References
- Aktamış, H., & Atmaca, A. C. (2016). Fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının argümantasyon tabanlı öğrenme yaklaşımına ilişkin görüşleri [View’s of pre-service science teachers about argumentationbased learning approach]. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 15(58), 936–947. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17755/esosder.258827
- Andriessen, J. (2006). Arguing to learn. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 443–460). Cambridge University Press.
- Author. (2019). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının tartışmaya yönelik öz-yeterlikleri, bilimin doğasına yönelik inanışları ve eleştirel düşünmeleri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi [Examining the relationship between pre-service teachers’ self-efficacy towards discussion, the nature of science beliefs and critical thinking] [Unpublished master’s thesis dissertation]. Aydın Adnan Menderes University.
- Avery, L. M., & Meyer, D. Z. (2012). Teaching science as science is practiced: Opportunities and limits for enhancing preservice elementary teachers’ self-efficacy for science and science teaching. School Science and Mathematics, 112(7), 395–409. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2012.00159.x
- Aybek, B., Aslan, S., Dinçer, S., & Arısoy, B. (2015). Öğretmen adaylarına yönelik eleştirel düşünme standartları ölçeği: Geçerlik v egüvenirlik çalışması [Critical thinking standards scale for the teacher candidates: Study of validity and reliability]. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 21(1), 25–50. http://www.kuey.net/index.php/kuey/article/view/141/133
- Aydeniz, M., & Ozdilek, Z. (2015). Assessing pre-service science teachers’ understanding of scientific argumentation: What do they know about argumentation after four years of college science? Science Education International, 26(2), 217–239. http://www.icaseonline.net/sei/june2015/p7.pdf
- Aytaç, A., & Er, K. O. (2018). Türkiye’de ve Finlandiya’da hizmet öncesi sınıf öğretmeni yetiştirme programlarındaki öğretmenlik uygulamalarının karşılaştırılması [A comparison of teaching practices in pre-service classroom teacher training programs in Turkey and Finland]. Journal of Educational Theory and Practice Research, 4(2), 10–19. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ekuad/issue/38280/442712
- Balcı, A. (2016). Sosyal bilimlerde yöntem, teknik ve ilkeler [Research methods, techniques and principles in social science] (12. ed.). PegemAkademi.
- Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
- Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44(9), 1175–1184. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.9.1175
- Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 71–81). Academic Press.
- Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
- Bassham, G., Irwin, W., Nardone, H., & Wallace, J. M. (2011). Critical thinking: A student’s introduction. McGraw-Hill.
- Bautista, N. U. (2011). Investigating the use of vicarious and mastery experiences in influencing early childhoodeducation majors’ self-efficacy beliefs. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22(4), 333–349. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-011-9232-5
- Bensley, D. A. (2011). Rules for reasoning revisited: Toward a scientific conception of critical thinking. In C. P. Horvath & J. M. Forte (Eds.), Critical thinking (pp. 1–36). Nova Science Publishers.
- Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. The Guilford Press.
- Cansoy, R., & Türkoglu, M. E. (2017). Examining the relationship between pre-service teachers’ critical thinking disposition, problem solving skills and teacher self-efficacy. International Education Studies, 10(6), 23–35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v10n6p23
- Cantrell, P., Young, S., & Moore, A. (2003). Factors affecting science teaching efficacy of preservice elementary teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 14(3), 177–192. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025974417256
- Cates, M. (2018). The effects of using dragonbox on the mathematics teaching efficacy of preservice middle grade teachers [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Georgia State University. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/mse_diss/67
- Chen, Y. C., Hand, B., & Norton-Meier, L. (2017). Teacher roles of questioning in early elementary science classrooms: A framework promoting student cognitive complexities in argumentation. Research in Science Education, 47(2), 373–405. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9506-6
- Chichekian, T., & Shore, B. M. (2016). Preservice and practicing teachers’ self-efficacy for inquiry-based instruction. Cogent Education, 3(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1236872
- Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2010). Supporting argumentation through students’ questions: Case studies in science classrooms. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(2), 230–284. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400903530036
- Choi, A., Klein, V., & Hershberger, S. (2015). Success, difficulty, and instructional strategy to enact an argument-based inquiry approach: Experiences of elementary teachers. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(5), 991–1011. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9525-1
- Connerly, D. (2006). Teaching critical thinking skills to fourth grade students identified as gifted and talented [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Graceland University.
