Identifying and exploring the effects of different types of tutor questions in individual online synchronous tutoring in mathematics

References

• Anania, J. (1983). The influence of instructional conditions on student learning and achievement. Evaluation in Education, 7(1), 1–92. doi: 10.1016/0191-765X(83)90002-2
   Google Scholar
• Araya, R., & Aljovin, E. (2017). The effect of teacher questions on elementary school students’ written responses on an online STEM platform. Paper presented at the international conference on applied human factors and ergonomics.
   Google Scholar
• Arroyo, I., Wixon, N., Allessio, D., Woolf, B., Muldner, K., & Burleson, W. (2017). Collaboration improves student interest in online tutoring. Paper presented at the international conference on artificial intelligence in education.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, A. (1991). Third generation distance education: the challenge of new technology. Research in Distance Education, 3, 10–15.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. S. (1984). The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Researcher, 13, 4–16. doi: 10.3102/0013189X013006004
   Google Scholar
• Boaler, J., & Brodie, K. (2004). The importance, nature, and impact of teacher questions. Paper presented at the proceedings of the twenty-sixth annual meeting of the North American chapter of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, A. J. (1983). Students’ potential for learning contrasted under tutorial and group approaches to instruction (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Chafe, W. L. (1970). Meaning and the structure of language. Illinois, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chappell, S., Arnold, P., Nunnery, J., & Grant, M. (2015). An examination of an online tutoring program’s impact on low-achieving middle school students’ mathematics achievement. Online Learning, 19(5), 37–53. doi: 10.24059/olj.v19i5.694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, S. L., Skidmore, S. T., & Martirosyan, N. M. (2017). A review of the literature on online developmental mathematics: Research-based recommendations for practice. The Community College Enterprise, 23(2), 9–26.
   Google Scholar
• Crespo, S. (2018). Generating, appraising, and revising representations of mathematics teaching with prospective teachers. In Scripting approaches in mathematics education (pp. 249–264). Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cukurova, M., Mavrikis, M., Luckin, R., Clark, J., & Crawford, C. (2017). Interaction analysis in online maths human tutoring: The case of third space learning. Paper presented at the international conference on artificial intelligence in education.
   Google Scholar
• De Smet, M., Van Keer, H., De Wever, B., & Valcke, M. (2010). Cross-age peer tutors in asynchronous discussion groups: Exploring the impact of three types of tutor training on patterns in tutor support and on tutor characteristics. Computers & Education, 54(4), 1167–1181. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deutskens, E., De Ruyter, K., Wetzels, M., & Oosterveld, P. (2004). Response rate and response quality of internet-based surveys: An experimental study. Marketing Letters, 15(1), 21–36. doi: 10.1023/B:MARK.0000021968.86465.00
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dohrn, S. W., & Dohn, N. B. (2018). The role of teacher questions in the chemistry classroom. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(1), 352–363. doi: 10.1039/C7RP00196G
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnelly, P. J., Blanchard, N., Olney, A. M., Kelly, S., Nystrand, M., & D’Mello, S. K. (2017). Words matter: Automatic detection of teacher questions in live classroom discourse using linguistics, acoustics, and context. Paper presented at the proceedings of the seventh international learning analytics & knowledge conference.
   Google Scholar
• Dron, J., & Anderson, T. (2014). Teaching crowds: Learning and social media. Edmonton: Athabasca University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ernst-Slavit, G., & Pratt, K. L. (2017). Teacher questions: Learning the discourse of science in a linguistically diverse elementary classroom. Linguistics and Education, 40, 1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.linged.2017.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flammer, A. (1981). Towards a theory of question asking. Psychological Research, 43(4), 407–420. doi: 10.1007/BF00309225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., & Person, N. K. (1994). Question asking during tutoring. American Educational Research Journal, 31(1), 104–137. doi: 10.3102/00028312031001104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guldberg, K., & Pilkington, R. (2007). Tutor roles in facilitating reflection on practice through online discussion. In T. W. Lauer, E. Peacock, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Journal of Educational Technology & Society (Vol. 10, pp. 61–72). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Hiebert, J., & Wearne, D. (1993). Instructional tasks, classroom discourse, and students’ learning in second-grade arithmetic. American Educational Research Journal, 30(2), 393–425. doi: 10.3102/00028312030002393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hrastinski, S., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Stenbom, S. (2018). Tutoring online tutors: Using digital badges to encourage the development of online tutoring skills. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(1), 127–136. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irwin, M., Fitzgerald, C., & Berg, W. P. (2000). Effect of the intensity of wireless telephone conversations on reaction time in a braking response. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 90(3_suppl), 1130–1134. doi: 10.2466/pms.2000.90.3c.1130
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, Y. (2014). Exploring teacher questioning as a formative assessment strategy. RELC Journal, 45(3), 287–304. doi: 10.1177/0033688214546962
   Google Scholar
• Kearsley, G. P. (1976). Questions and question asking in verbal discourse: A cross-disciplinary review. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 5(4), 355–375. doi: 10.1007/BF01079934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madden, N. A., & Slavin, R. E. (2017). Evaluations of technology-assisted small-group tutoring for struggling readers. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 33(4), 327–334. doi: 10.1080/10573569.2016.1255577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matell, M. S., & Jacoby, J. (1971). Is there an optimal number of alternatives for Likert scale items? Study I: Reliability and validity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 31(3), 657–674. doi: 10.1177/001316447103100307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPherson, M., & Nunes, M. B. (2004). The role of tutors as a integral part of online learning support. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 7(1).
   Google Scholar
• McPherson, M., & Nunes, M. B. (2009). The role of tutors as a fundamental component of online learning support. Distance and e-Learning in Transition, 235–246.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, S. R., Rice, C. T., Berliner, D. C., & Rosseau, E. W. (1980). The correspondence between teacher questions and student answers in classroom discourse. The Journal of Experimental Education, 48(3), 194–204. doi: 10.1080/00220973.1980.11011735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paoletti, T., Krupnik, V., Papadopoulos, D., Olsen, J., Fukawa-Connelly, T., & Weber, K. (2018). Teacher questioning and invitations to participate in advanced mathematics lectures. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 98(1), 1–17. doi: 10.1007/s10649-018-9807-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ram, A. (1991). A theory of questions and question asking. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1(3-4), 273–318. doi: 10.1080/10508406.1991.9671973
   Google Scholar
• Reichheld, F. F. (2003). The one number you need to grow. Harvard Business Review, 81(12), 46–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. (2003). Examining social presence in online courses in relation to studentsí perceived learning and satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7, 68–88.
   Google Scholar
• Roscoe, R. D., & Chi, M. T. (2007). Understanding tutor learning: Knowledge-building and knowledge-telling in peer tutors’ explanations and questions. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 534–574. doi: 10.3102/0034654307309920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmon, G. (2000). E-moderating: The key to teaching and learning online. London: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Savi, A. O., Ruijs, N. M., Maris, G. K., & van der Maas, H. L. (2018). Delaying access to a problem-skipping option increases effortful practice: Application of an A/B test in large-scale online learning. Computers & Education, 119, 84–94. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schacter, J. (2000). Does individual tutoring produce optimal learning? American Educational Research Journal, 37(3), 801–829. doi: 10.3102/00028312037003801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4–13. doi: 10.3102/0013189X027002004
   Google Scholar
• Stenbom, S., Jansson, M., & Hulkko, A. (2016). Revising the Community of Inquiry framework for the analysis of one-to-one online learning relationships. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3), 36–53. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsuei, M. (2017). Learning behaviours of low-achieving children’s mathematics learning in using of helping tools in a synchronous peer-tutoring system. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(2), 147–161. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2016.1276078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, N. M. (1989). Peer interaction and learning in small groups. International Journal of Educational Research, 13(1), 21–39. doi: 10.1016/0883-0355(89)90014-1
   Google Scholar
• Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89–100. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar