Learning embedded verb placement in Norwegian: Evidence for early overgeneralization

References

• Amaral, Luiz & Tom Roeper. 2014. Multiple grammars and second language representation. Second Language Research 30(1). 3–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambridge, Ben. 2013. How do children restrict their linguistic generalizations? An (un-) grammaticality judgment study. Cognitive Science 37(3). 508–543.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambridge, Ben, Julian M. Pine, Caroline F. Rowland, Franklin Chang & Amy Bidgood. 2013. The retreat from overgeneralization in child language acquisition: Word learning, morphology and verb argument structure. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 4(1). 47–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambridge, Ben, Julian M. Pine, Caroline F. Rowland, Rebecca L. Jones & Victoria Clark. 2009. A semantics-based approach to the “no negative evidence” problem. Cognitive Science 33(7). 1301–1316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambridge, Ben, Julian M. Pine, Caroline F. Rowland, Chris R. Young. 2008. The effect of verb semantic class and verb frequency (entrenchment) on children's and adults' graded judgements of argument-structure overgeneralization errors. Cognition 106(1). 87–129. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.12.015.
   Google Scholar
• Ambridge, Ben, Caroline F. Rowland, Anna Theakston & Michael Tomasello. 2006. Comparing different accounts of inversion errors in children’s non-subject wh-questions: “What experimental data can tell us?” Journal of Child Language 33(3). 519–557.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, C. L. 1979. Syntactic theory and the projection problem. Linguistic Inquiry 10(4). 533–581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, Douglas, Martin Mächler, Ben Bolker & Steve Walker. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67(1). 1–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentzen, Kristine, Gunnar H. Hrafnbjargarson, Þorbjörg Hróarsdóttir & Anna-Lena Wiklund. 2007. The Tromsø guide to the force behind V2. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 79. 93–118.
   Google Scholar
• Berwick, Robert. 1985. The acquisition of syntactic knowledge. Cambridge, MA/London: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biberauer, Theresa & Ian Roberts. 2009. The return of the subset principle. In Paola Crisma & Giuseppe Longobardi (eds.), Historical syntax and linguistic theory, 58–74. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biberauer, Theresa & Ian Roberts. 2012. Towards a parameter hierarchy for auxiliaries: Diachronic considerations. Cambridge Occasional Papers in Linguistics 6(9). 267–294.
   Google Scholar
• Blything, Ryan, Ben Ambridge & Elena Lieven. 2014. Children use statistics and semantics in the retreat from overgeneralization. PLoS ONE 9(10). 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowerman, Melissa. 1988. The “no negative evidence” problem: How do children avoid constructing an overly general grammar? In John A. Hawkins (ed.), Explaining language universals, 73–101. Oxford/Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Brandt, Silke, Elena Lieven & Michael Tomasello. 2010. Development of word order in German complement-clause constructions: Effects of input frequencies, lexical items and discourse function. Language 86(3). 583–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandt, Silke, Holger Diessel & Michael Tomasello. 2008. The acquisition of German relative clauses: A case study. Journal of Child Language 35(2). 325–348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clahsen, Harald & Klaus-Dirk Smolka. 1985. Psycholinguistic evidence and the description of V2 phenomena in German. In Hubert Haider & Martin Prinzhorn (eds.), Verb second phenomena in Germanic languages, 137–167. Dordrecht: Foris.
   Google Scholar
• Clahsen, Harald & Martina Penke. 1992. The acquisition of agreement morphology and its syntactic consequences: New evidence on German child language from the Simone-corpus. In Jürgen Meisel (ed.), The acquisition of verb placement: Functional categories and V2 phenomena in language acquisition, 181–224. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, João, Maria Lobo & Carolina Silva. 2011. Subject-object asymmetries in the acquisition of Portuguese relative clauses: Adults vs. children. Lingua 121(6). 1083–1100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crain, Stephen & Rosalind Thornton. 1998. Investigations in universal grammar. A guide to experiments on the acquisition of syntax and semantics. Cambridge, MA/London: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Demuth, Katherine. 2007. The role of frequency in language acquisition. In Insa Gülzow & Natalia Gagarina (eds.), Frequency effects in language acquisition: Defining the limits of frequency as an explanatory concept, 383–388. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Diessel, Holger. 2004. The acquisition of complex sentences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Diessel, Holger & Michael Tomasello. 2000. The development of relative clauses in spontaneous child speech. Cognitive Linguistics 11(1). 131–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diessel, Holger & Michael Tomasello. 2001. The acquisition of finite complement clauses in English: A corpus-based analysis. Cognitive Linguistics 12(2). 97–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudley, Rachel, Naho Orita, Valentine Hacquard & Jeffrey Lidz. 2015. Three-year-olds’ understanding of know and think. In F. Schwarz (ed.), Experimental perspectives on presuppositions, 241–262. Cham, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Faarlund, Jan Terje, Svein Lie & Kjell Ivar Vannebo. 1997. Norsk referansegrammatikk [Norwegian reference grammar]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Foraker, Stephani, Terry Regier, Naveen Khetarpal, Amy Perfors & Joshua Tenenbaum. 2009. Indirect evidence and the poverty of the stimulus: The case of anaphoric one. Cognitive Science 33. 287–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franco, Irene. 2010. Issues in the syntax of Scandinavian embedded clauses. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 86. 137–177.
