A blended model: simultaneously teaching a quantitative course traditionally, online, and remotely

References

• Affouf, M., & Walsh, T. P. (2007). An assessment of web-based homework in the teaching of college Algebra. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 14(4), 163–167.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, E., & Seaman, J. (2013). Changing course: Ten years of tracking online education in the United States. 2012 Babson survey of online learning. Retrieved June 9, 2013, from http://sloanconsortium.org/publications/survey/changing_course_2012
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, G., & Green, F. P. (2001). Student learning in the online environment: No significant difference? Quest, 53(1), 1–13. doi: 10.1080/00336297.2001.10491727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou, Y., & Chou, D. C. (2011). Course management systems and blended learning: An innovative learning approach. Decision Science Journal of Innovative Education, 9(3), 463–84. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4609.2011.00325.x
   Google Scholar
• Dereshiwsky, M. I. (1998). “Go Figure”: The surprising successes of teaching statistics courses via the Internet. Retrieved March 10, 2012, from http://leahi.kcc.hawaii.edu/org/tcon98/paper/dereshiwsky.html
   Google Scholar
• Dotterweich, D. P., & Rochelle, C. F. (2012). Online, ITV, and traditional delivery: Student characteristics and success factors in business statistics. American Journal of Business Education, 5(2), 129–138 doi: 10.1108/18363261211281744
   Google Scholar
• Du, C. (2011). A comparison of traditional and blended learning in introductory principles of accounting course. American Journal of Business Education, 4(9), 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, T. M., & Jonassen, D. H. (1991). Constructivism: New implications for instructional technology? Educational Technology, 31(5), 7–12.
   Google Scholar
• Farinella, J. (2007). Professor and student performance in online versus traditional introductory finance courses. Journal of Economics and Finance Education, 6(1), 40–47.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, J., & Tryjankowski, A. (2009). Online versus face-to-face learning: Looking at modes of instruction in master's-level courses. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 33(3), 219–228. doi: 10.1080/03098770903026149
   Google Scholar
• Grandzol, J. R. (2004). Teaching MBA statistics online: A pedagogically sound process approach. Journal of Education for Business, 79(4), 237–244. doi: 10.3200/JOEB.79.4.237-244
   Google Scholar
• Horvath, V. E., & Mills, C. S. (2011). The challenges for faculty using interactive television in distance education. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 29(1), 33–48. doi: 10.1080/15228835.2011.568678
   Google Scholar
• McCabe, M. (2007). Assessment, blending and creativity: The ABCs of technology in mathematics teaching. The International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 14(1), 54–59.
   Google Scholar
• McLaren, C. H. (2004). A comparison of student persistence and performance in online and classroom business statistics experiences. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 2(1), 1–10. doi: 10.1111/j.0011-7315.2004.00015.x
   Google Scholar
• Ocak, M. A. (2011). Why are faculty members not teaching blended courses? Insights from faculty members. Computers and Education, 56(3), 689–699. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pask, G. (1975). Conversation, cognition, and learning. New York, NY: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, C. R., & Freiberg, H. J. (1994). Freedom to learn (3rd ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill/Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Rovai, A. (2002). Building sense of community at a distance. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 3(1), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Scherrer, C. R. (2011). Comparison of an intro stats course taught traditional, hybrid, and online delivery. Informs Transactions on Education, 11(3), 106–110. doi: 10.1287/ited.1110.0063
   Google Scholar
• Sitter, V., Carter, C., Mahan, R., Massello, C., & Carter, T. (2009). Hybrid course design: Faculty and student perceptions. Proceedings of the 2009 ASCUE Summer Conference, N. Myrtle Beach, SC, pp. 40–51.
   Google Scholar
• Sprague, D., Maddux, C., Ferdig, R., & Albion, P. (2007). Editorial: Online education: Issues and research questions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 15(2), 157–166.
   Google Scholar
• Strang, K. D. (2012). Skype synchronous interaction effectiveness in a quantitative management science course. Decision Science Journal of Innovative Education, 10(1), 3–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4609.2011.00333.x
   Google Scholar
• Summers, J., Waigandt, A., & Whittaker, T. A. (2005). A comparison of student achievement and satisfaction in an online versus a traditional face-to-face statistics class. Innovations Higher Education, 29(3), 233–250. doi: 10.1007/s10755-005-1938-x
   Google Scholar
• Tallman, J., & Fitzgerald, M. (2005). Blending online and classroom learning environments: Reflections on experiences and points to consider. Knowledge Quest, 34(1), 25–28.
   Google Scholar
• Utts, J., Sommer, B., Acredolo, C., Maher, M. W., & Matthews, H. R. (2003). A study comparing traditional and hybrid internet-based instruction in introductory statistics classes. Journal of Statistics Education, 11(3). Retrieved from http://www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v11n3/utts.html
   Google Scholar
• Ward, B. (2004). The best of both worlds: A hybrid statistics course. Journal of Statistics Education, 12(3). Retrieved February 15, 2012, from www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v12n3/ward.html
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, D., & Allen, D. (2011). Success rates of online versus traditional college students. Research in Higher Education Journal, 14, 4–12.
   Google Scholar
• Wise, A. F., Padmanabhana, P., & Duffy, T. M. (2009). Connecting online learners with diverse local practices: The design of effective common reference points for conversation. Distance Education Journal, 30(3), 317–338. doi: 10.1080/01587910903236320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, D., & Jaggars, S. (2013). Adaptability to online learning: Differences across types of students and academic subject areas. Community College Research Center. Retrieved June 9, 2013, from http://ucaft.org/webfm_send/316
   Google Scholar