Revisiting the epistemic gap: It’s not the thought that counts

References

• Aikhenvald, A. Y. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aksu-Koç, Ayhan, and Dan I. Slobin. 1986. “A Psychological Account of the Development and Use of Evidentials in Turkish.” Wallace L. Chafe and Johanna Nichols. edited by, Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex. 159–67.
   Google Scholar
• Anđelković, D., N. Ševa, and J. Moskovljević. 2001. Srpski Elektronski Korpus Ranog Dečjeg Govora [Serbian Electronic Corpus of Early Child Language]. Laboratory for Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, and Department of General Linguistics, Faculty of Philology, University of Belgrade. Belgrade, Serbia.
   Google Scholar
• Barbiers, S., & van Dooren, A. (2017). Modal auxiliaries. In M. Everaert & H. van Riemsdijk (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell Companion to syntax (2nd ed., pp. 1–31). Oxford, UK: Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Bassano, Dominique. 1996. “Functional and Formal Constraints on the Emergence of Epistemic Modality: A Longitudinal Study on French.” First Language 16 (46):77–113. doi:10.1177/014272379601604605
   Google Scholar
• Bliss, L S. 1988. “Modal Usage by Preschool Children.” Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 9 (3):253–61. doi:10.1016/0193-3973(88)90028-7
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, L. M. 1970. Language Development: Form and Function in Emerging Grammars. Cambridge: II. IT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bolinger, Dwight. 1968. Aspects of Language. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World.
   Google Scholar
• Bowerman, Melissa. 1986. “First Steps in Acquiring Conditionals.” In On Conditionals, edited by E. C. Traugott, A. Ter Meulen, J. S. Reilly and C. A. Ferguson, 285–307. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braunwald, Susan R. 1985. “The Development of Connectives.” Journal of Pragmatics 9 (4):513–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, V. 1993. “Root and Epistemic Modal Auxiliary Verbs.” Dissertation. Amherst: University of Massachusetts.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Roger W. 1973. A First Language: The Early Stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, Jerome, and Joan Lucariello. 1989. “Monologue as Narrative Recreation of the World.” In Narratives from the Crib, edited by K. Nelson, 73–97. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, J. L., R. D. Perkins, and W. Pagliuca. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cesana-Arlotti, Nicoló, Ana Martín, Ernö Téglás, Liza Vorobyova, Ryszard Cetnarski, and Luca L. Bonatti. 2018. “Precursors of Logical Reasoning in Preverbal Human Infants.” Science 359 (6381):1263–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, S. 1991. “Early Acquisition of Epistemic Meanings in Korean: A Study of Sentence-ending Suffixes in the Spontaneous Speech of Three Children.” First Language 11 (31):93–119.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, S. (2006). Acquisition of modality. In The Expression of Modality, edited by W. Frawley, 141–172. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton
   Google Scholar
• Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-linguistic Perspective: Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coates, Jennifer. 1988. “The Acquisition of the Meanings of Modality in Children Aged Eight and Twelve.” Journal of Child Language 15:425–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Condoravdi, Cleo. 2002. “Temporal Interpretation of Modals.” In The Construction of Meaning, edited by D. Beaver, S Kaufmann, B. Clark and L. Casillas, 59–88. Mountain View, CA: CSLI Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Cournane, A., & Pérez‐Leroux, A. T. (2020). Leaving obligations behind: Epistemic incrementation in preschool English. Language Learning and Development, 16(3), 270–291
   Google Scholar
• Cournane, Ailís. 2015a. “Modal Development: Input-divergent L1 Acquisition in the Direction of Diachronic Reanalysis.” Dissertation. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto
   Google Scholar
• Cournane, Ailís. 2015b. “Revisiting the Epistemic Gap: Evidence for a Grammatical Source.” Proceedings of the 39th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cummins, D. D. 1996. “Evidence of Deontic Reasoning in 3- and 4-year-old Children.” Memory & Cognition 24 (6):823–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummins, D. D. 2013. “Deontic Reasoning as a Target of Selection: Reply to Astington and Dack.” Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 116 (4):970–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dack, Lisa Ain, and Janet W. Astington. 2011. “Deontic and Epistemic Reasoning in Children.” Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 110 (1):94–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Villiers, Jill G. 2007. “The Interface of Language and Theory of Mind.” Lingua 117 (11):1858–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demetras, Marty. (1989). Working parents conversational responses to their two-year-old sons. Working paper. University of Arizona, Tuscon, AZ.
   Google Scholar
• Demuth, Katherine, Jennifer Culbertson, and Jennifer Alter. 2006. “Word-minimality, Epenthesis and Coda Licensing in the Early Acquisition of English.” Language and Speech 49 (2):137–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Déprez, V., and A. Pierce. 1993. “Negation and Functional Projections in Early Grammar.” Linguistic Inquiry 24(1): 25–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diessel, H. 2011. “Grammaticalization and Language Acquisition.” In Handbook of Grammaticalization, edited by H. Narrog and B. Heine, 130–41. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dieuleveut, A., A. van Dooren, A. Cournane, and V. Hacquard. 2019. “Acquiring the Force of Modals: Sig You Guess What Sig Means?” Proceedings of the 42nd Annual to the Boston University Conference on Language Development (BUCLD42). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dudley, Rachel E. 2017. “The Role of Input in Discovering Presuppositions Triggers: Figuring Out What Everybody Already Knew.” Dissertation. College Park: University of Maryland.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, J. 1988. The Beginnings of Social Understanding. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fond, M. J. 2003. Deontic and Epistemic Modal Expression: Theory and Acquisition in English and Spanish. Northampton, Mass: Smith College.
   Google Scholar
• Giannakidou, A., and A. Mari. 2018. “A Unified Analysis of the Future as Epistemic Modality.” Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 36 (1):85–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleitman, Lila R. 1990. “The Structural Sources of Verb Meanings.” Language Acquisition 1 (1):3–55.
   Google Scholar
• Goupil, L., M. Romand-Monnier, and S. Kouider. 2016. “Infants Ask for Help When They Know They Don’t Know.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113 (13):3492–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griggs, R. A., and J. R. Cox. 1982. “The Elusive Thematic-materials Effect in Wason’s Selection Task.” British Journal of Psychology 73 (3):407–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, Jiansheng. 1994. “Social Interaction, Meaning, and Grammatical Form: Children’s Development and Use of Modal Auxiliaries in Mandarin Chinese.” Dissertation. Berkeley: University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Hacquard, Valentine. 2006. “Aspects of Modality.” Dissertation. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Hacquard, Valentine. 2010. “On the Event Relativity of Modal Auxiliaries.” Natural Language Semantics 18 (1):79–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacquard, Valentine. 2013. “The Grammatical Category of Modality.” Proceedings of the 19th Amsterdam Colloquium, Amsterdam, NL.19–26.
   Google Scholar
• Hacquard, Valentine, and Jeffrey Lidz. 2019. “Children’s Attitude Problems: Bootstrapping Verb Meaning from Syntax and Pragmatics.” Mind & Language 34(1), 73–96.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, P. L., and M. Núñez. 1996. “Understanding of Permission Rules by Preschool Children.” Child Development 67 (4):1572–91
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heizmann, Tanja. 2006. “Acquisition of Deontic and Epistemic Readings of Must and Müssen.” In UMOP 34: Current Issues in Language Acquisition (University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics), edited by Tanja Heizmann. Amherst: GLSA, University of Massachusetts. 21–50.
   Google Scholar
• Hickmann, M., and D. Bassano. 2016. “Modality and Mood in First Language Acquisition.” In The Oxford Handbook of Modality and Mood, edited by J. Nuyts and J. van der Auwera. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.430-447.
   Google Scholar
• Jackendoff, R. 1972. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jeretič, P. 2018. Evidence for Children’s Dispreference for Weakness: A Corpus Study. Ms. New York, NY, USA: New York University.
   Google Scholar
• Jespersen, Otto. 1924. Logic & Grammar. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klecha, Peter. 2016. “Modality and Embedded Temporal Operators.” Semantics and Pragmatics 9:9–1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klima, E., and U. Bellugi. 1966. “Syntactic Regularities in Children’s Speech.” Psycholinguistic Papers 183–208.
   Google Scholar
• Kovács, Á. M., T. Tauzin, E. Téglás, G. Gergely, and G. Csibra. 2014. “Pointing as Epistemic Request: 12-month-olds Point to Receive New Information.” Infancy 19 (6):543–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kratzer, Angelika. 1977. “What ‘Must’ and ‘Can’ Must and Can Mean.” Linguistics and Philosophy 1 (3):337–55.
   Google Scholar
• Kratzer, Angelika. 1981. “The Notional Category of Modality.” In Words, Worlds, and Contexts: New Approaches in Word Semantics, edited by H.-J. Eikmeyer and H. Rieser. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.38-74.
   Google Scholar
• Kuczaj, Stan A. 1977. “The Acquisition of Regular and Irregular past Tense Forms.” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 16 (5):589–600.
   Google Scholar
• Kuczaj, Stan A. 1982. “Old and New Forms, Old and New Meanings: The Form-function Hypotheses Revisited.” First Language 3 (7):55–61.
   Google Scholar
• Kuczaj, Stan A., and M. P. Maratsos. 1975. “What Children Can Say before They Will.” Merrill-Palmer Quarterly of Behavior and Development 21: 89–111.
   Google Scholar
• Lassiter, D. 2010. “Gradable Epistemic Modals, Probability, and Scale Structure.” Semantics and Linguistic Theory 20:197–215.
   Google Scholar
• Leahy, B. P., & Carey, S. E. (2020). The acquisition of modal concepts. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(1), 65–78 doi:10.1016/j.tics.2019.11.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics, Vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacWhinney, Brian. 2000. The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Milligan, K., J. W. Astington, and L. A. Dack. 2007. “Language and Theory of Mind: Meta-analysis of the Relation between Language Ability and False-belief Understanding.” Child Development 78 (2):622–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mody, S., & Carey, S. (2016). The emergence of reasoning by the disjunctive syllogism in early childhood. Cognition, 154, 40–48 doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2016.05.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mody, S., and S. Carey. 2016. “The Emergence of Reasoning by the Disjunctive Syllogism in Early Childhood.” Cognition 154:40–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modyanova, N., Agoos, C., Kenney, A., Echelbarger, M., Holt, A., & Wexler, K. (2010). Young children's interpretations of modal verbs. In J. Costa, A. Castro, M. Lobo, & F. Pratas (Eds.), Language acquisition and development: Proceedings of GALA 2009 (pp. 301–312). Newcastle‐Upon‐Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing
   Google Scholar
• Moore, Chris, Kiran Pure, and David Furrow. 1990. “Children’s Understanding of the Modal Expression of Speaker Certainty and Uncertainty and Its Relation to the Development of a Representational Theory of Mind.” Child Development 61 (3):722–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moscati, V., L. Zhan, and P. Zhou. 2017. “Children’s On-line Processing of Epistemic Modals.” Journal of Child Language 44 (5):1025–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moscati, V., and S. Crain. 2014. “When Negation and Epistemic Modality Combine: The Role of Information Strength in Child Language.” Language Learning and Development 10 (4):345–80.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, Daniela K., and Cristina M. Atance. 2000. ““Maybe My Daddy Give Me a Big Piano”: The Development of Children’s Use of Modals to Express Uncertainty.” First Language 20 (58):029–52.
