Integrating a moral reasoning game in a blended learning setting: effects on students' interest and performance

References

• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, D. J., Everly, G. S. Jr., Parker, C. L., & Links, J. M. (2005). Applying educational gaming to public health workforce emergency preparedness. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28(4), 490–495. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeksma, J., vander Hulst, A., & Maes, T. (2005). Games, meer dan spelen: ICT verkenningen voor het onderwijs. Zoetermeer: Stichting Kennisnet.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A. S., Brown, C. M., Mosbacher, J. L., & Dryden, W. E. (2006). Proactive and retroactive effects of narrative suggestion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 32(6), 1234–1243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burguillo, J. C. (2010). Using game theory and competition-based learning to stimulate student motivation and performance. Computer & Education, 55(2), 566–575. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, A., Darst, P., & Pangrazi, R. (2001). An examination of situational interest and its sources. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(3), 383–400. doi: 10.1348/000709901158578
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clayton Christensen Institute. (2012). Blended learning model definitions. Retrieved from http://www.christenseninstitute.org/blended-learning-model-definitions/\
   Google Scholar
• Colby, A., & Kohlberg, L. (1987). The measurement of moral judgment: Theoretical foundations and research validation (vol. 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenberg, N., & Mussen, P. H. (1989). The roots of prosocial behavior in children. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. doi: 10.2307/3151312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, J. C. (1979). Kohlberg's moral stage theory. A Piagetian revision. Human Development, 22(2), 89–112. doi: 10.1159/000272431
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, J. C. (2003). Moral development and reality: Beyond the theories of Kohlberg and Hoffman. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Gulc, E. (2006). Using blended learning to accommodate different learning styles. Retrieved from http://escalate.ac.uk/downloads/2917.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2009). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Halverson, L. R., Graham, C. R., Spring, K. J., Drysdale, J. S., Henrie, C. R. (2014). A thematic analysis of the most highly cited scholarship in the first decade of blended learning research. The Internet and Higher Education, 20, 20–34. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidi, S. (1990). Interest and its contribution as a mental resource for learning. Review of Educational Research, 60(4), 549–571. doi: 10.3102/00346543060004549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidi, S., & Renninger, A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, J. C., Hwang, M.Y., Liu, M. C., Ho, H. Y., & Chen, Y. L. (2014). Using a prediction-observation-explanation inquiry model to enhance student interest and intention to continue science learning predicted by their internet cognitive failure. Computers & Education, 72, 110–120. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirriemuir, J., & McFarlane, C. A. (2004). Literature review in games and learning. Bristol: Future lab. Retrieved from www.futurelab.org.uk/resources/documents/lit_reviews/Games_Review.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kohlberg, L. (1958). The development of modes of thinking and choice in years 10 to 16 (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In D. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research (pp. 347–480). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
   Google Scholar
• Kohlberg, L. (1984). The psychology of moral development: The nature and validity of moral stages. Essays on moral development (vol. 2). San Francisco: Harper & Row Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Krapp, A., Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (1992). Interest learning and development. In K. A. Renninger, K. A. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 1–26). Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
   Google Scholar
• Langdon, P. E., Clare, I. C. H., & Murphy, G. H. (2010). Developing an understanding of the literature relating to the moral development of people with intellectual disabilities. Developmental Review, 30(3), 273–293. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2010.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langdon, P. E., Murphy, G. H., Clare, I. C. H., & Palmer, E. J. (2010). The psychometric properties of the socio-moral reflection measure – short form and the moral theme inventory for men with and without intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 31(6), 1204–1215. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2010.07.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littlejohn, A., & Pegler, C. (2007). Preparing for blended E-learning: Understanding blended and online learning (connecting with E-learning). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Markham, K. M., Mintzes, J. J., & Jones, G. M. (1994). The concept map as a research and evaluation tool: Further evidence of validity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(1), 91–101. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660310109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayadas, F. A., & Picciano, A. G. (2007). Blended learning and localness: The means and the end. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(1), 3–7.
   Google Scholar
• McKenzie, W. A., Perini, E., Rohlf, V., Toukhsati, S., Conduit, R., & Sanson, G. (2013). A blended learning lecture delivery model for large and diverse undergraduate cohorts. Computers & Education, 64, 116–126. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.01.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McVeigh, H. (2009). Factors influencing the utilization of e-learning in post-registration nursing students. Nurse Education Today, 29(1), 91–99. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2008.07.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moll, J., Zahn, R., de Oliveira-Souza, R., Krueger, F., & Grafman, J. (2005). The neural basis of human moral cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6(10), 799–809. doi: 10.1038/nrn1768
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, C., & Tenbrunsel, A. E. (2014). Just think about it? Cognitive complexity and moral choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 123(2), 138–149. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno, R. (2006). Does the modality principle hold for different media? A test of the method-affects-learning hypothesis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(3), 149–158. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00170.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neff, K. D., & Helwig, C. C. (2002). A constructivist approach to understanding the development of reasoning about rights and authority within cultural contexts. Cognitive Development, 17(3–4), 1429–1450. doi: 10.1016/S0885-2014(02)00126-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell, A., & Rosenbloom, P. S. (1981). Mechanisms of skill acquisition and the law of practice. In J. R. Anderson (Ed.), Cognitive skills and their acquisition (pp. 1–55). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Nisbet, J. D., Watt, J. S., & Duncan, J. A. (1984). Educational disadvantage: Ten years on. Edinburgh: HM Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Palmeri, T. J. (1999). Theories of automaticity and the power law of practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 25(2), 543–551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, B., Plass, J. L., & Brünken, R. (2014). Cognitive and affective processes in multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 29, 125–127. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1965). The moral judgment of the child. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., & Schrauben, B. (1992). Students’ motivational beliefs and their cognitive engagement in classroom academic tasks. In D. H. Schunk & J. Meece (Eds.), Student perceptions in the classroom (pp. 149–179). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education. London: Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Rapp, D. N. (2006). The value of attention aware systems in educational settings. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(4), 603–614. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2005.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reay, J. (2001). Blended learning: A fusion for the future. Knowledge Management Review, 4(3), 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Resnick, L. (1987). Education and learning to think. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rest, J. R., Bebeau, M., & Volker, J. (1986). An overview of the psychology of morality. In J. R. Rest (Ed.), Moral development: Advances in research and theory (pp. 1–27). New York, NY: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Ritter, F. E., & Schooler, L. J. (2002). The learning curve. In W. Kintsch, N. Smelser, & P. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 8602–8605). Oxford: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Roeser, R. W., & Peck, S. (2009). An education in awareness: Self motivation and self-regulated learning in contemplative perspective. Educational Psychologist, 44(2), 119–136. doi: 10.1080/00461520902832376
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruffy, M. (1981). Influence of social factors in the development of the young child's moral judgment. European Journal of Social Psychology, 11(1), 61–75. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2420110104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommer, M., Rothmayr, C., Dohnel, K., Meinhardt, J., Schwerdtner, J., Sodian, B., & Hajak, G. (2010). How should I decide? The neural correlates of everyday moral reasoning. Neuropsychologia, 48(7), 2018–2026. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.03.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swan, K. (2003). Learning effectiveness: What the research tells us. In J. Bourne & J. C. Moore (Eds.), Elements of quality online education practice and direction (pp. 13–45). Needham, MA: Sloan Center for Online Education.
   Google Scholar
• Takezawa, M., Gummerum, M., & Keller, M. (2006). A stage for the rational tail of the emotional dog: Roles of moral reasoning in group decision making. Journal of Economic Psychology, 27(1), 117–139. doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2005.06.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tin, T. B. (2006). Investigating the nature of interest reported by a group of postgraduate students in an MA in English language teacher education program. System, 34(2), 222–238. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2005.09.004
   Google Scholar
• Vockell, E. (2006). Educational psychology: A practical approach (Online Ed.). Retrieved February 20, 2012, from http://education.calumet.purdue.edu/vockell/EdPsyBook/
   Google Scholar
• Vos, N., van der Meijden, H., & Denessen, E. (2011). Effects of constructing versus playing an educational game on student motivation and deep learning strategy use. Computers & Education, 56(1), 127–137. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.08.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitelock, D., & Jelfs, A. (2003). Special issue on blended learning. Journal of Educational Media, 28(2–3), 99–100. doi: 10.1080/1358165032000177407
   Google Scholar