1,391
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Revisiting variation affordance: applying variation theory in the design of educational software

Pages 527-538 | Received 07 Nov 2018, Accepted 13 Sep 2019, Published online: 24 Sep 2019

References

  • Åkerlind, G. S. (2018). What future for phenomenographic research? On continuity and development in the phenomenography and variation theory tradition. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 62(6), 949–958. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2017.1324899
  • Ashworth, P., & Lucas, U. (1998). What is the ‘world’ of phenomenography? Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 42(4), 415–431. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0031383980420407
  • Bowden, J., & Marton, F. (1998). The university of learning: Beyond quality and competence. London: Kogan Page.
  • Bowden, J. A., & Walsh, E. (Eds.). (2000). Phenomenography. Melbourne: RMIT University Press.
  • Dragonwise Project. (2003). Computer-assisted learning of Chinese characters: Classroom examples (in Chinese). Hong Kong: Dragonwise Project, Faculty of Education, The University of Hong Kong.
  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Piscataway, N.J.: Aldine Transaction.
  • Hannafin, M. J., & Hill, J. R. (2007). Epistemology and the design of learning environments. In R. A. Reiser, & J. V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (2nd ed.) (pp. 53–61). Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson.
  • Jonassen, D. H. (1991). Objectivism versus constructivism: Do we need a new philosophical paradigm? Educational Technology Research and Development, 39(3), 5–14. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296434
  • Lam, H. C. (2013). On generalization and variation theory. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 57(4), 343–356. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2012.656277
  • Lam, H. C. (2015). An exploratory study on primary 3 student writing of Chinese characters at their teachers’ dictation. Journal of Educational Research and Development, 11(2), 33–60. doi:https://doi.org/10.3966/181665042015061102002
  • Lam, H. C. (2018). The phenomenography tradition in the study of classroom teaching. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2018.1518417
  • Lam, H. C., Ki, W. W., Chung, A. L. S., Ko, P. Y., Lai, A. C. Y., Lai, S. M. S., … Lau, E. C. C. (2004). Designing learning objects that afford learners the experience of important variations in Chinese characters. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(2), 114–123. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2004.00071.x
  • Lam, H. C., Ki, W. W., Law, N., Chung, A. L. S., Ko, P. Y., Ho, A. H. S., & Pun, S. W. (2001). Designing CALL for learning Chinese characters. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17, 115–128. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2001.00164.x
  • Lam, H. C., Pun, K. H., Leung, S. T., Tse, S. K., & Ki, W. W. (1993). Computer-assisted-learning for learning Chinese characters. Communications of COLIPS: An International Journal of Chinese and Oriental Languages Information Processing Society, 3(1), 31–44.
  • Linguistic Society of Hong Kong. (2002). Guide to LSHK Cantonese romanization of Chinese characters (2nd ed.). Hong Kong: Linguistic Society of Hong Kong.
  • Marton, F. (2015). Necessary conditions of learning. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Marton, F., Runesson, U., & Tsui, A. B. M. (2004). The space of learning. In F. Marton & A. B. M. Tsui (Eds.), Classroom discourse and the space of learning (pp. 3–40). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1984). Approaches to learning. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell, & N. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning (pp. 36–55). Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.
  • Marton, F., & Tsui, A. B. M. (2004). Classroom discourse and the space of learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Mayer, R. E. (2002). Multimedia learning. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 41, 85–139. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(02)80005-6
  • Merrill, M. D. (2002). First principles of instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 43–59. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02505024
  • Pang, M. F. (2003). Two faces of variation: On continuity in the phenomenographic movement. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47(2), 145–156. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830308612
  • Reigeluth, C. M. (1999). What is instructional-design theory and how is it changing? In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models (Vol. 2): A new paradigm of instructional theory (pp. 5–29). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Rovio-Johansson, A., & Ingerman, Å. (2016). Continuity and development in the phenomenography and variation theory tradition. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 60(3), 257–271. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2016.1148074