   Google Scholar
• Onishi, Kristine H., and Renée Baillargeon. 2005. “Do 15-month-old Infants Understand False Beliefs?” Science 308 (5719):255–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozturk, O., and A. Papafragou. 2015. “The Acquisition of Epistemic Modality: From Semantic Meaning to Pragmatic Interpretation.” Language Learning and Development 11 (3):191–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, Frank R. 2001. Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Papafragou, Anna. 1998. “The Acquisition of Modality: Implications for Theories of Semantic Representation.” Mind & Language 13 (3):370–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papafragou, Anna. 2001. “Linking Early Linguistic and Conceptual Capacities: The Role of Theory of Mind.” In Edited by Alan Cienki, Barbara J. Luka, and Michael B. Smith. Conceptual and Discourse Factors in Linguistic Structure, 169–84. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, Jennifer M. 2006. “Positional Effects in Phonological Development: A Case Study.” Dissertation. St. John’s, Canada: Memorial University of Newfoundland.
   Google Scholar
• Pea, R. D. (1978). “The Development of Negation in Early Child Language.” PhD Thesis. University of Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, Hazel. 2021. “Attitude Verbs.” In Companion to Semantics, edited by L. Matthewson, C. Meier, H. Rullmann and T.E. Zimmermann. New York, NY: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Perner, Josef, and Heinz Wimmer. 1985. ““John Thinks That Mary Thinks That … ” attribution of second-order beliefs by 5-to 10-year-old children.” Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 39 (3):437–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piéraut-Le Bonniec, G. 1980. The Development of Modal Reasoning Genesis of Necessity and Possibility Notions.
   Google Scholar
• Portner, P. 2009. Modality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ramchand, G. 2018. Situations and Syntactic Structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Redshaw, J., and T. Suddendorf. 2016. “Children’s and Apes’ Preparatory Responses to Two Mutually Exclusive Possibilities.” Current Biology 26 (13):1758–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rett, Jessica, and Nina Hyams. 2014. “The Acquisition of Syntactically Encoded Evidentiality.” Language Acquisition 21 (2):173–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, Ian G. 1985. “Agreement Parameters and the Development of English Modal Auxiliaries.” Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 3:21–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, John R. 1967. Constraints on Variables in Syntax. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technologydissertation.
   Google Scholar
• Rullmann, Hotze, and Lisa Matthewson. 2018. “Towards a Theory of Modal-temporal Interaction.” Language 94 (2):281–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sachs, Jacqueline. 1983. “Talking about the There and Then: The Emergence of Displaced Reference in Parent-child Discourse.” Children’s Language 4:1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Shatz, Marilyn, Henry M. Wellman, and Sharon Silber. 1983. “The Acquisition of Mental Verbs: A Systematic Investigation of the First Reference to Mental State.” Cognition 14 (3):301–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shatz, Marilyn, and Sharon A. Wilcox. 1991. “Constraints on the Acquisition of English Modals.” In Perspectives on Language and Thought: Interrelations in Development, edited by S. A. Gelman and J. P. Byrnes, 319–53. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shepherd, Susan C. 1982. From Deontic to Epistemic: A Analysis of Modals in the History of English, Creoles, and Language Acquisition. In A. Ahlqvist (ed.), Papers from the Fifth International Conference on Historical Linguistics, 316–23. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Smoczynska, Magdalena. 1993. “The Acquisition of Polish Modal Verbs.” In Modality in Language Acquisition, edited by N. Dittmar and A. Reich, 145–69. Berlin: De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, William. 2007. Child Language: The Parametric Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Southgate, Victoria, Atsushi Senju, and Gergely Csibra. 2007. “Action Anticipation through Attribution of False Belief by 2-year-olds.” Psychological Science 18 (7):587–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E., and R. F. West. 1998. “Individual Differences in Rational Thought.