687
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Crowdsourcing mode-based learning activity flow approach to promote subject ontology generation and evolution in learning

ORCID Icon, &
Pages 965-983 | Received 03 May 2018, Accepted 06 Aug 2018, Published online: 13 Aug 2018

References

  • Ahn, L. V., Maurer, B., Mcmillen, C., Abraham, D., & Blum, M. (2008). reCAPTCHA: Human-based character recognition via web security measures. Science, 321(5895), 1465–1468.
  • Allert, H., Markannen, H., & Richter, C. (2006, October). Rethinking the use of ontologies in learning. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Learner-Oriented Knowledge Management and KM-Oriented Learning, in conjunction with the First European Conference on Technology-Enhanced Learning (pp. 115–125). Crete, Greece.
  • Alomari, J., Hussain, M., Turki, S., & Masud, M. (2015). Well-formed semantic model for co-learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 821–828.
  • Antoniou, G., & Vanharmelen, F. (2008). A semantic web primer. Massachusetts, US: MIT Press.
  • Benchcapon, T. (2002). An ontology model to facilitate knowledge-sharing in multi-agent systems. Knowledge Engineering Review, 17(1), 41–60.
  • Besemer, S. (1981). Media notes: Divergent thinking in mathematics. Curriculum Review, 20(3), 224–227.
  • Cao, L. B., & Zhang, C. Q. (2007). The evolution of KDD: Towards domain-driven data mining. International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, 21(4), 677–692.
  • Capuano, N., Dell’Angelo, L., Orciuoli, F., Miranda, S., & Zurolo, F. (2009, September). Ontology extraction from existing educational content to improve personalized e-Learning experiences. IEEE International Conference on Semantic Computing (pp. 577–582). San Francisco, CA.
  • Chandrasekaran, B., Josephson, J. R., & Benjamins, V. R. (1999). What are ontologies, and why do we need them? IEEE Intelligent Systems, 14(1), 20–26.
  • Chen, C. M. (2009). Ontology-based concept map for planning a personalised learning path. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(6), 1028–1058.
  • Chen, C. M., & Huang, S. H. (2014). Web-based reading annotation system with an attention-based self-regulated learning mechanism for promoting reading performance. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(5), 959–980.
  • Chi, Y., Qin, Y., Song, R., & Xu, H. (2018). Knowledge graph in smart education: A case study of entrepreneurship scientific publication management. Sustainability, 10(4), 995.
  • Chu, H. C., Hwang, G. J., Tsai, C. C., & Tseng, J. C. R. (2010). A two tier test approach to developing location-aware mobile learning systems for natural science courses. Computers &Education, 55(4), 1618–1627.
  • Clarke, D. (2003, August). Whole class patterns of participation and the distribution of responsibility for knowledge generation in the classroom. In 10th Biennial Conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction, Padova, Italy.
  • Cossins, D. (2013). Games for science. Scientist, 27(1), 41–48.
  • Dicheva, D., Sosnovsky, S., Gavrilova, T., & Brusilovsky, P. (2005, July). Ontological web portal for educational ontologies. The Workshop on Applications of Semantic Web Technologies for E-Learning at Aied, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Ding, Y., & Foo, S. (2002). Ontology research and development. Part 2 - a review of ontology mapping and evolving. Journal of Information Science, 28(5), 123–136.
  • Dozat, T., Qi, P., & Manning, C. D. (2017). Stanford’s graph-based neural dependency parser at the CoNLL 2017 shared task. Proceedings of the CoNLL 2017 Shared Task: Multilingual Parsing from Raw Text to Universal Dependencies (pp. 20–30).
  • Gadgil, N. J., Tahboub, K., Kirsh, D., & Delp, E. J. (2014). A web-based video annotation system for crowdsourcing surveillance videos. In Imaging and Multimedia Analytics in a Web and Mobile World 2014 (pp. 90–270). San Francisco, CA.
  • Gruber, T. R., & Olsen, G. R. (1994). An ontology for engineering mathematics. Principles of Knowledge Representation & Reasoning, 94, 258–269.
  • Hatala, M., GašEvić, D., Siadaty, M., Jovanovic, J., & Torniai, C. (2012). Ontology extraction tools: An empirical study with educators. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 5(3), 275–289.
  • Hewitt, A. (1995). A review of the role of activity-based learning experiences in the music curriculum, and their current implementation in the standard grade music course in Scotland. British Journal of Music Education, 12(3), 203–214.
  • Hills, T. T. (2015). Crowdsourcing content creation in the classroom. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 27(1), 47–67.
  • Howe, J. (2006). The rise of crowdsourcing. 06 Jenkins H Convergence Culture Where Old & New Media Collide, 14(14), 1–5.
  • Hsu, C. K., Hwang, G. J., & Chang, C. K. (2013). A personalized recommendation-based mobile learning approach to improving the reading performance of efl students. Computers & Education, 63(1), 327–336.
  • Hu, K., Wu, H., Qi, K., Yu, J., Yang, S., Yu, T., Zheng, J., & Liu, B. (2018). A domain keyword analysis approach extending term frequency-keyword active index with google word2vec model. Scientometrics, 114(1), 1–17.
  • Juffinger, A., Neidhart, T., Granitzer, M., Kern, R., Weichselbraun, A., & Wohlgenannt, G. (2009). Distributed web 2.0 crawling for ontology evolution. Journal of Digital Information Management, 7, 615–620.
  • Kunkel, R. (2015). Using skos to create a legal subject ontology for defense agency regulations. Legal Reference Services Quarterly, 34(4), 324–337.
  • Maedche, A., Motik, B., Stojanovic, L., Studer, R., & Volz, R. (2002). Managing multiple ontologies and ontology evolution in ontologging. Intelligent Information Processing, 2002, 51–63.
  • Martins, H., & Silva, N. (2009, May). A user-driven and a semantic-based ontology mapping evolution approach. Proceedings of the International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (pp. 214–221). Milan, Italy.
  • Marzano, A., & Notti, A. M. (2014, September). Educational assessment: semantic representation and ontologies. Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent NETWORKING and Collaborative Systems (pp. 695–698). Salerno, Italy.
  • Miranda, S., Orciuoli, F., & Sampson, D. G. (2016). A skos-based framework for subject ontologies to improve learning experiences. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 609–621.
  • Motiwalla, L. F. (2007). Mobile learning: A framework and evaluation. Computers & Education, 49(3), 581–596.
  • Niederer, S., & van Dijck, J. (2010). Wisdom of the crowd or technicity of content? Wikipedia as a sociotechnical system. New Media & Society, 12(8), 1368–1387.
  • Nudzor, H. P., Dare, A., Oduro, G. K. T., Bosu, R., & Addy, N. (2015). Examining activity-based learning (abl) practices in public basic schools in the northern region of Ghana. Educational Research, 57(4), 437–450.
  • Ouf, S., Ellatif, M. A., Salama, S. E., & Helmy, Y. (2017). A proposed paradigm for smart learning environment based on semantic web. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 796–818.
  • Poetz, M. K., & Schreier, M. (2012). The value of crowdsourcing: Can users really compete with professionals in generating new product ideas? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(2), 245–256.
  • Serra, I., & Girardi, R. (2011, April). Extracting non-taxonomic relationships of ontologies from texts. In Soft Computing Models in Industrial and Environmental Applications, Proceedings of the 6th International Conference SOCO 2011 (pp. 329–338). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
  • Stojanovic, N., & Stojanovic, L. (2002). Usage-oriented evolution of ontology-based knowledge management systems. On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2002: CoopIS, DOA, and ODBASE (pp. 1186–1204).
  • Wang, J., Mendori, T., & Xiong, J. (2014). A language learning support system using course-centered ontology and its evaluation. Computers & Education, 78(259), 278–293.
  • Way, K. A., Ottenbacher, M. C., & Harrington, R. J. (2011). Is crowdsourcing useful for enhancing innovation and learning outcomes in culinary and hospitality education? Journal of Culinary Science & Technology, 9(4), 261–281.
  • Wohlgenannt, G. (2016, December). A comparison of domain experts and crowdsourcing regarding concept relevance evaluation in ontology learning. In International Workshop on Multi-disciplinary Trends in Artificial Intelligence (pp. 243–254). Springer, Cham.
  • Xu, H., Song, D., Yu, T., & Tavares, A. (2017). An enjoyable learning experience in personalising learning based on knowledge management: A case study. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3001–3018.
  • Yang, X., Li, J., Guo, X., & Li, X. (2015). Group interactive network and behavioral patterns in online English-to-Chinese cooperative translation activity. Internet & Higher Education, 25, 28–36.
  • Yu, S. Q. (2007). From knowledge transfer to cognitive construction, and finally situated cognition: Development and prospect of three generation of mobile learning. China Educational Technology, 6, 7–18.
  • Yu, S., Yang, X., Cheng, G., & Wang, M. (2015). From learning object to learning cell: A resource organization model for ubiquitous learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(2), 206–224.
  • Zahirović Suhonjić, A., Despotović-Zrakić, M., Labus, A., Bogdanović, Z., & Barać, D. (2018). Fostering students’ participation in creating educational content through crowdsourcing. Interactive Learning Environments, 4, 1–14.
  • Zeng, Q., Zhao, Z., & Liang, Y. (2009). Course ontology-based user’s knowledge requirement acquisition from behaviors within e-learning systems. Computers & Education, 53(3), 809–818.
  • Zhitomirsky-Geffet, M., Erez, E. S., & Judit, B. I. (2017). Toward multiviewpoint ontology construction by collaboration of non-experts and crowdsourcing: The case of the effect of diet on health. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(3), 681–694.
  • Zouaq, A., & Nkambou, R. (2009). Evaluating the generation of domain ontologies in the knowledge puzzle project. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 21(11), 1559–1572.
  • Zouaq, A., & Nkambou, R. (2010). A survey of domain ontology engineering: Methods and tools. Advances in Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 308, 103–119.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.