Consumer Perceptions of Credibility and Selling Intent Among Advertisements, Advertorials, and Editorials: A Persuasion Knowledge Model Approach

REFERENCES

• Aker, J., Fournier, S., & Brasal, A. (2004). When do good brands go bad?. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balasubramanian, S.K. (1994). Beyond advertising and publicity: Hybrid messages and public policy issues. Journal of Advertising, 23, 29–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, G.T. (1994). Does publicity outperform advertising? An experimental test of the third-party endorsement. Journal of Public Relations Research, 6(3), 185–207.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, G.T., & Curtin, P.A. (1995). Tracing sources of information pollution: A survey and experimental test of print media's labeling policy for feature advertising. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 72(1), 178–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaiken, S., & Maheswaran, D. (1994). Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: Effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(3), 460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dix, S., & Phau, I. (2009). Spotting the disguises and masquerades: Revisiting the boundary between editorial and advertising. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 27(3), 413–427.
   Google Scholar
• Eisend, M. (2006). Two-sided advertising: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 23, 187–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisend, M., & Küster, F. (2011). The effectiveness of publicity versus advertising: A meta-analytic investigation of its moderators. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(6), 906–921.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot, M.T., & Speck, P.S. (1998). Consumer perceptions of advertising clutter and its impact across various media. Journal of Advertising Research, 38(1), 29–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friestad, M., & Wright, P. (1994). The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 21(1), 1–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodlad, N., Eadie, D.R., Kinnin, H., & Raymond, M. (1997). Advertorial: Creative solution or last resort. International Journal of Advertising, 16(2), 73–84.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., & Black, W. (1995). Multivariate data analysis (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Harmon, R.R., & Coney, K.A. (1982). The persuasive effects of source credibility in buy and lease situations. JMR, Journal of Marketing Research, 19(2), 255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasper, C.R., & Ouellette, S.J. (1994). Consumers' perception of risk and the purchase of apparel from catalogs, Journal of Direct Marketing, 8(2), 23–36.
   Google Scholar
• Kamins, M.A., & Assael, H. (1987). Two-sided versus one-sided appeals: A cognitive perspective on argumentation, source derogation, and the effect of disconfirming trial on belief change. Journal of Marketing Research, 24 ( February), 29–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman, L. (1984). How effective are advertorials? Marketing and Media Decisions, 19(3), 70–72.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, B.H., Pasadeos, Y., & Barban, A. (2001). On the deceptive effectiveness of labeled and unlabeled advertorial formats. Mass Communication and Society, 4(3), 265–281.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, M., & Lennon, S.J. (2000). Television shopping for apparel in the United States: Effects of perceived amount of information on perceived risks and purchase intention. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 28(3), 301–330.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, D.L., Hausknecht, D., & Thamodaran, K. (1986). Time compression, response opportunity, and persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 13(1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nan, X. (2013). Perceived source credibility and advertising persuasiveness: An investigation of moderators and psychological processes. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 34(2), 195
   Google Scholar
• Newell, S.J., & Goldsmith, R.E. (2002). The development of a scale to measure perceived corporate credibility. Journal of Business Research, 52(3), 235–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Notarantonio, E., & Quigley, C. (2009). The effectiveness of a buzz marketing approach compared to traditional advertising: An exploration. Journal of Promotion Management, 15, 455–464.
   Google Scholar
• Lawlor, M.A., & Prothero, A. (2008). Exploring children's understanding of television advertising—beyond the advertiser's perspective. European Journal of Marketing,1203–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, M., & Faber, R. (2007). Effects of product placement in on-line games on Brand memory: A perspective of the limited-capacity model of attention. Journal of Advertising, 36(4), 75–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord, K.R., & Putrevu, S. (1993). Advertising and publicity: An information processing perspective. Journal of Economic Psychology, 14(1), 57–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, K.D., & Smith N.C. (2008). Commercializing social interaction: The ethics of stealth marketing. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 27(1), 45–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGinnies, E., & Ward, C. (1980). Better liked than right: Trustworthiness and expertise as factors in credibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6, 467–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, J.J., & Rodger, S.L. (2005). An examination of advertising credibility and skepticism in five difference media using the persuasion knowledge model. American Academy Of Advertising Conference Proceedings, 5(1), 10–18.
   Google Scholar
• Ohanian, R. (1991). The impact of celebrity spokespersons' perceived image on consumers' intention to purchase. Journal of Advertising Research, 31(1), 46–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obermiller, C., & Spangenberg E. (1998). Development of a scale to measure consumer skepticism toward advertising. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 7, 159–186.
   Google Scholar
• Pornpitakpan, C. (2004). The persuasive effect of circadian arousal, endorser expertise, and argument strength in advertising. Journal of Global Marketing, 17(2), 141–172.
   Google Scholar
• Rinallo, D., & Basuroy, S. (2009). Does advertising spending influence media coverage of the advertiser? Journal of Marketing, 73(6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, A., Ozanne, L., & Cohen, D.A. (2002). An exploratory examination of advertorials. ANZMAC 2000: Conference proceedings, Melbourne, Victoria, 2–4 December 2002, Geelong, Vic., Deakin University.
   Google Scholar
• Rotfield, H.J., & Parsons, P. (1989). Self-Regulations and Magazine Advertising. Journal of Advertising, 18(4), 33–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stapel, J., (1994). Observations: A brief observation about likability and interestingness of advertising. Journal of Advertising Research, 34(2), 79–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternthal, B., Dholakia, R., & Leavitt, C. (1978). The persuasive effect of source credibility: Tests of cognitive response. Journal of Consumer Research, 4(4), 252–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Till, B.D., & Busler, M. (2000). The match-up hypothesis: Physical attractiveness, expertise, and the role of fit on brand attitude, purchase intent and brand beliefs, Journal of Advertising, 29(3), 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Reijmersdal, E.A., Neijens, P.C., & Smit, E.G. (2010). Customer magazines: Effects of commerciality on readers' reactions. Journal Of Current Issues & Research In Advertising (CTC Press), 32(1), 59–67.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, P., Friestad, M., & Boush, D.M. (2005). The development of marketplace persuasion knowledge in children, adolescents, and young adults. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 222–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, C., & Shaffer, D.R. (1987). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(4), 677–688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar