Behavioural sequential analysis of using an instant response application to enhance peer interactions in a flipped classroom

References

• Abramson, D., Pietroszek, K., Chinaei, L., Lank, E., & Terry, M. (2013). Classroom response systems in higher education: Meeting user needs with NetClick. Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 2013 IEEE, Berlin, Germany, pp. 840–846.
   Google Scholar
• Adam, D., Kioutsiouki, D., Karakostas, A., & Demetriadis, S. N. (2014). Do your students get it? Quiz it! The Android classroom response system. Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), 2014 IEEE 14th International Conference, Athens, Greece, pp. 168–170.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, O. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing. A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives (Abridged ed.). New York, NY: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1997). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis. London: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, J. W. (2000). The “classroom flip”: Using web course management tools to become the guide by the side. Selected papers from the 11th international conference on college teaching and learning, Jacksonville, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, R. (2008). Assessment for learning (Vol. 1). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bonaiuti, G., Calvani, A., & Piazza, D. (2015). Increasing classroom engagement and student comprehension through the use of clickers: An Italian secondary school experience. Research on Education and Media, 5(1), 95–108.
   Google Scholar
• Caldwell, J. E. (2007). Clickers in the large classroom: Current research and best-practice tips. Cell Biology Education, 6(1), 9–20.
   Google Scholar
• Camacho-Miñano, M.-d.-M., & del Campo, C. (2014). Useful interactive teaching tool for learning: Clickers in higher education. Interactive Learning Environments. doi:10.1080/10494820.2014.917108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, J., Rodgers, J., Sankupellay, M., Newcomb, M., & Cook, R. (2014). Systematic evaluation of GoSoapBox in tertiary education : A student response system for improving learning experiences and outcomes. INTED2014 Proceedings, IATED, Valencia, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, K.-H., & Hou, H.-T. (2015). Exploring students’ behavioural patterns during online peer assessment from the affective, cognitive, and metacognitive perspectives: A progressive sequential analysis. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 24(2), 171–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. (1996). Constructing self-explanations and scaffolded explanations in tutoring. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10(7), 33–49.
   Google Scholar
• Chiang, T. H., Yang, S. J., & Hwang, G. J. (2014). Students’ online interactive patterns in augmented reality-based inquiry activities. Computers & Education, 78, 97–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cong, G., Wang, L., Lin, C. Y., Song, Y. I., & Sun, Y. (2008). Finding question-answer pairs from online forums. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 31st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Contreras-Castillo, J., Pérez-Fragoso, C., & Favela, J. (2006). Assessing the use of instant messaging in online learning environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 14(3), 205–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, R. S., Dean, D. L., & Ball, N. (2013). Flipping the classroom and instructional technology integration in a college-level information systems spreadsheet course. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(4), 563–580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fautch, J. M. (2015). The flipped classroom for teaching organic chemistry in small classes: Is it effective?Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(1), 179–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fulton, K. (2012). Upside down and inside out: Flip your classroom to improve student learning. Learning & Leading with Technology, 39(8), 12–17.
   Google Scholar
• Gallavan, N. P. (2009). Developing performance-based assessment. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Guvendir, E. (2011). The role of non-verbal behavior of teachers in providing students corrective feedback and their consequences. Sino-US English Teaching, 8(9), 577–591.
   Google Scholar
• Herreid, C. F., & Schiller, N. A. (2013). Case studies and the flipped classroom. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(5), 62–66.
   Google Scholar
• Hiltz, S. R., & Wellman, B. (1997). Asynchronous learning networks as a virtual classroom. Communications of the ACM, 40(9), 44–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holzer, A., Govaerts, S., Ondrus, J., Vozniuk, A., Rigaud, D., Garbinato, B., & Gillet, D. (2013). Speakup–a mobile app facilitating audience interaction. Advances in Web-Based Learning–ICWL, 2013, 11–20.
   Google Scholar
• Holzer, A., Govaerts, S., Vozniuk, A., Kocher, B., & Gillet, D. (2014). Speakup in the classroom: Anonymous temporary social media for better interactions. Paper presented at the CHI'14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Toronto, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Hou, H. T., & Wu, S. Y. (2011). Analyzing the social knowledge construction behavioral patterns of an online synchronous collaborative discussion instructional activity using an instant messaging tool: A case study. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1459–1468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hrastinski, S. (2006). The relationship between adopting a synchronous medium and participation in online group work: An explorative study. Interactive Learning Environments, 14(2), 137–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irons, A. (2007). Enhancing learning through formative assessment and feedback. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Karakostas, A., Adam, D., Kioutsiouki, D., & Demetriadis, S. (2014). A pilot study of QuizIt: The new android classroom response system. Interactive Mobile Communication Technologies and Learning (IMCL), International Conference on Interactive Mobile Communication Technologies and Learning (IMCL2014), Thessaloniki, Greece, pp. 147–151.
   Google Scholar
• Kawaguchi, S., & Ma, Y. (2012). Corrective feedback, negotiation of meaning and grammar development: Learner-learner and learner-native speaker interaction in ESL. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 2(02), 57–70.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J., Chern, G., Feng, D., Shaw, E., & Hovy, E. (2006). Mining and assessing discussions on the web through speech act analysis. PaperAQ17 presented at the Web Content Mining with Human Language Technologies, Athens, Georgia, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 212–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, A. (2016). Mobile immersion: An experiment using mobile instant messenger to support second-language learning. Interactive Learning Environments. doi:10.1080/10494820.2015.1113706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lantz, M. E., & Stawiski, A. (2014). Effectiveness of clickers: Effect of feedback and the timing of questions on learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 280–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. W. S., & Shih, M. L. (2015). Teaching practices for the student response system at National Taiwan University. International Journal of Automation and Smart Technology, 5(3), 145–150.
   Google Scholar
• Liou, W.-K., Bhagat, K. K., & Chang, C.-Y. (2016). Beyond the flipped classroom: A highly interactive cloud-classroom (HIC) embedded into basic materials science courses. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(3), 460–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., Stull, A., DeLeeuw, K., Almeroth, K., Bimber, B., Chun, D., … Zhang, H. (2009). Clickers in college classrooms: Fostering learning with questioning methods in large lecture classes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34(1), 51–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sams, A., & Bergmann, J. (2013). Flip your students’ learning. Educational Leadership, 70(6), 16–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sierpinska, A. (1994). Understanding in mathematics. London: Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Stowell, J. R. (2015). Use of clickers vs. mobile devices for classroom polling. Computers & Education, 82, 329–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, J. C. Y. (2014). Influence of polling technologies on student engagement: An analysis of student motivation, academic performance, and brainwave data. Computers & Education, 72, 80–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseng, S.-C., & Tsai, C.-C. (2007). On-line peer assessment and the role of the peer feedback: A study of high school computer course. Computers & Education, 49(4), 1161–1174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker, B. (2012). The flipped classroom. Education Next, 12(1), 82–83.
   Google Scholar
• Vasana, S., & Ritzhaupt, A. D. (2009). A case study of a method for hybrid peer-evaluation in engineering education. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 7(1), 34–40.
   Google Scholar