The effect of centralization and cohesion on the social construction of knowledge in discussion forums

References

• Arbaugh, J.B., & Hwang, A. (2006). Does ‘teaching presence’ exist in online MBA courses?. The Internet and Higher Education, 9(1), 9–21. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2005.12.001
   Google Scholar
• Arvaja, M., & Häkkinen, J. (2010). Social aspects of collaborative learning. International encyclopedia of education, 685–690.Elsevier
   Google Scholar
• Aviv, R., Zippy, E., Gilad, R., & Geva, A. (2003). Network analysis of knowledge construction in asynchronous learning networks. JALN, 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Barkley, E., Cross, K., & Howell, C (2007). Tecnicas de aprendizaje colaborativo, Madrid: Morata.
   Google Scholar
• S. Borgatti, M. Everett, & L. Freeman (Eds.) (1999). UCINET 5.0 version 1.00, Natick: Analytic Technologies.
   Google Scholar
• Bravo, C., Redondo, M.A., Verdejo, M.F., & Ortega, M (2008). A framework for process-solution analysis in collaborative learning environments. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 66, 812–832. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2008.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bullen, M. (1997). A case study of participation and critical thinking in a university-level course delivered by computer conferencing, (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. Retrieved from https://circle.ubc.ca/handle/2429/6775
   Google Scholar
• Burt, R.S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Laat, M. (2002). Network and content analysis in an online community discourse. In G. Stahl (Eds.), In: Proceedings of Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL) 2002 ConferenceJanuary7–11Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.625–626. Retrieved from http://newmedia.colorado.edu/cscl/62.pdf
   Google Scholar
• De Wever, B., Schellens, T., Valcke, M., & Van Keer, H. (2006). Content analysis schemes to analyze transcripts of online asynchronous discussion groups: A review. Computers & Education, 46, 6–28. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewiyanti, S., Brand-Gruwel, S., Jochems, W., & Broers, N.J. (2007). Students’ experiences with collaborative learning in asynchronous computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(1), 496–514. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2004.10.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahy, P.J. (2003). Indicators of support in online interaction. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 1, 4
   Google Scholar
• Fahy, P.J., Crawford, G., & Ally, M. (2002). Patterns of Interaction in a computer conference transcript. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, July
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, L.C. (1979). Centrality in social networks, conceptual clarification. In R.A.J. Leenders, & S.M. Gabbay (Eds.), Corporate social capital and liability, 215–239.Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D.R. (2007). Online community of inquiry review: Social, cognitive, and teaching presence issues. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(1), 61–72.
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2, 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7–23. doi: 10.1080/08923640109527071
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D.R., & Archer, W. (2003). A community of inquiry framework for online learning. In M. Moore (Eds.), Handbook of distance education, New York, NY: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D.R., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Fung, T. (2004). Student role adjustment in online communities of inquiry: Model and instrument validation. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 8, 61–74. Retrieved from http://sloanconsortium.org/jaln/v8n2/student-role-adjustment-online-communities-inquiry-model-and-instrument-validation
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D.R., Cleveland-Innes, M., Koole, M., & Kappelman, J. (2006). Revisiting methodological issues in the analysis of transcripts: Negotiated coding and reliability. The Internet and Higher Education, 9(1), 1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2005.11.001
   Google Scholar
• Gros, B., & Silva, J. (2006). Metodologías para el análisis de espacios virtuales cola borativos. RED. Revista de Educación a Distancia, 16.
   Google Scholar
• Guerra, S., González, N., & García, R. (2010). Study on the use of ICTs as teaching tools by university instructors. Comunicar, 35, 141–148. doi: 10.3916/C35-2010-03-07
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunawardena, C.N., Carabajal, K., & Lowe, C.A. (2001). Critical analysis of models and methods used to evaluate online learning networks. American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Seattle: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Gunawardena, C., Lowe, C., & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(4), 379–431. doi: 10.2190/7MQV-X9UJ-C7Q3-NRAG
   Google Scholar
• Henri, F. (1992). Computer conferencing and content analysis. In A. Kaye (Eds.), In: Collaborative learning through computer conferencing: The Najaden papersBerlin: Springer-Verlag.117–136.
   Google Scholar
• Heo, H., Lim, K.Y., & Kim, Y. (2010). Exploratory study on the patterns of online interaction and knowledge co-construction in project-based learning. Computers & Education, 55, 1383–1392. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiltz, S.R., & Turoff, M. (2000). What makes learning networks effective?. Communications of the ACM, 45(2), 56–59.
   Google Scholar
• Järvelä, S., & Häkkinen, P. (2002). Web-based cases in teaching and learning: The quality of discussions and a stage of perspective taking in asynchronous communication. Interactive Learning Environments, 10, 1–22. doi: 10.1076/ilee.10.1.1.3613
   Google Scholar
• Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P.A., & Jochems, W. (2003). Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: a review of the research. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(3), 335–353. doi: 10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00057-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P.A., Jochems, W., & van Buuren, H. (2007). Measuring perceived sociability of computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Computers & Education, 49(2), 176–192. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macdonald, J. (2003). Assessing online collaborative learning: process and product. Computers & Education, 40, 377–391. doi: 10.1016/S0360-1315(02)00168-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez, A., Dimitriadis, Y., Rubia, B., Gomez, E., Garrachon, L., & Marcos, J.A. (2002). Studying social aspects of computer-supported collaboration with a mixed evaluation approach. In G. Stahl (Eds.), In: Proceedings of Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL) 2002 ConferenceJanuary7–11Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.631–632.
   Google Scholar
• Neitzel, A.A., & Neitzel, L.C. (2009). Investigating the reading process by means of collaborative environment. Comunicar, 33, 133–140. doi: 10.3916/c33-2009-03-004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nurmela, K., Lehtinen, E., & Palonen, T. (1999). Evaluating CSCL log files by social network analysis. In: Proceedings of the Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL)Palo Alto, CA: Lawrence Erlbaum.434–444.
   Google Scholar
• Lipponen, L., Rahikainen, M., Hakkarainen, K., & Palonen, T. (2002). Effective participation and discourse through a computer network: Investigating elementary students’ computer supported interaction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 27(4), 355–384. doi: 10.2190/MGTW-QG1E-G66E-F3UD
   Google Scholar
• Lockhorst, D., Admiraal, W., Pilot, A., & Veen, W. (2003). Analysis of electronic communication using 5 different perspectives. In: Paper presented at ORD 2003 (in Heerlen)
   Google Scholar
• Pena-Shaff, J.B., & Nicholls, C. (2004). Analyzing student interactions and meaning construction in computer bulletin board discussions. Computers & Education, 42, 243–265. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2003.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reffay, C. (2003). How social network analysis can help to measure cohesion in collaborative distance learning. Support for collaborative learning, [online]. Retrieved from http://edutice.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/00/19/14/PDF/reffay_chanier.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Reffay, C., & Chanier, T. (2002). Social network analysis used for modelling collaboration in distance learning. Intelligent Tutoring System Conference, [online]. Retrieved from lifc.univ-fcomte.fr/RECHERCHE/P7/pub/ITS02/reffayIts.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ridley, C., & Avery, A. (1979). Social network influence on the dyadic relationship. In R. Burgess, & T. Huston (Eds.), Social exchange in developing relationships, 223–246.New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rourke, L., & Anderson, T. (2004). Validity in quantitative content analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(1), 5–18. doi: 10.1007/BF02504769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D.R., & Archer, W. (2001). Methodological issues in analysis of asynchronous, text-based computer conferencing transcripts. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12(1), 8–22.
   Google Scholar
• Rytina, S. (1982). Structural constraints on intergroup contact. In P. Marsden, & N. Lin (Eds.), Social structure and network analysis, 81–100.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Saltz, J.S., Hiltz, S.R., & Turoff, M. (2004). Student social graphs: Visualizing a student's online social network. CSCW'04, 6–10.Chicago, IL
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. (1991). Social network analysis. A handbook, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2009). Community of inquiry as a theoretical framework to foster “epistemic engagement” and “cognitive presence” in online education. Computers & Education, 52(3), 543–553. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veerman, A., & Veldhuis-Diermanse, E. (2001). Collaborative learning through computer-mediated communication in academic education. Euro CSCL 2001, 625–632.Maastricht: McLuhan Institute, University of Maastricht.
   Google Scholar
• Veldhuis-Diermanse, A.E. (2002). CSCLearning? Participation, learning activities and knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning in higher education, Nederland (Unpublished doctoral dissertation) Wageningen Universiteit. Retrieved from http://edepot.wur.nl/121278
   Google Scholar
• Wang, L. (2010). How social network position relates to knowledge building in online learning communities?. Frontiers of Education in China, 5(1), 4–25. doi: 10.1007/s11516-010-0003-4
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., & Li, X. (2007). Social network analysis of interaction in online learning communities. In: Seventh IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning TechnologiesICALT699–700.
   Google Scholar
• Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2005). A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 46(1), 71–95. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, H.-L., & Tang, J.-H. (2004). Team structure and team performance in IS development: A social network perspective. Information & Management, 41(3), 335–349. doi: 10.1016/S0378-7206(03)00078-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, E. (2006). Interaction and cognitive engagement: An analysis of four asynchronous online discussions. Instructional Science, 34, 451–480. doi: 10.1007/s11251-006-0004-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar