Interaction analysis of teachers and students in inquiry class learning based on augmented reality by iFIAS and LSA

References

• Akçayır, M., Akçayır, G., Pektaş, H. M., & Ocak, M. A. (2016). Augmented reality in science laboratories: The effects of augmented reality on university students’ laboratory skills and attitudes toward science laboratories. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 334–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alalwan, N., Cheng, L., Al-Samarraie, H., Yousef, R., Alzahrani, A. I., & Sarsam, S. M. (2020). Challenges and prospects of virtual reality and augmented reality utilization among primary school teachers: A developing country perspective. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 66, 100876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Araújo, P. T., Cardoso, A. P., & Fidalgo, S. (2016). Leadership and pedagogical interaction as predictors of learning outcomes in physical education. In 7th ICEEPSY 2016 International Conference on Education & Educational Psychology. Future Academy. Cognitive-crcs. https://doi.org/10.15405/iceepsy2016 (1986-3020)
   Google Scholar
• Bacca, J., Baldiris, S., Fabregat, R., & Graf, S. (2014). Augmented reality trends in education: A systematic review of research and applications. Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 133–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bujak, K. R., Radu, I., Catrambone, R., Macintyre, B., Zheng, R., & Golubski, G. (2013). A psychological perspective on augmented reality in the mathematics classroom. Computers & Education, 68, 536–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, S., Liu, C., Wang, T., Liu, E., & Liang, J. C. (2021). Effects of learning physics using augmented reality on students’ self-efficacy and conceptions of learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(1), 235–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, S., Liu, E., Yang, Y., & Liang, J. C. (2019). Tablet-based AR technology: Impacts on students’ conceptions and approaches to learning mathematics according to their self-efficacy. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 248–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C. H., Chou, Y. Y., & Huang, C. Y. (2016). An augmented-reality-based concept map to support mobile learning for science. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25(4), 567–578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-016-0284-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, K. H., & Tsai, C. C. (2016). The interaction of child–parent shared reading with an augmented reality (AR) picture book and parents’ conceptions of AR learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(1), 203–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiang, T. H. C., Yang, S. J., & Hwang, G. J. (2014a). An augmented reality-based mobile learning system to improve students’ learning achievements and motivations in natural science inquiry activities. Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 352–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiang, T. H. C., Yang, S. J., & Hwang, G. J. (2014b). Students’ online interactive patterns in augmented reality-based inquiry activities. Computers & Education, 78, 97–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chuang, Y. T. (2017). MEMIS: A mobile-supported English-medium instruction system. Telematics and Informatics, 34(2), 640–656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dede, C. (2009). Immersive interfaces for engagement and learning. Science, 323(5910), 66–69. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1167311
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Serio, Á, Ibáñez, M. B., & Kloos, C. D. (2013). Impact of an augmented reality system on students’ motivation for a visual art course. Computers & Education, 68, 586–596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drexler, W. (2010). The networked student model for construction of personal learning environments: Balancing teacher control and student autonomy. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(3), 369–385. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy, T. M., & Raymer, P. L. (2010). A practical guide and a constructivist rationale for inquiry based learning. Educational Technology, 50(4), 3–15.
   Google Scholar
• Dunleavy, M., Dede, C., & Mitchell, R. (2009). Affordances and limitations of immersive participatory augmented reality simulations for teaching and learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(1), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-008-9119-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelson, D. C., Gordin, D. N., & Pea, R. D. (1999). Addressing the challenges of inquiry-based learning through technology and curriculum design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8(3-4), 391–450. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.1999.9672075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, H., Gao, C., & Chen, J. (2012). An improved Flanders interactive analysis system and its application. China Educational Technology, 309(10), 109–113 . https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-9860.2012.10.022
   Google Scholar
• Flanders, N. A. (1963). Intent, action and feedback: A preparation for teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 14(3), 251–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248716301400305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu, X., & Wang, W. (2004). New exploration of classroom analytical techniques to support teacher professional development. China Educational Technology, 210(07), 18–21. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-9860.2004.07.004
   Google Scholar
• Gunter, P. L., Jack, S. L., Shores, R. E., Carrell, D. E., & Flowers, J. (1993). Lag sequential analysis as a tool for functional analysis of student disruptive behavior in classrooms. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 1(3), 138–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/106342669300100301
   Google Scholar
• He, Y., Lu, J., Huang, H. X., He, S. T., Ma, N. N., Sha, Z. M., … Li, X. (2019). The effects of flipped classrooms on undergraduate pharmaceutical marketing learning: A clustered randomized controlled study. PLoS One, 14(4), 22. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou, H. T., Chang, K. E., & Sung, Y. T. (2010). Applying lag sequential analysis to detect visual behavioural patterns of online learning activities. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2), E25–E27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00935.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, J. (2020). Interrelationship between inquiry-based learning and instructional quality in predicting science literacy. Research in Science Education, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09946-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karagozlu, D. (2018). Determination of the impact of augmented reality application on the success and problem-solving skills of students. Quality & Quantity, 52(5), 2393–2402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0674-5
   Google Scholar
• Kiemer, K., Gröschner, A., Pehmer, A.-K., & Seidel, T. (2015). Effects of a classroom discourse intervention on teachers’ practice and students’ motivation to learn mathematics and science. Learning and Instruction, 35, 94–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhlthau, C. C. (2010). Guided inquiry: School libraries in the 21st century. School Libraries Worldwide, 16(1), 17–28.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Y., Zhao, S., Ma, Q., Qian, C., & Lin, Q. (2019). A feature analysis of regional classroom teaching in the trend of interactive instruction. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(2), 137–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1474230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, H. C. K., Hsieh, M. C., Wang, C. H., Sie, Z. Y., & Chang, S. H. (2011). Establishment and usability evaluation of an interactive AR learning system on conservation of fish. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(4), 181–187.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, D. P., & Rimm-Kaufman, S. E. (2015). Do student self-efficacy and teacher-student interaction quality contribute to emotional and social engagement in fifth grade math? Journal of School Psychology, 53(5), 359–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2015.07.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moersch, C. (1995). Levels of technology implementation (LoTi): A framework for measuring classroom technology use. Learning and Leading with Technology, 23(3), 40–40.
   Google Scholar
• Muñoz-Cristóbal, J. A., Jorrín-Abellán, I. M., Asensio-Perez, J. I., Martinez-Mones, A., Prieto, L. P., & Dimitriadis, Y. (2014). Supporting teacher orchestration in ubiquitous learning environments: A study in primary education. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 8(1), 83–97. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2014.2370634
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niu, X. J., Xu, X. Y., Cheng, L., & Cai, S. (2018). A comparative study on achievement degree of teaching objectives based on an interactive AR physical-simulation experimental procedure. Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Computers in education, Philippines: Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education, Nov 26th-30th.434–439.
   Google Scholar
• Pedaste, M., Mitt, G., & Jürivete, T. (2020). What is the effect of using mobile augmented reality in K12 inquiry-based learning? Education Sciences, 10(4), 94. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10040094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, N. E., VandeKamp, K. O., Mercer, L. K., & Nordby, C. J. (2002). Investigating teacher-student interactions that foster self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 37(1), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3701_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pianta, R. C. (2017). Teacher-student interactions: Measurement, impacts, improvement, and policy. In Ralph P. Ferretti & James Hiebert (Eds.), Teachers, teaching, and reform (pp. 75–93). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pöysä, S., Vasalampi, K., Muotka, J., Lerkkanen, M. K., Poikkeus, A. M., & Nurmi, J. E. (2019). Teacher–student interaction and lower secondary school students’ situational engagement. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(2), 374–392. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12244
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders-Stewart, K., Gyles, P., Shore, B., & Bracewell, R. (2015). Student outcomes in inquiry: Students’ perspectives. Learning Environments Research, 18(2), 289–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-015-9185-2
   Google Scholar
• Sotiriou, S., & Bogner, F. X. (2008). Visualizing the invisible: Augmented reality as an innovative science education scheme. Advanced Science Letters, 1(1), 114–122. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2008.012
   Google Scholar
• Wu, H. K., Lee, S. W. Y., Chang, H. Y., & Liang, J. C. (2013). Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. Computers & Education, 62, 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, K. T., Wang, T. H., & Chiu, M. H. (2015). Study the effectiveness of technology-enhanced interactive teaching environment on student learning of junior high School biology. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 11(2), 263–275. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1327a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z., Li, Z., Han, M., Su, Z., Li, W., & Pan, Z. (2021). An augmented reality-based multimedia environment for experimental education. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 80(1), 575–590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-09684-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar