The impact of an online collaborative learning program on students’ attitude towards technology

References

• Abedin, B. (2012). Sense of community and learning outcomes in computer supported collaborative learning environments. Business and Information, 9(1), 964–969.
   Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. (2002). Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 665–683. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00236.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbuckle, J. L. (2013). AMOS 22.0 user’s guide. Chicago: SPSS.
   Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M., & Weeks, D. G. (1979). Interrelations among models for the analysis of moment structures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 14, 169–186. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr1402_3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blunch, N. J. (2008). Introduction to structural equation modelling using SPSS and AMOS. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. M. (2009). Structural equation modeling with AMOS. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Callaghan, D. E., Graff, M. G., & Davies, J. (2013). Revealing all: Misleading self-disclosure rates in laboratory based on-line research. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(9), 690–694. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0399
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cara Ng, J. (2017). Interactivity in virtual learning groups: Theories, strategies, and the state of literature. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 7(1), 46–52. doi: 10.18178/ijiet.2017.7.1.840
   Google Scholar
• Cazan, A. M., Cocorada, E., & Maican, C. I. (2016). Computer anxiety and attitudes towards the computer and the internet with Romanian high-school and university students. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 258–267. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, A.-C., Jordan, M. E., & Schallert, D. L. (2013). Reconsidering assessment in online/hybrid courses: Knowing versus learning. Computers and Education, 68, 51–59. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.04.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, A. L., Bell, M. L., Nugent, J., & Smith, W. S. (2016). Global collaboration enhances technology literacy. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 75(5), 20–25.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, C. A. (2009). Transforming schooling through technology: Twenty-first century approaches to participatory learning. Education and Culture, 25(2), 46–61. doi: 10.1353/eac.0.0043
   Google Scholar
• Dayan, R., & Magen-Nagar, N. (2013). Teachers satisfaction following online courses in the ICT field. In Y. Yair, & A. Shmueli (Eds.), MEITAL’s 11th national convention book: The world of open information – New technologies and the ways to evaluate them in online teaching and learning (pp. 136–140). Jerusalem: The Hebrew University. (Hebrew).
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2012). Motivation, personality, and development within embedded social contexts: An overview of self-determination theory. In R. M. Ryan (Ed.), Oxford handbook of human motivation (pp. 85–107). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Freitas, S., & Oliver, M. (2005). Does e-learning policy drive change in higher education? A case study relating models of organizational change to e-leaning implementation. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 27(1), 81–96. doi: 10.1080/13600800500046255
   Google Scholar
• Demir, O., & Yurdugül, H. (2014). The adaptation of the scale of attitude towards computer into turkish for middle and secondary school students. Education and Science, 39(176), 247–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doll, J., & Ajzen, I. (1992). Accessibility and stability of predictors in the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 754–765. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.63.5.754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, K. M., & Shin, D. (2002). Student satisfaction: An alternative approach to assessing this important concept. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 24(2), 197–209. doi: 10.1080/1360080022000013518
   Google Scholar
• Francisa, L., Katzb, Y., & Jones, H. (2000). The reliability and validity of the Hebrew version of the computer attitude scale. Computers and Education, 35, 149–159. doi: 10.1016/S0360-1315(00)00022-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottfried, A. E., Marcoulides, G. A., Gottfried, A. W., & Oliver, P. H. (2009). A latent curve model of parental motivational practices and developmental decline in math and science academic intrinsic motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 729–739. doi: 10.1037/a0015084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halverson, R., & Smith, A. (2010). How new technologies have (and have not) changed teaching and learning in school. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 26(2), 16–49.
   Google Scholar
• Hanze, M., & Berger, R. (2007). Cooperative learning, motivational effects and student characteristics: An experimental study comparing cooperative learning and direct instruction in 12th grand physics classes. Learning and Instruction, 17(1), 29–41. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harasim, L. (2012). Learning theory and online technology: How new technologies are transforming learning opportunities. New York: Routledge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoyle, R. H., & Panter, A. T. (1995). Writing about structural equation models. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling; concepts, issues and applications (pp. 158–176). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hoyle, R. H. (2012). Handbook of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hue, L., & Ab Jalil, H. (2013). Attitudes towards ICT integration into curriculum and usage among university lecturers in Vietnam. International Journal of Instruction, 6(2), 54–66.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Making cooperative learning work. Theory Into Practice, 38(2), 67–73. doi: 10.1080/00405849909543834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, Y. J., & Yablon, Y. B. (2009). Mobile learning: A major e-learning platform. In A. Szucs (Ed.), New technology platforms for learning revisited, LOGOS conference proceedings (pp. 121–126). Budapest: European Distance an E-learning Network.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, C., Kim, M. K., Lee, C., Spector, J. M., & DeMeester, K. (2013). Teacher beliefs and technology integration. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29, 76–85. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2012.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klem, L. (2000). Structural equation modeling. In L. G. Grimm, & P. R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding MORE multivariate statistics (pp. 227–260). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kritz, M., Bachar, E., & Shonfeld, M. (in press). TEC: An online collaborative learning model in a multicultural environment. In M. Shonfeld, & D. Gibson (Eds.), Collaborative learning in a global world (pp. 184–206). New York, NY: IAP.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, C., Erickson, L., Alhramelah, A., Rhoton, D., Lindbeck, R., & Sammons, D. (2014). Technology and adult students in higher education: A review of the literature. Issues and Trends in Educational Technology, 2(1), University of Arizona Libraries. doi: 10.2458/azu_itet_v2i1_lambert
   Google Scholar
• Lavee, Y. (1988). Linear structural relationships (LISREL) in family research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 937–948. doi: 10.2307/352105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, M. K. O., Cheung, C. M. K., & Chen, Z. (2005). Acceptance of internet-based learning medium: The role of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation. Information & Management, 42(8), 1095–1104. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2003.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loyd, B. H., & Gressard, C. P. (1984). Reliability and factorial validity of computer attitude scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 44, 501–505. doi: 10.1177/0013164484442033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magen-Nagar, N., & Shamir-Inbal, T. (2014). National ICT program - a lever to change teachers’ work. American Journal of Educational Research, 2(9), 727–734. doi: 10.12691/education-2-9-4
   Google Scholar
• Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Melamed, U., Peled, R., Mor, N., Shonfeld, M., Harel, S., & Ben Shimon, I. (2011). A program for adjusting teacher education colleges to the 21st century. Jerusalem: Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Ocker, R. J., & Yaverbaum, G. J. (1999). Asynchronous computer-mediated communication versus face-to-face collaboration: Results on student learning, quality and satisfaction. Group Decision and Negotiation, 8(5), 427–440. doi: 10.1023/A:1008621827601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2013). Draft collaborative problem solving framework. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/Draft20PISA20201520Collaborative20Problem20Solving20Framework%20.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2005). Online learning communities revisited. Presentation to the 21st annual conference on distance teaching and learning. Retrieved from http://www.uwex.edu/disted/conference/Resource_library/proceedings/05_1801.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Resta, P., & Carroll, T. (2010). Redefining teacher education for digital age learners. Summit report. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Resta, P., & Shonfeld, M. (2013). A study of trans-national learning teams in a virtual world. In R. McBride, & M. Searson (Eds.), Proceedings of the society for information technology and teacher education international conference 2013 (pp. 2932–2940). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2013). Toward a social psychology of assimilation: Self-determination theory in cognitive development and education. In B. W. Sokol, F. M. E. Grouzet, & U. Muller (Eds.), Self-regulation and autonomy: Social and developmental dimensions of human conduct (pp. 191–207). Cambridge: Cambridge University.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., Koestner, R., & Deci, E. L. (1991). Ego-involved persistence: When free-choice behavior is not intrinsically motivated. Motivation and Emotion, 15, 185–205. doi: 10.1007/BF00995170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmons, J. E. (2006). Taxonomy of collaborative e-learning. Cincinnati, OH: Union Institute & University.
   Google Scholar
• Schifter, D. E., & Ajzen, I. (1985). Intentions, perceived control, and weight loss: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 843–851. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.49.3.843
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. (2010). Looking beyond learning: Notes towards the critical study of educational technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1), 65–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00338.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shifflet, R., & Weilbacher, G. (2015). Teacher beliefs and their influence on technology use: A case study. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 15(3). Retrieved from http://www.citejournal.org/vol15/iss3/socialstudies/article1.cfm
   Google Scholar
• Shonfeld, M., Hoter, E., & Ganayem, A. (2013). Israel: Connecting cultures in conflict. In R. Austin, & B. Hunter (Eds.), Online learning and community cohesion: Linking schools (pp. 41–58). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sivakumaran, T., & Lux, A. (2011). Overcoming computer anxiety: A three-step process for adult learners. US-China Education Review, 8(5), 155–161.
   Google Scholar
• So, H. J., & Brush, T. A. (2008). Student perceptions of collaborative learning, social presence and satisfaction in a blended learning environment: Relationships and critical factors. Computers & Education, 51, 318–336. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2007.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TEC. (2014). Technology, Education and Cultural Diversity. Environments. Available at : http://tecs.macam.ac.il/groups/profile/350592/tec4-m-ed/tab/350597/tec4-med.
   Google Scholar
• Tseng, H., Wang, C., Ku, H., & Sun, L. (2009). Key factors in online collaboration and their relationship to teamwork satisfaction. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 10(2), 195–206.
   Google Scholar
• Vroom, V. H. (2003). Educating managers for decision making and leadership. Management Decision, 41, 968–978. doi: 10.1108/00251740310509490
   Google Scholar
• Yalman, M., & Tunga, M. A. (2014). Examining the attitudes of students from state and foundation universities in Turkey towards the computer and www (world wide web). Education and Science, 39(137), 222–233.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, C. (2012). Student satisfaction, performance, and knowledge construction in online collaborative learning. Educational Technology & Society, 15(1), 127–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, T. D. (2012). Exploring learner to content interaction as a success factor in online courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(4), 152–165.
   Google Scholar