356
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Editorial

‘The village and the world’: research with, for and by teachers in an age of data

, ORCID Icon, &

References

  • Ball, S. J. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215–228.
  • Bridges, S., & Searle, A. (2011). Changing workloads of primary school teachers: ‘I seem to live on the edge of chaos’. School Leadership and Management, 31(5), 313–433.
  • Burrow, R., Williams, R., & Thomas, D. (2020). Stressed, depressed and exhausted: Six years as a teacher in UK state education. Work, Employment and Society, 34(5), 949–958.
  • Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (1993). Inside/Outside: Teacher research and knowledge. New York: Columbia University Teachers’ College.
  • Connell, R. W. (2009). Good teachers on dangerous ground: towards a new view of teacher quality and professionalism. Critical Studies in Education, 50(3), 213–229.
  • Fitzgerald, S., McGrath-Champ, S., Stacey, M., Wilson, R., & Gavin, M. (2019). Intensification of teachers’ work under devolution: A ‘tsunami’ of paperwork. Journal of Industrial Relations, 61(5), 613–636.
  • Furlong, J., Menter, I., Munn, P., Whitty, G., Hallgarten, J., & Johnson, N. (2014). Research and the Teaching Profession: Building the capacity for a self-improving education system. London: BERA.
  • Gavin, M., McGrath-Champ, S., Wilson, R., Fitzgerald, S., & Stacey, M. (2021, in press). Teacher workload in Australia: National reports of intensification and its threats to democracy. In S. Riddle, A. Heffernan, & D. Bright (Eds.), New perspectives on education for democracy. Routledge.
  • Gore, J. (2020). Why isn’t this empowering? The discursive positioning of teachers in efforts to improve teaching. In A. Brown & E. Wisby (Eds.), Knowledge, policy and practice in education and the struggle for social justice: Essays inspired by the work of Geoff Whitty (pp. 199–216). London: UCL Press.
  • Groundwater-Smith, S., & Mockler, N. (2009). Teacher professional learning in an age of compliance: Mind the gap. Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Hardy, I., & Lewis, S. (2017). The ‘doublethink’ of data: Educational performativity and the field of schooling practices. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 38(5), 671–685.
  • Hardy, I., Reyes, V., & Hamid, M. O. (2019). Performative practices and ‘authentic accountabilities’: Targeting students, targeting learning? The International Education Journal: Comparative Perspectives, 18(1), 20–33.
  • Hattie, J. (2008). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Oxon: Routledge.
  • Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. London: Routledge.
  • Hayes, D., Mills, M., Christie, P., & Lingard, B. (2006). Teachers and schooling making a difference: Productive pedagogies, assessment and performance. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
  • Holloway, J., & Brass, J. (2018). Making accountable teachers: The terrors and pleasures of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 33(3), 361–382.
  • Kim, K. (2019). Teachers’ administrative workload crowding out instructional activities. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 39(1), 31–49.
  • Kumashiro, K. K. (2012). Bad teacher! How blaming teachers distorts the bigger picture. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Ladwig, J. (2018). On the limits of evidence-based learning of educational science. In G. E. Hall, L. F. Quinn, & D. M. Gollnick (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of teaching and learning (pp. 639–659). New Jersey, US: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Larsen, M. A. (2010). Troubling the discourse of teacher centrality: A comparative perspective. Journal of Education Policy, 25(2), 207–231.
  • Lewis, S., & Holloway, J. (2019). Datafying the teaching ‘profession’: Remaking the professional teacher in the image of data. Cambridge Journal of Education, 49(1), 35–51.
  • Lupton, D. (2016). The quantified self. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • McGrath-Champ, S., Wilson, R., Stacey, M., & Fitzgerald, S. (2018). Understanding work in schools. Retrieved from https://www.nswtf.org.au/files/18438_uwis_digital.pdf
  • Mills, M., & Goos, M. (2017). The place of research in teacher education? An analysis of the Australian teacher education ministerial advisory group report action now: Classroom ready teachers. In A companion to research in teacher education (pp. 637 650). Singapore: Springer.
  • Mockler, N., & Stacey, M. (2020). Evidence of teaching practice in an age of accountability: When what can be counted isn’t all that counts. Oxford Review of Education, 1–19. doi:10.1080/03054985.2020.1822794
  • Morgan, M., & Craith, D. N. (2015). Workload, stress and resilience of primary teachers: Report of a survey of INTO members. Irish Teachers’ Journal, 3(1), 9–20.
  • Noffke, S. E. (1997). Chapter 6: Professional, personal, and political dimensions of action research. Review of Research in Education, 22(1), 305–343.
  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2019). TALIS 2018 Results. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/education/talis-2018-results-volume-i-1d0bc92a-en.htm
  • Player-Koro, C., Bergviken Rensfeldt, A., & Selwyn, N. (2018). Selling tech to teachers: Education trade shows as policy events. Journal of Education Policy, 33(5), 682–703.
  • Sachs, J. (1997). Renewing teacher professionalism through innovative links. Educational Action Research, 5(3), 449–462.
  • Sachs, J. (2016). Teacher professionalism: Why are we still talking about it? Teachers and Teaching, 22(4), 413–425.
  • Skourdoumbis, A. (2017). Teacher quality, teacher effectiveness and the diminishing returns of current education policy expressions. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 15(1), 42–59.
  • Stevenson, H. (2017). The ‘datafication’ of teaching: Can teachers speak back to the numbers? Peabody Journal of Education, 92(4), 537–557.
  • Thrupp, M. (1999). Schools making a difference: Let’s be realistic! Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
  • White, S., Down, B., Mills, M., Shore, S., & Woods, A. (2020). Strengthening a research-rich teaching profession: An Australian study. Teaching Education, 1–15. doi:10.1080/10476210.2020.1737666
  • Zipin, L., & Hattam, R. (2009). Partnership action research for social justice: Politics, challenges and possibilities. In S. Noffke & B. Somekh (Eds.), The sage jandbook of educational action research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.