References
- Akcaoglu, M., & Lee, E. (2018). Using Facebook groups to support social presence in online learning. Distance Education, 39(3), 334–352. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1476842
- Asch, S. E. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41(3), 258. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0055756
- Bacev-Giles, C., & Haji, R. (2017). Online first impressions: Person perception in social media profiles. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 50–57. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.04.056
- Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
- Boling, E. C., Hough, M., Krinsky, H., Saleem, H., & Stevens, M. (2012). Cutting the distance in distance education: Perspectives on what promotes positive, online learning experiences. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(2), 118–126. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.11.006
- Cadima, R., Ferreira, C., Monguet, J., Ojeda, J., & Fernandez, J. (2010). Promoting social network awareness: A social network monitoring system. Computers & Education, 54(4), 1233–1240. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.11.009
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
- Cui, G., Lockee, B., & Meng, C. (2013). Building modern online social presence: A review of social presence theory and its instructional design implications for future trends. Education and Information Technologies, 18(4), 661–685. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-012-9192-1
- Drost, E. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105.
- Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (2013). Social cognition: From brains to culture. London: Sage.
- Garrison, D. R., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2007). Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(3), 157–172. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.04.001
- Gunawardena, C. N., & Zittle, F. J. (1997). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer-mediated conferencing environment. American Journal of Distance Education, 11(3), 8–26. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/08923649709526970
- Hancock, J. T., & Dunham, P. J. (2001). Impression formation in computer-mediated communication revisited: An analysis of the breadth and intensity of impressions. Communication Research, 28(3), 325–347. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/009365001028003004
- Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. London: Guilford Press.
- Hayes, A. F., & Scharkow, M. (2013). The relative trustworthiness of inferential tests of the indirect effect in statistical mediation analysis: Does method really matter? Psychological Science, 24(10), 1918–1927. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613480187
- Judd, C. M., James-Hawkins, L., Yzerbyt, V., & Kashima, Y. (2005). Fundamental dimensions of social judgment: Understanding the relations between judgments of competence and warmth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 899. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.899
- Kirschner, P. A., Kreijns, K., Phielix, C., & Fransen, J. (2015). Awareness of cognitive and social behaviour in a CSCL environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(1), 59–77. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12084
- Krämer, N. C., Neubaum, G., Hirt, M., Knitter, C., Ostendorf, S., & Zeru, S. (2017). “I see you, I know you, it feels good” – qualitative and quantitative analyses of ambient awareness as a potential mediator of social networking sites usage and well-being. Computers in Human Behavior, 77, 77–85. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.024
- Kreijns, K., & Kirschner, P. A. (2018). Extending the SIPS-model: A research framework for online collaborative learning. In V. Pammer-Schindler, M. Pérez-Sanagustín, H. Drachsler, R. Elferink, & M. Scheffel (Eds.), Lifelong technology-enhanced learning. EC-TEL 2018. Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 11082). Cham: Springer.
- Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., Jochems, W., & Van Buuren, H. (2007). Measuring perceived sociability of computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Computers & Education, 49(2), 176–192. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.05.004
- Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., & Vermeulen, M. (2013). Social aspects of CSCL environments: A research framework. Educational Psychologist, 48(4), 229–242. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.750225
- Kreijns, K., Weidlich, J., & Rajagopal, K. (2018). The psychometric properties of a preliminary social presence measure using Rasch analysis. In V. Pammer-Schindler, M. Pérez-Sanagustín, H. Drachsler, R. Elferink, & M. Scheffel (Eds.), Lifelong technology-enhanced learning. EC-TEL 2018. Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 11082). Cham: Springer.
- Legon, R., & Garrett, R. (2018). The changing landscape of online learning. A deeper dive CHLOE. Retrieved from www.qualitymatters.org/sites/default/files/research-docs-pdfs/2018-QM-Eduventures-CHLOE-2-Report.pdf
- Leonardi, P. M. (2015). Ambient awareness and knowledge acquisition: Using social media to learn who knows what and who knows whom. MIS Quarterly, 39(4), 747–762. doi: https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2015/39.4.1
- Leonardi, P. M., & Meyer, S. R. (2015). Social media as social lubricant: How ambient awareness eases knowledge transfer. American Behavioral Scientist, 59(1), 10–34. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764214540509
- Levordashka, A., & Utz, S. (2016). Ambient awareness: From random noise to digital closeness in online social networks. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 147–154. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.037
- Levordashka, A., & Utz, S. (2017). Spontaneous trait inferences on social media. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(1), 93–101. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616663803
- Metzger, M. J., Wilson, C., & Zhao, B. Y. (2018). Benefits of browsing? The prevalence, nature, and effects of profile consumption behavior in social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 23(2), 72–89. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmx004
- Öztok, M., & Kehrwald, B. A. (2017). Social presence reconsidered: Moving beyond, going back, or killing social presence. Distance Education, 38(2), 259–266. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2017.1322456
- Richardson, J. C., Maeda, Y., Lv, J., & Caskurlu, S. (2017). Social presence in relation to students’ satisfaction and learning in the online environment: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 402–417. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.001
- Rosenberg, S., Nelson, C., & Vivekananthan, P. S. (1968). A multidimensional approach to the structure of personality impressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(4), 283. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0026086
- Rovai, A. P., & Wighting, M. J. (2005). Feelings of alienation and community among higher education students in a virtual classroom. The Internet and Higher Education, 8(2), 97–110. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2005.03.001
- Seaman, J. E., Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2018). Grade increase: Tracking distance education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group.
- Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunication. London: Wiley.
- Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7(4), 422. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.7.4.422
- Sobel, M. E. (1986). Some new results on indirect effects and their standard errors in covariance structure models. Sociological Methodology, 16, 159–186. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/270922
- Stürmer, S., Ihme, T. A., Fisseler, B., Sonnenberg, K., & Barbarino, M. L. (2018). Promises of structured relationship building for higher distance education: Evaluating the effects of a virtual fast-friendship procedure. Computers & Education, 124, 51–61. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.015
- Symeonides, R., & Childs, C. (2015). The personal experience of online learning: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 539–545. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.015
- Uleman, J. S., Adil Saribay, S., & Gonzalez, C. M. (2008). Spontaneous inferences, implicit impressions, and implicit theories. Annual Reviews of Psychology, 59, 329–360. doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093707
- Uleman, J. S., & Kressel, L. M. (2013). A brief history of theory and research on impression formation. In D. Calston (Ed.), Oxford handbook of social cognition (pp. 53–73). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Van Der Heide, B., D’Angelo, J. D., & Schumaker, E. M. (2012). The effects of verbal versus photographic self-presentation on impression formation in Facebook. Journal of Communication, 62(1), 98–116. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01617.x
- Van Merriënboer, J. J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2017). Ten steps to complex learning: A systematic approach to four-component instructional design. New York: Routledge.
- Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19(1), 52–90. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/009365092019001003
- Walther, J. B. (1993). Impression development in computer-mediated interaction. Western Journal of Communication (Includes Communication Reports), 57(4), 381–398. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10570319309374463
- Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 3–43. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/009365096023001001
- Walther, J. B. (2011). Theories of computer-mediated communication and interpersonal relations. The Handbook of Interpersonal Communication, 4, 443–479.
- Wanous, J. P., Reichers, A. E., & Hudy, M. J. (1997). Overall job satisfaction: How good are single-item measures? Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(2), 247. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.82.2.247
- Wei, C. W., Chen, N. S., & Kinshuk. (2012). A model for social presence in online classrooms. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(3), 529–545. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-012-9234-9
- Weidlich, J., & Bastiaens, T. J. (2017). Explaining social presence and the quality of online learning with the SIPS model. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 479–487. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.016
- Weidlich, J., & Bastiaens, T. J. (2019). Designing sociable online learning environments and enhancing social presence: An affordance enrichment approach. Computers & Education, 142, 103622. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103622
- Weidlich, J., Kreijns, K., Rajagopal, K., & Bastiaens, T. (2018). What social presence is, what it isn’t, and how to measure it: A work in progress. In T. Bastiaens, J. Van Braak, M. Brown, L. Cantoni, M. Castro, R. Christensen, … O. Zawacki-Richter (Eds.), Proceedings of EdMedia: World conference on educational media and technology (pp. 2142–2150). Amsterdam: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).