Risk/Benefit Communication about Food—A Systematic Review of the Literature

REFERENCES

• Azjen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Dec. Processes, 50:179–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bambra, C. (2011). Real world reviews: A beginner's guide to undertaking systematic reviews of public health policy interventions. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 65(1):14–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, G. and Kropp, C. (2011). Is science based consumer advice prepared to deal with uncertainties in second modernity? - The role of scientific experts in risk communication in the case of food supplements. Sci. Technol. Innovation Stud. 6:1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, L. (2004). Trust in food in the age of mad cow disease: A comparative study of consumers’ evaluation of food safety in Belgium, Britain and Norway. Appetite, 42:21–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briner, R. B. and Rousseau, D. M. (2011). Evidence-based I–O psychology: Not there yet. Ind. Organ. Psychol. 4(1):3–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalmers, I. (2003). Trying to do more good than harm in policy and practice: The role of rigorous, transparent, up-to-date evaluations. Ann. Am. Acad. Polit. Soc. Sci. 589(1):22–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 39(5):752–766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conner, M. and Armitage, C. J. (1998). Extending the theory of planned behavior: A review and avenues for further research. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 28(15):1429–1464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa-Font, M., Gila, J. M. and Traill, W. B. (2008). Consumer acceptance, valuation of and attitudes towards genetically modified food. Review and Implications for Food Policy, 22:99–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henwood, K. and Pidgeon, N. (eds), (2003), Grounded theory in psychological research. Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association, doi: 10.1037/10595-008
   Google Scholar
• Dijk, H. van, Fischer, A. R. H. and Frewer, L. J. (2011). Consumer responses to integrated risk-benefit information associated with the consumption of food. Risk Anal. 31:429–439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dosman, D. M., Adamowicz, W. L. and Hrudey, S. E. (2001). Socioeconomic determinants of health-and food safety-related risk perceptions. Risk Anal. 21:307–318
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Gazzar, F. E. and Marth, E. H. (1992). Foodborne disease: Investigative procedures and economic assessment. J. Environ. Health 55(2):24–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fife-Schaw, C. and Rowe, G. (2006). Public perceptions of everyday food hazards: A psychometric study. Risk Anal. 16(4), 487–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, A. R., De Jong, A. E., Van Asselt, E. D., De Jonge, R., Frewer, L. J. and Nauta, M. J. (2007). Food safety in the domestic environment: An interdisciplinary investigation of microbial hazards during food preparation. Risk Anal. 27(4):1065–1082.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, A. R., van Dijk, H., de Jonge, J., Rowe, G. and Frewer, L. J. (in press). Attitudes and attitudinal ambivalence change towards nanotechnology applied to food production. Public Underst. Sci.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., Lichtenstein, S., Read, S. and Combs, B. (1978). How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits. Policy Sci. 9(2):127–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frewer, L. (2003). Societal issues and public attitudes towards genetically modified Foods. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 14:319–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frewer, L. J., Bergmann, K., Brennan, M., Lion, R., Meertens, R., Rowe, G., Siegrist, M. and Vereijken, C. (2011). Consumer response to novel agri-food technologies: Implications for predicting consumer acceptance of emerging food technologies. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 22(8):442–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frewer, L. J., Howard, C., Hedderley, D. and Shepherd, R. (1997). The elaboration likelihood model and communication about food risks. Risk Anal. 17(6):759–770.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frewer, L. J., van der Lans, I. A., Fischer, A. R. H., Reinders, M. J., Menozzi, D., Zhang, X., van den Berg, I. and Zimmermann, K. L. (in press 2013). Public perceptions of agri-food applications of genetic modification – A systematic review and meta-analysis. Trends Food Sci. Technol.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glik, D. C. (2007). Risk Communication for public health emergencies. Annu. Rev. Pub. Health 28:33–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., McFarlane, F., Bate, P. and Kyriakidou, O. (2004). Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: Systematic review and recommendations. The Milbank Quarterly, 82(4):581–630.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., McFarlane, F., Bate, P. and Kyriakidou, O. (2005). Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: A Systematic review. Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, R. J., Dunwoody, S. and Neuwirth, K. (1999). Model of the relationship of risk information seeking and processing to the development of preventive behaviors. Environ. Res. Sec. A, 80:S230–S245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooper, L., Thompson, R. L., Harrison, R. A., Summerbell, C. D., Ness, A. R., Moore, H., Worthington, H. V., Durrington, P. N., Higgins, J. P. T., Capps, N. E., Riemersma, R. A., Ebrahim, S. B. and Smith, G. D. (2006). Risks and benefits of omega 3 fats for mortality, cardiovascular disease, and cancer: Systematic review. Br. Med. J. 332(7544):752–755.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kher, S. V., De Jonge, J., Wentholt, M. T. A., Deliza, R., de Andrade, J. C., Cnossen, H. J., Luijckx, N. B. L. and Frewer, L. J. (2011). Consumer perceptions of risks of chemical and microbiological contaminants associated with food chains: A cross-national study. Int. J. Consumer Stud. 37(1):73–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirk, S. F. L., Greenwood, D., Cade, J. E. and Pearman, A. D. (2002). Public perception of a range of potential food risks in the United Kingdom. Appetite 38:189–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellens, W., Terpstra, T. and De Maeyer, P. (2013). Perception and communication of flood risks: A systematic review of empirical research. Risk Anal. 33:24–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleef, E. van, Frewer, L. J., Chryssochoidis, G. M., Houghton, J. R., Korzen-Bohr, S., Krystallis, T., Lassen, J., Pfenning, U. and Rowe, G. (2006). Perceptions of food risk management among key stakeholders: Results from a cross-European study. Appetite 47(1):46–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleef, E. van, Ueland, Ø., Theodoridis, G., Rowe, G., Pfenning, U., Houghton, J., van Dijk, H., Chryssochoidis, G. and Frewer, L. J (2009). Food risk management quality: Consumer evaluations of past and emerging food safety incidents. Health, Risk Soc. 11(2):1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Knuth, B. A., Connelly, N. A., Sheeshka, J. and Patterson, J. (2003). Weighing health benefit and health risk information when consuming sport-caught fish. Risk Anal. 23(6):1185–1197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köenig, A., Kuiper, H. A., Marvin, H. J. P., Boon, P. E., Busk, L., Cnudde, F., Cope, S., Davies, H. V., Dreyer, M., Frewer, L. J., Kaiser, M., Kleter, G. A., Knudsen, I., Gérard, P., Prandini, A., Renn, O., Smith, M. R., Traill, B. W., van der Voet, H., van Trijp, H., Vos, E. and Wentholt, M. T. A. (2010). The SAFE FOODS framework for improved risk analysis of foods. Food Control. 21, 12, 1566–1587.
   Google Scholar
• Lampila, P. and Lähteenmäki, L. (2007). Consumers’ attitudes towards high pressure freezing of food. Br. Food J. 109:838–851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lusk, J. L., Jamal, M., Kurlander, L., Roucan, M. and Taulman, L. (2005). A meta-analysis of genetically modified food valuation studies. J. Agric. Res. Econ. 30(1):28–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. and Cacioppo, J. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 19:123–205.
   Google Scholar
• Pidgeon, N., Kasperson, R. and Slovic, P., Eds. (2003). The Social Amplification of Risk. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poortinga, W. and Pidgeon, N. F. (2005). Trust in risk regulation: Cause or consequence of the acceptability of GM food? Risk Anal. 25:199–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renn, O. and Rohrmann, B. (2000). Cross-cultural risk perception: A survey of empirical studies. Boston, Dordrecht and London: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Rozin, P., Spranca, M., Krieger, Z., Neuhaus, R., Surillo, D., Swerdlin, A. and Wood, K. (2004). Preference for natural: Instrumental and ideational/moral motivations, and the contrast between foods and medicines. Appetite 43:147–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutsaert, P., Regan, Á., Pieniak, Z., McConnon, Á., Moss, A., Wall, P. and Verbeke, W. (in press 2013). The use of social media in food risk and benefit communication. Trends Food Sci. Technol. Doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2012.10.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saba, A. and Messina, F. (2003). Attitudes towards organic foods and risk/benefit perception associated with pesticides. Food Qual. Pref. 14:637–645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savadori, L., Graffeo, M., Bonini, N., Lombardi, L., Tentori, K. and Rumiati, R. (2007). Rebuilding consumer trust in the context of a food crisis. In: Trust in Risk Management, Eds. Siegrist, M., Earle, T. C., and Gutscher, H. Y., London: Earthscan Publications. pp. 159–171.
   Google Scholar
• Siegrist, M., Cousin, M. E., Kastenholz, H. and Wiek, A. (2007a). Public acceptance of nanotechnology foods and food packaging: The influence of affect and trust. Appetite 49(2):459–466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegrist, M., Earle, T. C. and Gutscher, H., Eds., Earthscan, London, Washington.
   Google Scholar
• Siegrist, M., Gutscher, H. and Keller, C. (2007b). Trust and confidence in crisis communication: Three case studies. In: Trust in risk management, pp. 267–286.
   Google Scholar
• Sparks, P., Shepherd, R. and Frewer, L. J. (1995). Assessing and structuring attitudes towards the use of gene technology in food production: The role of perceived ethical obligation. J. Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol. 16:267–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic, P. E. (2000). The Perception of Risk. London: Earthscan Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Tenbült, P., De Vries, N. K., Dreezens, E. and Martijn, C. (2008). Intuitive and explicit reactions towards “new” food technologies: Attitude strength and familiarity. Br. Food J. 110(6):622–635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ter Huurne, E. and Gutteling, J. (2008). Information needs and risk perception as predictors of risk information seeking. J. Risk Res. 11:847–862.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, K. M. (2002). Variability and uncertainty meet risk management and risk communication. Risk Anal. 22(3):647–654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trumbo, C. W. and McComas, K. A. (2003). the function of credibility in information processing for risk perception. Risk Anal. 23(2):343–353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbeke, W. (2001). Beliefs, attitude and behaviour towards fresh meat revisited after the Belgian dioxin crisis. Food Qual. Pref. 12:489–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbeke, W., Sioen, I., Pieniak, Z., Van Camp, J. and De Henauw, S. (2005). Consumer perception versus scientific evidence about health benefits and safety risks from fish consumption. Pub. Health Nutr. 8(4):422–429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbeke, W. and Vackier, I. (2005). Individual determinants of fish consumption: Application of the theory of planned behaviour. Appetite 44(1):67–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbeke, W., Vanhonacker, F., Frewer, L. J., Sioen, I., De Henauw, S. and Van Camp, J. (2008). Communicating risks and benefits from fish consumption: Impact on Belgian consumers’ perception and intention to eat fish. Risk Anal. 28:951–967.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verplanken, B. (1991). Persuasive communication of risk information: A test of cue versus message processing effects in a field experiment. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 17:188–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visschers, V. H. M., Meertens, R. M., Passchier, W. F. and de Vries, N. K. (2008). Audiovisual risk communications unraveled: Effects on gut feelings and cognitive processes. J. Risk Res. 11:207–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, T. L. and Sheeran, P. (2006). Does changing behavioral intentions engender behaviour change? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Psychol. Bull. 132:249–268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, J. and Goddard, E. (2011). The evolution of risk perceptions related to bovine spongiform encephalopathy- Canadian consumer and producer behaviour. J. Toxicol. Environ Health Part A 74:191–225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar