Self-efficacy and problem-solving skills in mathematics: the effect of instruction-based dynamic versus static visualization

References

• Arcavi, A. (2003). The role of visual representations in the learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 52(3), 215–241. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024312321077
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental design for research. Hopewell, NJ: Houghton Mifflin Company.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, Y. L. (2015). Examining relationships among elementary mathematics teachers’ efficacy and their students’ mathematics self-efficacy and achievement. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(6), 1307–1320. doi: https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1387a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, K. E., Wu, L. J., Lai, S. C., & Sung, Y. T. (2016). Using mobile devices to enhance the interactive learning for spatial geometry. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(4), 916–934. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2014.948458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark-Wilson, A., & Hoyles, C. (2018). A research-informed web-based professional development toolkit to support technology-enhanced mathematics teaching at scale. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dori, Y. J., & Belcher, J. (2005). How does technology-enabled active learning affect undergraduate students’ understanding of electromagnetism concepts? The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), 243–279. doi: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1402_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duval, R. (2006). A cognitive analysis of problems of comprehension in a learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61, 103–131. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-0400-z
   Google Scholar
• Duval, R. (2017). Understanding the mathematical way of thinking – The registers of semiotic representations (T. M. M. Campos, Ed.). Cham: Springer International.
   Google Scholar
• Dvir, A., & Tabach, M. (2017). Learning extrema problems using a non-differential approach in a digital dynamic environment: The case of high-track yet low-achievers. ZDM, 49(5), 785–798. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0862-8
   Google Scholar
• Fang, N., & Guo, Y. (2016). Interactive computer simulation and animation for improving student learning of particle kinetics. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(5), 443–455. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, N., & Tajvidi, M. (2017). The effects of computer simulation and animation (CSA) on students’ cognitive processes: A comparative case study in an undergraduate engineering course. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2017, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Granberg, C., & Olsson, J. (2015). ICT-supported problem solving and collaborative creative reasoning: Exploring linear functions using dynamic mathematics software. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 37, 48–62. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2014.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackett, G., & Betz, N. E. (1989). An exploration of the mathematics self-efficacy/mathematics performance correspondence. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20, 261–273. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/749515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74.
   Google Scholar
• Hiebert, J. (2013). Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics. Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hoyles, C., & Lagrange, J. B. (2010). Mathematics education and technology: Rethinking the terrain. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kaberman, Z., & Dori, Y. J. (2009). Question posing, inquiry, and modeling skills of high school chemistry students in the case-based computerized laboratory environment. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7, 597–625. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-007-9118-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaput, J., Noss, R., & Hoyles, C. (2002). Developing new notations for a learnable mathematics in the computational era. In L. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 51–75). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Karsenty, R., Arcavi, A., & Hadas, N. (2007). Exploring informal mathematical products of low achievers at the secondary school level. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 26(2), 156–177. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2007.05.003
   Google Scholar
• Kay, R. H. (2012). Examining factors that influence the effectiveness of learning objects in mathematics classrooms. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 12(4), 350–366. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2012.732189
   Google Scholar
• Kohen, Z. (2019). Informed integration of IWB technology, incorporated with exposure to varied mathematics problem-solving skills: Its effect on students' real-time emotions. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 50(8), 1128–1151.
   Google Scholar
• Kramarski, B. (2004). Making sense of graphs: Does metacognitive instruction make a difference on students’ mathematical conceptions and alternative conceptions? Learning and Instruction, 14(6), 593–619. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krutetskii, V. A. (1976). The psychology of mathematical abilities in school children. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, L., Boscolo, P., Tornatora, M. C., & Ronconi, L. (2013). Besides knowledge: A cross-sectional study on the relations between epistemic beliefs, achievement goals, self-beliefs, and achievement in science. Instructional Science, 41(1), 49–79. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-012-9210-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mevarech, Z., & Kramarski, B. (2014). Critical maths for innovative societies. The role of metacognitive pedagogies. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• National Council for Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2014). Principles to action: Ensuring mathematical success for all. Reston, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Governors Association. (2010). The common core state standards. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/the-standards/mathematics
   Google Scholar
• Nitsch, R., Fredebohm, A., Bruder, R., Kelava, A., Naccarella, D., Leuders, T., & Wirtz, M. (2015). Students’ competencies in working with functions in secondary mathematics education—empirical examination of a competence structure model. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(3), 657–682. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9496-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noss, R., Healy, L., & Hoyles, C. (1997). The construction of mathematical meanings: Connecting the visual with the symbolic. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 33(2), 203–233. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002943821419
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 results: Creative problem solving: Students’ skills in tackling real-life problems (volume V), PISA. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, P. D., Marsh, H. W., Ciarrochi, J., Marshall, S., & Abduljabbar, A. S. (2014). Juxtaposing math self-efficacy and self-concept as predictors of long-term achievement outcomes. Educational Psychology, 34(1), 29–48. . doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2013.797339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prediger, S., Fischer, C., Selter, C., & Schöber, C. (2018). Combining material-and community-based implementation strategies for scaling up: The case of supporting low-achieving middle school students. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Presmeg, N. C. (1986). Visualisation in high school mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 6(3), 42–46.
   Google Scholar
• Radović, S., Radojičić, M., Veljković, K., & Marić, M. (2018). Examining the effects of Geogebra applets on mathematics learning using interactive mathematics textbook. Interactive Learning Environments. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1512001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos-Trigo, M. (2014). Problem solving in mathematics education. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp. 496–501). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Schukajlow, S., Leiss, D., Pekrun, R., Blum, W., Müller, M., & Messner, R. (2012). Teaching methods for modelling problems and students’ task-specific enjoyment, value, interest and self-efficacy expectations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79, 215–237. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9341-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schukajlow, S., Rakoczy, K., & Pekrun, R. (2017). Emotions and motivation in mathematics education: Theoretical considerations and empirical contributions. ZDM, 49, 307–322. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0864-6
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, B., & Dreyfus, T. (1993). Measuring integration of information in multirepresentational software. Interactive Learning Environments, 3(3), 177–198. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1049482930030302
   Google Scholar
• Stieff, M. (2017). Drawing for promoting learning and engagement with dynamic visualizations. In Learning from dynamic visualization (pp. 333–356). Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Usher, E. L., & Pajares, F. (2009). Sources of self-efficacy in mathematics: A validation study. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34(1), 89–101. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, I., & Schnotz, W. (2017). Learning from static and dynamic visualizations: What kind of questions should we ask? In R. Lowe & R. Ploetzner (Eds.), Learning from dynamic visualization – Innovations in research and application (pp. 69–91). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wai, J., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2009). Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(4), 817–835. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, H. K., Kuo, C. Y., Jen, T. H., & Hsu, Y. S. (2015). What makes an item more difficult? Effects of modality and type of visual information in a computer-based assessment of scientific inquiry abilities. Computers & Education, 85, 35–48. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yerushalmy, M. (2005). Functions of interactive visual representations in interactive mathematical textbooks. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 10(3), 217–249. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-005-0538-2
   Google Scholar
• Zazkis, D. (2016). On transitions between representations: The role of contextual reasoning in calculus problem solving. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 16(4), 374–388. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2016.1190042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar