Why Consumers Like Facebook Brands: The Role of Aspirational Brand Personality in Consumer Behavior

References

• Aaker, J. L. (1997). Dimensions of brand personality. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(3), 347–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aaker, J. L. (1999). The malleable self: The role of self-expression in persuasion. Journal of Marketing Research, 36(2), 45–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akin, M. (2011). Predicting consumers' behavioral intentions with perceptions of brand personality: A study in cell phone markets. International Journal of Business and Management, 6(6), 193–206.
   Google Scholar
• Back, M. D., Stopfer, J. M., Vazire, S., Gaddis, S., Schmukle, S. C., Egloff, B., & Gosling, S. D. (2010). Facebook profiles reflect actual personality, not self-idealization. Psychological Science, 21(3), 372–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797609360756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batra, R., Lehmann, D., & Singh, D. (1993). The brand personality component of brand goodwill: Some antecedents and consequences. In D. A. Aaker & A. Biel (Eds.), Brand equity and advertising. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. pp. 83–96.
   Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M. (1992). On the fit of models to covariances and methodology to the bulletin. Psychological Bulletin, 112(3), 400–404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A. (1989). A new incremental fit index f or general structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 17(3), 303–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, D. (2008). Why youth (heart) social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. In D. Buckingham (Ed.), Youth, identity, and digital media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. pp. 119–142.
   Google Scholar
• Branaghan, R. J., & Hildebrand, E. A. (2011). Brand personality, self‐congruity, and preference: A knowledge structures approach. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 10(5), 304–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bumgarner, B. A. (2007). You have been poked: Exploring the uses and gratifications of Facebook among emerging adults. First Monday, 12(11). Retrieved on July 28, 2014, from http://www.firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2026/1897
   Google Scholar
• Bronstein, J. (2013). Like me! Analyzing the 2012 presidential candidates' Facebook pages. Online Information Review, 37(2), 173–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouvier, G. (2012). How Facebook users select identity categories for self-presentation. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 7(1), 37–57.
   Google Scholar
• Bushelow, E. E. (2012). Facebook pages and benefits to brands. Elon Journal of Undergraduate Research in Communications, 3(2), 5–17.
   Google Scholar
• Carmines, E. G., & McIver, J. P. (1981). Analyzing models with unobservable variables. In G. W. Bohrnstedt & E. F. Borgatta (eds.), Social measurement: Current issue (pp. 65–111). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, M. (2014). Social identity gratifications of social network sites and their impact on collective action participation. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 17(3), 229–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan C., Berger, J., & Van Boven, L. (2013). Identifiable but not identical: Combining social identity and uniqueness motives in choice. Journal of Consumer Research, S288-S300, 39(3), https://doi.org/10.1086/664804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, C. M., Chiu, P. Y., & Lee, M. K. (2011). Online social networks: Why do students use Facebook? Computers in Human Behavior, 27(4), 1337–1343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, W. W. (1998). Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quarterly, 22(1), 7–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu, S. C. (2011). Viral advertising in social media: Participation in Facebook groups and responses among college-aged users. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 12(1), 30–43.
   Google Scholar
• Creamer, M. (2012, January 27). Study: Only 1& of Facebook “fans” engage with brands. Retrieved from http://adage.com/article/digital/study-1-facebook-fans-engage-brands/232351/
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dickstein-Fischer, L. A. (2012). Facebook use in relation to gender, introversion-extroversion, and sense of belonging among college students. ( Counseling psychology dissertations. Paper 33). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2047/d20002738
   Google Scholar
• eMarketer. (2015, September 8). College students still spend most social time with Facebook. Retrieved from http://www.emarketer.com/Article/College-Students-Still-Spend-Most-Social-Time-with-Facebook/1012955
   Google Scholar
• eMarketer. (2013, June 18). Social networking reaches nearly one in four around the world. Retrieved from http://www.emarketer.com/Article/Social-Networking-Reaches-Nearly-One-Four-Around-World/1009976
   Google Scholar
• Fan Page List. (n.d.), “Product brands with the most fans on Facebook as of October 2015 (in millions). Retrieved from http://www.statista.com/statistics/265657/leading-product-brands-with-the-most-fans-on-facebook/Facebook. (2013, October 30).
   Google Scholar
• Facebook. (n.d.). Stats. Retrieved from http://newsroom.fb.com/company-info
   Google Scholar
• Fitzsimons, G. M., Chartrand, T. L., & Fitzsimons, G. J. (2008). Automatic effects of brand exposure on motivated behavior: How Apple makes you “think different”. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 21–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freling, T. H., & Forbes, L. P. (2005). An examination of brand personality through methodological triangulation. Journal of Brand Management, 13(2), 148–162.
   Google Scholar
• Gerbasi, M. E., & Prentice, D. A. (2013). The self- and other-interest inventory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(3), 495–514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giroux, M., & Grohmann, B. (2015). Activating multiple facets of the self: How identity facets and brand personality can influence self-brand connections. Advances in Consumer Research, 43, 538–539.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, R. E., & Goldsmith, E. B. (2012). Brand personality and brand engagement. American Journal of Management, 12(1), 11–20.