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 127 (2):161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephany, Ursula. 1979. “Modality.” In Language Acquisition, edited by P. Fletcher and M. Garman, 2nd ed., 1986, 375–400. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stromswold, Karin. 1996. “Analyzing Children’s Spontaneous Speech.” In Language, Speech, and Communication. Methods for Assessing Children’s Syntax, edited by D. McDaniel, C. McKee and H. S. Cairns, 23–53. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sweetser, Eve. 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Theakston, Anna L., Elena V. Lieven, Julian M. Pine, and Caroline F. Rowland. 2001. “The Role of Performance Limitations in the Acquisition of Verb-argument Structure: An Alternative Account.” Journal of Child Language 28 (1):127–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomasello, Michael, and Malinda Carpenter. 2007. “Shared Intentionality.” Developmental Science 10 (1):121–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traugott, Elizabeth C. 2006. “Historical Aspects of Modality.” In The Expression of Modality, edited by W. Frawley, 107–39. Berlin: De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Traugott, Elizabeth. C. 1989. “On the Rise of Epistemic Meanings in English: An Example of Subjectification in Semantic Change.” Language 65 (1):31–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Auwera, Johan, and Andreas Ammann. 2005. “Epistemic Possibility.” In The World Atlas of Language Structures, edited by M. Haspelmath, M. S. Dryer, D. Gil and B. Comrie, 306–09. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Dooren, Annemarie, Anouk Dieuleveut, Ailís Cournane, and Valentine Hacquard. 2017. “Learning What Must and Can Must and Can Mean.” Proceedings of the 21st Amsterdam Colloquium.Amsterdam, NL.
   Google Scholar
• van Dooren, Annemarie, Maxime Tulling, Ailís Cournane, and Valentine Hacquard. 2019. “Lexical Aspect and Modal Flavor in Dutch.” Proceedings from the 42nd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (BUCLD 42). Presented at the Boston, MA. Boston, MA: Cascadilla Press.
   Google Scholar
• Veselinović, Dunja. 2019. The Syntax and Acquisition of Modal Verb Flavors. New York: New York University dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• Veselinović, D., & Cournane, A. (2020). The grammatical source of missing epistemic meanings from modal verbs in child BCS. In T. Ionin, & J. E. MacDonald (Eds.), Formal approaches to slavic linguistics 26 (pp. 417–436). Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications..
   Google Scholar
• Wason, P. C. 1966. “Reasoning„. In New Horizons in Psychology, edited by B. Foss, pp. 135-151. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Weist, Richard M., and Andrea A. Zevenbergen. 2008. “Autobiographical Memory and past Time Reference.” Language Learning and Development 4 (4):291–308.
   Google Scholar
• Wellman, H. M., and J. G. Miller. 2008. “Including Deontic Reasoning as Fundamental to Theory of Mind.” Human Development 51 (2):105–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, G. (1979). Learning and using the auxiliary verb in English. In V. Lee (Ed.), Cognitive development: Language and thinking from birth to adolescence (pp. 250–270). London: Croom Helm..
   Google Scholar
• Wells, Gordon. 1985. Language Development in the Pre-school Years. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Werner, T. 2006. “Future and Non-future Modal Sentences.” Natural Language Semantics 14 (3):235–55.
   Google Scholar
• Westergaard, M. 2008. “Acquisition and Change: On the Robustness of the Triggering Experience for Word Order Cues.” Lingua 118 (12):1841–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wijnen, F., and M. Verrips. 1998. “The Acquisition of Dutch Syntax.” In The Acquisition of Dutch, edited by S. Gillis and A. De Houwer, 223–300. Amsterdam, NL: John Benjamins. 
   Google Scholar
• Woodward, Amanda L. 1998. “Infants Selectively Encode the Goal Object of an Actor’s Reach.” Cognition 69 (1):1–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ünal, E., & Papafragou, A. (2016). Production–comprehension asymmetries and the acquisition of evidential morphology. Journal of Memory and Language, 89, 179–199 doi:10.1016/j.jml.2015.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar