References
- Alper, S., & Raharinirina, S. (2006). Assistive technology for individuals with disabilities: A review and synthesis of the literature. Journal of Special Education Technology, 21(2), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340602100204
- Bouck, E. C. (2017). Assistive technology. Sage.
- Bouck, E. C., & Flanagan, S. M. (2009). Assistive technology and mathematics: What is there and where can we go in special education. Journal of Special Education Technology, 24(2), 17–30.
- Bouck, E. C., & Park, J. (2018). Mathematics manipulatives to support students with disabilities: A systematic review of the literature. Education and Treatment of Children, 41, 65–106.
- Bouck, E. C., Chamberlain, C., & Park, J. (2017). Concrete and app-based manipulatives to support students with disabilities with subtraction. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 52, 317–331.
- Bouck, E. C., Satsangi, R., & Park, J. (2018). The concrete-representational-abstract approach for students with learning disabilities: An evidence-based practice synthesis. Remedial and Special Education, 39, 211–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932517721712
- Bouck, E. C., Bassette, L., Shurr, J., Park, J., Kerr, J., & Whorley, A. (2017). Teaching equivalent fractions to secondary students with disabilities via the virtual-representational-abstract instructional sequence. Journal of Special Education Technology, 32, 220–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643417727291
- Bouck, E. C., Park, J., Levy, K., Cwiakala, K., & Whorley, A. (2020). App-based manipulatives and explicit instruction to support division with remainders. Exceptionality, 28, 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2019.1586709
- Bouck, E. C., Park, J., Satsangi, R., Cwiasksi, K., & Levy, K. (2019). Using the virtual-abstract instructional sequence to support acquisition of algebra. Journal of Special Education Technology, 34, 253–268.
- Bouck, E. C., Park, J., Shurr, J., Bassette, L., & Whorley, A. (2018). Using the virtual-representational-abstract approach to support students with intellectual disability in mathematics. Focus on Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 33, 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357618755696
- Bouck, E. C., Park, J., Sprick, J., Shurr, J., Bassette, L., & Whorley, A. (2017). Using the virtual-abstract instructional sequence to teach addition of fractions. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 70, 163–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2017.09.002
- Bouck, E. C., Satsangi, R., Doughty, T. T., & Courtney, W. T. (2014). Virtual and concrete manipulatives: A comparison of approaches for solving mathematics problems for students with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 44, 180–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-013-1863-2
- Bouck, E. C., Shurr, J., Bassette, L., Park, J., Kerr, J., & Whorley, A. (2018). Adding it up: comparing concrete and app-based manipulatives to support students with disabilities with adding fractions. Journal of Special Education Technology, 33, 194–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643418759341
- Bouck, E. C., Shurr, J., Tom, K., Jasper, A. D., Bassette, L., Miller, B., & Flanagan, S. M. (2012). Fix it with TAPE: Repurposing technology to be assistive technology for students with high incidence disabilities. Preventing School Failure, 56, 121–128.
- Bouck, E. C., Working, C., & Bone, E. (2018). Manipulative apps to support students with disabilities in mathematics. Intervention in School & Clinic, 53, 177–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451217702115
- Bowman, J. A., McDonnell, J., Ryan, J. H., & Fudge-Coleman, O. (2019). Effective mathematics instruction for students with moderate and severe disabilities: A review of the literature. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 34, 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1177-1088357619827932
- Brainingcamp. (2018). Cuisenaire® Rods. https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/cuisenaire-rods/id536204074?mt=8.
- Carbonneau, K. J., Marley, S. C., & Selig, J. P. (2013). A meta-analysis of the efficacy of teaching mathematics with concrete manipulatives. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 380–400. https://doi.org/10.1037.a0031084
- Connolly, A. J. (2007). KeyMath-3 diagnostic assessment: Manual forms A and B. Pearson.
- Cook, B. G., Buysse, V., Klingner, J., Landrum, T. J., McWilliam, R. A., Tankersley, M., & Test, D. W. (2014). CEC’s standards for classifying the evidence base of practices in special education. Remedial and Special Education, 36, 220–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932514557271
- Council for Exceptional Children (CEC). (2014). Council for exceptional children: Standards for evidence-based practices in special education. Teaching Exceptional Children, 46, 206–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/00400059914531389
- Doabler, C. T., & Fien, H. (2013). Explicit mathematics instruction: What teachers can do for teaching students with mathematics difficulties. Intervention in School and Clinic, 48, 276–285. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451212473151
- Edyburn, D. L. (2005). Assistive technology and students with mild disabilities: From consideration to outcomes measurement. In D. Edyburn, K. Higgins, & R. Boone (Eds.), Handbook of special education technology research and practice (pp. 239–270). Knowledge by Design.
- Edyburn, D. L. (2006). Cognitive prostheses for students with mild disabilities: Is this what assistive technology looks like? Journal of Special Education Technology, 21, 62–65.
- Fahsl, A. J. (2009). Mathematics accommodations for all students. Intervention in School and Clinic, 42, 198–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/10534512070420040201
- Gast, D. L., & Spriggs, A. D. (2014). Visual analysis of graphic data. In D. L. Gast (Ed.), Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral science (2nd ed., pp. 176–210). Routledge.
- Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (2014). Kaufman test of educational achievement-Third Edition (KTEA™-III). Person.
- Kiru, E. W., Doabler, C. T., Sorrells, A. M., & Cooc, N. A. (2018). A synthesis of technology-mediated mathematics interventions for students with or at risk for mathematics learning disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 33, 111–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643417745835
- Lai, S. A., & Berkeley, S. (2012). High-stakes test accommodations: Research and practice. Learning Disability Quarterly, 35, 158–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948711433874
- Lee, H., & Templeton, R. (2008). Ensuring equal access to technology: Providing assistive technology for students with disabilities. Theory into Practice, 47, 212–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840802153874
- Parette, H. P., & Scherer, M. (2004). Assistive technology use and stigma. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 39, 217–226.
- Peltier, C., Morin, K. L., Bouck, E. C., Lingo, M. E., Pulos, J., Scheffler, F. A., … Deardorff, M. E. (2019). A meta-analysis of single-case research using mathematics manipulatives with students at risk or identified with a disability. Journal of Special Education. Advance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466919844516
- Psychological Corporation. (2009). Wechsler individual achievement test-Third Edition (WIAT-III). Psychological Corp.
- Riemer-Riess, M. L., & Wacker, R. R. (2000). Factors associated with assistive technology discontinuance among individuals with disabilities. Journal of Rehabilitation, 66, 44–50.
- Root, J. R., Browder, D. M., Saunders, A. F., & Lo, Y.-Y. (2017). Schema-based instruction with concrete and virtual manipulatives to teach problem solving to students with autism. Remedial and Special Education, 38, 42–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932516643592
- Satsangi, R., & Bouck, E. C. (2015). Using virtual manipulative instruction to teach the concepts of area and perimeter to secondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 38, 174–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948714550101
- Satsangi, R., Bouck, E. C., Taber-Doughty, T., Bofferding, L., & Roberts, C. A. (2016). Comparing the effectiveness of virtual and concrete manipulatives to teach algebra to secondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 39, 240–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948716649754
- Satsangi, R., Hammer, R., & Evmenova, A. S. (2018). Teaching multistep equations with virtual manipulatives to secondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice , 33, 99–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12166
- Satsangi, R., Hammer, R., & Hogan, C. D. (2018). Studying virtual manipulatives paired with explicit instruction to teach algebraic equations to students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 41, 227–242. [Advanced Online Publication]. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948718769248
- Satsangi, R., & Miller, B. (2017). The case for adopting virtual manipulatives in mathematics education for students with disabilities. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 61, 303–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2016.1275505
- Shin, M., Bryant, D. P., Bryant, B. R., McKenna, J. W., Hou, F., & Ok, M. W. (2017). Virtual manipulatives: Tools or teaching mathematics to students with learning disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 52, 148–153. https://doi.org/101177/1053451216633830
- Spooner, F., Root, J., Saunders, A. F., & Browder, D. M. (2018). An updated evidence-based practice review on teaching mathematics to students with moderate and severe developmental disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 40, 150–165. [Advanced Online Publication]. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932517751005
- Vannest, K. J., & Ninci, J. (2015). Evaluating intervention effects in single-case research designs. Journal of Counseling & Development, 93, 403–411. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcad.12038
- Vannest, K. J., Parker, R. I., Gonen, O., & Adiguzel, T. (2016). Single case research: Web-based calculator for SCR analysis (Version 2.0) [Web-based application]. Texas A&M University. Retrieved July 23, 2018, from singlecaseresearch.org.
- Wechsler, D. (2003). Wechsler intelligence scale for children-Fourth Edition (WISC-IV). Pearson Assessments.
- Wechsler, D. (2014). Wechsler intelligence scale for children-Fifth Edition (WISC-V). Pearson.
- White, O. R., & Haring, N. G. (1980). Exceptional teaching (2nd ed.). Merrill.
- Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III test of achievement. Riverside Publishing Company.