Supporting adaptive learning pathways through the use of learning analytics: developments, challenges and future opportunities

References

• Agudo-Peregrina, ÁF, Hernández-García, Á, & Iglesias-Pradas, S. (2012). Predicting academic performance with learning analytics in virtual learning environments: A comparative study of three interaction classifications (pp. 1–6). Andorra: Computers in education (SIIE), 2012 international symposium on IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmad, N. (2013). Self-directed learning: Students interest in viewing the learner model. In Research and Innovation in Information Systems (ICRIIS) (pp. 493–498). Kuala Lumpur: 2013 international conference on IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Ali, L., Asadi, M., Gašević, D., Jovanović, J., & Hatala, M. (2013). Factors influencing beliefs for adoption of a learning analytics tool: An empirical study. Computers & Education, 62, 130–148. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almosallam, E. A., & Ouertani, H. C. (2014). Learning analytics: Definitions, applications and related fields. In T. Herawan, M. Mat Deris, & J. Abawajy (Eds.), Proceedings of the first international conference on advanced data and information engineering (DaEng-2013) (pp. 721–730). Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ammari, A., Lau, L., & Dimitrova, V. (2012 April). Deriving group profiles from social media to facilitate the design of simulated environments for learning (pp. 198–207). 2nd international conference on learning analytics and knowledge. Vancouver, BC: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Anaya, A. R., Luque, M., & Peinado, M. (2016). A visual recommender tool in a collaborative learning experience. Expert Systems with Applications, 45, 248–259. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2015.01.071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baneres, D. (2015). Towards an analytical framework to enhance teaching support in digital systems design Course (pp. 148–155). Complex, intelligent, and software intensive systems (CISIS), 2015 Ninth international conference on IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Brusilovsky, P. (1996). Methods and techniques of adaptive hypermedia. User Modeling and User Adapted Interaction, 6(2–3), 87–129. doi: 10.1007/BF00143964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgos, D., Tattersall, C., & Koper, R. (2007). Representing adaptive and adaptable units of learning. In B. Fernández-Manjón, J. M. Sánchez-Pérez, J. A. Gómez-Pulido, M. A. Vega-Rodríguez & J. Bravo-Rodríguez (Eds.), Computers and education: E-learning, from theory to practice (pp. 41–56). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. P., & Oblinger, D. G. (2007). Academic analytics. Educause Quarterly, 42(4), 40–57.
   Google Scholar
• Chatti, M. A., Dyckhoff, A. L., Schroeder, U., & Thüs, H. (2012). A reference model for learning analytics. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 4(5–6), 318–331. doi:10.1504/IJTEL.2012.051815
   Google Scholar
• Clow, D. (2012). The learning analytics cycle: Closing the loop effectively (pp. 134–138). Second international conference on learning analytics and knowledge. Vancouver, BC: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, S., Gaevic, D., Siemens, G., & Joksimovic, S. (2014). Current state and future trends: A citation network analysis of the learning analytics field (pp. 231–240). Proceedings of the fourth international conference on learning analytics and knowledge. Indianapolis: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Duval, E. (2011). Attention please! learning analytics for visualization and recommendation (pp. 9–17). First International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge. Banff, AB: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Dybå, T., & Dingsøyr, T. (2008). Empirical studies of agile software development: A systematic review. Information and Software Technology, 50(9), 833–859. doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2008.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Economides, A. A. (2009). Adaptive context-aware pervasive and ubiquitous learning. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 1(3), 169–192. doi: 10.1504/IJTEL.2009.024865
   Google Scholar
• Ezen-Can, A., Grafsgaard, J. F., Lester, J. C., & Boyer, K. E. (2015). Classifying student dialogue acts with multimodal learning analytics (pp. 280–289). Fifth international conference on learning analytics and knowledge. Poughkeepsie, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Falakmasir, M. H., Hsiao, I. H., Mazzola, L., Grant, N., & Brusilovsky, P. (2012). The impact of social performance visualization on students (pp. 565–569). Advanced learning technologies (ICALT), 2012 IEEE 12th international conference on IEEE, Rome, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, R. (2012). Learning analytics: Drivers, developments and challenges. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 4(5–6), 304–317. doi:10.1504/IJTEL.2012.051816
   Google Scholar
• Florian-Gaviria, B., Glahn, C., & Fabregat Gesa, R. (2013). A software suite for efficient use of the european qualifications framework in online and blended courses. Learning Technologies, IEEE Transactions, 6(3), 283–296. doi:10.1109/TLT.2013.18
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Froschl, C. (2005). User modeling and user profiling in adaptive e-learning systems (Master thesis). Institute for Information Systems and Computer Media (IICM), Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria. Retrieved from http://bernstein.iicm.tugraz.at:8080/Ressourcen/Theses/cfroeschl.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gazulla, E. D., & Leinonen, T. (2016). Why do we want data for learning? Learning analytics and the laws of media. In B. Gros, Kinshuk, & M. Maina (Eds.), The future of ubiquitous learning: Learning designs for emerging pedagogies (pp. 59–72). Berlin: Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Giannakos, M. (2016). Orchestrating 21st century learning ecosystems using analytics (pp. 47–51). First international workshop on learning analytics across physical and digital spaces. CEUR-WS.org.
   Google Scholar
• Hickey, D. T., Quick, J. D., & Shen, X. (2015). Formative and summative analyses of disciplinary engagement and learning in a big open online course (pp. 310–314). Fifth international conference on learning analytics and knowledge. Poughkeepsie, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Hijon-Neira, R., Velazquez-Iturbide, A., Pizarro-Romero, C., & Carrico, L. (2014 October). Merlin-know, an interactive virtual teacher for improving learning in Moodle (pp. 1–8). Frontiers in education conference (FIE), 2014 IEEE. Madrid: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Junco, R., & Clem, C. (2015). Predicting course outcomes with digital textbook usage data. The Internet and Higher Education, 27, 54–63. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamardeen, I. (2014). Adaptive e-tutorial for enhancing student learning in construction education. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 10(2), 79–95. doi:10.1080/15578771.2012.756437
   Google Scholar
• Kay, J. (2001). Learner control. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 11(1), 111–127. doi:10.1023/A:1011194803800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalil, M., & Ebner, M. (2016). What is learning analytics about? A survey of different methods used in 2013–2015. In Proceedings of smart learning conference, Dubai, UAE, 7–9 March, 2016 (pp. 294–304). Dubai: HBMSU.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, D., Park, Y., Yoon, M., & Jo, I.-H. (2016). Toward evidence-based learning analytics: Using proxy variables to improve asynchronous online discussion environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 30, 30–43. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchenham, B., Brereton, O. P., Budgen, D., Turner, M., Bailey, J., & Linkman, S. (2009). Systematic literature reviews in software engineering – a systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 51(1), 7–15. doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2008.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knutov, E., De Bra, P., & Pechenizkiy, M. (2009). AH 12 years later: A comprehensive survey of adaptive hypermedia methods and techniques. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, 15(1), 5–38. doi: 10.1080/13614560902801608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovanović, V., Gašević, D., Dawson, S., Joksimović, S., Baker, R. S., & Hatala, M. (2015). Does time-on-task matter? Implications for the validity of learning analytics findings. Journal of Learning Analytics, 2(3), 81–110. doi:10.18608/jla.2015.23.6.
   Google Scholar
• Kump, B., Seifert, C., Beham, G., Lindstaedt, S. N., & Ley, T. (2012). Seeing what the system thinks you know: Visualizing evidence in an open learner model (pp. 153–157). 2nd international conference on learning analytics and knowledge. Vancouver, BC: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J., & Park, O. (2008). Adaptive instructional systems. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merill, J. van Merrienboer, & M. P. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 469–484). New York, NY: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Magoulas, G. D., Papanikolaou, Y., & Grigoriadou, M. (2003). Adaptive web-based learning: Accommodating individual differences through system’s adaptation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4), 511–527. doi:10.1111/1467-8535.00347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcos-García, J. A., Martínez-Monés, A., & Dimitriadis, Y. (2015). DESPRO: A method based on roles to provide collaboration analysis support adapted to the participants in CSCL situations. Computers & Education, 82, 335–353. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, F., & Whitmer, J. C. (2016). Applying learning analytics to investigate timed release in online learning. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 21(1), 59–74. doi: 10.1007/s10758-015-9261-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenney, S., & Mor, Y. (2015). Supporting teachers in data-informed educational design. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(2), 265–279. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mora, N., Caballé, S., Daradoumis, T., Gañ án, D., & Barolli, L. (2014 September). Providing cognitive and social networking assessment to virtualized collaborative learning in engineering courses (pp. 463–468). Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems (INCoS), international conference. Salerno: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Mulwa, C., Lawless, S., Sharp, M., Arnedillo-Sanchez, I., & Wade, V. (2010). Adaptive educational hypermedia systems in technology enhanced learning: A literature review. 2010 ACM conference on Information technology education. ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Papamitsiou, Z. K., & Economides, A. A. (2014). Learning analytics and educational data mining in practice: A systematic literature review of empirical evidence. Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 49–64. Retrieved from http://www.ifets.info/journals/17_4/4.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papamitsiou, Z., & Economides, A. A. (2016). Learning analytics for smart learning environments: A meta-analysis of empirical research results from 2009 to 2015. In M. J. Spector, B. B. Lockee, & M. D. Childress (Eds.), Learning, design, and technology (pp. 1–23). Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Razzaq, L. M., & Heffernan, N. T. (2009 July). To tutor or not to tutor: That is the question (pp. 457–464). 14th international conference on artificial intelligence in education – AIED. Brighton: IOS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rienties, B., & Rivers, B. A. (2014). Measuring and understanding learner emotions: Evidence and prospects. Learning Analytics Review, 1, 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez Groba, A., Vazquez Barreiros, B., Lama, M., Gewerc, A., & Mucientes, M. (2014 October). Using a learning analytics tool for evaluation in self-regulated learning (pp. 1–8). Frontiers in education conference (FIE), 2014 IEEE. Madrid: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Triana, M. J., Martínez-Monés, A., Asensio-Pérez, J. I., & Dimitriadis, Y. (2015). Scripting and monitoring meet each other: Aligning learning analytics and learning design to support teachers in orchestrating CSCL situations. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(2), 330–343. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero, C., & Ventura, S. (2013). Data mining in education. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 3(1), 12–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruipérez-Valiente, J. A., Muñoz-Merino, P. J., Leony, D., & Kloos, C. D. (2015). ALAS-KA: A learning analytics extension for better understanding the learning process in the khan academy platform. Computers in Human Behavior, 47, 139–148. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos, J. L., Govaerts, S., Verbert, K., & Duval, E. (2012). Goal-oriented visualizations of activity tracking: A case study with engineering students (pp. 143–152). 2nd international conference on learning analytics and knowledge. Vancouver: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Santos, J. L., Verbert, K., Govaerts, S., & Duval, E. (2013). Addressing learner issues with StepUp!: An evaluation: Third international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (pp. 14–22). Leuven: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Siemens, G. (2012). Learning analytics: Envisioning a research discipline and a domain of practice (pp. 4–8). 2nd international conference on learning analytics and knowledge. Vancouver: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner, C. M., Kickmeier-Rust, M. D., & Albert, D. (2014). Learning analytics and educational data mining: An overview of recent techniques. Learning Analytics for and in Serious Games, 6, 61–75.
   Google Scholar
• Tabuenca, B., Kalz, M., Drachsler, H., & Specht, M. (2015). Time will tell: The role of mobile learning analytics in self-regulated learning. Computers & Education, 89, 53–74. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tempelaar, D. T., Rienties, B., & Giesbers, B. (2015). In search for the most informative data for feedback generation: Learning analytics in a data-rich context. Computers in Human Behavior, 47, 157–167. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmers, C. F., Walraven, A., & Veldkamp, B. P. (2015). The effect of regulation feedback in a computer-based formative assessment on information problem solving. Computers & Education, 87, 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNESCO Institute for Information Technology in Education. (2012). Learning analytics. Policy Brief. Retrieved November 16, 2016, from http://iite.unesco.org/pics/publications/en/files/3214711.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vahdat, M., Ghio, A., Oneto, L., Anguita, D., Funk, M., & Rauterberg, M. (2015). Advances in learning analytics and educational data mining (pp. 297–306). European symposium on artificial neural networks, computational intelligence and machine learning (ESANN2015). Bruges: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• van Leeuwen, A., Janssen, J., Erkens, G., & Brekelmans, M. (2015). Teacher regulation of cognitive activities during student collaboration: Effects of learning analytics. Computers & Education, 90, 80–94. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandewaetere, M., Desmet, P., & Clarebout, G. (2011). The contribution of learner characteristics in the development of computer-based adaptive learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 118–130. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar