58,470
Views
25
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Impact of “High Quality, Low Price” Appeal on Consumer Evaluations

REFERENCES

  • Aguirre-Rodriguez, A. (2013). The effect of consumer persuasion knowledge on scarcity appeal persuasiveness. Journal of Advertising, 42(4), 371–379.
  • Ailawadi, K., Neslin, S.A., & Gedenk, K. (2001). Pursuing the value-conscious consumer: Store brands versus national brand promotions. Journal of Marketing, 65( January), 71–89.
  • Akdeniz, B., Calantone, R.J., & Voorhees, C.M. (2013). Effectiveness of marketing cues on consumer perceptions of quality: The moderating roles of brand reputation and third-party information. Psychology & Marketing, 30(1), 76–89.
  • Anderson, E.T., & Simester, D.I. (2003). Mind your pricing cues. Harvard Business Review, 81( September), 96–103.
  • Biswas, A., & Burton, S. (1993). Consumer perceptions of tensile price claims in advertisements: An assessment of claim types across different discount levels. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 21(3), 217–229.
  • Bobinski, Jr., G. S., Cox, D., & Cox, A. (1996). Retail ‘sale’ advertising, perceived retailer credibility, and price rationale. Journal of Retailing, 72(3), 291–306.
  • Bornemann, T., & Homburg, C. (2011). Psychological distance and the dual role of price. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(3), 490–504.
  • Burton, S., Lichtenstein, D.R., & Herr, P.M. (1993). An examination of the effects of information consistency and distinctiveness in a reference-price advertisement context. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 2074–2092.
  • Burton, S., Lichtenstein, D.R., Netemeyer, R.G., & Garretson, J.A. (1998). A scale for measuring attitude toward private label products and an examination of its psychological and behavioral correlates. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 26(4), 293–306.
  • Cacioppo, J.T., & Petty, R.E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42( January), 116–131.
  • Cacioppo, J.T., Petty, R.E., & Kao, C.F. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48(3), 306–307.
  • Darke, P.R., & Chung, C.M. Y. (2005). Effects of pricing and promotion on consumer perceptions: It depends on how you frame it. Journal of Retailing, 81(1), 35–47.
  • Dodds, W.B., Monroe, K.B., & Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers' product evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 28( August), 307–319.
  • Haugtvedt, C.P., Petty, R.E., & Cacioppo, J.T. (1992). Need for cognition and advertising: Understanding the role of personality variables in consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 1(3), 239–260.
  • Howard, D., & Kerin, R.A. (2006). Broadening the scope of reference price advertising research: A field study of consumer shopping involvement. Journal of Marketing, 79( October), 184–204.
  • Inman, J.J., McAlister, L., & Hoyer, W.D. (1990). Promotion signal: Proxy for a price cut? Journal of Consumer Research, 17( June), 74–81.
  • Inman, J.J., Peter, A.C., & Raghubir, P. (1997). Framing the deal: The role of restrictions in accentuating deal value. Journal of Consumer Research, 24( June), 68–79.
  • Kardes, F.R., Cronley, M.L., & Kim, J. (2006). Construal-level effects on preference stability, preference-behavior correspondence, and the suppression of competing brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16( 2), 135–144.
  • Lambert, D.R. (1980). Price as a quality signal: The tip of the iceberg. Economic Inquiry, 18( January), 144–150.
  • Lambert, Z.V. (1972). Price and choice behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 9( February), 35–40.
  • Leavitt, H.J. (1954). A note on some experimental findings about the meaning of price. Journal of Business. 27( July), 205–210.
  • Lichtenstein, D.R., Bloch, P.H., & Black, W.C. (1988). Correlates of price acceptability. Journal of Consumer Research, 15( September), 243–252.
  • Lichtenstein, D.R., & Burton, S. (1989). The relationship between perceived and objective price–quality. Journal of Marketing Research, 26( November), 429–443.
  • Lichtenstein, D.R., Ridgway, N.M., & Netemeyer, R.G. (1993). Price perceptions and consumer shopping behavior: A field study. Journal of Marketing Research, 30( May), 234–245.
  • Manning, K.C., & Sprott, D.E. (2007). Multiple unit price promotions and their effects on quantity purchase intentions. Journal of Retailing, 83(4), 411–421.
  • Miyazaki, A.D., Grewal, D., & Goodstein, R.C. (2005 The effect of multiple extrinsic cues on quality perceptions: A matter of consistency,"Journal of Consumer Research, 32(. June), 146–153.
  • Mobley, M.F., Bearden, W.O., & Teel, J.E. (1988). An investigation of individual responses to tensile price claims. Journal of Consumer Research, 15( September), 273–279.
  • Monroe, K.B. (2003). Pricing: Making profitable decisions, 3rd ed., Burr Ridge, IL: Irwin.
  • Monroe, K.B., & Dodds, W.B. (1988). A research program for establishing the validity of the price–quality relationship. Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 151–168.
  • Olson, J.C. (1977). Price as an informational cue: Effects on product evaluations. In A.G. Woodside, J.N. Sheth, & P.D. Bennett (eds.), Consumer and industrial buying behavior (pp. 267–286). New York: North-Holland.
  • Peterson, R.A., & Wilson, W.R. (1985). Perceived risk and price-reliance schema as price-perceived-quality mediators. In J. Jacoby & J.C. Olson (eds.), Perceived quality: How consumers view stores and merchandise (pp. 247–267). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
  • Raghubir, P., & Corfman, K. (1999). When do price promotions affect pretrial brand evaluations? Journal of Marketing Research, 36, 211–222.
  • Raghubir Das, P. (1992). Semantic cues and buyer evaluation of promotional communication. AMA summer educators’ conference proceedings 3, 12–17.
  • Rao, A.R. (1989). The effect of price, brand name, and store name on buyers' perceptions of product quality: An integrative review. Journal of Marketing Research, 26( August), 351–357.
  • Rao, A.R., & Monroe, K.B. (1988). The moderating effect of prior knowledge on cue utilization in product evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 15( September), 253–264.
  • Scitovszky, T. (1944–1945). Some consequences of the habit of judging quality by price. Review of Economic Studies, 12(2), 100–105.
  • Suri, R., Kohli, C., & Monroe, K.B. (2007). The effects of perceived scarcity on consumers' processing of price information. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35(1), 89–100.
  • Teas, R.K., & Agarwal, S. (2000). The effects of extrinsic product cues on consumers' perceptions of quality, sacrifice, and value. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28 (2), 278–290.
  • Tellis, G., & Gaeth, G.J. (1990). Best value, price-seeking, and price aversion: The impact of information and learning on consumer choices. Journal of Marketing, 54( April), 34–45.
  • Tull, D.S., Boring, R.A., & Gonsior, M.H. (1964). A note on the relationship of price and imputed quality. Journal of Business, 37( July), 186–191.
  • Van Herpen, E., Pieters, R., & Zeelenberg, M. (2009). When demand accelerates demand: Trailing the bandwagon. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19(3), 302–312.
  • Walters, A., & Long, M. (2012). The effect of food label cues on perceptions of quality and purchase intentions among high-involvement consumers with varying levels of nutrition knowledge. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 44(4), 350–354.
  • Wansink, B., Kent, R.J., & Hock, S.J. (1998). An anchoring and adjustment model of purchase quantity decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 35( February), 71–81.
  • Wheatley, J.J., & Chiu, J.S. Y. (1977). The effects of price, store image, and product and respondent characteristics on perceptions of quality. Journal of Marketing Research, 14( May), 181–186.
  • Wheatley, J.J., Chiu, J.S. Y., & Goldman, A. (1981), Physical quality, price, and perceptions of product quality: Implications for retailers. Journal of Retailing, 57(2), 100–116.
  • Zeithaml, V.A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52( July), 2–22.