Courseware development with animated pedagogical agents in learning system to improve learning motivation

References

• Arafa, Y., & Mamdani, A. (2003). Scripting embodied agents behaviour with CML: Character markup language. Proceedings of the 8th international conference on intelligent user interfaces (pp. 313–316). Miami, FL: ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, R. K. (2002). Optimizing learning from examples using animated pedagogical agents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 416–427. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, R. K., Mayer, R. E., & Merrill, M. M. (2005). Fostering social agency in multimedia learning: Examining the impact of an animated agent's voice. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 117–139. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, D. C., Butler, L. T., & Rosis, F. de. (2005). Evaluating a realistic agent in an advice-giving task. International Journal of Human – Computer Studies, 63(3), 304–327. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolliger, D. U., Supanakorn, S., & Boggs, C. (2010). Impact of podcasting on student motivation in the online learning environment. Computers & Education, 55(2), 714–722. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bongalos, Y. Q., Bulaon, D. D. R., Celedonio, L. P., Guzman, A. B. D., & Ogarte, C. J. F. (2006). University teachers’ experiences in courseware development. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37, 695–704. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00589.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brutzman, D., Zyda, M., Pullen, M., Morse, K., & Tolk, A. (2002). Extensible modeling and simulation framework (xmsf) framework opportunities. Proceedings of the interservice/industry training, education, and simulation conference, Orlando, FL, USA. Retrieved from http://www.movesinstitute.org/xmsf/IITSEC2002/XmsfOverviewIITSEC2002.ppt
   Google Scholar
• Chin, K. Y., Chen, Y. L., Chen, J. S., Hong, Z. W., & Lin, J. M. (2011). Exploring the efficiency of multimedia with an animated agent in web-based learning systems. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, E94-D(4), 754–762. doi: 10.1587/transinf.E94.D.754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, D. A., Beckman, T. J., Thomas, K. G., & Thompson, W. G. (2009). Measuring motivational characteristics of courses: Applying Keller's instructional materials motivation survey to a web-based course. Academic Medicine, 84(11), 1505–1509. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181baf56d
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, S. D., Gholson, B., & Driscoll, D. M. (2002). Animated pedagogical agents in multimedia educational environments: Effects of agent properties, picture features and redundancy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 428–434. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunsworth, Q., & Atkinson, R. K. (2007). Fostering multimedia learning of science: Exploring the role of an animated agent's image. Computers & Education, 49, 677–690. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.11.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, R. C. (2007). Motivation and second language acquisition. porta linguarum, 8, 9–20.
   Google Scholar
• Green, M. & Sulbaran, T. (2006). Motivation assessment instrument for virtual reality scheduling simulator. Proceedings of conference e-Learning in corporate, government, healthcare, and higher education (pp. 45–50), Honolulu, HI, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Gulz, A. (2004). Benefits of virtual characters in computer based learning environments: Claims and evidence. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 14, 313–334.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, Z. W., Chuang, C. H., Wu, C. H., Chin, K. Y., Lin, J. M., & Chen, Y. L. (2011). Scripting animated conversational agents in an Internet multi-agent advertising system. Journal of Convergence Information Technology, 6(2), 293–305. doi: 10.4156/jcit.vol6.issue2.30
   Google Scholar
• Huang, D. W., Diefes-Dux, H., Imbrie, P. K., Daku, B., & Kallimani, J. G. (2004). Learning motivation evaluation for a computer-based instructional tutorial using ARCS model of motivational design. Proceedings of 34th annual on frontiers in education (FIE 2004), 1, T1E-30–6, Savannah, GA.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, W., Diefes-Dux, H., & Imbrie, P. K. (2006). A preliminary validation of attention, relevance, confidence and satisfaction model based instructional material motivational survey in a computer-based tutorial setting. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(2), 243–259. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00582.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, W. H., Huang, W. Y., & Tschopp, J. (2010). Sustaining iterative game playing processes in DGBL: The relationship between motivational processing and outcome processing. Computers & Education, 55(2), 789–797. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.03.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, S. Y., & Kim, M. J. (2006). A comparison of problem-based learning and lecture-based learning in an adult health nursing course. Nurse Education Today, 26(4), 315–321. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2005.11.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, W. L. Rickel, J. W., & Lester, J. C. (2000). Animated pedagogical agents: Face-to-face interaction in interactive learning environments. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 11, 47–78.
   Google Scholar
• Kablan, Z., & Erden, M. (2008). Instructional efficiency of integrated and separated text with animated presentations in computer-based science instruction. Computers & Education, 51, 660–668. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2007.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, J. M. (1987). Development and use of the ARCS model of motivational design. Journal of Instructional Development, 10(3), 2–10. doi: 10.1007/BF02905780
   Google Scholar
• Keller, J. M. (2008). First principles of motivation to learn and e3-learning. Distance Education, 29(2), 175–185. doi: 10.1080/01587910802154970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, J. M., & Suzuki, K. (2004). Learner motivation and e-learning design: A multinationally validated process. Journal of Educational Media, 29(3), 229–239. doi: 10.1080/1358165042000283084
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., & Baylor, A. L. (2006). A social-cognitive framework for pedagogical agents as learning companions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 54(6), 569–596. doi: 10.1007/s11423-006-0637-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., Baylor, A. L., & Group, P. (2006). Pedagogical agents as learning companions: The role of agent competency and type of interaction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 54(3), 223–243. doi: 10.1007/s11423-006-8805-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lester, J. C., & Stone, B. A. (1997). Increasing believability in animated pedagogical agents. Proceedings of the first international conference on autonomous agents (pp. 16–21). ACM Press, Marina del Rey, CA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2005). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2000). A learner-centered approach to multimedia explanations: Deriving instructional design principles from cognitive theory. Interactive Multimedia Electronic Journal of Computer Enhanced Learning, 2(2), 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno, R., Mayer, R. E., Spires, H. A., & Lester, J. C. (2001). The case for social agency in computer-based teaching: Do students learn more deeply when they interact with animated pedagogical agents? Cognition and Instruction, 19(2), 177–213. doi: 10.1207/S1532690XCI1902_02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno, R., Reislein, M., & Ozogul, G. (2010). Using virtual peers to guide visual attention during learning. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications, 22(2), 52–60. doi: 10.1027/1864-1105/a000008
   Google Scholar
• Moundridou, M., & Virvou, M. (2002). Evaluating the persona effect of an interface agent in a tutoring system. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18, 253–261. doi: 10.1046/j.0266-4909.2001.00237.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prendinger, H., Descamps, S., & Ishizuka, M. (2004). MPML: A markup language for controlling the behavior of life-like characters. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 15(2), 183–203. doi: 10.1016/j.jvlc.2004.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodgers, D. L., & Withrow-Thorton, B. J. (2005). The effect of instructional media on learner motivation. International Journal of Instructional Media, 32(4), 333–342.
   Google Scholar
• Schiaffino, S., Garcia, P., & Amandi, A. (2008). Eteacher: Providing personalized assistance to e-learning students. Computers & Education, 51, 1744–1754. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shneiderman, B. (1998). Designing the user interface: Strategies for effective human-computer interaction (3rd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, ISBN 0–201–16505–8.
   Google Scholar
• Sims, E. M. (2007). Reusable, lifelike virtual humans for mentoring and role-playing. Computers & Education, 49, 75–92. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, S.-C. (2009). Courseware development for semiconductor technology and its application into instruction. Interacting with Computers, 11, 499–516.
   Google Scholar
• Tsou, W., Wang, W., & Li, H.-Y. (2002). How computers facilitate English foreign language learners acquire English abstract words. Computers & Education, 39(4), 415–428. doi: 10.1016/S0360-1315(02)00078-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., Blais, M. R., Briere, N. M., Senecal, C., & Vallieres, E. F. (1992). The academic motivation scale: A measure of intrinsic, extrinsic, and motivation in education. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 1003–1017. doi: 10.1177/0013164492052004025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Mulken, S., André, E., & Müller, J. (1998). The persona effect: How substantial is it? Proceedings of HCI on people and computers XIII (pp. 56–66). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Veletsianos, G., Heller, R., Overmyer, S., & Procter, M. (2010). Conversational agents in virtual worlds: Bridging disciplines. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41, 123–140. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01027.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virvou, M., & Alepis, E. (2005). Mobile educational features in authoring tools for personalized tutoring. Computers & Education, 44, 53–68. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2003.12.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, J. H., Sproull, L., & Subramani, R. (1994). Using a human face in an interface. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar