teacher Education, 111, 103621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, M. (2023). Powerful pedagogies for the school geography curriculum. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 32(1), 69–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2022.2146840
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruane, J. (2005). Essentials of research methods. A guide to social science research. Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Scheele, B., & Groeben, N. (1988). Dialog-Konsens-Methoden zur Rekonstruktion Subjektiver Theorien: Die Heidelberger Struktur-Lege-Technik (SLT), konsuale Ziel-Mittel-Argumentation und kommunikative Flußdiagram-Beschreibung von Handlungen [Dialogue-consensus methods for reconstructing subjective theories: The Heidelberg structure-formation technique (SFT), consensual goal-means argumentation, and communicative flowchart description of actions]. Francke.
   Google Scholar
• Schiro, M. S. (2013). Curriculum theory: Conflicting visions and enduring concerns. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Tuithof, H. (2017). The characteristics of Dutch experienced history teachers’ PCK in the context of a curriculum innovation. Utrecht University.
   Google Scholar
• Tuithof, H., van Drie, J., Bronkhorst, L., Dorsman, L., & van Tartwijk, J. (2021). Teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of two specific historical contexts captured and compared. Educational Studies, 49(4), 686–711. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2021.1877621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uhlenwinkel, A., Béneker, T., Bladh, G., Tani, S., & Lambert, D. (2017). Geocapabilities and curriculum leadership: Balancing the priorities of aim-based and knowledge-led curriculum thinking in schools. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 26(4), 327–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2016.1262603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Berg, G., Bosschaart, A., Kolkman, R., Pauw, I., Van der Schee, J. & Vankan, L. (Eds.) (2009). Handboek vakdidactiek aardrijkskunde [Handbook of geography didactics]. Landelijk Expertiesecentrum Mens-en Maatschappijvakken.
   Google Scholar
• Virranmäki, E., Valta-Hulkkonen, K., & Pellikka, A. (2021). Geography curricula objectives and students’ performance: Enhancing the student’s higher-order thinking skills? Journal of Geography, 120(3), 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2021.1877330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winch, C. (2013). Curriculum design and epistemic ascent. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 47(1), 128–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, M. (2014). Powerful knowledge as a curriculum principle. In M. Young, D. Lambert, C. Roberts & M. Roberts (Eds.), Knowledge and the future school: Curriculum and social justice (pp. 65–88). Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Zweeris, E., Tigelaar, H., & Janssen, F. J. J. M. (2023). Studying curriculum orientations in teachers’ everyday practices: A goal systems approach. Teaching and Teacher Education, 122, 103969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar