Weather observers: a manipulative augmented reality system for weather simulations at home, in the classroom, and at a museum

References

• Allen, S. (2004). Designs for learning: Studying science museum exhibits that do more than entertain. Science Education, 88(S1), 17–33. doi: 10.1002/sce.20016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azuma, R. T. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 6(4), 355–385. doi: 10.1162/pres.1997.6.4.355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, T., Urhahne, D., Schanze, S., & Ploetzner, R. (2009). Collaborative inquiry learning: Models, tools, and challenges. International Journal of Science Education, 32(3), 349–377. doi: 10.1080/09500690802582241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billett, S. (1996). Situated learning: Bridging sociocultural and cognitive theroising. Learning and Instruction, 6(3), 263–280. doi: 10.1016/0959-4752(96)00006-0
   Google Scholar
• Bogen, M., Wind, J., & Giuliano, A. (2006). ARiSE – Augmented reality in school environments. In W. Nejdl & K. Tochtermann (Eds.), Innovative approaches for learning and knowledge sharing (Vol. 4227, pp. 709–714). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. S., Colllns, A., & Duguld, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42. doi: 10.3102/0013189X018001032
   Google Scholar
• Chan, T. W., Roschelle, J., Hsi, S., Kinshuk, S. M., & Brown, T. (2006). One-to-one technology-enhanced learning: An opportunity for global research collaboration. Research and Practice of Technology Enhanced Learning, 1(1), 3–29. doi: 10.1142/S1793206806000032
   Google Scholar
• Chang, C.-S., Chen, T.-S., & Hsu, W.-H. (2011). The study on integrating WebQuest with mobile learning for environmental education. Computers & Education, 57(1), 1228–1239. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.12.005 doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, Y.-J., Chen, C.-H., Huang, W.-T., & Huang, W.-S. (2011, 11–15 July). Investigating students’ perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of English learning using augmented reality. Paper presented at the IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME), Barcelona, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C.-M. (2011). An intelligent mobile location-aware book recommendation system that enhances problem-based learning in libraries. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–27. doi:10.1080/10494820.2011.593525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y.-C. (2006). A study of comparing the use of augmented reality and physical models in chemistry education. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2006 ACM international conference on Virtual reality continuum and its applications, Hong Kong, China.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, K.-H., & Tsai, C.-C. (2012). Affordances of augmented reality in science learning: Suggestions for future research. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 1–14. doi:10.1007/s10956-012-9405-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu, H.-C., Hwang, G.-J., & Tseng, J. C. R. (2010). An innovative approach for developing and employing electronic libraries to support context-aware ubiquitous learning. The Electronic Library, 28(6), 873–890. doi: 10.1108/02640471011093552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coombs, P. H., & Ahmed, M. (1974). Attacking rural poverty: How nonformal education can help. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Di Serio, Á., Ibáñez, M. B., & Kloos, C. D. (2013). Impact of an augmented reality system on students’ motivation for a visual art course. Computers & Education, 68, 586–596. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.002
   Google Scholar
• Donald, J. G. (1991). The measurement of learning in the museum. Canadian Journal of Education, 3(1), 371–382. doi: 10.2307/1494885
   Google Scholar
• Dunleavy, M., & Simmons, B. (2011). Assessing learning and identity in augmented reality science games. In L. Annetta & S. Bronack (Eds.), Serious educational game assessment (pp. 221–240). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• El Sayed, N. A. M., Zayed, H. H., & Sharawy, M. I. (2011). ARSC: Augmented reality student card. Computers & Education, 56(4), 1045–1061. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.019 doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eshach, H. (2007). Bridging in-school and out-of-school learning: Formal, non-formal, and informal education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(2), 171–190. doi: 10.1007/s10956-006-9027-1
   Google Scholar
• Flexer, B. K., & Borun, M. (1984). The impact of a class visit to a participatory science museum exhibit and a classroom science lesson. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21(9), 863–873. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660210902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, H. (1991). The unschooled mind. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gerstner, S., & Bogner, F. X. (2009). Cognitive achievement and motivation in hands-on and teacher-centred science classes: Does an additional hands-on consolidation phase (concept mapping) optimise cognitive learning at work stations? International Journal of Science Education, 32(7), 849–870. doi: 10.1080/09500690902803604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ha, T., Lee, Y., & Woo, W. (2011). Digilog book for temple bell tolling experience based on interactive augmented reality. Virtual Reality, 15(4), 295–309. doi: 10.1007/s10055-010-0164-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hearns, M. K., Miller, B. K., & Nelson, D. L. (2010). Hands-on learning versus learning by demonstration at three recall points in university students. OTJR:Occupation Participation and Health, 30(4), 169–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks, E. C. (1986). Museums and schools as partner. ERIC Digest (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 278380).
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, M.-C., & Lin, H.-C. K. (2006). Interaction design based on augmented reality technologies for English vocabulary learning. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Computers in Education, Putrajaya, Malaysia.
   Google Scholar
• Huynh, D.-N. T., Raveendran, K., Xu, Y., Spreen, K., & MacIntyre, B. (2009). Art of defense: A collaborative handheld augmented reality board game. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2009 ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Video Games, New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, G. J., Wu, P. H., Zhuang, Y. Y., & Huang, Y. M. (2011). Effects of the inquiry-based mobile learning model on the cognitive load and learning achievement of students. Interactive Learning Environments, 21(4), 1–17. doi:10.1080/10494820.2011.575789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irawati, S., Hong, S., Kim, J., & Ko, H. (2008). 3D edutainment environment: learning physics through VR/AR experiences. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology, Yokohama, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Iwata, T., Yamabe, T., & Nakajima, T. (2011, 28–31 August). Augmented reality go: Extending traditional game play with interactive self-learning support. Paper presented at the 17th IEEE International Conference on Embedded and Real-Time Computing Systems and Applications (RTCSA), Toyama, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Kaagan, S. S. (1999). Leadership games: Experiential learning for organizational development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Klopfer, E., & Squire, K. (2008). Environmental detectives – The development of an augmented reality platform for environmental simulations. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(2), 203–228. doi: 10.1007/s11423-007-9037-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koran, J. J., Morrison, L., Lehman, J. R., Koran, M. L., & Gandara, L. (1984). Attention and curiosity in museums. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21(4), 357–363. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660210403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lally, V., Sharples, M., Tracy, F., Bertram, N., & Masters, S. (2012). Researching the ethical dimensions of mobile, ubiquitous and immersive technology enhanced learning (MUITEL): A thematic review and dialogue. Interactive Learning Environments, 20(3), 217–238. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2011.607829
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li-Der, C., Ching-Chao, L., Ming-Yu, L., & Chun-Yen, C. (2004, 23–25 March). A tour guide system for mobile learning in museums. Paper presented at the proceedings of the 2nd IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education, Taiwan.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, H.-T., & Lan, L. W. (2012). An exhibition guiding system with enhanced interactive functions. The Electronic Library, 30(1), 120–133. doi: 10.1108/02640471211204105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, C., Huot, S., Diehl, J., Mackay, W., & Beaudouin-Lafon, M. (2012). Evaluating the benefits of real-time feedback in mobile augmented reality with hand-held devices. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2012 ACM annual conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Austin, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, T.-Y., Tan, T.-H., & Chu, Y.-L. (2007, 11–13 July). 2D Barcode and augmented reality supported English learning system. Paper presented at the 6th IEEE/ACIS International Conference on Computer and Information Science, ICIS 2007, Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Looi, C. K., Wong, L. H., So, H. J., Seow, P., Toh, Y., & Chen, W. (2009). Anatomy of a mobilized lesson: Learning my way. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1120–1132. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.05.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mocker, D. W., & Spear, G. E. (1982). Lifelong learning: Formal, nonformal, informal, and self-directed. Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse on Adult, Career, and Vocational Education.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, L. C. (1997). From knowledge to narrative: Educators and the changing museum. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Sandifer, C. (2003). Technological novelty and open-endedness: Two characteristics of interactive exhibits that contribute to the holding of visitor attention in a science museum. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(2), 121–137. doi: 10.1002/tea.10068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schell, J. W., & Black, R. S. (1997). Situated learning: An inductive case study of a collaborative learning experience. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 34(4), 5–28.
   Google Scholar
• Sharples, M., Lonsdale, P., Meek, J., Rudman, P., & Vavoula, G. N. (2007). An evaluation of MyArtSpace: A mobile learning service for school museum trips. Paper presented at the Proceedings of 6th Annual Conference on Mobile Learning, mLearn 2007, Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Sheppard, B. (1993). Building museum and school partnership. Harrisburg: Pennsylvania Federation of Museums and Historical Organizations.
   Google Scholar
• Sumadio, D. D., & Rambli, D. R. A. (2010, 19–21 March). Preliminary evaluation on user acceptance of the augmented reality use for education. Paper presented at the Second International Conference on Computer Engineering and Applications (ICCEA), Bali Island, Indonesia.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, H.-K., Lee, S. W.-Y., Chang, H.-Y., & Liang, J.-C. (2013). Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. Computers & Education, 62(0), 41–49. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.024
   Google Scholar
• Xanthoudaki, M. (1998). Is it always worth the trip? The contribution of museum and gallery educational programmes to classroom art education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 28(2), 181–195. doi: 10.1080/0305764980280204
   Google Scholar
• Young, M. F. (1993). Instructional design for situated learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 41(1), 43–58. doi: 10.1007/BF02297091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar