1,373
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

Developing teachers’ research capacity: the essential role of teacher education

ORCID Icon
Pages 27-46 | Received 18 Aug 2020, Accepted 02 Dec 2020, Published online: 21 Jan 2021

References

  • AERA (American Education Research Association). (2015). AERA statement on use of value-added models (VAM) for the evaluation of educators and educator preparation programs. Educational Researcher, 44(8), 448–452.
  • AERA, APA & NCME (American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education). (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
  • Amrein-Beardsley, A., Pivovarova, M., & Geiger, T. J. (2016). Value-added models: What the experts say. Phi Delta Kappan, 98(2), 35–40.
  • Beckett, L. (2020). Research-informed teacher learning. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
  • Bell, C. A., & Youngs, P. (2011). Substance and show: Understanding responses to teacher education programme accreditation processes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(2), 298–307.
  • Berg, B. (2001). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Berliner, D. C., & Biddle, B. J. (1995). The manufactured crisis: Myths, fraud, and the attack on America’s public schools. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley.
  • Biesta, G. (2009). Good education in an age of measurement: On the need to reconnect with the question of purpose in education. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 33–46.
  • Boyd, D., Grossman, P., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2009). Teacher preparation and student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31(4), 416–440.
  • Bryk, A. (2015). 2014 AERA distinguished lecture: Accelerating how we learn to improve. Educational Researcher, 44(9), 467–477.
  • Campbell, K. H. (2013). A call to action: Why we need more practitioner research. Democracy & Education, 20(7), 1–8.
  • Chingos, M. M., & Peterson, P. (2010). It’s easier to pick a good teacher than to train one: Familiar and new results on the correlates of teacher effectiveness. Economics of Education Review, 30(3), 449–465.
  • Chira, S. (1992, April 8). Renegade researchers offer rebuttal: U.S. schools are better than many say. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/1992/04/08/education/renegade-researchers-offer-rebuttal-us-schools-are-better-than-many-say.html
  • Cochran-Smith, M. (2005). The politics of teacher education and the curse of complexity. Journal of Teacher Education, 56(3), 181–185.
  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2013). Why the NCTQ teacher prep ratings are nonsense. Washington Post. http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/wp/2013/06/18/why-thenctq-teacher-prep-ratings-are-nonsense/
  • Gansle, K. A., Noell, G. H., & Burns, J. M. (2012). Do student achievement outcomes differ across teacher preparation programs? An analysis of teacher education in Louisiana. Journal of Teacher Education, 63(5), 304e317.
  • Gardner, H. E., & Shulman, L. S. (2005). The professions in America today: Crucial but fragile. Daedalus, 134(3), 13–18.
  • Gelling, L., & Munn-Giddings, C. (2011). Ethical review of action research: The challenges for researchers and research ethics committees. Research Ethics, 7(3), 100–106.
  • Goldhaber, D. (2019). Evidence-based teacher preparation: Policy context and what we know. Journal of Teacher Education, 70(2), 90–101.
  • Goldhaber, D., Liddle, S., & Theobald, R. (2013). The gateway to the profession: Assessing teacher preparation programs based on student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 34, 29–44.
  • Gore, J. M., & Zeichner, K. M. (1991). Action research and reflective teaching in preservice teacher education: A case study from the United States. Teaching & Teacher Education, 7(2), 119–136.
  • Graham, S. (2019). Changing how writing is taught. Review of Research in Education, 43(1), 277–303.
  • Graham, S., Hebert, M., & Harris, K. R. (2015). Formative assessment and writing: A meta-analysis. The Elementary School Journal, 115(4), 524–547.
  • Hanushek, E. (2011). The economic value of higher teacher quality. Economics of Education Review, 30(3), 466–479.
  • Hanushek, E. A., & Woessmann, L. (2007). Education quality and economic growth. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
  • Hanushek, E. A., & Woessmann, L. (2010). The high cost of low educational performance: The Long-run economic impact of improving PISA outcomes. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/44417824.pdf
  • Harris, K. R. (2018). Educational psychology: A future retrospective. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(2), 163–173.
  • Henry, G. T., Kershaw, D. C., Zulli, R. A., & Smith, A. A. (2012). Incorporating teacher effectiveness into teacher preparation program evaluation. Journal of Teacher Education, 63(5), 335e355.
  • Hopmann, S. T. (2008). No child, no school, no state left behind: Schooling in the age of accountability. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40(4), 417–456.
  • Kamenetz, A. (2018, April 29). What ‘a nation at risk’ got wrong, and right, about U.S. schools. How learning happens: NPREd.
  • Kitchen, J., & Stevens, D. (2008). Action research in teacher education. Action Research, 6(1), 7–28.
  • Komatsu, H., & Rappleye, J. (2017). A new global policy regime founded on invalid statistics? Hanushek, Woessmann, PISA, and economic growth. Comparative Education, 53(2), 166–191.
  • Labaree, D. (1998). Educational researchers: Living with a lesser form of knowledge. Educational Researcher, 27(8), 4–12.
  • Labaree, D. (2014). Let’s measure what no one teaches: PISA, NCLB, and the shrinking aims of education. Teachers College Record, 116(9), 1–14.
  • Lagemann, E. C. (1989). The plural worlds of educational research. History of Education Quarterly, 29(2), 185–214.
  • Lagemann, E. C. (2008). Comments on Bulterman-Bos: Education research as a distributed activity across universities. Educational Researcher, 37(7), 424–428.
  • Lanier, J., & Little, J. (1984). Research on teacher education. Occasional Paper No. 80. Michigan State University: Institute for Research on Teaching. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED251450.pdf
  • Loughran, J. (2002). Understanding self-study of teacher education practices. In J. Loughran & T. Russell (Eds.), Improving teacher education practices through self-study (pp. 239–248). London, U.K.: Routledge-Falmer.
  • National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, DC: Author.
  • Noell, G. H., Burns, J. M., & Gansle, K. A. (2018). Linking student achievement to teacher preparation: Emergent challenges in implementing value added assessment. Journal of Teacher Education, 70(2), 128–138.
  • Noffke, S. E., & Somekh, B. (Eds.). (2009). The SAGE handbook of educational action research. Thousand, Oaks, CA: SAGE.
  • Oancea, A. (2014). Teachers’ professional knowledge and state-funded teacher education: A (hi)story of critiques and silences. Oxford Review of Education, 40(4), 497–519.
  • Patton, M. Q. (2012). Essentials of utilization-focused evaluation. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
  • Peralta, Y., & Tatto, M.T. (2018). Preparing high-quality mathematics primary teachers: exploring program strategies and standards in the United States, Russia, Poland, and Chinese Taipei. In Tatto. M.T., Rodriguez. M., Smith. W., Reckase. M., & Bankov. K. (Eds.). Exploring the Mathematics Education of Teachers using TEDS-M Data (pp. 31–67). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer
  • Plano-Clark, V., & Creswell, J. (2015). Understanding research: A consumer’s guide. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
  • Pring, R. (2015). Philosophy of educational research. London: Bloomsbury.
  • Ravitch, D. (2007). Challenges to teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 58(4), 269–273.
  • Ronfeldt, M., Goldhaber, D., Cowan, J., Bardelli, E., Johnson, J., & Tien, C. D. (2018). Identifying promising clinical placements using administrative data: Preliminary results from ISTI placement initiative pilot. CALDER Working Paper No. 189. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.
  • Sass, T., Semykina, A., & Harris, D. (2014). Value-added models and the measurement of teacher productivity. Economics of Education Review, 38, 9–23.
  • Shavelson, R. J., & Towne, L. (Eds.). (2002). Scientific research in education. Washington, DC: National Research Council, National Academy Press.
  • Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–23.
  • Simmerman, S., Harward, S., Pierce, L., Peterson, N., Morrison, T. G., Korth, B., … Shumway, J. (2012). Elementary teachers’ perceptions of process writing. Literacy Research & Instruction, 51(4), 292–307.
  • Sleeter, C. (2014). Toward teacher education research that informs policy. Educational Researcher, 43(3), 146–153.
  • Stenhouse, L. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. London, U.K.: Heinemann.
  • Tatto, M. T. (2007). International comparisons and the global reform of teaching. In M. T. Tatto (Ed.), Reforming teaching globally (pp. 7–18). Oxford, UK: Symposium Books.
  • Tatto, M. T. (2011). Reimagining the education of teachers: The role of comparative and international research. Comparative Education Review, 55(4), 495–516.
  • Tatto, M. T., Burn, K., Menter, I., Mutton, T., & Thompson, I. (2018). Learning to teach in England and the United States: The evolution of policy and practice. Abingdon, England: Routledge.
  • Tatto, M. T., Richmond, G., & Carter, D. J. (2016). The research we need in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 67(4), 247–250.
  • Tatto, M. T., Rodriguez, M., Reckase, M., Smith, W., Bankov, K., & Pippin, J. (2020). The first five years of teaching mathematics (FIRSTMATH): Concepts, methods and strategies for comparative international research. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
  • Tatto, M. T., Rodriguez, M., Smith, W., Reckase, M., & Bankov, K. (Eds.). (2018). Exploring the mathematics education of teachers using TEDS-M data. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
  • Tatto, M. T., Savage, C., Liao, W., Marshall, S. L., Goldblatt, P., & Contreras, L. M. (2016). The emergence of high-stakes accountability policies in teacher preparation: An examination of the U.S. Department of Education’s proposed regulations. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 24(21), 21.
  • Tatto, M. T., Schwille, J., Senk, S. L., Ingvarson, L., Rowley, G., Peck, R., Bankov, K., Rodriguez, M. & Reckase, M. (2012). Policy, Practice, and Readiness to Teach Primary and Secondary Mathematics in 17 Countries. Findings from the IEA Teacher Education and Development Study in Mathematics (TEDS-M). Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Student Achievement. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED542380.pdf
  • Tatto, M.T. (2018a). The mathematical education of primary teachers. In Tatto. M.T., Rodriguez. M., Smith. W., Reckase. M., & Bankov. K. (Eds.). Exploring the Mathematics Education of Teachers using TEDS-M Data (pp. 205–256). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
  • Tatto, M.T. (2018b). The mathematical education of secondary teachers. In Tatto. M.T., Rodriguez. M., Smith W., Reckase, M. & Bankov. K. (Eds.). Exploring the Mathematics Education of Teachers using TEDS-M Data (pp. 409–450). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
  • Tatto, M.T (2021). Professionalism in teaching and the role of teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1849130.
  • Tuttle, C. C., Anderson, T., & Glazerman, S. (2009). ABCTE teachers in Florida and their effect on student performance. Washington DC. Retrieved from http://www.nctq.org/docs/ABCTE_FL_teachers.pdf
  • Valli, L., & Price, J. N. (2005). Preservice teachers becoming agents of change: Pedagogical implications for action research. Journal of Teacher Education, 56(1), 57–72.
  • Weiss, C.H. (1997). Evaluation: Methods for studying programs and policies, 2nd.Edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall
  • Winters, M. A., & Cowen, J. M. (2012). Grading New York: Accountability and student proficiency in America’s largest school district. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 34(3), 313–327.
  • Zeichner, K. (1998). The new scholarship in teacher education. AERA division K, Vice-Presidential address (revised version). Presented at the AERA Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA.
  • Zeichner, K. (2007). Accumulating knowledge across self-studies in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 58(1), 36–46.
  • Zeichner, K. (2010). Competition, economic rationalization, increased surveillance, and attacks on diversity: Neo-liberalism and the transformation of teacher education in the U.S. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(8), 1544–1552.
  • Zeichner, K. M., & Noffke, S. E. (2001). Practitioner research. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 298–330). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
  • Zhao, Y. (2020). Two decades of havoc: A synthesis of criticism against PISA. Journal of Educational Change, 21(2), 245–266.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.