Using the Practice of Modeling to Support Preservice Teachers’ Reflection on the Process of Teaching and Learning

References

• Bean, T. W., & Stevens, L. P. (2002). Scaffolding reflection for preservice and inservice teachers. Reflective Practice, 3(2), 205–218.
   Google Scholar
• Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, R. W. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practices. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, D., & Ball, D. (1999). Instruction, capacity, and improvement (CPRE Research Report No. RR-043). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Coll, R. K., & Lajium, D. (2011). Modeling and the future of science learning. In M. S. Khine & I. M. Saleh (Eds.), Models and modeling cognitive tools for scientific enquiry (pp. 3–21). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, B., & Cullen, M. (2005). Dynamic assessment of preservice teachers’ knowledge of models and modelling. In K. Boersma, H. Eijkelhof, M. Goedhart, & O. Jong (Eds.), Research and the quality of science education (pp. 309–323). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, E. (2003). Prompting middle school science students for productive reflection: Generic and directed prompts. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(1), 91–142. doi:10.1207/S15327809JLS1201_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, E. (2004). Knowledge integration in science teaching: Analysing teachers’ knowledge development. Research in Science Education, 34(1), 21–53. doi:10.1023/B:RISE.0000021034.01508.b8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, E. (2006). Characterizing productive reflection among preservice elementary teachers: Seeing what matters. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 281–301. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2005.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jong, O., Van Driel, J. H., & Verloop, N. (2005). Preservice teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of using particle models in teaching chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(8), 947–964.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (1996). The expert learner: Strategic, self-regulated, and reflective. Instructional Science, 24, 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forbes, C. T., Zangori, L., & Schwarz, C. V. (2015). Empirical validation of integrated learning performances for hydrologic phenomena: 3rd-grade students’ model-driven explanation-construction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(7), 895–921. doi:10.1002/tea.21226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gess-Newsome, J. (2015). A model of teacher professional knowledge and skill including PCK. In A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp. 28–42). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Griffen, M. L. (2003). Using critical incidents to promote and assess reflective thinking in preservice teachers. Reflective Practice, 4(2), 207–220. doi:10.1080/14623940308274
   Google Scholar
• Grotzer, T., & Mittlefehldt, S. (2012). The role of metacognition in students’ understanding and transfer of explanatory structures in science. In A. Zohar & Y. J. Dori (Eds.), Metacognition in science education: Trends in current research (pp. 79–99). New York, NY: Springer Science+Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Kenyon, L., Davis, E., & Hug, B. (2011). Design approaches to support preservice teachers in scientific modeling. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22(1), 1–21. doi:10.1007/s10972-010-9225-9
   Google Scholar
• Larkin, D. (2012). Misconceptions about “misconceptions”: Preservice secondary science teachers’ views on the value and role of students’ ideas. Science Education, 96(5), 927–959. doi:10.1002/sce.21022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, O., Miller, E., & Januszyk, R. (Eds.). (2015). NGSS for all students. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Linn, M. (2000). Designing the knowledge integration environment. International Journal of Science Education, 22(8), 781–796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linn, M., Eylon, B. S., & Davis, E. (2004). The knowledge integration perspective on learning. In M. C. Linn, E. A. Davis, & P. Bell (Eds.), Internet environments for science education (pp. 29–46). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Ledermann (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 95–132). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Washington, DC: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Munby, H., Russell, T., & Martin, A. K. (2001). Teachers’ knowledge and how it develops. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 877–904). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, C. (2009). Developing preservice elementary teachers’ knowledge and practices through modeling-centered scientific inquiry. Science Education, 93(4), 720–744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, C., & Gwekwerere, Y. (2007). Using a guided inquiry and modeling instructional frame work (EIMA) to support preservice K-8 science teaching. Science Education, 91(1), 158–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, C., & White, B. (2005). Metamodeling knowledge: Developing students’ understanding of scientific modeling. Cognition and Instruction, 23(2), 165–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver, N. (2013). Reflective pedagogies and the metacognitive turn in college teaching. In M. Kaplan, N. Silver, D. LaVaque-Manty, & D. Meizlish (Eds.), Using reflection and metacognition to improve student learning: Across the disciplines, across the academy (pp. 1–17). Sterling, VA: Stylus.
   Google Scholar
• White, B. Y., & Frederiksen, J. R. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction, 16(1), 3–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiggins, G. P., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., & Braaten, M. (2008). Beyond the scientific method: Model‐based inquiry as a new paradigm of preference for school science investigations. Science Education, 92(5), 941–967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zangori, L., & Forbes, C. T. (2016). Development of an empirically based learning performances framework for 3rd-grade students’ model-based explanations about plant processes. Science Education, 100(6), 961–982. doi:10.1002/sce.21238
   Google Scholar
• Zangori, L., & Hanuscin, D. L., (2017, January). Exploring elementary preservice teachers’ conceptions of the nature, purpose, and practice of modeling. Paper presented at 2017 annual meeting of the Association of Science Teacher Educators (ASTE), Des Moines, IA.
   Google Scholar