   Google Scholar
• Gärtner, Hans-Martin. 2001. Are there V2 relative clauses in German? Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 3(2). 97–141.
   Google Scholar
• Gould, Isaac. 2017. Choosing a grammar. Learning paths and ambiguous evidence in the acquisition of syntax. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Gropen, Jess, Steven Pinker, Michelle Hollander, Richard Goldberg & Ronald Wilson. 1989. The learnability and acquisition of the dative alternation in English. Language 65(2). 203–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacquard, Valentine & Jeffrey Lidz. 2018. Children’s attitude problems: Bootstrapping verb meaning from syntax and pragmatics. Mind & Language 34(8). 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Haegeman, Liliane. 2013. Adverbial clauses, main clause phenomena, and composition of the left periphery. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haider, Hubert. 1985. V-second in German. In Hubert Haider & Martin Prinzhorn (eds.), Verb second phenomena in Germanic languages, 137–167. Dordrecht: Foris.
   Google Scholar
• Håkansson, Gisela & Kristina Hansson. 2000. Comprehension and production of relative clauses: A comparison between Swedish impaired and unimpaired children. Journal of Child Language 27(2). 313–333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Håkansson, Gisela & Sheila Dooley Collberg. 1994. The preference for Modal + Neg: An L2 perspective applied to Swedish L1 children. Second Language Research 10(2). 95–124.
   Google Scholar
• Heycock, Caroline. 2006. Embedded root phenomena. In Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Blackwell companion to syntax, vol. II, 174–209. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Heycock, Caroline. 2010. V-to-I and V2 in subordinate clauses: An investigation of Faroese in relation to Icelandic and Danish. Journal of Comparative German Linguistics 13(1). 61–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heycock, Caroline, Antonella Sorace, Zakaris S. Hansen & Frances Wilson. 2013. Acquisition in variation (and vice versa): V-to-T in Faroese children. Language Acquisition 20(1). 5–22.
   Google Scholar
• Holmberg, Anders. 2015. Verb-second. In Tibor Kiss & Artemis Alexiadou (eds.), Syntax – theory and analysis: An international handbook, 342–382. Berlin: de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Holmberg, Anders & Christer Platzack. 1995. The role of inflection in Scandinavian syntax. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huttenlocher, Janellen, Marina Vasilyeva, Elina Cymerman & Susan Levine. 2002. Language input and child syntax. Cognitive Psychology 45(3). 337–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huttenlocher, Janellen, Marina Vasilyeva, Heidi R. Waterfall, Jack L. Vevea & Larry V. Hedges. 2007. The varieties of speech to young children. Developmental Psychology 43(5). 1062–1083.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johannessen, Janne B., Joel Priestly, Kristin Hagen, Tor A. Åfarli & Øystein A. Vangsnes. 2009. The Nordic dialect corpus—An advanced research tool. In Kristiina Jokinen & Eckhard Bick (eds.), Proceedings of the 17th Nordic Conference of Computational Linguistics NODALIDA 2009. NEALT Proceedings Series Volume 4, 73–80. Odense: Northern European Association for Language Technology (NEALT). http://tekstlab.uio.no/nota/scandiasyn/ (2 January and 15 March 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Jordens, Peter. 1988. The acquisition of word order in Dutch and German as L1 and L2. Second Language Research 4(1). 41–65.
   Google Scholar
• Julien, Marit. 2007. Embedded V2 in Norwegian and Swedish. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 80. 103–161.
   Google Scholar
• Julien, Marit. 2010. Embedded clauses with main clause word order in Mainland Scandinavian. Lund University Working Paper. http://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/000475 (15 March 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Julien, Marit. 2015. The force of V2 revisited. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 18. 139–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidd, Evan, Elena Lieven & Michael Tomasello. 2006. Examining the role of lexical frequency in the acquisition and processing of sentential complements. Cognitive Development 21(2). 93–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, Shevaun, Valentine Hacquard & Jeffrey Lidz. 2017. “Think” pragmatically: Children’s interpretation of belief reports. Language Learning and Development 13(4). 357–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieven, Elena. 2010. Input and first language acquisition: Evaluating the role of frequency. Lingua 120(11). 2546–2556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lightfoot, David. 1999. The development of language: Acquisition, change and evolution. Malden, MA/Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lightfoot, David. 2006. How new languages emerge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lind, Marianne, Hanne G. Simonsen, Pernille Hansen, Elisabeth Holm & Bjørn-Helge Mevik. 2015. Norwegian words: A lexical database for clinicians and researchers. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 29(4). 276–290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohndal, Terje, Marit Westergaard & Øystein Vangsnes. 2020. Verb second in Norwegian: Variation and acquisition. In Rebecca Woods & Sam Wolfe (eds.), Rethinking verb second. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mazurkewich, Irene & Lydia White. 1984. The acquisition of the dative alternation: Unlearning overgeneralizations. Cognition 16(3). 261–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novogrodsky, Rama & Naama Friedmann. 2006. The production of relative clauses in syntactic SLI: A window to the nature of the impairment. Advances in Speech-Language Pathology 8(4). 364–375.
