4,764
Views
21
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Preservice Science Teachers’ Opportunities for Learning Through Reflection When Planning a Microteaching Unit

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Abdurrahman, K. (2010). Learner-centred micro teaching in teacher education. International Journal of Instruction, 3(1), 77–100.
  • Arsal, Z. (2014). Microteaching and pre-service teachers’ sense of self-efficacy in teaching. European Journal of Teacher Education, 37(4), 453–464. doi:10.1080/02619768.2014.912627
  • Arthur, J., Waring, M., Coe, R., & Hedges, L. (2012). Research methods & methodologies in education. London, UK: Sage.
  • Bell, N. D. (2007). Microteaching: What is it that is going on here? Linguistics and Education, 18(1), 24–40. doi:10.1016/j.linged.2007.04.002
  • Benton-Kupper, J. (2001). The microteaching experience: Student perspective. Education, 121(4), 830–836.
  • Biesta, J., & Burbules, N. (2003). Pragmatism and educational research. Oxford, UK: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Borgerding, A., Klein, V., Ghosh, R., & Eibel, E. (2015). Student teachers’ approaches to teaching biological evolution. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26(4), 371–392. doi:10.1007/s10972-015-9428-1
  • Cofré, H., Vergara, C., Lederman, N., Lederman, J., Santibáñez, D., Jiménez, J., & Yancovic, M. (2014). Improving Chilean in-service elementary teachers’ understanding of nature of science using self-contained NOS and content-embedded mini-courses. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(7), 759–783. doi:10.1007/s10972-014-9399-7
  • Cruickshank, D., & Metcalfe, K. (1993). Improving preservice teacher assessment through on-campus laboratory experiences. Theory and Practice, 32(2), 86–92. doi:10.1080/00405849309543580
  • Dewey, J. (1910/1997). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. In L. Hickman (Ed.), Collected works of John Dewey (pp. 6.177 – 6.357). The electronic edition (Middle Works, Vol. 6). Charlottesville, VA: InteLex.
  • Dewey, J. (1916/1996). Democracy and Education. In L. Hickman (Ed.), Collected works of John Dewey (pp. 9.1 – 9.371). The electronic edition (Middle Works, Vol. 9). Charlottesville, VA: InteLex.
  • Dewey, J. (1925). Experience and Nature. In L. Hickman (Ed.), Collected works of John Dewey (pp. 1.1 – 1.329). The electronic edition (Later Works, Vol. 1). Charlottesville, VA: InteLex.
  • Dewey, J. (1933/1997). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. In L. Hickman (Ed.), Collected works of John Dewey (pp. 8.104 – 8.315). The electronic edition (Later Works, Vol. 8). Charlottesville, VA: InteLex.
  • Dewey, J. (1934). Art as Experience. In L. Hickman (Ed.), Collected works of John Dewey (pp. 10.1 – 10.368). The electronic edition (Later Works, Vol. 10). Charlottesville, VA: InteLex.
  • Dewey, J. (1938). Logic: The theory of Inquiry. In L. Hickman (Ed.), Collected works of John Dewey (pp. 12.1 – 12.527). The electronic edition (Later Works, Vol. 12). Charlottesville, VA: InteLex.
  • Diana, T. J. (2013). Microteaching revisited: Using technology to enhance the professional development of pre-service teachers. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 86(4), 150–154. doi:10.1080/00098655.2013.790307
  • English, A. (2005). Negativity and the new in John Dewey’s theory of learning and democracy. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 8(2), 28–37. doi:10.1007/s11618-005-0121-6
  • Englund, T. (2007). Utbildning som kommunikation: Deliberativa samtal som möjlighet.[Education as communication: Deliberative conversation as a possibility]. Göteborg, Sweden: Daidalos.
  • Fernández, M. (2010). Investigating how and what prospective teachers learn through microteaching lesson study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(2), 351–362. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.09.012
  • Fernández, M., & Robinson, M. (2006). Prospective teachers’ perspectives on microteaching lesson study. Education, 127(2), 203–221.
  • Grossman, P. (2009). Studying teacher education, the report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education: Research on pedagogical approaches in teacher education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Hamza, K. (2013). Distractions in the school science laboratory. Research in Science Education, 43(4), 1477–1499. doi: 10.1007/s11165-012-9316-z
  • Hamza, K., & Wickman, P.-O. (2008). Describing and analyzing learning in action: An empirical study of the importance of misconceptions in learning science. Science Education, 92(1), 141–164.
  • Hamza, K, & Wickman, P.-O. (2009). Beyond Explanations: What Else Do Students Need to Understand Science? Science Education, 93(6), 1026–1049. doi: 10.1002/sce.v93:6
  • Hanson, J., & Howe, K. (2011). The potential for deliberative democratic civic education. Democracy & Education, 19(2), 1–9.
  • Johansson, A.-M., & Wickman, P.-O. (2018). The use of organising purposes in science instruction as a scaffolding mechanism to support progressions: A study of talk in two primary science classrooms. Research in Science & Technological Education, 36(1), 1–16. doi:10.1080/02635143.2017.1318272
  • Kelly, G. J., McDonald, S., & Wickman, P.-O. (2012). Science learning and epistemology. In K. Tobin, B. J. Fraser, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 281–291). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
  • Lederman, N. G., & Gess-Newsome, J. (1991). Metamorphosis, adaptation, or evolution?: Preservice science teachers’ concerns and perceptions of teaching and planning. Science Education, 75(4), 443–456. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
  • Lidar, M., Lundqvist, E., & Östman, L. (2006). Teaching and learning in the science classroom: The interplay between teachers’ epistemological moves and students’ practical epistemology. Science Education, 90(1), 148–163. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
  • Loughran, J. (2006). Developing a pedagogy of teacher education – Understanding teaching and learning about teaching. Oxon, UK: Routledge.
  • Loughran, J. J. (2002). Effective reflective practice: In search of meaning in learning about teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(1), 33–43. doi:10.1177/0022487102053001004
  • Lundqvist, E., Almqvist, J., & Östman, L. (2009). Epistemological norms and companion meanings in science classroom communication. Science Education, 93(5), 859–874. doi:10.1002/sce.v93:5
  • Mergler, A. G., & Tangen, D. (2010). Using microteaching to enhance teacher efficacy in pre-service teachers. Teaching Education, 21(2), 199–210. doi:10.1080/10476210902998466
  • Moser, A., & Korstjens, I. (2018). Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 3: Sampling, data collection and analysis. European Journal of General Practice, 24(1), 9–18. doi:10.1080/13814788.2017.1375091
  • Parker, J., & Heywood, D. (2013). Exploring how engaging with reflection on learning generates pedagogical insight in science teacher education. Science Teacher Education, 97(3), 410–441. doi:10.1002/sce.21049
  • Rogers, C. (2002). Seeing student learning: Teacher change and the role of reflection. Harvard Educational Review, 72(2), 230–253.
  • Rogers, C. (2007). Att definiera reflektion: John Dewey och det reflektiva tänkandet. In C. Brusling & G. Strömqvist (ed.), Reflektion och praktik i läraryrket. [Reflection and practice in teaching] (pp. 49–79). Malmö, Sweden: Studentlittertur.
  • Rudsberg, K., Öhman, J., & Östman, L. (2013). Analyzing students’ learning in classroom discussions about socioscientific issues. Science Education, 97(4), 594–620. doi:10.1002/sce.2013.97.issue-4
  • Wickman, P.-O. (2004). The practical epistemologies of the classroom: A study of laboratory work. Science Education, 88(3), 325–344. doi:10.1002/sce.10129
  • Wickman, P.-O., & Östman, L. (2002). Learning as discourse change: A sociocultural mechanism. Science Education, 86(5), 601–623. doi:10.1002/sce.10036