References
- Carraccio C, Wolfsthal SD, Englander R, Ferentz K, Martin C. Shifting paradigms: from Flexner to competencies. Acad Med. 2002;77(5):361–367. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200205000-00003.
- Kogan JR, Hatala R, Hauer KE, Holmboe E. Guidelines: the do's, don'ts and don't knows of direct observation of clinical skills in medical education. Perspect Med Educ. 2017;6(5):286–305. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-017-0376-7.
- Massie J, Ali JM. Workplace-based assessment: a review of user perceptions and strategies to address the identified shortcomings. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2016;21(2):455–473. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-015-9614-0.
- LaDonna KA, Hatala R, Lingard L, Voyer S, Watling C. Staging a performance: learners' perceptions about direct observation during residency. Med Educ. 2017;51(5):498–510. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13232.
- Cheung WJ, Patey AM, Frank JR, Mackay M, Boet S. Barriers and enablers to direct observation of trainees' clinical performance: a qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework. Acad Med. 2019;94(1):101–114. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002396.
- Lorwald AC, Lahner FM, Greif R, Berendonk C, Norcini J, Huwendiek S. Factors influencing the educational impact of Mini-CEX and DOPS: a qualitative synthesis. Med Teach. 2018;40(4):414–420. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2017.1408901.
- Lorwald AC, Lahner FM, Mooser B, et al. Influences on the implementation of Mini-CEX and DOPS for postgraduate medical trainees' learning: a grounded theory study. Med Teach. 2019;41(4):448–456. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2018.1497784.
- Bok HG, Teunissen PW, Favier RP, et al. Programmatic assessment of competency-based workplace learning: when theory meets practice. BMC Med Educ. 2013;13:123doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-13-123.
- Harrison C, Wass V. The challenge of changing to an assessment for learning culture. Med Educ. 2016;50(7):704–706. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13058.
- Harrison CJ, Konings KD, Schuwirth LWT, Wass V, van der Vleuten C. Changing the culture of assessment: the dominance of the summative assessment paradigm. BMC Med Educ. 2017;17(1):73doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-0912-5.
- Holmboe E, Ginsburg S, Bernabeo E. The rotational approach to medical education: time to confront our assumptions? Med Educ. 2011;45(1):69–80. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03847.x.
- Telio S, Ajjawi R, Regehr G. The “educational alliance” as a framework for reconceptualizing feedback in medical education. Acad Med. 2015;90(5):609–614. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000560.
- Telio S, Regehr G, Ajjawi R. Feedback and the educational alliance: examining credibility judgements and their consequences. Med Educ. 2016;50(9):933–942. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13063.
- Watling C, LaDonna KA, Lingard L, Voyer S, Hatala R. 'Sometimes the work just needs to be done': socio-cultural influences on direct observation in medical training . Med Educ. 2016;50(10):1054–1064. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13062.
- Watling CJ, Ginsburg S. Assessment, feedback and the alchemy of learning. Med Educ. 2019;53(1):76–85. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13645.
- Ramani S, Konings KD, Ginsburg S, van der Vleuten C. Twelve tips to promote a feedback culture with a growth mind-set: swinging the feedback pendulum from recipes to relationships. Med Teach. 2019;41(6):625–631. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2018.1432850.
- Ramani S, Post SE, Konings K, Mann K, Katz JT, van der Vleuten C. "It's just not the culture": a qualitative study exploring residents' perceptions of the impact of institutional culture on feedback. Teach Learn Med. 2017;29(2):153–161. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2016.1244014.
- Voyer S, Cuncic C, Butler DL, MacNeil K, Watling C, Hatala R. Investigating conditions for meaningful feedback in the context of an evidence-based feedback programme. Med Educ. 2016;50(9):943–954. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13067.
- Sukhera J, Wodzinski M, Milne A, Teunissen PW, Lingard L, Watling C. Implicit bias and the feedback paradox: exploring how health professionals engage with feedback while questioning its credibility. Acad Med. 2019;94(8):1204–1210. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002782.
- Watling C, Driessen E, van der Vleuten CP, Lingard L. Learning from clinical work: the roles of learning cues and credibility judgements. Med Educ. 2012;46(2):192–200. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04126.x.
- Bates J, Konkin J, Suddards C, Dobson S, Pratt D. Student perceptions of assessment and feedback in longitudinal integrated clerkships. Med Educ. 2013;47(4):362–374. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12087.
- Starmer AJ, O'Toole JK, Rosenbluth G, et al. Development, implementation, and dissemination of the I-PASS handoff curriculum: a multisite educational intervention to improve patient handoffs. Acad Med. 2014;89(6):876–884. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000264.
- Starmer AJ, Spector ND, Srivastava R, et al. Changes in medical errors after implementation of a handoff program. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(19):1803–1812. doi:https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa1405556.
- Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101. doi:https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
- Boyatzis RE. Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development. Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications, Inc; 1998.
- Young JQ, Sugarman R, Schwartz J, McClure M, O’Sulivan P. A mobile app to capture EPA assessment data: utilizing the consolidated framework for implementation reserach to identify enablers and barriers to engagement. Perspect Med Educ. 2020 Jun 5. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-020-00587-z.
- Young JQ, Sugarman R, Schwartz J, McClure M, O’Sulivan P. Using implementation science to explore the enablers and barriers to engagement with a direct observation and feedback tool. Acad Med. In Press.
- Young JQ, Lieu S, O'Sullivan P, Tong L. Development and initial testing of a structured clinical observation tool to assess pharmacotherapy competence. Acad Psychiatry. 2011;35(1):27–34. doi:https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ap.35.1.27.
- Young JQ, Irby DM, Kusz M, O’Sullivan PS. Performance assessment of pharmacotherapy: results from a content validity survey of the Psychopharmacotherapy-Structured Clinical Observation (P-SCO) tool. Acad Psychiatry. 2018;42(6):765–772. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-017-0876-0.
- Young JQ, McClure M. Fast, easy, and good: assessing entrustable professional activities in psychiatry residents with a mobile app. Acad Med. 2020Apr 7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000003390.
- Young JQ, Rasul R, O’Sullivan PS. Evidence for the validity of the psychopharmacotherapy-structured clinical observation tool: results of a factor and time series analysis. Acad Psychiatry. 2018;42(6):759–764. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-018-0928-0.
- Young JQ, Sugarman R, Holmboe E, O’Sullivan PS. Advancing our understanding of narrative comments generated by direct observation tools: lessons from the psychopharmacotherapy-structured clinical observation. J Grad Med Educ. 2019;11(5):570–579. doi:https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-19-00207.1.
- Holmboe ES. Faculty and the observation of trainees' clinical skills: problems and opportunities. Acad Med. 2004;79(1):16–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200401000-00006.
- Holmboe ES. Work-based Assessment and Co-production in Postgraduate Medical Training. GMS J Med Educ. 2017;34(5):Doc58doi:https://doi.org/10.3205/zma001135.
- Brown J, Nestel D, Clement T, Goldszmidt M. The supervisory encounter and the senior GP trainee: managing for, through and with. Med Educ. 2018;52(2):192–205. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13468.
- Ginsburg S, Regehr G, Lingard L, Eva KW. Reading between the lines: faculty interpretations of narrative evaluation comments. Med Educ. 2015;49(3):296–306. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12637.
- Ginsburg S, van der Vleuten CP, Eva KW, Lingard L. Cracking the code: residents' interpretations of written assessment comments. Med Educ. 2017;51(4):401–410. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13158.
- Kogan JR, Conforti LN, Bernabeo E, Iobst W, Holmboe E. How faculty members experience workplace-based assessment rater training: a qualitative study. Med Educ. 2015;49(7):692–708. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12733.
- van de Ridder JM, McGaghie WC, Stokking KM, ten Cate OT. Variables that affect the process and outcome of feedback, relevant for medical training: a meta-review. Med Educ. 2015;49(7):658–673. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12744.
- Sargeant J, Lockyer J, Mann K, et al. Facilitated reflective performance feedback: developing an evidence- and theory-based model that builds relationship, explores reactions and content, and coaches for performance change (R2C2). Acad Med. 2015;90(12):1698–1706. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000809.
- Sargeant J, Lockyer JM, Mann K, et al. The R2C2 model in residency education: how does it foster coaching and promote feedback use? Acad Med. 2018;93(7):1055–1063. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002131.
- Watling CJ, Ajjawi R, Bearman M. Approaching culture in medical education: three perspectives. Med Educ. 2020;54(4):289–295. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14037.
- Butler DL, Winne PH. Feedback and self-regulated learning: a theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research. 1995;65(3):245–281. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543065003245.
- Hauer KE, O'Brien BC, Hansen LA, et al. More is better: students describe successful and unsuccessful experiences with teachers differently in brief and longitudinal relationships. Acad Med. 2012;87(10):1389–1396. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31826743c3.
- Govaerts M. Workplace-based assessment and assessment for learning: threats to validity. J Grad Med Educ. 2015;7(2):265–267. doi:https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-15-00101.1.
- Watling CJ, Kenyon CF, Zibrowski EM, et al. Rules of engagement: residents' perceptions of the in-training evaluation process. Acad Med. 2008;83(10 Suppl):S97–S100. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e318183e78c.
- Nicol DJ, Macfarlane‐Dick D. Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Stud Higher Educ. 2006;31(2):199–218. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090.
- Eva KW, Armson H, Holmboe E, et al. Factors influencing responsiveness to feedback: on the interplay between fear, confidence, and reasoning processes. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2012;17(1):15–26. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-011-9290-7.
- Garino A. Ready, willing and able: a model to explain successful use of feedback. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2020;25(2):337–361.
- Dunning D, Heath C, Suls JM. Flawed self-assessment: implications for health, education, and the workplace. Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2004;5(3):69–106. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-1006.2004.00018.x.