512
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Teasing Apart Explanations of a Developmental Delay in Binding: Experimental Evidence from the Comparison of SLI and Williams Syndrome

ORCID Icon &
Pages 24-38 | Received 08 Apr 2016, Accepted 18 Apr 2016, Published online: 11 Aug 2016

References

  • Akker, Saskia van der, John Hoeks, Jennifer Spenader & Petra Hendriks. 2012. Is the Dutch Delay of Principle B Effect dependent on verb type? In Marion Elenbaas & Suzanne Aalberse (eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands, 1–14. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Bavin, Edith. 2015. Memory profiles of children with SLI. In Stavroula Stavrakaki (ed.), Specific Language Impairment: Current trends in research (Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 58), 125–144. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Bellugi, Ursula, Shelly Marks, Amy Bihrle & Helene Sabo. 1988. Dissociation between language and cognitive functions in Williams syndrome. In Dorothy Bishop & Kay Mogford (eds.), Language development in exceptional circumstances, 177–189. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Bishop, Dorothy. 2000. Pragmatic language impairment: A correlate of SLI, a distinct subgroup or part of the autistic continuum? In Dorothy Bishop & Lawrence Leonard (eds.), Speech and language impairments in children: Causes, characteristics, intervention and outcome, 99–113. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
  • Bishop, Dorothy, Catherine Adams & Courtenay Frazier Norbury. 2006. Distinct genetic influences on grammar and phonological short term memory deficits: Evidence from 6-year-old twins. Genes, Brain, and Behavior 5. 158–169.
  • Bishop, Dorothy, Peter Bright, Cheryl James, Sonia Bishop & Heather van der Lely. 2000. Grammatical SLI: A distinct subtype of developmental language impairment? Applied Psycholinguistics 21. 159–181.
  • Bishop, Dorothy, Janet Chan, Catherine Adams, Joanne Hartley & Fiona Weir. 2000. Conversational responsiveness in specific language impairment: Evidence of disproportionate pragmatic difficulties in a subset of children. Development and Psychopathology 12(2). 177–199.
  • Bishop, Dorothy & Lewis Rosenbloom. 1987. Childhood language disorders: Classification and overview. In William Yule & Michael Rutter (eds.), Language development and disorders: Clinics in developmental medicine, 16–41. London: Mac Keith Press.
  • Briscoe, Josie & Peter Rankin. 2009. Exploration of “double-jeopardy” hypothesis within working memory profiles for children with specific language impairment. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 44. 236–250.
  • Brock, Jon. 2007. Language abilities in Williams syndrome: A critical review. Development and Psychopathology 19(1). 97–127.
  • Chien, Yu-Chin & Ken Wexler. 1990. Children’s knowledge of locality conditions in binding as evidence for the modularity of syntax and pragmatics. Language Acquisition 1. 225–295.
  • Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
  • Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin and use. New York: Praeger.
  • Clahsen, Harald & Mayella Almazan. 1998. Syntax and morphology in Williams syndrome. Cognition 68. 167–198.
  • Conroy, Anastasia, Eri Takahashi, Jeffrey Lidz & Colin Phillips. 2009. Equal treatment for all antecedents: How children succeed with Principle B. Linguistic Inquiry 40. 446–486.
  • Davies, Mark, Orlee Udwin & Patricia Howlin. 1998. Adults with Williams syndrome: Preliminary study of social, emotional and behavioural difficulties. British Journal of Psychiatry 172. 273–276.
  • Franks, Steven & Phil Connell. 1996. Knowledge of binding in normal and SLI children. Journal of Child Language 23. 431–464.
  • Gathercole, Susan & Alan Baddeley. 1990. Phonological memory deficits in language disordered children: Is there a causal connection? Journal of Memory and Language 29. 336–360.
  • Guasti, Maria Teresa. 2002. Language development: The growth of grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Heim, Irene. 1998. Anaphora and semantic interpretation: A reinterpretation of Reinhart’s approach. In Uli Sauerland & Orin Percus (eds.), The interpretive tract. Special Issue, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 25. 205–246.
  • Hick, Rachel, Nicola Botting & Gina Conti-Ramsden. 2005. Cognitive abilities in children with specific language impairment: Consideration of visuo-spatial skills. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 40. 137–149.
  • Jaeger, T. Florian. 2008. Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language 59. 434–446.
  • Jakubowicz, Celia. 1984. On markedness and binding principles. Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistics Society 14. 154–182.
  • Jarrold, Christopher, Alan Baddeley & Alexa Hewes. 1999. Genetically dissociated components of working memory: Evidence from Down’s and Williams syndrome. Neuropsychologia 37. 637–651.
  • Kail, Robert. 1994. A method for studying the generalized slowing hypothesis in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 37. 118–421.
  • Karmiloff-Smith, Annette. 1979. A functional approach to child language: A study of determiners and reference. (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 24). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Laws, Glynis & Dorothy Bishop. 2004. Pragmatic language impairment and social deficits in Williams syndrome: A comparison with Down’s syndrome and specific language impairment. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 39(1). 45–64.
  • Leonard, Lawrence. 2014. Children with Specific Language Impairment. Ambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Lum, Jarrad, Gina Conti-Ramsden, Debra Page & Michael Ullman. 2012. Working, declarative and procedural memory in specific language impairment. Cortex 48. 1138–1154.
  • Maratsos, Michael. 1976. The use of definite and indefinite reference in young children. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Mervis, Carlyn, Bonita Klein-Tasman & Michelle Mastin. 2001. Adaptive behaviour of 4- through 8-year-old children with Williams syndrome. American Journal of Mental Retardation 106. 82–93.
  • Norbury, Courtenay Frazier, Dorothy Bishop & Josie Briscoe. 2002. Does impaired grammatical comprehension provide evidence for an innate grammar module? Applied Psycholinguistics 23(2). 247–268.
  • Novogrodsky, Rama & Naama Friedmann. 2010. Not all dependencies are impaired in Syntactic-SLI: Binding in children with a deficit in Wh-movement. In Jane Chandlee, Katie Franich, Kate Iserman & Lauren Keil (eds.), Online Proceedings Supplement, 34th Boston University Conference on Language Development [BUCLD 34]. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press. http://www.bu.edu/bucld/proceedings/supplement/vol34/
  • Perovic, Alexandra. 2001. Binding principles in Down syndrome. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 13. 425–446.
  • Perovic, Alexandra. 2006. Syntactic deficit in Down syndrome: More evidence for the modular organization of language. Lingua 116(10). 1616–1630.
  • Perovic, Alexandra. 2008. A crosslinguistic analysis of binding in Down syndrome. In Pedro Guijarro-Fuentes, Maria Larranaga & John Clibbens (eds.), First language acquisition of morphology and syntax: Perspectives across languages and learners. (Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 45), 235–267. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Perovic, Alexandra, Nadezhda Modyanova & Ken Wexler. 2013. Comparison of grammar in neurodevelopmental disorders: The case of binding in Williams syndrome and autism with and without language impairment. Language Acquisition 20(2). 133–154.
  • Perovic, Alexandra & Ken Wexler. 2007. Complex grammar in Williams syndrome. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 21. 729–745.
  • Perovic, Alexandra & Ken Wexler. 2010. Development of verbal passive in Williams syndrome. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 53(5). 1294–1306.
  • Perovic, Alexandra & Ken Wexler. 2014. Contrasting linguistic profiles of children with SLI and autism with and without language impairment. Paper presented at the 13th International Congress for the Study of Child Language, July 14–18, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Rapin, Isabelle & Doris Allen. 1983. Developmental language disorders: Nosologic considerations. In Ursula Kirk (ed.), Neuropsychology of language, reading and spelling, 155–184. New York: Academic Press.
  • Reinhart, Tanya. 2006. Interface strategies: Optimal and costly computation. (Linguistic Inquiry Monographs). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Reinhart, Tanya & Eric Reuland. 1993. Reflexivity. Linguistic Inquiry 24(4). 657–721.
  • Rice, Mabel & Ken Wexler. 1996. A phenotype of Specific Language Impairment: Extended optional infinitives. In Mabel Rice (ed.), Toward a genetics of language, 215–239. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Ring, Melanie & Harald Clahsen. 2005. Distinct patterns of language impairment in Down’s syndrome, Williams syndrome, and SLI: The case of syntactic chains. Journal of Neurolinguistics 18. 479–501.
  • Rowe, Melissa & Carolyn B. Mervis. 2006. Working memory in Williams syndrome. In Tracy Packiam Alloway & Susan Gathercole (eds.), Working memory and neurodevelopmental disorders, 267–293. New York: Psychology Press.
  • Sanoudaki, Eirini & Spyridoula Varolokosta. 2014. Pronoun comprehension in individuals with Down syndrome: Deviance or delay? Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 57. 1442–1452.
  • Singer Harris, Naomi, Ursula Bellugi, Elizabeth Bates, Wendy Jones & Michael Rossen. 1997. Contrasting profiles of language development in children with Williams and Down syndromes. Developmental Neuropsychology 13. 345–370.
  • Stojanovik, Vesna, Mick Perkins & Sara Howard. 2001. Language and conversational abilities in Williams syndrome: How good is good? International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 36. 234–239.
  • Tager-Flusberg, Helen. 2006. Defining language phenotypes in autism. Clinical Neuroscience Research 6. 219–224.
  • Tallal, Paula & Malcolm Piercy. 1973. Defects of non-verbal auditory perception in children with developmental aphasia. Nature 241. 468–469.
  • Thornton, Rosalind & Ken Wexler. 1999. Principle B, VP ellipsis and interpretation in child grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Tomblin, Bruce, Nancy Records, Paula Buckwalter, Xuyang Zhang, Elaine Smith & Marlea O’Brien. 1997. Prevalence of specific language impairment in kindergarten children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 40. 1245–1260.
  • Tomblin, Bruce & Xuyang Zhang. 1999. Language patterns and etiology in children with specific language impairment. In Helen Tager-Flusberg (ed.), Neurodevelopmental disorders, 361–382. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • van der Lely, Heather & Linda Stollwerck. 1997. Binding theory and specifically language impaired children. Cognition 62. 245–290.
  • Vicari, Stefano, Daniela Brizzolara, Giovanni Carlesimo, Grazia Pezzini & Virginia Volterra. 1996. Memory abilities in children with Williams syndrome. Cortex 32(3). 503–514.
  • Wang, Paul & Bellugi, Ursula. 1994. Evidence from two genetic syndromes for a dissociation between verbal and visual-spatial short-term memory. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 16. 317–322.
  • Wexler, Ken. 1990. Innateness and maturation in linguistic development. Developmental Psychobiology 23. 645–660.
  • Wexler, Ken. 1996. The development of inflection in a biologically based theory of language acquisition. In Mabel L. Rice (ed.), Toward a genetics of language, 113–144. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Wexler, Ken. 2011. Cues don’t explain learning: Maximal trouble in the determiner system. In Edward Gibson & Neal J. Pearlmutter (eds.), The processing and acquisition of reference, 15–42. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Wexler, Ken. 2013. Luria’s biolinguistic suggestion and the growth of language. In Cedric Boeckx & Kleanthes Grohmann (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of biolinguistics, 94–128. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wexler, Ken & Yu-Chin Chien. 1985. The development of lexical anaphors and pronouns. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development 24. 138–149.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.