   Google Scholar
• Grieve, R., Indian, M., Witteveen, K., Tolan, G. A., & Marrington, J. (2013). Face-to face or Facebook: Can social connectedness be derived online? Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 604–609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, N. (2010). This time it's personal: Social networks, viral politics and identity management. In D. Riha & A. Maj (Eds.), Emerging practices in cyberculture and social networking (pp. 1–23). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Rodopi.
   Google Scholar
• Hagerty, B. M., Lynch-Sauer, J., Patusky, K. L., Bouwsema, M., & Collier, P. (1992). Sense of belonging: A vital mental health concept. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 6(3), 172–177.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haferkamp, N., Eimler, S. C., Papadakis, A. M., & Kruck, J. V. (2012). Men are from Mars, women are from Venus? Examining gender differences in self-presentation on social networking sites. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(2), 91–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halpern, D., & Gibbs, J. (2012). Social media as a catalyst for online deliberation? Exploring the affordances of Facebook and YouTube for political expression. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1159–1168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Black, B., Bain, B., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Haivas, S. M., Hofmans, J., & Pepermans, R. (2013). Volunteer engagement and intention to quit from a self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43(9), 1869–1880. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollenbaugh, E. E., & Ferris, A. L. (2014). Facebook self-disclosure: Examining the role of traits, social cohesion, and motive. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 50–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyllegard, K., Ogle, J., Yan, R., & Reitz, A. (2011). An exploratory study of college students fanning behavior on Facebook: The influence of technology acceptance, identity, and market mavenism. The College Student Journal, 45(3), 601–616.
   Google Scholar
• Jie, Y., Chou, T., & Chou, N. (2012). Assessing the fit of two brand personality scales in a Chinese context and revisiting the predictive validity of two methods of measuring self-congruity. Journal of Brand Management, 19(6), 525–540. https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.2011.54
   Google Scholar
• Jin, S. A. A. (2013). Peeling back the multiple layers of Twitter's private disclosure onion: The roles of virtual identity discrepancy and personality traits in communication privacy management on Twitter. New Media & Society, 15(6), 813–833, 151461444812471814.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, S. (2014). Factors influencing intention of mobile application use. International Journal of Mobile Communications, 12(4), 360–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, C. K., Han, D., & Park, S. B. (2001). The effect of brand personality and brand identification on brand loyalty: Applying the theory of social identification. Japanese Psychological Research, 43(4), 195–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koetsier, J. (2013, March 5). Facebook: 15 million businesses, companies, and organizations now have a Facebook page. Retrieved from http://venturebeat.com/2013/03/05/facebook-15-million-businesses-companies-and-organizations-now-have-a-facebook-page/
   Google Scholar
• Koles, B., & Nagy, P. (2012). Virtual customers behind avatars: The relationship between virtual identity and virtual consumption in second life. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 7(2), 87–105.
   Google Scholar
• Kosinski, M., Stillwell, D., & Graepel, T. (2013). Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.110(15), 5802–5805, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1218772110
   Google Scholar
• Kramer, N. C., & Winter, S. (2008). Impression management 2.0: The relationship of self-esteem, extraversion, self-efficacy, and self-presentation within social networking sites. Journal of Media Psychology, 20, 106–116.
   Google Scholar
• Lievrouw, L. A., & Livingstone, S. (2006). Handbook of new media: Student edition. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsman, A., Mudd, D., Rich, M., & Bruich, S. (2012). The power of “like”: How brands reach (and influence) fans through social media marketing. Journal of Advertising Research, 52(1), 40–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S. (2008). Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: Teenagers' use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expression. New Media & Society, 10, 393–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madi, A. (2016). Using values to segment virtual consumers on social networking sites. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 34(5), 623–645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malär, L., Krohmer, H., Hoyer, W. D., & Nyffenegger, B. (2011). Emotional brand attachment and brand personality: The relative importance of the actual and the ideal self. Journal of Marketing, 75(4), 35–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehdizadeh, S. (2010). Self-presentation 2.0: Narcissism and self-esteem on Facebook. Cyberpsychology, Behavior & Social Networking, 13(4), 357–364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muntinga, D. G., Moorman, M., & Smit, E. G. (2011). Introducing COBRAs: Exploring motivations for brand-related social media use. International Journal of Advertising, 30(1), 13–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naylor, R. W., Lamberton, C. P., & West, P. M. (2012). Beyond the “like” button: The impact of mere virtual presence on brand evaluations and purchase intentions in social media settings. Journal of Marketing, 76, 105–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson-Field, K., Riebe, E., & Sharp, B. (2012). What's not to ‘like?’ Can a Facebook fan base give a brand the advertising reach it needs? Journal Of Advertising Research, 52(2), 262–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols, B. S., & Schumann, D. W. (2012). Consumer preferences for assimilative versus aspirational models in marketing communications: The role of product class, individual difference and mood state. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 20(4), 359–375.
   Google Scholar
• Park, J. K., & John, D. R. (2010). Got to get you into my life: Do brand personalities rub off on consumers? Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 655–669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson, M. (2015, May 4). Social media demographics to inform a better segmentation strategy. Retrieved from http://sproutsocial.com/insights/new-social-media-demographics
   Google Scholar
• Phau, I., & Lau, K. C. (2001). Brand personality and consumer self-expression: Single or dual carriageway? The Journal of Brand Management, 8(6), 428–444.
   Google Scholar
• Pempek, T. A., Yermolayeva, Y. A., & Calvert, S. L. (2009). College students' social networking experiences on Facebook. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30, 227–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poyry, E., Parvinen, P., & Malmivaara, T. (2013). Can we get from liking to buying? Behavioral differences in hedonic and utilitarian Facebook usage. Electronic Commerce Research and Application, 12(4), 224–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quester, P., Plewa, C., Palmer, K., & Mazodier, M. (2013). Determinants of community-based sponsorship impact on self-congruity. Psychology & Marketing, 30(11), 996–1007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramaseshan, B., & Tsao, H. Y. (2007). Moderating effects of the brand concept on the relationship between brand personality and perceived quality. Journal of Brand Management, 14(6), 458–466.
   Google Scholar
• Ramo et al. (2015). Feasibility and quit rates of the tobacco status project: A Facebook smoking cessation intervention for young adults.
   Google Scholar
• Rauschnabel, P., Mau, G., & Ivens, B. S. (2013). Who likes Facebook? Exploring the characteristics of brand fans on Facebook. In S. Rosengren, M. Dahlen & S. Okazaki (Eds.), Advances in advertising research (Vol. 4, pp. 43–54). Germany: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
   Google Scholar
• Royo-Vela, M., & Casamassima, P. (2011). The influence of belonging to virtual brand communities on consumers' affective commitment, satisfaction and word-of-mouth advertising. Online Information Review, 35(4), 517–542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2002). An overview of self-determination theory: An organismic-dialectical perspective. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 3–33). Rochester, NY: The University of Rochester Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwämmlein, E., & Wodzicki, K. (2012). What to tell about me? Self-presentation in online communities. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(4), 387–407. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01582.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidman, G. (2013). Self-presentation and belonging on Facebook: How personality influences social media use and motivations. Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 402–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stieger, S., Burger, C., Bohn, M., & Voracek, M. (2013). Who commits virtual identity suicide? Differences in privacy concerns, internet addiction, and personality between Facebook users and quitters. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(9), 629–634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, T., & Wu, G. (2012). Traits, predictors, and consequences of Facebook self-presentation. Social Science Computer Review, 30(4), 419–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sung, Y., Choi, S.M., & Tinkham, S. F. (2012). Brand-situation congruity: The roles of self-construal and brand commitment. Psychology & Marketing, 29(12), 941–955.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sung, Y., & Kim, J. (2010). Effects of brand personality on brand trust and brand affect. Psychology & Marketing, 27(7), 639–661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sung, Y., & Tinkham, S. F. (2005). Brand personality structures in the United States and Korea: Common and culture-specific factors. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15(4), 334–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, J. C. (1982). Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 15–40). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ülkümen, G., & Cheema, A. (2011). Framing goals to influence personal savings: The role of specificity and construal level. Journal of Marketing Research (JMR), 48(6), 958–969. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.09.0516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlachopoulus, S. P., Kaperoni, M., & Moustaka, F. C. (2011). The relationship of self-determination theory variables to exercise identity. Psychology of Sport & Exercise, 12, 265–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2010.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, E., Buil, I., de Chernatony, L., & Hogan, M. (2014). Who “likes” you… and why? A typology of Facebook fans. Journal of Advertising Research, 54(1), 92–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waters, R. D., Burnett, E., Lamm, A., & Lucas, J. (2009). Engaging stakeholders through social networking: How nonprofit organizations are using Facebook. Public Relations Review, 35, 102–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wessels, B. (2012). Identification and the practices of identity and privacy in everyday digital communication. New Media & Society, 14(8), 1251–1268, 1461444812450679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, K., Argo, J. J., & Sengupta, J. (2012). Dissociative versus associative responses to social identity threat: The role of consumer self-construal. Journal of Consumer Research, 39, 5240–5255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, C. C., & Brown, B. B. (2015). Factors involved in associations between Facebook use and college adjustment: Social competence, perceived usefulness, and use patterns. Computers in Human Behavior, 46, 245–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yee, N., & Bailenson, J. (2007). The proteus effect: The effect of transformed self-representation on behavior. Human Communication Research, 33, 271–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, S., Grasmuck, S., & Martin, J. (2008). Identity construction on Facebook: Digital empowerment in anchored relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1816–1836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, L., Lu, Y., Wang, B., Chau, P. Y. K., & Zhang, L. (2012). Cultivating the sense of belonging and motivating user participation in virtual communities: A social capital perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 32(6), 574–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2012.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, W., Yuan, C. H., Chang, W. H., & Wu, Y. C. J. (2016). Profile pictures on social media: Gender and regional differences. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 891–898.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar