Perception of Naturalness of Food Packaging and Its Role in Consumer Product Evaluation

References

• Batra, R. K. (2009). When good looks kill: An examination of consumer response to visually attractive product design. Advances in Consumer Research, 8, 252.
   Google Scholar
• Bech-Larsen, T. (1996). Danish consumers’ attitudes to the functional and environmental characteristics of food packaging. Journal of Consumer Policy, 19, 339–363.
   Google Scholar
• Belk, R. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 139–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloch, P. H. (1995). Seeking the ideal form: Product design and consumer response. Journal of Marketing, 59(3), 16–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, R. L. (1958). Wrapper influence on the perception of freshness in bread. Journal of Applied Psychology, 42, 257–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, S., Ibanez, L., Loureiro, M. L., & Marette, S. (2009). Quality promotion through eco-labeling: Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, 7(2), 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Chandran, S., Batra, R. K., & Lawrence, B. (2009). Is seeing believing? Consumer responses to opacity of product packaging. Advances in Consumer Research, North American Conference Proceedings, 36, 970–971.
   Google Scholar
• Chryssohoidis, G. M., & Krystallis, A. (2005). Organic consumers’ personal values research: Testing and validating the list of values (LOV) scale and implementing a value-based segmentation task. Food Quality and Preference, 16, 585–599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corey, R. J., & Bone, P. F. (1992). Ethical packaging: A call for research. Journal of Marketing Management, 2, 44–54.
   Google Scholar
• Creusen, M. E. H., & Schoormans, J. P. L. (2005). The different roles of product appearance in consumer choice. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22, 63–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darian, J. C., & Tucci, L. (2011). Perceived health benefits and food purchasing decisions. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 28, 421–428.
   Google Scholar
• Dittmar, H. (1992). The social psychology of material possessions: To have is to be. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
   Google Scholar
• Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., & Grewal, D. (1991). The effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers’ product evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 28, 307–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, G., de Challemaison, B., & Cox, D. N. (2010). Consumers’ ratings of the natural and unnatural qualities of foods. Appetite, 54, 557–563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischler, C. (2010, February). Evolution of the healthy food market, its frontiers and its future. Conférence Nutreating: Food, Consumer and Health Claims. Paris, France: AgroParisTech.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald Bone, P., & Russo France, K. (2009). Qualified health claims on package labels. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 28, 253–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garretson, J. A., & Burton, S. (2000). Effects of nutrition facts panel values, nutrition claims, and health claims on consumer attitudes, perceptions of disease-related risks, and trust. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 19, 213–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golan, E., Kuchler, F., & Mitchell, L. (2000). Economics of food labelling, economic research service. Food and Rural Economics Division, US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Handbook, 793, 1–41.
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, P., Ibáñez, V. A., & Forcada Sainz, F. J. (2005). Green branding effects on attitude: Functional versus emotional positioning strategies. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 23, 9–29.
   Google Scholar
• Kardes, F. R. (2002). Consumer behaviour and managerial decision making. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Kirk, R. E. (1982). Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Bermont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Klinkenberg, J. M. (1996). Précis de sémiotique générale. Brussels, Belgium: De Boeck.
   Google Scholar
• Mathios, A. D., & Ippolito, P. M. (1998). Food companies spread nutrition information through advertising and labels. Food Review, 21(2), 38–44.
   Google Scholar
• McCracken, G. (1986). Culture and consumption: A theoretical account of the structure and movement of the cultural meaning of consumer goods. Journal of Consumer Research, 13, 71–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDaniel, C., & Baker, R. C. (1977). Convenience food packaging and the perception of product quality. Journal of Marketing, 41(4), 57–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nancarrow, C., & Wright, L. T. (1998). Gaining competitive advantage from packaging and labelling in marketing communications. British Food Journal, 100, 110–118.
   Google Scholar
• Nunally, J. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Ohanian, R. (1990). Construction and validation of a scale to measure celebrity endorsers’ perceived expertise, trustworthiness, and attractiveness. Journal of Advertising, 19(3), 39–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orth, U. R., & De Marchi, R. (2007). Endurance of advertising-evoked brand image beliefs in the face of product trial. Journal of Food Products Marketing, 13, 31–44.
   Google Scholar
• Orth, U. R., & Malkewitz, K. (2008). Holistic package design and consumer brand impressions. Journal of Marketing, 72(3), 64–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, C., Jaworski, B. J., & MacInnis, D. J. (1986). Strategic brand concept-image management. Journal of Marketing, 50(4), 135–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen, E. R., & Neergaard, P. (2006). Caveat emptor—Let the buyer beware! Environmental labelling and the limitations of green consumerism. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15, 15–29.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, R. (1995). Une meta-analyse du coefficient alpha de Cronbach. Recherche et Applications en Marketing [Research and Applications in Marketing], 10(2), 75–88.
   Google Scholar
• Plasschaert, J., & Floet, M. W. (1995). The meaning of colour on packaging---A methodology for qualitative research using semiotic principles and computer image manipulation. In ESOMAR Marketing Research Congress (pp. 217–232). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: ESOMAR.
   Google Scholar
• Prendergast, G., & Pitt, L. (1996). Packaging, marketing, logistics and the environment: Are there trade-offs? International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 26(6), 60–72.
   Google Scholar
• Rao, A. R., Qu, L., & Ruekert, R. W. (1999). Signalling unobservable product quality through a brand ally. Journal of Marketing Research, 36, 258–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raghubir, P., & Greenleaf, E. (2006). Ratios in proportion: What should the shape of the package be? Journal of Marketing, 70, 95–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rokka, J., & Uusitalo, L. (2008). Preference for green packaging in consumer product choices: Do consumers care? International Journal of Consumer Studies, 32, 516–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roosen, J., Marette, S., Blanchemanche, S., & Verger, P. (2007). The effect of product health information on liking and choice. Food Quality and Preference, 18, 759–770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenfeld, J. (1987). Packaging wraps up sales. Marketing Communications,12, 43–48, 79.
   Google Scholar
• Rozin, P., Spranca, M., Krieger, Z., Neuhaus, R., Surillo, D., Swerdlin, A., & Wood, K. (2004). Preference for natural: Instrumental and ideational/moral motivations, and the contrast between foods and medicines. Appetite, 43, 147–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozin, P. (2005). The meaning of “natural”: process more important than content. Psychological Science, 16, 652–658.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rundh, B. (2005). The multi-faceted dimension of packaging. Marketing logistic or marketing tool? British Food Journal, 107, 670–684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sara, R. (1990). Packaging as a retail marketing tool. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 20(8), 29–30.
   Google Scholar
• Silayoi, P., & Speece, M. (2007). The importance of packaging attributes: A conjoint analysis approach. European Journal of Marketing, 41, 1495–1517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinclair, J., & Irani, T. (2005). Advocacy advertising for biotechnology. Journal of Advertising, 34(3), 59–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teisl, M. F., Rubin, J., & Noblet, C. L. (2008). Non-dirty dancing? Interactions between eco-labels and consumers. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29, 140–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thogersen, J. (2000). Psychological determinants of paying attention to eco-labels in purchase decisions: Model development and multinational validation. Journal of Consumer Policy, 23, 285–313.
   Google Scholar
• Underwood, R. L. (2003). The communicative power of product packaging: Creating brand identity via lived and mediated experience. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 11, 62–76.
   Google Scholar
• Underwood, R. L., Klein, N. M., & Burke, R. R. (2001). Packaging communication: Attentional effects of product imagery. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 10, 403–422.
   Google Scholar
• Venter, K., van der Merwe, D., de Beer, H., Kempen, E., & Bosman, M. (2011). Consumers’ perceptions of food packaging: An exploratory investigation in Potchefstroom, South Africa. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 35, 273–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanoli, R., & Naspetti, S. (2001). Consumer motivations in the purchase of organic food: A means-end approach. British Food Journal, 8, 643–653.
   Google Scholar