Case-based learning in virtual groups – collaborative problem solving activities and learning outcomes in a virtual professional training course

References

• Badke-Schaub, P., & Frankenberger, E. (1999). Analysis of design projects. Design Studies, 20(5), 481–494. doi: 10.1016/S0142-694X(99)00017-4
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, E.G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64(1), 1–35. doi: 10.3102/00346543064001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jong, T., & Ferguson-Hessler, M.G.M. (1996). Types and qualities of knowledge. Educational Psychologist, 31(2), 105–113. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep3102_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillenbourg, P. (1999). Introduction: What do you mean by ‘collaborative learning'?. In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches, (pp. 1–15). Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Dochy, F., Segers, M., Van den Bossche, P., & Gijbels, D. (2003). Effects of problem-based learning: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 13(5), 533–568. doi: 10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00025-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dörner, D. (1989). Die Logik des Misslingens. Strategisches Denken in komplexen Situationen [The logic of failure. Strategic thinking in complex situations], Reinbeck: Rowohlt.
   Google Scholar
• Dörner, D., Kreuzig, H.W., Reither, F., & Stäudel, T. (1983). Lohhausen. Vom Umgang mit Unbestimmtheit und Komplexität [Lohhausen. Dealing with uncertainty and complexity], Bern: Huber.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Mandl, H., & Haake, J. (2007). Scripting computer-supported communication of knowledge. Cognitive, computational, and educational perspectives, NewYork: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F., & Waibel, M.C. (2002). Wenn virtuelle Lerngruppen nicht so funktionieren wie sie eigentlich sollten [When virtual learning groups do not function as they ought to]. In U. Rinn & J. Wedekind (Eds.), Referenzmodelle netzbasierten Lehrens und Lernens. Virtuelle Komponenten der Präsenzlehre [Reference models for net-based teaching and learning. Virtual components of face-to-face teaching] (pp. 35–50). Münster: Waxmann. (Media in Science, Volume
   Google Scholar
• Gijbels, D., Dochy, F., Van den Bossche, P., & Segers, M. (2005). Effects of problem-based learning: A meta analysis from the angle of assessment. Review of Educational Research, 75(1), 27–61. doi: 10.3102/00346543075001027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gräsel, C. (1997). Problemorientiertes Lernen. Strategieanwendung und Gestaltungsmöglichkeiten. [Problem-oriented learning. Strategic application and design possibilities], Göttingen: Hogrefe.
   Google Scholar
• Gräsel, C., Bruhn, J., Mandl, H., & Fischer, F. (1997). Lernen mit Computernetzen aus konstruktivistischer Perspektive [Learning with computer networks under a constructivist perspective]. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 25(1), 4–18.
   Google Scholar
• Grohmann, S. (1997). Die Fallmethode. Theoretische Grundlagen [The case method: Theoretical basics]. In J. Aff & M. Wagner (Eds.), Methodische Bausteine der Wirtschaftsdidaktik [Methodical components of economy didactics], Wien: Manz.
   Google Scholar
• Gruenfeld, D.H., & Hollingshead, A.B. (1993). Sociocognition in work groups: The evolution of group integrative complexity and its relation to task performance. Small Group Research, 24(3), 383–405. doi: 10.1177/1046496493243006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasenbein, M. (2007). Fallorientiertes Lernen in virtuellen Gruppen – Prozessaktivitäten und Prozessergebnisse in einem virtuellen Kurs der betrieblichen Weiterbildung. [Case-based learning in virtual groups – process activities and process outcomes in a virtual professional training course], Berlin: Logos.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, J.R. (1989). The complete problem solver, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Häkkinen, P. (2003). Collaborative learning and networked interaction in distributed learning environments. Journal of Education for Teaching, 29(3), 279–292. doi: 10.1080/0260747032000120178
   Google Scholar
• Heimerl, P., & Loisel, O. (2005). Lernen mit Fallstudien in der Organisations- und Personalentwicklung: Anwendungen, Fälle und Lösungshinweise [Learning with case studies in organizational and human resource development], Wien: Linde.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R.T., & Johnson, D.W. (1996). Cooperation and the use of technology. In D.H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 1017–1044). New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R.T., Johnson, D.W., & Smith, K.A. (1991). Cooperative learning: Increasing college faculty instructional productivity, Washington, DC: George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development. (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 4)
   Google Scholar
• Kapur, M., & Kinzer, Ch. K. (2007). Examining the effect of problem type in a synchronous computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55, 439–459. doi: 10.1007/s11423-007-9045-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., & McGuire, T.W. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39(10), 1123–1134. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.39.10.1123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirschner, P., Sweller, J., & Clark, R.E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopp, B., & Mandl, H. (2009). Blended Learning: Forschungsfragen und Perspektiven [Blended learning: Research Questions and Perspectives]. In L.J. Issing & P. Klimsa (Eds.), Online-Lernen. Handbuch für Wissenschaft und Praxis [Online-Learning. Handbook for Science and Practice] (pp. 139–150). München: Oldenbourg.
   Google Scholar
• Kopp, B., Schnurer, K., & Mandl, H. (2009). Collaborative learning in virtual seminars: Analyzing learning processes and learning outcomes. In G. Stahl & F. Hesse (Eds.), Proceedings of 8th International Conference on Collaborative Learning (CSCL) (151–160). Greece: Athens.
   Google Scholar
• Mabry, E.A., & Attridge, M.D. (1990). Small group interaction and outcome correlates for structured and unstructured tasks. Small Group Research, 21(3), 315–332. doi: 10.1177/1046496490213002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandl, H., Ertl, B., & Kopp, B. (2006). Computer support for collaborative learning environments. In P. Dochy, L. Verschaffel, M. Boekaerts & S. Vosniadou (Eds.), Past, present, and future trends: Sixteen essays in honour of Erik De Corte (pp. 223–237). Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Paechter, M. (2003). Wissenskommunikation, Kooperation und Lernen in virtuellen Gruppen [Knowledge communication, cooperation and learning in virtual groups], Lengerich: Pabst.
   Google Scholar
• Paechter, M., Kreisler, M., & Maier, B. (2010). Supporting collaboration and communication in videoconferences. In B. Ertl (Eds.), E-collaborative knowledge construction – Learning from computer-supported and virtual environments (pp. 195–212). Hershey, NY: IG Global.
   Google Scholar
• Reinmann, G., & Mandl, H. (2006). Unterrichten und Lernumgebungen gestalten [Teaching and designing learning environments]. In A. Krapp & B. Weidenmann (Eds.), Pädagogische Psychologie [Pedagogical Psychology] (pp. 613–658). Weinheim: Beltz.
   Google Scholar
• Resnick, L.B., Salmon, M., Zeitz, C.M., Wathen, S.H., & Holowchak, M. (1993). Reasoning in conversation. Cognition and Instruction, 11(3&4), 347–364. doi: 10.1080/07370008.1993.9649029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slavin, R.E. (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research and practice, Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Stark, R., Gruber, H., Renkl, A., & Mandl, H. (1998). Instructional effects in complex learning: Do objective and subjective learning outcomes converge?. Learning and Instruction, 8(2), 117–129. doi: 10.1016/S0959-4752(97)00005-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stähli, A. (1992). Managementandragogik 1. Harvard Anti Case, London: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
   Google Scholar
• Stempfle, J., & Badke-Schaub, P. (2002). Kommunikation und Problemlösen in Gruppen: Eine Prozessanalyse [Communication and problem solving in groups: A process analyses]. Gruppendynamik und Organisationsberatung, 33(1), 57–81. doi: 10.1007/s11612-002-0006-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinberger, A. (2003). Scripts for computer-supported collaborative learning. Effects of social and epistemic cooperation scripts on collaborative knowledge construction, (Dissertation. Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich). Retrieved fromhttp://edoc.ub.uni-muenchen.de/archive/00001120/01/Weinberger_Armin.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wetzel, J. (1995). Problemlösen in Gruppen: Auswirkungen von psychologischen Trainingsmaßnahmen und Expertenbeteiligung unter kooperativen und kompetitiven Arbeitsbedingungen [Problem solving in groups: Effects of psychological training courses and expert evaluations under collaborative and competitive working conditions], Dissertation. Technical University Carolo-Wilhelmina, Braunschweig
   Google Scholar