Supporting the Supporters: Professional Development for Science Coordinators

References

• Abd-El-Khalick, F. S., Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (1998). The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural. Science Education, 82, 417–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akerson, V. L., & Abd‐El‐Khalick, F. (2003). Teaching elements of nature of science: A yearlong case study of a fourth‐grade teacher. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 1025–1049. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akerson, V., & Hanuscin, D. (2007). Teaching nature of science through inquiry: Results of a three-year professional development program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 653–680. doi:10.1002/tea.20159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akerson, V. L., Morrison, J. A., & McDuffie, A. R. (2006). One course is not enough: Preservice elementary teachers’ retention of improved views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 194–213. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, R. D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13, 1–12. doi:10.1023/A:1015171124982
   Google Scholar
• Beinsenherz, P. C., & Yager, R. E. (1991). The school science supervisor: A necessity for a quality program. School of Science and Mathematics, 91, 152–156. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.1991.tb12069.x
   Google Scholar
• Bell, R. L., Lederman, N. G., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. S. (2000). Developing and acting upon one’s conception of the nature of science: A follow-up study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 563–581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, R. L., Maeng, J. L., & Binns, I. C. (2013). Learning in context: Technology integration in a teacher preparation program informed by situated learning theory. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50, 348–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, R., Smetana, L., & Binns, I. (2005). Simplifying inquiry instruction: Assessing the inquiry level of classroom activities. The Science Teacher, 72(7), 30–33.
   Google Scholar
• Birman, B. S., Desimone, L., Porter, A. C., & Garet, M. S. (2000). Designing professional development that works. Educational Leadership, 57(8), 28–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birman, B., Le Floch, K. C., Klekotka, A., Ludwig, M., Taylor, J., Walters, K., … Yoon, K. (2007). State and local implementation of the No Child Left Behind Act: Vol. 2. Teacher quality under NCLB: Interim report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education; Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development; Policy and Program Studies Service.
   Google Scholar
• Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3–15. doi:10.3102/0013189X033008003
   Google Scholar
• Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, R. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practices. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, D. K., & Hill, H. C. (1998). Instructional policy and classroom performance: The mathematics reform in California (RR-39). Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Copeland, M. A., & Knapp, M. S. (2006). Connecting leadership with learning: A framework for reflection, planning and action. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Corcoran, T., Fuhrman, S. H., & Belcher, C. L. (2001). The district role in instructional improvement. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(1), 78–84. doi:10.1177/003172170108300116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Plano-Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38, 181–199. doi:10.3102/0013189X08331140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domina, T., Lewis, R., Agarwal, P., & Hanselman, P. (2015). Professional sense-makers: Instructional specialists in contemporary schooling. Educational Researcher, 44, 359–364. doi:10.3102/0013189X15601644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duschl, R. A., Schweingruber, H. A., & Shouse, A. W. (Eds.). (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edmondson, M. E., Sterling, D., & Reid, V. (2012, March). Investigating the impact of a new science coordinator/liaison academy. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching, Indianapolis, IN.
   Google Scholar
• Engle, R. A., Lam, D. P., Meyer, X. S., & Nix, S. E. (2012). How does expansive framing promote transfer? Several proposed explanations and a research agenda for investigating them. Educational Psychologist, 47, 215–231. doi:10.1080/00461520.2012.695678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 119–161). New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ertmer, P. A., Glazewski, K. D., Jones, D., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A., Goktas, Y., Collins, K., & Kocaman, A. (2009). Facilitating technology-enhanced problem-based learning (PBL) in the middle school classroom: An examination of how and why teachers adapt. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 20(1), 35–54.
   Google Scholar
• Firestone, W. A., Mangin, M. M., Martinez, M. C., & Plovsky, T. (2005). Leading coherent professional development: A comparison of three districts. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41, 413–448. doi:10.1177/0013161X04269605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fryckholm, J. (2004). Teachers’ tolerance for discomfort: Implications for curricular reform in mathematics. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 19, 125–149.
   Google Scholar
• Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 915–945. doi:10.3102/00028312038004915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, H. P. (1970). The education of the science supervisor. School of Science and Mathematics, 70, 363–365. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.1970.tb08646.x
   Google Scholar
• Hewson, P. W. (2007). Teacher professional development in science. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1177–1202). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16, 235–266. doi:10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honig, M. I. (2006). Street-level bureaucracy revisited: Frontline district central office administrators as boundary spanners in education policy implementation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 28(4), 357–383. doi:10.3102/01623737028004357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, M. M. (1999). Form and substance in mathematics and science professional development. Madison: University of Wisconsin at Madison, National Institute for Science Education.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, M. M. (2016). How does professional development improve teaching? Review of Educational Research, 86, 945–980. doi:10.3102/0034654315626800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keys, C. W., & Bryan, L. A. (2001). Co-constructing inquiry-based science with teachers: Essential research for lasting reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 631–645. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederman, N. G. (2007). Nature of science: Past, present, and future. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 831–880). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. (1983). Street-level bureaucracy: The dilemmas of the individual in public service. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Loucks-Horsley, S., Stiles, K. E., Mundry, S., Love, N., & Hewson, P. W. (2010). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luft, J., Bell, R. L., & Gess‐Newsome, J. (Eds.) (2008). Science as inquiry in the secondary setting. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luft, J. A., & Hewson, P. W. (2014). Research on teacher professional development programs in science. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (2nd ed., 889–910). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Madrazo, G. M., & Hounshell, P. B. (1987). Science supervisor: Results of research in science supervision. Science Education, 71(1), 9–14. doi:10.1002/sce.3730710104
   Google Scholar
• Matkins, J. J., & Bell, R. L. (2007). Awakening the scientist inside: Global climate change and the nature of science in an elementary science methods course. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18, 137–163.
   Google Scholar
• McLellan, H. (1996). Situated learning: Multiple perspectives. In H. McLellan (Ed.), Situated learning perspectives (pp. 5–17). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Mulvey, B. (2012). Learning and teaching about the nature of science through process skills (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/openview/b3431d2c608970b580ab91c447c255cc/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
   Google Scholar
• National Commission on Mathematics and Science Teaching for the 21st Century. (2000). Before it’s too late. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perrine, W. G. (1984). Teacher and supervisory perceptions of elementary science supervisors. Science Education, 68, 3–9. doi:10.1002/sce.3730680104
   Google Scholar
• Peters, E. E. (2009). Shifting to a student-centered science classroom: An exploration of teacher and student changes in perceptions and practices. Journal of Science Teacher Educationm. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s10972-009-9178-z
   Google Scholar
• Pianta, R. C. (2011). Teaching children well: New evidence based approaches to teacher professional development and training. Center for American Progress, 11, 1–36.
   Google Scholar
• Reinisch, B. (1966). The need for science consultants. Science Education, 50, 52–54. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, M. P., Abell, S., Lannin, J., Wang, C., Musikul, K., Barker, D., & Dingman, S. (2007). Effective professional development in science and mathematics education: Teachers’ and facilitators’ views. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5, 507–532. doi:10.1007/s10763-006-9053-8
   Google Scholar
• Stepien, W., & Gallagher, S. (1993). Problem based learning: As authentic as it gets. Educational Leadership, 50, 25–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterling, D. R. (2007). Modeling problem-based instruction. Science and Children, 45(4), 50–53.
   Google Scholar
• Sterling, D. R., & Frazier, W. M. (2006). Collaboration with community partners. The Science Teacher, 73(4), 28–31.
   Google Scholar
• Sterling, D. R., Matkins, J. J., Frazier, W. M., & Logerwell, M. G. (2007). Science camp as a transformative experience for students, parents, and teachers in an urban setting. School Science and Mathematics, 107, 134–148. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2007.tb17928.x
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, S. J. (1993). The overlooked position of subject area supervisor. Clearing House, 67(1), 25–30. doi:10.1080/00098655.1993.9956011
   Google Scholar
• Trumbull, D. J., Scrano, G., & Bonney, R. (2006). The relations among two teachers’ practices and beliefs, conceptualizations of the nature of science, and their implementation of student independent inquiry projects. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 1717–1750. doi:10.1080/09500690600560928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, C. C. (2002). Nested epistemologies: Science teachers’ beliefs of teaching, learning, and science. International Journal of Science Education, 24, 771–783. doi:10.1080/09500690110049132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitworth, B. A. (2014). Professional development and teacher change: The missing leadership link. (Doctoral dissertation).
   Google Scholar
• Whitworth, B. A., & Chiu, J. L. (2015). Professional development and teacher change: The missing leadership link. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26, 121–137. doi: 10.1007/s10972‐014‐9411‐2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitworth, B. A., Maeng, J. L., Wheeler, L. B., & Chiu, J. L. (2017). Investigating the role of a district science coordinator. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54, 914–936. doi: 10.1002/tea.21391
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, S. M. (2013, April 19). Professional development for science teachers. Science, 340, 310–313. doi:10.1126/science.1230725
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, K. S., Duncan, T., Lee, S. W.-Y., Scarloss, B., & Shapley, K. (2007). Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement (Issues & Answers Report, REL 2007–No. 033). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Southwest.
   Google Scholar