Toward effective group formation in computer-supported collaborative learning

References

• Abedin, B., Daneshgar, F., & D'Ambra, J. (2012). Pattern of non-task interactions in asynchronous computer-supported collaborative learning courses. Interactive Learning Environments. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/10494820.2011.641676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ani, Z. C., Yasin, A., Husin, M. Z., & Hamid, Z. A. (2010). A method for group formation using genetic algorithm. International Journal on Computer Science and Engineering, 2(9), 3060–3064.
   Google Scholar
• Bacon, D. R., Stewart, K. A., & Anderson, E. S. (2001). Methods of assigning players to teams: A review and novel approach. Simulation & Gaming, 32(1), 6–17. doi: 10.1177/104687810103200102
   Google Scholar
• Bacon, D. R., Stewart, K. A., & Silver, W. S. (1999). Lessons from the best and worst student team experiences: How a teacher can make a difference. Journal of Management Education, 23(5), 467–488. doi: 10.1177/105256299902300503
   Google Scholar
• Bekele, R. (2005o, October). Computer-assisted learner group formation based on personality traits (PhD dissertation). Hamburg University, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Bruffee, K. A. (1984). Collaborative learning and the conversation of mankind. College English, 46(7), 635–652. doi: 10.2307/376924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C. (2008o, August). The effectiveness of computer supported collaborative learning on helping tasks in a mathematics course (PhD dissertation). University of Southern California.
   Google Scholar
• Chu, S. K. W., & Kennedy, D. M. (2011). Using online collaborative tools for groups to co-construct knowledge. Online Information Review, 35(4), 581–597. doi: 10.1108/14684521111161945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cocea, M., & Magoulas, G. D. (2010). Group formation for collaboration in exploratory learning using group technology techniques. In R. Setchi, I. Jordanov, R. J. Howlett, & L. C. Jain (Eds.), Proceedings of the 14th international conference on knowledge-based and intelligent information and engineering systems, lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 6277, pp. 103–113). Cardiff: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Deibel, K. (2005). Team formation methods for increasing interaction during in-class group work. Proceedings of the 10th annual SIGCSE conference on innovation and technology in computer science education (pp. 291–295), Caparica, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning? In R. Setchi, I. Jordanov, R. J. Howlett, & L. C. Jain (Eds.), Collaborative learning: Cognitive approaches (pp. 1–19). Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In P. A. Kirschner (Ed.), Three worlds of CSCL: Can we support CSCL? (pp. 61–91). Heerlen: Open University Nederland.
   Google Scholar
• Dumitrescu, I., & Stutzle T. (2010). Usage of exact algorithms to enhance stochastic local search algorithms. In V. Maniezzo, T. Stutzle, & S. Voß, (Eds.), Matheuristics, annals of information systems (Vol. 10, pp. 103–134). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Francescato, D., Porcelli, R., Mebane, M., Cuddetta, M., & Renzi, P. (2006). Evaluation of the efficacy of collaborative learning in face-to-face and computer-supported university contexts. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(2), 163–176. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2005.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gogoulou, A., Gouli, E., Boas, G., Liakou, E., & Grigoriadou, M. (2007). Forming homogeneous, heterogeneous and mixed groups of learners. Proceeding of workshop on personalization in learning environments at individual and group level in conjunction with the 11th international conference on user modeling (pp. 33–40), Corfu, Greece.
   Google Scholar
• Gokhale, A. (1995). Collaborative learning enhances critical thinking. Journal of Technology Education, 7(1), 22–30.
   Google Scholar
• Graf, S., & Bekele, R. (2006). Forming heterogeneous groups for intelligent collaborative learning systems with ant colony optimization. In M. Ikeda, K. D. Ashley, & T.-W. Chan (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th international conference on intelligent tutoring systems: Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 4053, pp. 217–226). Jhongli, Taiwan: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Harasim, L. M. (1993). Collaborating in cyberspace using computer conferences as a group learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 3(2), 119–130. doi: 10.1080/1049482930030202
   Google Scholar
• Holubec, E. J., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1995). Cooperative learning in reading and language arts. In M. Rabinowitz, P. Antonacci, & C. N. Hedley (Eds.), Thinking and literacy: The mind at work (pp. 229–240). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Hubscher, R. (2010). Assigning students to groups using general and context-specific criteria. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 3(3), 178–189. doi: 10.1109/TLT.2010.17
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBM ILOG CPLEX Optimization Studio v12.4 (2011). Retrieved from http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21573683
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, S. E., May, K. E., & Whitney, K. (1995). Understanding the dynamics of diversity in decision-making teams. In R. A. Guzzo & E. Sa1las (Eds.), Team decision-making effectiveness in organizations (pp. 204–261). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Jin, D., Qinghua, Z., Jiao, D., & Zhiyong, G. (2006). A method for learner grouping based on personality clustering. Proceedings of the 10th international conference on computer supported cooperative work in design (pp. 1–6), Nanjing.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1994). An overview of cooperative learning. In J. S. Thousand, R. A. Villa, & A. I. Nevin (Eds.), Creativity and collaborative learning: A practical guide to empowering students and teachers (pp. 31–44). Baltimore, MD: Brookes Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Making cooperative learning work. Theory into Practice, 38(2), 67–73. doi: 10.1080/00405849909543834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapur, M., Voiklis, J., & Kinzer, C. K. (2008). Sensitivities to early exchange in synchronous computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) groups. Computers & Education, 51(1), 54–66. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2007.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, Y. T., Huang, Y. H., & Cheng, S. C. (2010). An automatic group composition system for composing collaborative learning groups using enhanced particle swarm optimization. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1483–1493. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipponen, L., Hakkarainen, K., & Paavola, S. (2004). Practices and orientations of CSCL. In J. W. Strijbos, P. A. Kirschner, & R. L. Martens (Eds.), What we know about CSCL: And implementing it in higher education (pp. 31–50). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Lou, Y. (2004). Understanding process and affective factors in small group versus individual learning with technology. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 31(4), 337–369. doi: 10.2190/XF5A-T29G-X170-7950
   Google Scholar
• Lou, Y., Abrami, P. C., & d'Apollonia, S. (2001). Small group and individual learning with technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71(3), 449–521. doi: 10.3102/00346543071003449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnisalis, I., Demetriadis, S., & Karakostas, A. (2011). Adaptive and intelligent systems for collaborative learning support: A review of the field. IEEE Transaction on Learning Technologies, 4(1), 5–20. doi: 10.1109/TLT.2011.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, E., & Paredes, P. (2004). Using learning styles for dynamic group formation in adaptive collaborative hypermedia systems. In M. Matera & S. Comai (Eds.), Proceedings of the first international workshop on adaptive hypermedia and collaborative web-based systems (pp. 188–197). Munich, Germany: Rinton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mello, J. A. (1993). Improving individual member accountability in small work group settings. Journal of Management Education, 17(2), 253–259. doi: 10.1177/105256299301700210
   Google Scholar
• Michaelsen, L. K., Knight, A. B., & Fink, L. D. (2004). Team-based learning: A transformative use of small groups in college teaching. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno, J., Ovalle, D. A., & Vicari, R. M. (2012). A genetic algorithm approach for group formation in collaborative learning considering multiple student characteristics. Computers & Education, 58(1), 560–569. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.09.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijstad, B. A., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2002). Creativity and group innovation. Applied Psychology, 51(3), 400–406. doi: 10.1111/1464-0597.00984
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakley, B., Felder, R. M., Brent, R., & Elhajj, I. (2004). Turning student groups into effective teams. Journal of Student Centered Learning, 2(1), 8–33.
   Google Scholar
• O'Malley, C., & Scanlon, E. (1990). Computer-supported collaborative learning: Problem solving and distance education. Computers & Education, 15(1–3), 127–136. doi: 10.1016/0360-1315(90)90138-W
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ounnas, A. (2010, November). Enhancing the automation of forming groups for education with semantics (PhD dissertation). University of Southampton.
   Google Scholar
• Ounnas, A., Davis, H., & Millard, D. (2009). A framework for semantic group formation in education. Educational Technology and Society, 12(4), 43–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxford, R. L. (1997). Cooperative learning, collaborative learning, and interaction: Three communicative strands in the language classroom. Modern Language Journal, 81(4), 443–456. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1997.tb05510.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollalis, Y. A., & Mavrommatis, G. (2009). Using similarity measures for collaborating groups formation: A model for distance learning environments. European Journal of Operational Research, 193(2), 626–636. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2007.11.053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prichard, J., Stratford, R., & Bizo, L. (2006). Team-skills training enhances collaborative learning. Learning and Instruction, 16(3), 256–265. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resta, P., & Laferrière, T. (2007). Technology in support of collaborative learning. Educational Psychology Review, 19(1), 65–83. doi: 10.1007/s10648-007-9042-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rysavy, S. D. M., & Sales, G. C. (1989). Cooperative learning in computer-based instruction. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 39(2), 70–79. doi: 10.1007/BF02298155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saleh, I., & Kim, S. (2009). A fuzzy system for evaluating students’ learning achievement. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(3), 3243–6236. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2008.07.088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salomon, G., & Globerson, T. (1989). When teams do not function the way they ought to. International Journal of Educational Research, 13(1), 89–99. doi: 10.1016/0883-0355(89)90018-9
   Google Scholar
• Shu, W., & Chuang, Y. H. (2012). Wikis as an effective group writing tool: A study in Taiwan. Online Information Review, 36(1), 89–103. doi: 10.1108/14684521211206980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. E. (1987). Developmental and motivational perspectives on cooperative learning: A reconciliation. Child Development, 58(5), 1161–1167. doi: 10.2307/1130612
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soh, L. K., Khandaker, N., & Jiang, H. (2006). Multiagent coalition formation for computer-supported cooperative learning. Proceedings of the 5th international joint conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems (pp. 1844–1851). New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Solimeno, A., Mebane, M. E., Tomai, M., & Francescato, D. (2008). The influence of students and teachers characteristics on the efficacy of face-to-face and computer supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 51(1), 109–128. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2007.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, G. L. (2006). A meta-analytic review of relationships between team design features and team performance. Journal of Management, 32(1), 29–55. doi: 10.1177/0149206305277792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strong, J. T., & Anderson, R. E. (1990). Free-riding in group projects: Control mechanisms and preliminary data. Journal of Marketing Education, 12(2), 61–67. doi: 10.1177/027347539001200208
   Google Scholar
• Tanimoto, S. L. (2007). The squeaky wheel algorithm: Automatic grouping of students for collaborative projects. Proceeding of workshop on personalization in learning environments at individual and group level in conjunction with the 11th international conference on user modeling (pp. 79–80).
   Google Scholar
• Timmers, S., Valcke, M., De Mil, K., & Baeyens, W. R. G. (2008). The impact of computer supported collaborative learning on internship outcomes of pharmacy students. Interactive Learning Environments, 16(2), 131–141. doi: 10.1080/10494820701288675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolmie, A. K., Topping, K. J., Christie, D., Donaldson, C., Howe, C., Jessiman, E., Livingstong, K., & Thurstonh, A. (2010). Social effects of collaborative learning in primary schools. Learning and Instruction, 20(3), 177–191. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, D. Y., Lin, S. S. J., & Sun, C. T. (2007). Diana: A computer supported heterogeneous grouping system for teachers to conduct successful small learning groups. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(4), 1997–2010. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2006.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter, M. (2004). Developing a group model for student software engineering teams (Master's thesis). University of Saskatchewan, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, S. J. H. (2006). Context aware ubiquitous learning environments for peer-to-peer collaborative learning. Educational Technology & Society, 9(1), 188–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, S. J. H., Zhang, J., Su, A. Y. S., & Tsai, J. J. P. (2011). A collaborative multimedia annotation tool for enhancing knowledge sharing in CSCL. Interactive Learning Environments, 19(1), 45–62. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2011.528881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yannibelli, V., & Amandi, A. (2012). A deterministic crowding evolutionary algorithm to form learning teams in a collaborative learning context. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(10), 8584–8592. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.01.195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakrzewska, D. (2009). Cluster analysis in personalized e-learning systems. In N. T. Nguyen & E. Szczerbicki (Eds.), Intelligent systems for knowledge management, studies in computational intelligence  (Vol. 252, pp. 229–250). Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, K., Cui, L., Wang, H., & Sui, Q. (2007). An improvement of matrix-based clustering method for grouping learners in e-learning. Proceedings of the 11th international conference on computer supported cooperative work in design (pp. 1010–1015), Melbourne, Australia.
   Google Scholar