Validating A Model for Assessing Science Teacher’s Adaptive Expertise with Computer-Supported Complex Systems Curricula and Its Relationship to Student Learning Outcomes

References

• Allison, P. (1998). Multiple regression: A primer. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Science Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, S. M., & Koslowski, B. (2002). Adaptive expertise: Effects of type of experience and the level of theoretical understanding it generates. Thinking & Reasoning, 8(4), 237–267. doi:10.1080/13546780244000088
   Google Scholar
• Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1993). Surpassing ourselves: An inquiry into the nature and implications of expertise. Chicago, IL: Open Court.
   Google Scholar
• Berliner, D. C. (2001). Learning about and from expert teachers. International Journal of Educational Research, 35, 463–482. doi:10.1016/S0883-0355(02)00004-6
   Google Scholar
• Blandford, S. (2012). Managing professional development in schools. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bransford, J., Darling-Hammond, L., & LePage, P. (2005). Introduction. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 1–39). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (1999). How experts differ from novices. In J. D. Bransford, A. L. Brown, & R. R. Cocking (Eds.), How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (pp. 19–38). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Calabrese Barton, A. (2007). Science learning’s in urban settings. In A. K. Abell & N. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 319–343). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Capra, F. (1996). The web of life. New York, NY: Doubleday Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carbonell, K. B., Stalmeijer, R. E., Könings, K. D., Segers, M., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2014). How experts deal with novel situations: A review of adaptive expertise. Educational Research Review, 12, 14–29. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2014.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, T. (2011). Theoretical perspectives, methodological approaches, and trends in the study of expertise. In Y. Li & G. Kaiser (Eds.), Expertise in mathematics instruction: An international perspective (pp. 19–39). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavior sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, V. M., Schlager, M., Toyama, Y., Riel, M., & Vahey, P. (2005, April 11–15). Characterizing adaptive expertise in science teaching. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Conference, Montreal, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, B., & Sumara, D. J. (2006). Complexity and education: Inquiries into learning, teaching, and research. Mahwah, NJ: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Arment, S. T., Reed, E., & Wetzel, A. P. (2013). Promoting adaptive expertise: A conceptual framework for special educator preparation. Teacher Education and Special Education: the Journal of the Teacher. doi:10.1177/0888406413489578
   Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A. (2004). Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. Academic Medicine, 79(10), S70–S81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A. (2008). Deliberate practice and acquisition of expert performance: A general overview. Academic Emergency Medicine, 15(11), 988–994. doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00227.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N., Feltovich, P. J., & Hoffman, R. R. (2006). The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers and Education, 59, 423–435. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairbanks, C. M., Duffy, G. G., Faircloth, B. S., He, Y., Levin, B., Rohr, J., & Stein, C. (2010). Beyond knowledge: Exploring why some teachers are more thoughtfully adaptive than others. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 161–171. doi:10.1177/0022487109347874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrari, M. (2002). The pursuit of excellence through education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Hammerness, K., Darling-Hammond, L., Bransford, J., Berliner, D., Corchan-Smith, M., McDonald, M., & Zeichner, K. (2007). How teachers learn and develop. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 358–389). Hoboken, NJ: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Hatano, G. (1982). Cognitive consequences of practice in culture specific procedural skills. The Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, 4(1), 15–18.
   Google Scholar
• IES/NSF. (2013). Common guidelines for education research and development: a report from the institute of education sciences, U.S. department of education and the national science foundation. Washington, DC: Authors.
   Google Scholar
• Janssen, F., Grossman, P., & Westbroek, H. (2015). Facilitating decomposition and recomposition in practice-based teacher education: The power of modularity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 51, 137–146. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2015.06.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. R., & Creech, J. C. (1983). Ordinal measures in multiple indicator models: A simulation study of categorization error. American Sociological Review, 48(3), 398–407. doi:10.2307/2095231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, M. M. (2010). Attribution error and the quest for teacher quality. Educational Researcher, 39(8), 591–598. doi:10.3102/0013189X10390804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koh, E., Hong, H., & Seah, J. (2014). Learner adaptivity: An initial conceptualisation. In A. Hung, K. Lim, & S. Lee (Eds.), Adaptivity as a transformative disposition for learning in the 21st century (pp. 15e30). London, UK: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, F., & Murnane, R. (2004). Expert thinking in the new division of labor: How computers are creating the next job market. New York, NY: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, X., Schwartz, D. L., & Hatano, G. (2005). Toward teachers’ adaptive metacognition. Educational Psychologist, 40(4), 245–255. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4004_6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, D. S., McCabe, G. P., & Craig, B. (2007). Introduction to the practice of statistics (6th ed.). New York, NY: W.H. Freeman and Company.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2011). Successful K–12 STEM education: Identifying effective approaches in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Science Board. (2010). Preparing the next generation of STEM innovators: Identifying and developing our nation’s human capital. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, P. (2014). When teaching makes a difference: Developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge through learning study. International Journal of Science Education, 36(11), 1794–1814. doi:10.1080/09500693.2013.879621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penuel, W. R., Fishman, B. J., Haugan Cheng, B., & Sabelli, N. (2011). Organizing research and development at the intersection of learning, implementation, and design. Educational Researcher, 40(7), 331–337. doi:10.3102/0013189X11421826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiser, B. J. (2013). What professional development strategies are needed for successful implementation of the next generation science standards? Invitational Research Symposium on Science Assessment, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Rozenszajn, R., & Yarden, A. (2013). Expansion of biology teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) during a long-term professional development program. Research in Science Education, 44, 189–213. doi:10.1007/s11165-013-9378-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savickas, M. L. (2005). The theory and practice of career construction. In S. D. Brown & R. W. Lent (Eds.), Career development and counseling: Putting theory and research to work (pp. 42e70). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Soslau, E. (2012). Opportunities to develop adaptive teaching expertise during supervisory conferences. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 768–779. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2012.02.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timperley, H. (2013). Learning to practise: A paper for discussion. Auckland, New Zealand: The University of Auckland.
   Google Scholar
• Tsui, A. B. M. (2009). Distinctive qualities of expert teachers. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(4), 421–439. doi:10.1080/13540600903057179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Driel, J. H., & Berry, A. (2012). Teacher professional development focusing on pedagogical content knowledge. Educational Researcher, 41(1), 26–28. doi:10.3102/0013189X11431010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogt, F., & Rogalla, M. (2009). Developing adaptive teaching competency through coaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 1051–1060. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilensky, U., & Rand, W. (2015). An introduction to agent-based modeling: Modeling natural, social, and engineered complex systems with NetLogo. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, S. M. (2013). Professional development for science teachers. Science, 340, 310–313. doi:10.1126/science.1230725
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, S., Anderson, E., Koehler-Yom, J., Evans, C., Park, M., Sheldon, J., … Klopfer, E. (2017). Teaching about complex systems is no simple matter: Building effective professional development for computer-supported complex systems instruction. Instructional Science, 45(1), 99–121. doi:10.1007/s11251-016-9388-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, S., Anderson, E., Koehler-Yom, J., Sheldon, J., Schoenfeld, I., Wendel, D., … Evans, C. (2015a). Design features for computer-supported complex systems learning and teaching in high school science classrooms. Journal of Research in STEM Education, 1(1), 17–30.
   Google Scholar
• Yoon, S., Goh, S., & Park, M. (2018). Teaching and learning about complex systems in K–12 science education: A review of empirical studies 1995–2015. Review of Educational Research, 88(2), 285–325. doi:10.3102/0034654317746090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, S., Klopfer, E., Anderson, E., Koehler-Yom, J., Sheldon, J., Schoenfeld, I., … Goh, S. (2016). Designing computer-supported complex systems curricula for the next generation science standards in high school science classrooms. Systems, 4(38), 1–18. doi:10.3390/systems4040038
   Google Scholar
• Yoon, S., Koehler-Yom, J., Anderson, E., Lin, J., & Klopfer, E. (2015b). Using an adaptive expertise lens to understand the quality of teachers’ classroom implementation of computer-supported complex systems curricula in high school science. Research in Science and Technology Education, 33(2), 237–251. doi:10.1080/02635143.2015.1031099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, S. A. (2011). Using social network graphs as visualization tools to influence peer selection decision-making strategies to access information about complex socioscientific issues. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20(4), 549–588. doi:10.1080/10508406.2011.563655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar