Exploring the effects of automated written corrective feedback, computer-mediated peer feedback and their combination mode on EFL learner’s writing performance

References

• Bitchener, J. (2012). A reflection on ‘the language learning potential’ of written CF. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(4), 348–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, C.-F. (2012). Peer review via three modes in an EFL writing course. Computers and Composition, 29(1), 63–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2012.01.001
   Google Scholar
• Chang, N., Watson, A. B., Bakerson, M. A., Williams, E. E., McGoron, F. X., & Spitzer, B. (2012). Electronic feedback or handwritten feedback: What do undergraduate students prefer and why? Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, 1(1), 1.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, T. (2016). Technology-supported peer feedback in ESL/EFL writing classes: A research synthesis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(2), 365–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.960942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chukharev-Hudilainen, E., & Saricaoglu, A. (2016). Causal discourse analyzer: Improving automated feedback on academic ESL writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(3), 494–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.991795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cifuentes, L., & Shih, Y.-C. D. (2001). Teaching and learning online: A collaboration between US and Taiwanese students. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(4), 456–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/08886504.2001.10782327
   Google Scholar
• Conijn, R., Martinez-Maldonado, R., Knight, S., Buckingham Shum, S., Van Waes, L., & Van Zaanen, M. (2020). How to provide automated feedback on the writing process? A participatory approach to design writing analytics tools. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1839503
   Google Scholar
• Delante, N. L. (2017). Perceived impact of online written feedback on students’ writing and learning: A reflection. Reflective Practice, 18(6), 772–804. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2017.1351351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diab, N. M. (2010). Effects of peer-versus self-editing on students’ revision of language errors in revised drafts. System, 38(1), 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dikli, S., & Bleyle, S. (2014). Automated essay scoring feedback for second language writers: How does it compare to instructor feedback? Assessing Writing, 22, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2014.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dizon, G. (2016). A comparative study of Facebook vs. Paper-and-pencil writing to improve L2 writing skills. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(8), 1249–1258. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2016.1266369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Double, Kit S, McGrane, Joshua A., & Hopfenbeck, Therese N. (2020). The Impact of Peer Assessment on Academic Performance: A Meta-analysis of Control Group Studies. Educational Psychology Review, 32(2), 481–509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09510-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebadi, S., & Rahimi, M. (2017). Exploring the impact of online peer-editing using Google Docs on EFL learners’ academic writing skills: A mixed methods study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(8), 787–815. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1363056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, R, & Barkhuizen, G P. (2005). Analysing learner language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ferris, D. R. (2010). Second language writing research and written corrective feedback in SLA: Intersections and practical applications. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 181–201. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guardado, M., & Shi, L. (2007). ESL students’ experiences of online peer feedback. Computers and Composition, 24(4), 443–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2007.03.002
   Google Scholar
• Guo, Q., Feng, R., & Hua, Y. (2021). How effectively can EFL students use automated written corrective feedback (AWCF) in research writing? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(1-2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1879161
   Google Scholar
• Ho, M.-c., & Savignon, S. J. (2007). Face-to-face and computer-mediated peer review in EFL writing. CALICO Journal, 24(2), 269–290. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v24i2.269-290
   Google Scholar
• Ho, P. V. P., Phung, L. T. K., Oanh, T. T. T., & Giao, N. Q. (2020). Should peer E-comments replace traditional peer comments? International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 295–314. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13120a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, R. H., Garralda, A., Li, D. C., & Lock, G. (2006). Interactional dynamics in on-line and face-to-face peer-tutoring sessions for second language writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2005.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J., Link, S., & Hegelheimer, V. (2015). Rethinking the role of automated writing evaluation (AWE) feedback in ESL writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 27, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Link, S., Mehrzad, M., & Rahimi, M. (2020). Impact of automated writing evaluation on teacher feedback, student revision, and writing improvement. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(1-2), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1743323
   Google Scholar
• Liu, J., & Sadler, R. W. (2003). The effect and affect of peer review in electronic versus traditional modes on L2 writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2(3), 193–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1475-1585(03)00025-0
   Google Scholar
• Ma, Q. (2020). Examining the role of inter-group peer online feedback on wiki writing in an EAP context. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(3), 197–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1556703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malvern, D., & Richards, B. (2012). Measures of lexical richness. The encyclopedia of applied linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Matsumura, S., & Hann, G. (2004). Computer anxiety and students’ preferred feedback methods in EFL writing. The Modern Language Journal, 88(3), 403–415. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.00237.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owston, R. D., & Wideman, H. H. (1997). Word processors and children’s writing in a high-computer-access setting. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 30(2), 202–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/08886504.1997.10782223
   Google Scholar
• Pham, H. T. P. (2020). Computer-mediated and face-to-face peer feedback: Student feedback and revision in EFL writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(1-2), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1868530
   Google Scholar
• Plakans, L., Gebril, A., & Bilki, Z. (2019). Shaping a score: Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in integrated writing performances. Language Testing, 36(2), 161–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532216669537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polio, C.. (2001). Research Methodology in Second Language Writing Research: The Case of Text-Based Studies. In On Second Language Writing (pp. 91–115). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Polio, C. G. (1997). Measures of linguistic accuracy in second language writing research. Language Learning, 47(1), 101–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.31997003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarré, C., Grosbois, M., & Brudermann, C. (2019). Fostering accuracy in L2 writing: Impact of different types of corrective feedback in an experimental blended learning EFL course. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(7), 707–729. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1635164
   Google Scholar
• Shang, H.-F. (2017). An exploration of asynchronous and synchronous feedback modes in EFL writing. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 29(3), 496–513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-017-9154-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shang, H.-F. (2019). Exploring online peer feedback and automated corrective feedback on EFL writing performance. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(1), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1629601
   Google Scholar
• Shintani, N. (2016). The effects of computer-mediated synchronous and asynchronous direct corrective feedback on writing: A case study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(3), 517–538. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.993400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skehan, P.. (1996). Second language acquisition research and task-based instruction. In Challenge and Change in Language Teaching (pp. 17–30). Oxford: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Skehan, P. (1998). Task-based instruction. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 18, 268–286. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190500003585
   Google Scholar
• Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (1999). The influence of task structure and processing conditions on narrative retellings. Language Learning, 49(1), 93–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson, M., & Phakiti, A. (2014). The effects of computer-generated feedback on the quality of writing. Assessing Writing, 19, 51–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2013.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tannacito, T., & Tuzi, F. (2002). A comparison of e-response: Two experiences, one conclusion. Kairos, 7(3), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Tuzi, F. (2004). The impact of e-feedback on the revisions of L2 writers in an academic writing course. Computers and Composition, 21(2), 217–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2004.02.003
   Google Scholar
• Waer, H. (2021). The effect of integrating automated writing evaluation on EFL writing apprehension and grammatical knowledge. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 15(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2021.1914062
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y.-C. (2015). Promoting collaborative writing through wikis: A new approach for advancing innovative − active learning in an ESP context. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(6), 499–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.881386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y.-J., Shang, H.-F., & Briody, P. (2013). Exploring the impact of using automated writing evaluation in English as a foreign language university students’ writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(3), 234–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2012.655300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warschauer, D. W. M. (2006). Electronic feedback and second language writing. In Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues (pp. 105–122). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, B., Lawrence, J., Warschauer, M., & Lin, C.-H. (2015). Middle school students’ writing and feedback in a cloud-based classroom environment. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 20(2), 201–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-014-9239-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou, B., Wang, D., & Xing, M. (2016). Collaborative tasks in Wiki-based environment in EFL learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(5), 1001–1018. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2015.1121878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar