References
- Achieve, Inc. (2016). Using phenomena in NGSS-designed lessons and units.
- Achieve, Inc. (2017) . Primary evaluation of essential criteria (PEEC) for next generation science standards instructional materials design.
- American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989) . Science for all Americans. Project 2061. Oxford University Press.
- Avery, L. M. (2013). Rural science education: Valuing local knowledge. Theory Into Practice, 52(1), 28–35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07351690.2013.743769
- Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1996). Reform by the book: What is—or might be—the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform? Educational Researcher, 25(9), 6–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X025009006
- Barab, S., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1301_1
- Biological Sciences Curriculum Study. (2019) . NextGen time: Professional learning for next generation science.
- Brehm, J. M., Eisenhauer, B. W., & Stedman, R. C. (2012). Environmental concern: Examining the role of place meaning and place attachment. Society and Natural Resources: An International Journal, 26(5), 522–538. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2012.715726
- Carnegie Corporation of New York. (2017) . Instructional materials and implementation of NGSS: Demand, supply, and strategic opportunities. ARLOSOUL: Visualize Innovation.
- Davis, E. A., Palincsar, A. S., Smith, P. S., Arias, A. M., & Kademian, S. M. (2017). Educative curriculum materials: Uptake, impact, and implications for research and design. Educational Researcher, 46(6), 293–304. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X17727502
- Driver, R., Squires, A., Rushworth, P., & Wood-Robinson, V. (1994). Making sense of secondary science: Research into children’s ideas. Routledge.
- Duff, P. A., & Talmy, S. (2011). Language socialization approaches to second language acquisition: Social, cultural, and linguistic development in additional languages. In D. Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 95–116). Routledge.
- Ellis, N., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (Eds.). (2009). Language as a complex adaptive system. Wiley.
- Grapin, S. (2019). Multimodality in the new content standards era: Implications for English learners. Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages Quarterly, 53(1), 30–55. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.2019.53.issue-1
- Grapin, S. E., Haas, A., Llosa, L., Lee, O., & Goggins, M. (2019). Beyond general-purpose talk moves. Science and Children, 57(4), 36–43 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2505/4/sc19_057_04_36
- Grapin, S. E., Llosa, L., Haas, A., Goggins, M., & Lee, O. (2019). Precision: Toward a meaning-centered view of language use with English learners in the content areas. Linguistics and Education, 50, 71–83. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2019.03.004
- Grapin, S. E., Llosa, L., Haas, A., & Lee, O. (in press). Rethinking instructional strategies with English learners in the content areas in light of contemporary perspectives on content and language learning. Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages Journal.
- Harris, C. J., Penuel, W. R., D’Angelo, C. M., DeBarger, A. H., Gallagher, L. P., Kennedy, C. A., & Krajcik, J. S. (2015). Impact of project‐based curriculum materials on student learning in science: Results of a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(10), 1362–1385. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21263
- Haywood, B. K. (2014). A “sense of place” in public participation in scientific research. Science Education, 98(1), 64–83. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21087
- Johnson, P. (1998). Progression in children’s understanding of a “basic” particle theory: A longitudinal study. International Journal of Science Education, 20(4), 393–412. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069980200402
- Krajcik, J., & Blumenfeld, P. C. (2006). Project-based learning. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 317–333). Cambridge University Press.
- Krajcik, J., Codere, S., Dahsah, C., Bayer, R., & Mun, K. (2014). Planning instruction to meet the intent of the next generation science standards. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(2), 157–175. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9383-2
- Krajcik, J., & Czerniak, C. (2013). Teaching science in elementary and middle school classrooms: A project-based approach (4th ed.). Routledge.
- Krajcik, J. S., Palincsar, A., & Miller, E. (2015). Multiple literacy in project-based learning. Lucas Education Research.
- Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2014). Sociocultural theory and the pedagogical imperative in L2 education: Vygotskian praxis and the research/practice divide. Routledge.
- Lee, O. (2020). Making everyday phenomena phenomenal: Using phenomena to promote equity in science instruction. Science and Children, 58(1), 22–32.
- Lee, O., Eichinger, C. D., Anderson, W. C., Berkheimer, D. G., & Blakeslee, T. D. (1993). Changing middle school students’ conceptions of matter and molecules. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(2 3), 249–270. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
- Lee, O., Goggins, M., Haas, A., Januszyk, R., Llosa, L., & Grapin, S. (2019). Making everyday phenomena phenomenal: NGSS-aligned instructional materials using local phenomena with student diversity. In P. Spycher & E. Haynes (Eds.), Culturally and linguistically diverse learners and STEAM: Teachers and researchers working in partnership to build a better path forward (pp. 211–230). Information Age Publishing.
- Lee, O., Llosa, L., Grapin, S. E., Haas, A., & Goggins, M. (2019). Science and language integration with English learners: A conceptual framework guiding instructional materials development. Science Education, 103(2), 317–337. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.2019.103.issue-2
- Lee, O., Quinn, H., & Valdés, G. (2013). Science and language for English language learners in relation to Next Generation Science Standards and with implications for Common Core State Standards for English language arts and mathematics. Educational Researcher, 42(4), 223–233. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X13480524
- Mehta, J., & Fine, S. (2019). search of deeper learning: The quest to remake the American high school. Harvard University Press.
- Merritt, J., & Krajcik, J. (2013). Learning progression developed to support students building a particle model of matter. In G. Tsaparlis & H. Sevian (Eds.), Concepts of matter in science education (pp. 11–45). Springer.
- Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory into Practice, 31(2), 132–141. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849209543534
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2018) . English learners in STEM subjects: Transforming classrooms, schools, and lives. National Academies Press.
- National Center for Education Statistics. (2019) . The condition of education 2019. U.S. Department of Education.
- National Research Council. (1996) . National science education standards. National Academy Press.
- National Research Council. (2007) . Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. National Academies Press.
- National Research Council. (2012) . A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press.
- National Science Teachers Association. (2016). EQuIP rubric for lessons & units: Science (Version 3.0). https://www.nextgenscience.org/sites/default/files/EQuIPRubricforSciencev3.pdf
- National Science Teachers Association. (2017). Criteria for evaluating phenomena. http://static.nsta.org/ngss/docs/Criteria%20for%20Evaluating%20a%20Phenomenon.pdf
- Next Generation Science Standards Lead States. (2013a). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Appendix A–Conceptual shifts in the next generation science standards. https://www.nextgenscience.org/resources/ngss-appendices
- Next Generation Science Standards Lead States. (2013b). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Appendix D–All standards, all students: Making the NGSS accessible to all students. https://www.nextgenscience.org/resources/ngss-appendices
- Next Generation Science Standards Lead States. (2013c). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Appendix E–Disciplinary core idea progressions. https://www.nextgenscience.org/resources/ngss-appendices
- Next Generation Science Standards Lead States. (2013d). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Appendix F–Science and engineering practices. https:// www.nextgenscience.org/resources/ngss-appendices
- Next Generation Science Standards Lead States. (2013e). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Appendix G–Crosscutting concepts. https://www.nextgen science.org/resources/ngss-appendices
- Open SciEd. (2020). Middle school scope and sequence and instructional materials. https://www.openscied.org/
- Penuel, W., Clark, T., Van Horne, K., Bell, P., & Stromholt, S. (2016, March). Adapting curriculum for 3-dimensional learning [Paper presentation]. Council of State Science Supervisors National Conference, Nashville, TN.
- Pruitt, S. L. (2014). The next generation science standards: The features and challenges. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(2), 145–156. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9385-0
- Reiser, B. J., Fumagalli, M., & Novak, M. (2015). NGSS storylines: How to construct coherent instructional sequences driven by phenomena and motivated by student question [Paper presentation]. Illinois Science Education Conference, Tinley Park, IL.
- Reiser, B. J., Michaels, S., Moon, J., Bell, T., Dyer, E., Edwards, K. D., & Park, A. (2017). Scaling up three-dimensional science learning through teacher-led study groups across a state. Journal of Teacher Education, 68(3), 280–298. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487117699598
- Sandoval, W. (2014). Conjecture mapping: An approach to systematic educational design research. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(1), 18–36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2013.778204
- Smith, G. (2002). Place-based education: Learning to be where we are. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(8), 584–594. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170208300806
- Smith, P. S., & Plumley, C. L. (2016). A review of research literature on teaching about the small particle model of matter to elementary students. Horizon Research.
- Tolbert, S., & Knox, C. (2016). “They might know a lot of things that I don’t know”: Investigating differences in preservice teachers’ ideas about contextualizing science instruction in multilingual classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 38(7), 1133–1149. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1183266
- U.S. Department of Education. (2015). Every student succeeds act. https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-114s1177enr/pdf/BILLS-114s1177enr.pdf
- Zuengler, J., & Miller, E. (2006). Cognitive and sociocultural perspectives: Two parallel SLA worlds? TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 35–58. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/40264510