- Council of Higher Education (2007). Eğitim fakültesi öğretmen yetiştirme lisans programı [Teacher education programs in faculties of education]. YÖK.
- Creel, R. E. (2001). Thinking philosophically: An introduction to critical reflection and rational dialogue. Wiley-Blackwell.
- Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson.
- Cross, D. I. (2008). Creating optimal mathematics learning environments: Combining argumentation and writing to enhance achievement. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(5), 905–930. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-008-9144-9
- Dehghani, M., Pakmehr, H., & Malekzadeh, A. (2011). Relationship between students’ critical thinking and self-efficacy beliefs in Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 2952–2955. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.221
- Demiral, Ü., & Çepni, S. (2018). Examining argumentation skills of preservice science teachers in terms of their critical thinking and content knowledge levels: An example using GMOs. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 15(3), 128–151. http://www.tused.org/index.php/tused/article/view/256/206
- Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. D. C. Heath & Co. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/37423/37423-h/37423-h.htm
- Dou, R., Brewe, E., Zwolak, J. P., Potvin, G., Williams, E. A., & Kramer, L. H. (2016). Beyond performance metrics: Examining a decrease in students’ physics self-efficacy through a social networks lens. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.020124
- Dwyer, C. P., Hogan, M. J., Harney, O. M., & Kavanagh, C. (2017). Facilitating a student-educator conceptual model of dispositions towards critical thinking through interactive management. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(1), 47–73. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9460-7
- Ennis, R. H. (2020, May 18). The nature of critical thinking: An outline of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. University of Illinios. https://education.illinois.edu/docs/default-source/faculty-documents/robert-ennis/thenatureofcriticalthinking_51711_000.pdf
- Erduran, S., & Msimanga, A. (2014). Science curriculum reform in South Africa: Lessons for professional development from research on argumentation in science education. Education as Change, 18(sup1), 33–46. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/16823206.2014.882266
- Erika, F., Supardi, Z. A. I., & Tukiran, T. (2019, December). Development of student worksheet for improving the self-efficacy and ability to argue of chemistry teacher candidates study on junior high school students behavior based on Keirsey personality type [Paper presentation]. Mathematics, Informatics, Science, and Education International Conference (MISEIC 2019), Surabaya, Indonesia.
- Fettahlıoğlu, P., & Kaleci, D. (2018). Online argumentation implementation in the development of critical thinking disposition. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 6(3), 127–136. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v6i3.2904
- Feyzioğlu, B. (2019). Examination of laboratory perceptions of pre-service science teachers with different goal orientations on inquiry-based analytical chemistry courses: A case study. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 7(3), 281–310. https://www.ijemst.net/index.php/ijemst/article/download/678/184
- Freeley, A. J., & Steinberg, D. L. (2009). Argumentation and debate critical thinking for reasoned decision making (12th ed.). Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
- Gambrill, E. (2019). Critical thinking and the process of evidence-based practice. Oxford University Press.
- García-Carmona, A. (2019). Pre-service primary science teachers’ abilities for solving a measurement problem through inquiry. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9858-7
- George, D., & Mallery, P. (2016). IBM SPSS statistics 23 step by step a simple guide and reference (14th ed.). Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
- Gibson, C. (1995). Critical thinking: Implications for instruction. Reference & User Services Quarterly (RQ), 35(1), 27–35. http://hdl.handle.net/1811/53705
- Gurcay, D., & Ferah, H. O. (2018). High school students’ critical thinking related to their metacognitive self-regulation and physics self-efficacy beliefs. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 6(4), 125–130. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v6i4.2980
- Hall, D. (2011). Debate: Innovative teaching to enhance critical thinking and communication skills in healthcare professionals. The Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice, 9(3), 1–8. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1361&context=ijahsp
- Halpern, D. F. (2014). Thought & knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking (5th ed.). Psychology Press.
- Hare, W. (1979). Open-mindedness and education. McGill-Queen’s Press-MQUP.
- Hasnunidah, N., Susilo, H., Henie Irawati, M., & Sutomo, H. (2015). Argument-driven inquiry with scaffolding as the development strategies of argumentation and critical thinking skills of students in Lampung, Indonesia. American Journal of Educational Research, 3(9), 1185–1192. http://pubs.sciepub.com/education/3/9/20
- Hiğde, E., & Aktamış, H. (2017). Fen bilgisiöğretmenadaylarınınargümantasyontemelli fen derslerininincelenmesi: Durum çalışması[Examination of pre-service science teachers’ argumentation-based science lessons: Case study]. Elementary Online, 16(1), 89–113. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.17051/io.2017.79802
- Hirsch, R. (1989). Argumentation, information and interaction: Studies in face-to-face interactive argumentation under differing turn-taking conditions [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Göteborg.
- Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cut off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
- Hyytinen, H., Toom, A., & Postareff, L. (2018). Unraveling the complex relationship in critical thinking, approaches to learning and self-efficacy beliefs among first-year educational science students. Learning and Individual Differences, 67, 132–142. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.08.004
- Innabi, H., & El Sheikh, O. (2007). The change in mathematics teachers’ perceptions of critical thinking after 15 years of educational reform in Jordan. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 64(1), 45–68. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-005-9017-x
- Iordanou, K., & Constantinou, C. P. (2014). Developing pre-service teachers’ evidence-based argumentation skills on socio-scientific issues. Learning and Instruction, 34, 42–57. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.07.004
- Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., & Erduran, S. (2007). Argumentation in science education: An overview. In S. Erduran & M. P. Jimenez-Aleixandre (Eds.), Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research (pp. 3–27). Springer.
- Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., & Puig, B. (2012). Argumentation, evidence evaluation and critical thinking. In B. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 1001–1015). Springer.
- Kadayifci, H., & Yalcin-Celik, A. (2016). Implementation of argument-driven inquiry as an instructional model in a general chemistry laboratory course. Science Education International, 27(3), 369–390. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1118430.pdf
- Kapucu, S. (2016). Guided inquiry-based electricity experiments: Pre-service elementary science teachers’ difficulties. Journal of Education and Future, 10, 71–93. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jef/issue/24512/259771
- Kelloway, E. K. (2014). Using Mplus for structural equation modeling: A researcher’s guide. Sage Publications.
- Kennedy, R. R. (2009). The power of in-class debates. Active Learning in Higher Education, 10(3), 225–236. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787409343186
- Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. The Guilford Press.
- Kozikoglu, I. (2019). Investigating critical thinking in prospective teachers: Metacognitive skills, problem solving skills and academic self-efficacy. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 10(2), 111–130. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1220699.pdf
- Kwan, A. (2015). Constructive alignment for deep learning: Very short, argument-based laboratory reports. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 23(2), 46–58.
- Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Ablex.
- Lin, S. S. (2014). Science and non-science undergraduate students’ critical thinking and argumentation performance in reading a science news report. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(5), 1023–1046. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9451-7
- Lipman, M. (1988). Critical thinking: What can it be? Educational Leadership, 46(1), 38–43. https://www.ascd.org/el/articles/critical-thinking-what-can-it-be
- Lytzerinou, E., & Iordanou, K. (2020). Teachers’ ability to construct arguments, but not their perceived self-efficacy of teaching, predicts their ability to evaluate arguments. International Journal of Science Education, 42(4), 617–634. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1722864
- Maddux, J. E. (1995). Self-efficacy theory: An introduction. In J. E. Maddux (Ed.), Self-efficacy, adaptation, and adjustment: Theory, research, and application (pp. 3–33). Plenum.
- Marshall, J. C., Horton, R., Igo, B. L., & Switzer, D. M. (2009). K-12 science and mathematics teachers’ beliefs about and use of inquiry in the classroom. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(3), 575–596. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-007-9122-7
- Martinovski, B., & Mao, W. (2009). Emotion as an argumentation engine: Modeling the role of emotion in negotiation. Group Decision and Negotiation, 18(3), 235–259. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-008-9153-7
- Mathews, S. R., & Lowe, K. (2011). Classroom environments that foster a disposition for critical thinking. Learning Environments Research, 14(1), 59–73. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-011-9082-2
- McKinnon, M., & Lamberts, R. (2014). Influencing science teaching self-efficacy beliefs of primary school teachers: A longitudinal case study. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 4(2)(2), 172–194. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2013.793432
- McLean, C. L. (2005). Evaluating critical thinking skills: Two conceptualizations. Journal of Distance Education, 20(2), 1–20. http://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/84/64
- McNeill, K. L., Katsh-Singer, R., González-Howard, M., & Loper, S. (2016). Factors impacting teachers’ argumentation instruction in their science classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 38(12), 2026–2046. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1221547
- Micallef, N., He, B., Kumar, S., Ahamad, M., & Memon, N. (2020). The role of the crowd in countering misinformation: A case study of the COVID-19 Infodemic. ArXiv. http://claws.cc.gatech.edu/covid_counter_misinformation.html
- Ministry of National Education [MoNE]. (2018). İlköğretim kurumları (ilkokullar ve ortaokullar) fen bilimleri dersi (3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ve 8. sınıflar) öğretim programı [Primary education institutions (primary and secondary schools) science courses (3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 grades) curriculum]. Talim ve Terbiye Kurulu Başkanlığı. Ankara.
- Moafian, F., & Ghanizadeh, A. (2011). A correlational analysis of EFL university students’ critical thinking and self-efficacy. Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 30(1), 119–149. http://jtls.shirazu.ac.ir/article_396_00ee4f7a7cb72391e0f03e6e9cee7dce.pdf
- Moon, J. (2008). Critical thinking: An exploration of theory and practice. Routledge.
- Moore, B. N., & Parker, R. (2015). Critical thinking: Evaluating claims and arguments in everyday life (12th ed.). Mountain View.
- Namdar, B., & Salih, E. (2017). Fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının teknoloji destekli argümantasyona yönelik görüşleri [Preservice science teachers’ views of technology-supported argumentation]. Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University Journal of Faculty of Education, 17(3), 1384–1410. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17240/aibuefd.2017.17.31178-338837
- Ozdem, Y., Ertepinar, H., Cakiroglu, J., & Erduran, S. (2013). The nature of pre-service science teachers’ argumentation in inquiry-oriented laboratory context. International Journal of Science Education, 35(15), 2559–2586. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.611835
- Özdemir, O. (2015). Sınıf öğretmen adaylarının kalıtsal benzerlik ve farklılıklarla ilgili argümanları [Pre-service teacher’s arguments about hereditary similarities and variations]. Pamukkale University Journal of Education, 38(38), 143–155. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.9779/PUJE699
- Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2008). A miniature guide to the foundations of analytic thinking. The Foundation for Critical Thinking.
- Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2012). The thinker’s guide to the nature and functions of critical and creative thinking. The Foundation for Critical Thinking.
- Phan, H. P. (2009). Relations between goals, self‐efficacy, critical thinking and deep processing strategies: A path analysis. Educational Psychology, 29(7), 777–799. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410903289423
- Polo, C., Lund, K., Plantin, C., & Niccolai, G. P. (2016). Group emotions: The social and cognitive functions of emotions in argumentation. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 11(2), 123–156. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-016-9232-8
- Powell-Moman, A. D., & Brown-Schild, V. B. (2011). The influence of a two-year professional development institute on teacher self-efficacy and use of inquiry-based instruction. Science Educator, 20(2), 47–53. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ960637.pdf
- Rapanta, C. (2019). Argumentation as critically oriented pedagogical dialogue. Informal Logic, 39(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v39i1.5116
- Robertshaw, B., & Campbell, T. (2013). Constructing arguments: Investigating pre-service science teachers’ argumentation skills in a socio-scientific context. Science Education International, 24(2), 195–211. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1015818.pdf
- Roy, A., & Macchiette, B. (2005). Debating the issues: A tool for augmenting critical thinking skills of marketing students. Journal of Marketing Education, 27(3), 264–276. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475305280533
- Sampson, V., & Clark, D. (2008). Assessment of the ways students generate arguments in science education: Current perspectives and recommendations for future directions. Science Education, 92(3), 447–472. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20276
- Schafersman, S. D. (1991). An introduction to critical thinking. https://facultycenter.ischool.syr.edu/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Critical-Thinking.pdf
- Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research, 8(2), 23–74.
- Schopenhauer, A. (2012). Eristischedialektik [Ü. Hıncal, Trans.]. Sel Publications (Original work published 1830).
- Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. Erlbaum.
- Schunk, D. H. (1983). Ability versus effort attributional feedback: Differential effects on self-efficacy and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(6), 848–856. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.75.6.848
- Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories an educational perspective (6th ed.). Pearson Education.
- Schunk, D. H., & Miller, S. D. (2002). Self-efficacy and adolescents’ motivation. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Academic motivation of adolescents (pp. 29–52). Information Age.
- Scott, S. (2008). Perceptions of students’ learning critical thinking through debate in a technology classroom: A case study. The Journal of Technology Studies, 34(1), 39–44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21061/jots.v34i1.a.5
- Shaabani, F., Maktabi, G. H., Yeylagh, M. S., & Morovati, Z. (2011). The relationship between academic self-efficacy and creativity with critical thinking in university students. Journal of Educational and Management Studies,1(1), 32–37. http://www.jems.science-line.com/attachments/article/10/J.%20Educ.%20Manage.%20Stud.%20(1)1,%2032-37,%202011,%20A5.pdf
- Siegel, H. (1989). The rationality of science, critical thinking, and science education. Synthese, 80(1), 9–41. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00869946
- Sönmez, E., Kabataş Memiş, E., & Yerlikaya, Z. (2019). The effect of practices based on argumentation-based inquiry approach on teacher candidates’ critical thinking. Educational Studies, 47(1), 59–83. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2019.1654364
- Sternberg, R. J. (1986). Critical thinking: Its nature, measurement and improvement critical thinking: Its nature, measurement,and improvement. In F. R. Link (Ed.), Essays on the intellect (pp. 45–65). Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
- Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
- Taşkoyan, S. N. (2008). Fen ve teknoloji öğretiminde sorgulayıcı öğrenme stratejilerinin öğrencilerin sorgulayıcı öğrenme becerileri, akademik başarıları ve tutumları üzerindeki etkisi [The effect of inquiry learning strategies on students’ skills of inquiry learning, academic success and attitudes] [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Dokuz Eylul University.
- Tatar, N. (2012). Inquiry-based science laboratories: An analysis of preservice teachers’ beliefs about learning science through inquiry and their performances. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 11(3), 248–266. http://oaji.net/articles/2014/987-1419168329.pdf
- Tatar, N., & Buldur, S. (2013). Improving preservice science teachers’ self-efficacy about the use of alternative assessment: Implication for theory and practice. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 12(4), 452–464. http://oaji.net/articles/2015/987-1425809148.pdf
- Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge University Press.
- Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2007). The differential antecedents of self-efficacy beliefs of novice and experienced teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(6), 944–956. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.05.003
- Tschannen-Moran, M., & McMaster, P. (2009). Sources of self-efficacy: Four professional development formats and their relationship to self-efficacy and implementation of a new teaching strategy. The Elementary School Journal, 110(2), 228–245. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103252
- Ucar, S. (2012). How do pre-service science teachers’ views on science, scientists, and science teaching change over time in a science teacher training program? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(2), 255–266. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9311-6
- Usher, E. L., & Schunk, D. H. (2018). Social cognitive theoretical perspective of self-regulation. In D. H. Schunk & J. A. Greene (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (2nd ed., pp. 19–35). Routledge/Taylor & Francis.
- Van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R. (2004). A systematic theory of argumentation the pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge University Press.
- Van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R., Johnson, R. H., Plantin, C., & Willard, C. A. (2013). Fundamentals of argumentation theory: A handbook of historical backgrounds and contemporary developments. Routledge.
- Viholainen, A., Tossavainen, T., Viitala, H., & Johansson, M. (2019). University mathematics students’ self-efficacy beliefs about proof and proving. LUMAT: International Journal on Math, Science and Technology Education, 7(1), 148–164. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.7.1.406
- Walton, D. (2006). Fundamentals of critical argumentation: Critical reasoning and argumentation. Cambridge University Press.
- Woolfolk, A. (2010). Educational psychology: Modular active learning edition (11th ed.). Pearson.
- Yalçın-Çelik, A. (2010). Bilimsel tartışma esaslı öğretim yaklaşımının lise öğrencilerinin kavramsa lanlamaları, kimya dersine karşı tutumları, tartışma isteklilikleri ve kalitesi üzerine etkisinin incelenmesi [An analysis of the influences of the teaching approach based on scientific argumentation on high school students’ conceptual understanding, attitudes, and willingness for argumentation and the quality of argumentation] [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Gazi University.
- Yeh, S. S. (1998). Empowering education: Teaching argumentative writing to cultural minority middleschool students. Research in the Teaching of English, 33(1), 49–83. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40171572
- Yun, S. M., & Kim, H. B. (2015). Changes in students’ participation and small group norms in scientific argumentation. Research in Science Education, 45(3), 465–484. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-014-9432-z
- Zare, P., & Othman, M. (2015). Students’ perceptions toward using classroom debate to develop critical thinking and oral communication ability. Asian Social Science, 11(9), 158–170. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n9p158
- Zimmerman, B. (1995). Self-efficacy and educational development. In A. Bandura (Ed.), Self-efficacy in changing societies (pp. 202–231). Cambridge University Press.