Clickers in the flipped classroom: bring your own device (BYOD) to promote student learning

References

• Abrahamson, L. (2006). A brief history of networked classrooms: Effects, cases, pedagogy, and implications. In D. A. Banks (Ed.), Audience response systems in higher education (pp. 1–25). Hershey, PA: Information Science.
   Google Scholar
• Agbatogun, A. O. (2014). Developing learners’ second language communicative competence through active learning: Clickers or communicative approach? Educational Technology & Society, 17(2), 257–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ally, M. (2013). Mobile learning: From research to practice to impact education. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education: Gulf Perspectives, 10(2), 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Ash, K. (2012). Educators view “flipped” model with a more critical eye. Education Week, 32(2), S6–S7.
   Google Scholar
• Attali, Y., & Arieli-Attali, M. (2015). Gamification in assessment: Do points affect test performance? Computers & Education, 83, 57–63. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.12.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beatty, I. D., & Gerace, W. J. (2009). Technology-enhanced formative assessment: A research-based pedagogy for teaching science with classroom response technology. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(2), 146–162. doi: 10.1007/s10956-008-9140-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beekes, W. (2006). The “millionaire” method for encouraging participation. Active Learning in Higher Education, 7(1), 25–36. doi: 10.1177/1469787406061143
   Google Scholar
• Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Blasco-Arcas, L., Buil, I., Hernández-Ortega, B., & Sese, F. J. (2013). Using clickers in class. The role of interactivity, active collaborative learning and engagement in learning performance. Computers & Education, 62, 102–110. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradford Networks. (2013). The impact of BYOD in education: White papers. Retrieved from https://www.bradfordnetworks.com/resources/the-impact-of-byod-in-education/
   Google Scholar
• Bruff, D. (2009). Teaching with classroom response systems: Creating active learning environments. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Cardoso, W. (2011). Learning a foreign language with a learner response system: The students’ perspective. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(5), 393–417. doi: 10.1080/09588221.2011.567354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Hsieh, J. S., Wu, W. C. V., & Marek, M. W. (in press). Using the flipped classroom to enhance EFL learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chien, Y. T., Chang, Y. H., & Chang, C. Y. (2016). Do we click in the right way? A meta-analytic review of clicker-integrated instruction. Educational Research Review, 17, 1–18. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2015.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cubric, M., & Jefferies, A. (2015). The benefits and challenges of large-scale deployment of electronic voting systems: University student views from across different subject groups. Computers & Education, 87, 98–111. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutrim Schmid, E. (2008). Using a voting system in conjunction with interactive whiteboard technology to enhance learning in the English language classroom. Computers & Education, 50(1), 338–356. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2006.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• da Rocha Seixas, L., Gomes, A. S., & de Melo Filho, I. J. (2016). Effectiveness of gamification in the engagement of students. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 48–63. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dicheva, D., Dichev, C., Agre, G., & Angelova, G. (2015). Gamification in education: A systematic mapping study. Educational Technology & Society, 18(3), 75–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domínguez, A., Saenz-de-Navarrete, J., de-Marcos, L., Fernández-Sanz, L., Pagés, C., & Martínez-Herráiz, J. (2013). Gamifying learning experiences: Practical implications and outcomes. Computers & Education, 63, 380–392. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Han, J. H. (2014). Closing the missing links and opening the relationships among the factors: A literature review on the use of clicker technology using the 3P model. Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 150–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, T. M. (2010). Use of audience response systems for summative assessment in large classes. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(2), 226–237. doi: 10.14742/ajet.1092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, B., & Kotwica, K. (2013). Bring your own device (BYOD) to work: Trend report. Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Hew, K. F., Huang, B., Chu, K. W. S., & Chiu, D. K. (2016). Engaging Asian students through game mechanics: Findings from two experiment studies. Computers & Education, 92–93, 221–236. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, L., Schwartz-Shea, P., & Yim, J. M. J. (2013). Adapting clicker technology to diversity courses: New research insights. Journal of Political Science Education, 9(3), 273–291. doi: 10.1080/15512169.2013.796234
   Google Scholar
• Hung, H. T. (2015). Flipping the classroom for English language learners to foster active learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(1), 81–96. doi: 10.1080/09588221.2014.967701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunsu, N. J., Adesope, O., & Bayly, D. J. (2016). A meta-analysis of the effects of audience response systems (clicker-based technologies) on cognition and affect. Computers & Education, 94, 102–119. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, G. J., Lai, C. L., & Wang, S. Y. (2015). Seamless flipped learning: A mobile technology-enhanced flipped classroom with effective learning strategies. Journal of Computers in Education, 2(4), 449–473. doi: 10.1007/s40692-015-0043-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., & Freeman, A. (2015). NMC horizon report: 2015 higher education edition. Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Kapp, K. (2012). The gamification of learning and instruction: Game-based methods and strategies for training and education. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
   Google Scholar
• Kay, R. H., & LeSage, A. (2009). Examining the benefits and challenges of using audience response systems: A review of the literature. Computers & Education, 53(3), 819–827. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenwright, K. (2009). Clickers in the classroom. TechTrends, 53(1), 74–77. doi: 10.1007/s11528-009-0240-7
   Google Scholar
• Kim, M. K., Kim, S. M., Khera, O., & Getman, J. (2014). The experience of three flipped classrooms in an urban university: An exploration of design principles. The Internet and Higher Education, 22, 37–50. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2009). Will mobile learning change language learning? ReCALL, 21(2), 157–165. doi: 10.1017/S0958344009000202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, C. L., & Hwang, G. J. (2016). A self-regulated flipped classroom approach to improving students’ learning performance in a mathematics course. Computers & Education, 100, 126–140. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landers, R. N., Bauer, K. N., & Callan, R. C. (In press). Gamification of task performance with leaderboards: a goal setting experiment. Computers in Human Behavior.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lantz, M. E. (2010). The use of “Clickers” in the classroom: Teaching innovation or merely an amusing novelty? Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4), 556–561. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.02.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laxman, K. (2011). A study on the adoption of clickers in higher education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(8), 1291–1303. doi: 10.14742/ajet.894
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. J., & Hammer, J. (2011). Gamification in education: What, how, why bother? Academic Exchange Quarterly, 15(2), 146–151.
   Google Scholar
• Ludvigsen, K., Krumsvik, R., & Furnes, B. (2015). Creating formative feedback spaces in large lectures. Computers & Education, 88, 48–63. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacGeorge, E. L., Homan, S. R., Dunning Jr, J. B., Elmore, D., Bodie, G. D., Evans, E., … Geddes, B. (2008). Student evaluation of audience response technology in large lecture classes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(2), 125–145. doi: 10.1007/s11423-007-9053-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marlow, S. L., Salas, E., Landon, L. B., & Presnell, B. (2016). Eliciting teamwork with game attributes: A systematic review and research agenda. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 413–423. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martyn, M. (2007). Clickers in the classroom: An active learning approach. Educause Quarterly, 30(2), 71–74.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., Stull, A., DeLeeuw, K., Almeroth, K., Bimber, B., Chun, D., … Zhang, H. (2009). Clickers in college classrooms: Fostering learning with questioning methods in large lecture classes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34(1), 51–57. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mu, H., & Paparas, D. (2015). Incorporating the advantages of clickers and mobile devices to teach economics to non-economists. Journal of Finance and Economics, 3(1), 1–14. doi: 10.12735/jfe.v3i1p01
   Google Scholar
• O’Flaherty, J., & Phillips, C. (2015). The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 85–95. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oigara, J., & Keengwe, J. (2013). Students’ perceptions of clickers as an instructional tool to promote active learning. Education and Information Technologies, 18(1), 15–28. doi: 10.1007/s10639-011-9173-9
   Google Scholar
• Pachler, N., Bachmair, B., & Cook, J. (2009). Mobile learning: Structures, agency, practices. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Poole, D. (2012). The impact of anonymous and assigned use of student response systems on student achievement. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 23(2), 101–112.
   Google Scholar
• Sevian, H., & Robinson, W. E. (2011). Clickers promote learning in all kinds of classes: Small and large, graduate and undergraduate, lecture and lab. Journal of College Science Teaching, 40(3), 14–18.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. K., Trujillo, C., & Su, T. T. (2011). The benefits of using clickers in small-enrollment seminar-style biology courses. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 10(1), 14–17. doi: 10.1187/cbe.10-09-0114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stowell, J. R. (2015). Use of clickers vs. mobile devices for classroom polling. Computers & Education, 82, 329–334. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strayer, J. F. (2012). How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learning Environments Research, 15(2), 171–193. doi: 10.1007/s10984-012-9108-4
   Google Scholar
• Sun, J. C. Y. (2014). Influence of polling technologies on student engagement: An analysis of student motivation, academic performance, and brainwave data. Computers & Education, 72, 80–89. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sykes, J., & Reinhardt, J. (2012). Language at play: Digital games in second and foreign language teaching and learning. New York, NY: Pearson-Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Termos, M. H. (2013). The effects of the classroom performance system on student participation, attendance, and achievement. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 25(1), 66–78.
   Google Scholar
• Traxler, J., & Kukulska-Hulme, A. (Eds.). (2015). Mobile learning: The next generation. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, A. I. (2015). The wear out effect of a game-based student response system. Computers & Education, 82, 217–227. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanner, T., & Palmer, E. (2015). Personalising learning: Exploring student and teacher perceptions about flexible learning and assessment in a flipped university course. Computers & Education, 88, 354–369. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werbach, K., & Hunter, D. (2012). For the win: How game thinking can revolutionize your business. Philadelphia, PA: Wharton Digital Press.
   Google Scholar
• White, P. J., Delaney, D. G., Syncox, D., Akerberg, O. A., & Alters, B. (2011). Clicker implementation models. Educause Quarterly, 34(4), 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Zack, L., Fuselier, J., Graham-Squire, A., Lamb, R., & O’Hara, K. (2015). Flipping freshman mathematics. PRIMUS, 25(9–10), 803–813. doi: 10.1080/10511970.2015.1031302
   Google Scholar
• Zichermann, G., & Cunningham, C. (2011). Gamification by design: Implementing game mechanics in web and mobile apps. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media.
   Google Scholar