624
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Persistence in Science Play and Gender: Findings from Early Childhood Classrooms in Ireland

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all

References

  • Accenture. (2014). Powering economic growth; Attracting more young women into science and technology. https://www.accenture.com/ie-en/~/media/Accenture/Conversion-Assets/DotCom/Documents/Global/PDF/Industries_14/Accenture-STEMPowering-Economic-Growth.pdf
  • Alexander, J. M., Johnson, K. E., & Kelley, K. (2012). Longitudinal analysis of the relations between opportunities to learn about science and the development of interests related to science. Science Education, 96(5), 763–786. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21018
  • Ambady, N., Shih, M., Kim, A., & Pittinsky, T. L. (2001). Stereotype susceptibility in children: Effects of identity activation on quantitative performance. Psychological Science, 12(5), 385–390. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00371
  • Ansari, A., & Gottfried, M. A. (2018). Early childhood educational settings and school absenteeism for children with disabilities. AERA Open, 47(5). https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858418785576
  • Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B, & Wong, B. (2010). “Doing” science versus “being” a scientist: Examining 10/11-year-old schoolchildren's constructions of science through the lens of identity. Science Education, 94(4), 617–639. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20399
  • Baram-Tsabari, A., & Yarden, A. (2005). Characterizing children’s spontaneous interests in science and technology. International Journal of Science Education, 27(7), 803–826. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500038389
  • Blumberg, F. C., Deater-Deckard, K., Calvert, S. L., Flynn, R. M., Green, C. S., Arnold, D., & Brooks, P. J. (2019). Digital games as a context for children’s cognitive development: Research recommendations and policy considerations. Social Policy Report, 32(1), 1–33.
  • Cimpian, A., Arce, H. C., Markman, E. M., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Subtle linguistic cues affect children’s motivation. Psychological Science, 18 (4), 314–316. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40064611
  • Clerkin, A., Perkins, R., & Chubb, E. (2017). Inside the primary classroom: What happens in fourth class? Educational Research Centre.
  • Common Sense Media. (2017). The common sense census: Zero to eight: Media use by kids zero to eight.
  • Corpus, J. H., & Lepper, M. R. (2007). The effects of person versus performance praise on children’s motivation: Gender and age as moderating factors. Educational Psychology, 27(4), 487–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410601159852
  • Crowley, K., Callanan, M. A., Tenenbaum, H. R., & Allen, E. (2001). Parents explain more often to boys than to girls during shared scientific thinking. Psychological Science, 12(3), 258–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00347
  • Cvencek, D., Meltzoff, A. N., & Greenwald, A. G. (2011). Math-gender stereotypes in elementary school children. Child Development, 82(3), 766–779. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01529.x
  • Edson, M. T. (2013). Starting with science: Strategies for introducing young children to inquiry. Stenhouse Publishers.
  • Foster-Hanson, E., Leslie, S.-J., & Rhodes, M. (2016). How does generic language elicit essentialist beliefs? In Proceedings of the 38th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1541–1546). Philadelphia, PA: Cognitive Science Society.
  • Fox, J., & Weisberg, S. (2018). An R companion to applied regression (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.
  • Gelman, S. A., & Roberts, S. O. (2017). How language shapes the cultural inheritance of categories. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(30), 7900–7907. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1621073114
  • Gelman, S. A., Ware, E. A., & Kleinberg, F. (2010). Effects of generic language on category content and structure. Cognitive Psychology, 61(3), 273–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.06.001
  • Gilligan, T., Lovett, J., McLoughlin, E., Murphy, C., Finlayson, O., Corriveau, K., & McNally, S. (2020). We practise every day’: Parents’ attitudes towards early science learning and education among a sample of urban families in Ireland. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 28(6), 898–910. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2020.1836588
  • Greenfield, T. A. (1997). Gender- and grade-level differences in science interest and participation. Science Education, 81(3), 259–276. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1098-237x(199706)81:3<259::aidsce1>3.3.co;2-3
  • Helmke, A., & Aken, M. (1995). The causal ordering of academic achievement and self-concept of ability during elementary school: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(4), 624–637. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.87.4.624
  • Hothorn, T., Hornik, K., Wiel, M. A. V. D., & Zeileis, A. (2008). Implementing a class of permutation tests: The coin package. Journal of Statistical Software, 28(8), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v028.i08
  • Hyde, J. (2014). Gender similarities and differences. Annual Review of Psychology, 65(1), 373–398.
  • Kamins, M. L., & Dweck, C. S. (1999). Person versus process praise and criticism: Implications for contingent self-worth and coping. Developmental Psychology, 35(3), 835–847. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.35.3.835
  • Kassambra, A., Kosinski, M., & Przemyslaw, B. (2019). Survminer: Drawing survival curves using “ggplot2.” The Comprehensive R Archive Network. https://cran.rproject.org/package=survminer
  • Keeves, J., & Kotte, D. (1992). Disparities between the sexes in science education: 1970 – 1984. In J. Keeves (Ed.), The IEA study of science III (pp. 141–164). Pergamon.
  • Lane, H. C., & Yi, S. (2017). Playing with virtual blocks: Minecraft as a learning environment for practice and research. In F. C. Blumberg & P. J. Brooks (Eds.), Cognitive development in digital contexts (pp. 145–166). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809481-5.00007-9
  • Leibham, M., Alexander, J., & Johnson, K. (2013). Science interests in preschool boys and girls: Relations to later self-concept and science achievement. Science Education, 97(4), 574–593. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21066
  • Leonard, J. A., Garcia, A., & Schulz, L. E. (2019). How adults’ actions, outcomes, and testimony affect preschoolers’ persistence. Child Development, 91(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13305
  • Lerkkanen, M.-K., Kiuru, N., Pakarinen, E., Viljaranta, J., Poikkeus, A. M., Rasku-Puttonen, H., et al. (2012). The role of teaching practices in the development of children’s interest in reading and mathematics in kindergarten. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 37(4), 266–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.03.004.
  • Levy, S. R., & Dweck, C. S. (1999). The impact of children’s static versus dynamic conceptions of people on stereotype formation. Child Development, 70(5), 1163–1180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00085
  • Makin, T. R., & Orban de Xivry, -J.-J. (2019). Ten common statistical mistakes to watch out for when writing or reviewing a manuscript. ELife, 8, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.48175
  • Maltese, A. V., & Tai, R. H. (2011). Pipeline persistence: Examining the association of educational experiences with earned degrees in STEM among U.S. students. Science Education, 95, 877–907. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20441
  • Martin, A., Ryan, R. M., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2013). Longitudinal associations among interest, persistence, supportive parenting, and achievement in early childhood. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 28(4), 658–667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2013.05.003
  • Master, A., Cheryan, S., Moscatelli, A., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2017). Programming experience promotes higher STEM motivation among first-grade girls. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 160, 92–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.03.013
  • McClelland, M. M., Acock, A. C., Piccinin, A., Rhea, S. A., & Stallings, M. C. (2013). Relations between preschool attention span-persistence and age 25 educational outcomes. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 28(2), 314–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2012.07.008
  • McClure, E. R., Guernsey, L., Clements, D. H., Nall Bales, S., Nichols, J., Kendall-Taylor, N., & Levine, M. H. (2017). STEM starts early: Grounding science, technology, engineering, and math education in early childhood. The Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop New America.
  • Meyer, M., Cimpian, A, and Leslie, S. (2015). Women are underrepresented in fields where success is believed to require brilliance. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00235
  • Morgan, P. L., Farkas, G., Hillemeier, M. M., & Maczuga, S. (2016). Science achievement gaps begin very early, persist, and are largely explained by modifiable factors. Educational Researcher, 45(1), 18–35. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X16633182
  • Mueller, C. M., & Dweck, C. S. (1998). Praise for intelligence can undermine children’s motivation and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 33–52. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.33
  • Muenks, K., Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2018). I can do this! The development and calibration of children’s expectations for success and competence beliefs. Developmental Review, 48(July 2017), 24–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2018.04.001
  • National Council for Curriculum and Assessment. (2009). Aistear, the early childhood curriculum framework: Guidelines for good practice. NCCA. https://ncca.ie/media/4151/aistear_theearlychildhoodcurriculumframework.pdf
  • National Science Foundation. (2011). S&E degrees: 1966–2008. http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/nsf11316/pdf/nsf11316.pdf
  • Nayfeld, I., Brenneman, K., & Gelman, R. (2011). Science in the classroom: Finding a balance between autonomous exploration and teacher-led instruction in preschool settings. Early Education and Development, 22(6), 970–988. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2010.507496
  • Nosek, B. A., Smyth, F. L., Sriram, N., Lindner, N. M., Devos, T., Ayala, A., … Greenwald, A. G. (2009). National differences in gender-science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(26), 10593–10597. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0809921106
  • Oppermann, E., Brunner, M., & Anders, Y. (2019). The interplay between preschool teachers’ science self-efficacy beliefs, their teaching practices, and girls’ and boys’ early science motivation. Learning and Individual Differences, 70(January 2018), 86–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2019.01.006
  • Osborne, J., & Dillon, J. (2008). Science education in Europe: Critical reflections. http://www.fisica.unina.it/traces/attachments/article/149/Nuffield-Foundation-Osborne-Dillon-Science-Education-in-Europe.pdf%5Cnpapers2://publication/uuid/FA17ED57-71AF-429E-B7E5-D9E33DA4A538
  • Parmar, M. K. B., & Machin, D. (1995). Survival analysis: A practical approach.Wiley.
  • Patrick, H., & Mantzicopoulos, P. (2015). Chatper 2: Young children’s motivation for learning science. In K. C. Trundle & M. Saçkes (Eds.), Research in early childhood science education (pp. 1–390). Springer Science+Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9505-0
  • Qiu, W., Chavarro, J., Lazarus, R., Rosner, B., & Ma, J. (2018). powerSurvEpi: Power and sample size calculation for survival analysis of epidemiological studies. Comprehensive R Archive Network. https://cran.r-project.org/package=powerSurvEpi
  • Reilly, D., Neumann, D. L., & Andrews, G. (2019). Investigating gender differences in mathematics and science: Results from the 2011 trends in mathematics and science survey. Research in Science Education, 49(1), 25–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9630-6
  • Rhodes, M., Leslie, S. J., & Tworek, C. M. (2012). Cultural transmission of social essentialism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(34), 13526–13531. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1208951109
  • Rhodes, M., Leslie, S. J., Yee, K. M., & Saunders, K. (2019). Subtle linguistic cues increase girls’ engagement in science. Psychological Science, 30(3), 455–466. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797618823670
  • Samarapungavan, A., Patrick, H, and Mantzicopoulos, P. (2011). What kindergarten students learn in inquiry-based science classrooms. Cognition and Instruction, 29(4), 416–470. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2011.608027
  • Sikder, S., & Fleer, M. (2018). The relations between ideal and real forms of small science: Conscious collaboration among parents and infants-toddlers. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 13(4), 865–888. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-018-9869-x
  • Sonnenschein, S., & Munsterman, K. (2002). The influence of home-based reading interactions on 5-year-olds’ reading motivations and early literacy development. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 17(3), 318–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2006(02)00167-9
  • The STEM Education Review Group. (2016). STEM Education in the Irish School System: A report on Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Education. https://www.education.ie/en/The-Education-System/STEM-Education-Policy/
  • Team, R. C. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.r-project.org/
  • Therneau, T. (2015). A package for survival analysis in S. Comprehensive R Archive Network. https://cran.r-project.org/package=survival
  • Therneau, T., & Grambsch, P. M. (2000). Modeling survival data: Extending the cox model. Springer.
  • Valeski, T. N., & Stipek, D. J. (2001). Young children’s feelings about school. Child Development, 72(4), 1198–1213. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00342
  • Wickham, H. (2017). Tidyverse: Easily install and load the “Tidyverse.” Comprehensive R Archive Network. https://cran.r-project.org/package=tidyverse
  • Zentall, S. R., & Morris, B. J. (2010). “Good job, you’re so smart”: The effects of inconsistency of praise type on young children’s motivation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 107(2), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2010.04.015
  • Zentall, S. R., & Morris, B. J. (2012). A critical eye: Praise directed toward traits increases children’s eye fixations on errors and decreases motivation. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 19(6), 1073–1077. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-012-0294-y
  • Zimmerman, C. (2007). The development of scientific thinking skills in elementary and middle school. Developmental Review, 27(2), 172–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2006.12.001

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.