   Google Scholar
• Pearl, Lisa & Benjamin Mis. 2016. The role of indirect positive evidence in syntactic acquisition: A look at anaphoric one. Language 92(1). 1–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinker, Steven. 1984. Language learnability and language development. Cambridge, MA/London: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pinker, Steven. 1989. Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure. Cambridge, MA/London: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pozzan, Lucia. 2011. Asking questions in learner English: First and second language acquisition of main and embedded interrogative structures. New York: The City University of New York dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• Pozzan, Lucia & Virginia Valian. 2017. Asking questions in child English: Evidence for early abstract representations. Language Acquisition 24(3). 209–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramscar, Michael, Melody Dye & Stewart M. McCauley. 2013. Error and expectation in language learning: The curious absence of mouses in adult speech. Language 89(4). 760–793.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringstad, Tina Louise. 2019. Distribution and function of embedded V–Neg in Norwegian: A corpus study. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 42(3). 329–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roeper, Thomas. 1999. Universal bilingualism. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 2(3). 169–86.
   Google Scholar
• Roeper, Tom. 2007. What frequency can do and what it can’t. In Insa Gülzow & Natalia Gagarina (eds.), Frequency effects in language acquisition: Defining the limits of frequency as an explanatory concept, 23–47. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Rohde, Douglas & David Plaut. 1999. Language acquisition in the absence of explicit negative evidence: How important is starting small? Cognition 72. 67–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RStudio Team (2016). Rstudio: Integrated development environment, Boston, MA. http://www.rstudio.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Sanfelici, Emanuela, Petra Schulz & Corinna Trabandt. 2017. On German V2 “relative clauses”: Linguistic theory meets acquisition. In Elisa Di Domenico (ed.), Syntactic complexity from a language acquisition perspective, 63–104. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Schönenberger, Manuela. 2001. Embedded V-to-C in child grammar: The acquisition of verb placement in Swiss German. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Shatz, Marilyn, Henry M. Wellman & Sharon Silber. 1983. The acquisition of mental verbs: A systematic investigation of the first reference to mental state. Cognition 14(3). 301–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stromswold, Karin. 1990. Learnability and the acquisition of auxiliaries. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• Tekstlab. 2004. Norsk talespråkskorpus—Oslodelen [Norwegian speech corpus—The Oslo part]. Tekstlaboratoriet, ILN, University of Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Tekstlab. 2009. BigBrother-korpuset [The BigBrother corpus]. Tekstlaboratoriet, ILN, University of Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Tomasello, Michael. 2009. The usage-based theory of language acquisition. In Edith L. Bavin (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of child language, 69–88. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vikner, Sven. 1995. Verb movement and expletive subjects in the Germanic languages. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waldmann, Christian. 2014. The acquisition of Neg-V and V-Neg order in embedded clauses in Swedish: A microparametric approach. Language Acquisition 21(1). 45–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinberg, Amy. 1990. Markedness versus maturation: The case of subject-auxiliary inversion. Language Acquisition 1(2). 165–194.
   Google Scholar
• Westergaard, Marit & Kristine Bentzen. 2007. The (non-)effect of input frequency on the acquisition of word order in Norwegian embedded clauses. In Insa Gülzow & Natalia Gagarina (eds.), Frequency effects in language acquisition: Defining the limits of frequency as an explanatory concept, 271–306. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Westergaard, Marit. 2009a. The acquisition of word order: Micro-cues, information structure, and economy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Westergaard, Marit, Antonella Sorace, Caroline Heycock, & Kristine Bentzen. 2014. Variable verb placement in embedded clauses: Comparing English and Norwegian children and adults. In Carla Contemori & Lena Dal Pozzo (eds.), Inquiries into linguistic theory and language acquisition. Papers offered to Adriana Belletti, 229–238. Siena: CISCL Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wiklund, Anna-Lena, Kristine Bentzen, Gunnar H. Hrafnbjargarson & Þorbjörg Hróarsdóttir. 2009. On the distribution and illocution of V2 in Scandinavian that-clauses. Lingua 119(12). 1914–1938.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Charles. 2002. Knowledge and learning in natural language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Charles. 2016. The price of linguistic productivity: How children learn to break the rules of language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar