Group trust, communication media, and interactivity: toward an integrated model of online collaborative learning

References

• AbuSeileek, A. F. (2012). The effect of computer-assisted cooperative learning methods and group size on the EFL learners’ achievement in communication skills. Computers & Education, 58(1), 231–239. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aubert, B., & Kelsey, B. (2003). Further understanding of trust and performance in virtual teams. Small Group Research, 34, 575–618. doi: 10.1177/1046496403256011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Borokhovski, E., Wade, C. A., Tamim, R. M., Surkes, M. A., & Bethel, E. C. (2009). A meta-analysis of three types of interaction treatments in distance education. Review of Educational Research, 79, 1243–1289. doi: 10.3102/0034654309333844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best Practices in Online Teaching Strategies. (2009, July 1). Retrieved on June 10, 2014, from http://www.uwec.edu/AcadAff/resources/edtech/upload/Best-Practices-in-Online-Teaching-Strategies-Membership.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Blanco-Fernandez, Y., López-Nores, M., Gil-Solla, A., Ramos-Cabrer, M., & Pazos-Arias, J. J. (2011). User-generated contents and reasoning-based personalization: Ingredients for a novel model of mobile TV. Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 5289–5298. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.10.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blasco-Arcas, L., Buil, I., Hernández-Ortega, B., & Sese, F. J. (2013). Using clickers in class. The role of interactivity, active collaborative learning and engagement in learning performance. Computers & Education, 62, 102–110. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blattberg, R., & Deighton, J. (1991). Interactive marketing: Exploiting the age of addressability. Sloan Management Review, 33, 5–14.
   Google Scholar
• Bulu, S. T., & Yildirim, Z. (2008). Communication behaviors and trust in collaborative online teams. Educational Technology & Society, 11, 132–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, C. K. K., & Chan, Y.-Y. (2011). Students’ views of collaboration and online participation in knowledge forum. Computers & Education, 57, 1445–1457. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, X., Li, Y., Sun, J., & Huang, J. (2015). Application of a novel collaboration engineering method for learning design: A case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47, 803–818. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, X., & Macaulay, L. (2014). Exploring individual trust factors in computer mediated group collaboration: A case study approach. Group Decision and Negotiation, 23, 533–560. doi: 10.1007/s10726-013-9340-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, X., Nolan, T., & Macaulay, L. (2013). Don’t give up the community: A viewpoint of trust development in online collaboration. Information Technology & People, 26, 298–318. doi: 10.1108/ITP-10-2012-0116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, X., Yin, G. P., Azadegan, A., & Kolfschoten, G. L. (2016). Trust evolvement in hybrid team collaboration: A longitudinal case study. Group Decision and Negotiation, 25, 267–288. doi: 10.1007/s10726-015-9442-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measuremant invariance. Strcutural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255. doi: 10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coll, C. C., Rochera, M. J., & De Gispert, I. I. (2014). Supporting online collaborative learning in small groups: Teacher feedback on learning content, academic task and social participation. Computers & Education, 75, 53–64. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.01.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croxton, R. A. (2014). The role of interactivity in student satisfaction and persistence in online learning. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(2), 314–325.
   Google Scholar
• Dabbagh, N., & Bannan-Ritland, B. (2005). Online learning: Concepts, strategies, and application. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, W. M. (2009). Groupwork as a form of assessment: Common problems and recommended solutions. High Education, 58, 563–584. doi: 10.1007/s10734-009-9216-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitrov, D. M. (2010). Testing for factorial invariance in the context of construct validation. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 43, 121–149. doi: 10.1177/0748175610373459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du, J., Xu, J., & Fan, X. (2014). Help seeking in online collaborative groupwork: A multilevel analysis. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 24(3), 321–337. doi: 10.1080/1475939X.2014.897962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du, J., & Xu, J. (2010). The quality of online discussion reported by graduate students. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 11(1), 13–24.
   Google Scholar
• Faizi, R., El Afia, A., & Chiheb, R. (2013). Exploring the potential benefits of using social media in education. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 3, 50–53. doi: 10.3991/ijep.v3i4.2836
   Google Scholar
• Fan, X., & Sivo, S. A. (2005). Sensitivity of fit indices to misspecified structural or measurement model components: Rationale of two-index strategy revisited. Structural Equation Modeling, 12, 343–367. doi: 10.1207/s15328007sem1203_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finegold, A., & Cooke, L. (2006). Exploring the attitudes, experiences and dynamics of interaction in online groups. The Internet and Higher Education, 9(3), 201–215. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.06.003
   Google Scholar
• Fu, H., Chu, S., & Kang, W. (2013). Affordances and constraints of a wiki for primary-school students? Group projects. Educational Technology & Society, 16(4), 85–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, F., Zhang, T., & Franklin, T. (2013). Designing asynchronous online discussion environments: Recent progress and possible future directions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44, 469–483. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01330.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaytan, J., & McEwen, B. C. (2007). Effective online instructional and assessment strategies. The American Journal of Distance Education, 21(3), 117–132. doi: 10.1080/08923640701341653
   Google Scholar
• Guasch, T., Espasa, A., Alvarez, I. M., & Kirschner, P. A. (2013). Effects of feedback on collaborative writing in an online learning environment. Distance Education, 34, 324–338. doi: 10.1080/01587919.2013.835772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Havard, B., Du, J., & Xu, J. (2008). Online collaborative learning and communication media. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 19(1), 37–50.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, M. H., Chang, C. M., & Yen, C. H. (2011). Exploring the antecedents of trust in virtual communities. Behavior & Information Technology, 30, 587–601. doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2010.549513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, G. J., Bruner IIG. C., & Kumar, A. (2006). Interactivity and its facets revisited. Journal of Advertising, 35, 35–52. doi: 10.2753/JOA0091-3367350403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joo, Y. J., Lim, K. Y., & Kim, E. K. (2011). Online university students’ satisfaction and persistence: Examining perceived level of presence, usefulness and ease of use as predictors in a structural model. Computers & Education, 57, 1654–1664. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joreskog, K. G. (1971). Simultaneous factor analysis in several populations. Psychometrika, 36, 409–426. doi: 10.1007/BF02291366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J. (2013). Influence of group size on students’ participation in online discussion forums. Computers & Education, 62, 123–129. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreft, I., & De Leeuw, J. (1998). Introducing multilevel modeling. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kuo, F. R., Hwang, G. J., & Lee, C. C. (2012). A hybrid approach to promoting students’ web-based problem-solving competence and learning attitude. Computers & Education, 58(1), 351–364. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.09.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latusek-Jurczak, D., & Prystupa-Rządca, K. (2014). Collaboration and trust-building in open innovation community. Journal of Economics & Management, 17, 47–62.
   Google Scholar
• Le, X. H., Doll, T., Barbosu, M., Luque, A., & Wang, D. (2012). An enhancement of the role-based access control model to facilitate information access management in context of team collaboration and workflow. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 45, 1084–1107. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2012.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, M. J. (Ed.). (2010). Web 2.0-based e-learning: Applying social informatics for tertiary teaching. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, T. J., Duh, H. B. L., Li, N., Wang, H. Y., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). An investigation of learners’ collaborative knowledge construction performances and behavior patterns in an augmented reality simulation system. Computers & Education, 68, 314–321. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.05.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ling, K. C., bin Daud, D., Piew, T. H., Keoy, K. H., & Hassan, P. (2011). Perceived risk, perceived technology, online trust for the online purchase intention in Malaysia. International Journal of Business and Management, 6(6), 167–182.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1988). Familiarity, confidence, trust: Problems and alternatives. In D. Gambetta (Ed.), Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations (pp. 94–109). New York, NY: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• MacCallum, R. C., Roznowski, M., & Necowitz, L. B. (1992). Model modifications in covariance structure analysis: The problem of capitalization on chance. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 490–504. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.111.3.490
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 320–341. doi: 10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martín-SanJosé, J. F., Juan, M. C., Seguí, I., & García-García, I. (2015). The effects of computer-based games and collaboration in large groups vs. collaboration in pairs or traditional methods. Computers & Education, 87, 42–54. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, W. W., Sun, K., & Ma, J. (2014). The impacts of cognitive learning styles on the use of online learning and collaborative writing environments. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 16(1), 97–111. doi: 10.1504/IJIL.2014.063376
   Google Scholar
• Matschke, C., Moskaliuk, J., & Kimmerle, J. (2013). The impact of group membership on collaborative learning with wikis. Cyberpsychology, Behavior & Social Networking, 16(2), 127–131. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0254
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIsaac, M. S. (2002). Online learning from an international perspective. Education Media International, 39, 18–21.
   Google Scholar
• McKnight, D. H., & Chervany, N. L. (2002). What trust means in e-commerce customer relationship: An interdisciplinary conceptual typology. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6, 35–59. doi: 10.1080/10864415.2001.11044235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLuhan, M. (1994). Understanding media: The extensions of man. Cambridge: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Michaelsen, L. K., Sweet, M., & Parmelee, D. X. (Eds.). (2011). Team-based learning: Small group learning’s next big step. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Nam, C. W. (2014). The effects of trust and constructive controversy on student achievement and attitude in online cooperative learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 37, 237–248. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oncu, S., & Cakir, H. (2011). Research in online learning environments: Priorities and methodologies. Computers & Education, 57, 1098–1108. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.12.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, J. Y. (2015). Student interactivity and teacher participation: An application of legitimate peripheral participation in higher education online learning environments. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 24(3), 389–406. doi: 10.1080/1475939X.2014.935743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poellhuber, B., Anderson, T., & Roy, N. (2011). Distance students’ readiness for social media and collaboration. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12, 102–125. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v12i6.1018
   Google Scholar
• Poirier, C. R., & Feldman, R. S. (2007). Promoting active learning using individual response technology in large introductory psychology classes. Teaching of Psychology, 34, 194–196. doi: 10.1080/00986280701498665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ractham, P., & Firpo, D. (2011). Using social networking technology to enhance learning in higher education: A case study using Facebook. In Proceedings of the 44th Hawaii international conference on system sciences. Washington, DC: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Rafaeli, S., & Sudweeks, F. (1997). Networked interactivity. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2(4). Online.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, T. S., & McInnerney, J. M. (2007). Seven problems of online group learning (and their solutions). Educational Technology and Society, 10, 257–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, R. (2013, October 27). Collaboration time. Brookline, MA: Amos A Lawrence School. Retrieved from http://lawrenceschoolbrookline.org/principals-corner-102813/
   Google Scholar
• Rose, J., & Schlichter, B. R. (2013). Decoupling, re-engaging: Managing trust relationships in implementation projects. Information Systems Journal, 23, 5–33. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2011.00392.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rovai, A. P. (2001). Classroom community at a distance: A comparative analysis of two ALN-based university programs. The Internet and Higher Education, 4, 105–118. doi: 10.1016/S1096-7516(01)00053-7
   Google Scholar
• Rovai, A. P. (2002). Building sense of community at a distance. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 3(1), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Rovai, A. P. (2007). Facilitating online discussions effectively. Internet and Higher Education, 10, 77–88. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.10.001
   Google Scholar
• Schwier, R. A., & Daniel, B. K. (2008). Implications of a virtual learning community model for designing distributed communities of practice in higher education. In C. Kimble, P. Hildreth, & I. Bourdon (Eds.) Communities of practice: Creating learning environments for educators ( Vol. 2, pp. 347–363). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2009). Community of inquiry as a theoretical framework to foster “epistemic engagement” and “cognitive presence” in online education. Computers & Education, 52, 543–553. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, D. (2010). The effects of trust, security and privacy in social networking: A security-based approach to understand the pattern of adoption. Interacting with Computers, 22, 428–438. doi: 10.1016/j.intcom.2010.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• So, H. J., & Brush, T. A. (2008). Student perceptions of collaborative learning, social presence and satisfaction in a blended learning environment: Relationships and critical factors. Computers & Education, 51(1), 318–336. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2007.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swan, K., Shen, J., & Hiltz, S. R. (2006). Assessment and collaboration in online learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 10(1), 45–62.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, D., & McGregor, I. (2009). Online and self- and peer assessment for groupwork. Education and Training, 51, 434–447. doi: 10.1108/00400910910987237
   Google Scholar
• Tseng, H., Wang, C., Ku, H., & Sun, L. (2009). Key factors in online collaboration and their relationship to teamwork satisfaction. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 10, 195–206.
   Google Scholar
• Uhrenfeldt, L., Lakanmaa, R. L., Flinkman, M., Basto, M. L., & Attree, M. (2014). Collaboration: A SWOT analysis of the process of conducting a review of nursing workforce policies in five European countries. Journal of Nursing Management, 22(4), 485–498. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2012.01466.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y. D. (2014). Building student trust in online learning environments. Distance Education, 35, 345–359. doi: 10.1080/01587919.2015.955267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson-Manheim, M. B., & Bélanger, F. (2007). Communication media repertoires: Dealing with the multiplicity of media choices. MIS Quarterly, 31, 267–293. doi: 10.2307/25148791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, J., & Chang, Y. (2005). Towards understanding members’ interactivity, trust, and flow in online travel community. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 105, 937–954. doi: 10.1108/02635570510616120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, C. H., Hwang, G. J., Kuo, F. R., & Huang, I. (2013). A mindtool-based collaborative learning approach to enhancing students’ innovative performance in management courses. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(1), 128–142. doi: 10.14742/ajet.163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, J., & Tsang, A. S. L. (2008). Factors affecting members’ trust belief and behaviour intention in virtual communities. Behaviour & Information Technology, 27, 115–125. doi: 10.1080/01449290600961910
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, J., Du, J., & Fan, X. (2013). Individual and group-level factors for students’ emotion management in online collaborative groupwork. Internet and Higher Education, 19, 1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, F. (2001). Competition within computer-assisted cooperative learning environments: Cognitive, affective, and social outcomes. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 24, 99–117. doi: 10.2190/3U7R-DCD5-F6T1-QKRJ
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, K., & Ge, X. (2006). The dynamics of online collaborative learning: Team task, group development, peer relationship, and communication media. In A. D. de Figueiredo & A. A. Afonso (Eds.), Managing learning in virtual settings: The role of context (pp. 98–116). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, C. (2012). Student satisfaction, performance, and knowledge construction in online collaborative learning. Educational Technology & Society, 15, 127–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar