Social Information in Facebook News Feed Ads: Effects of Personal Relevance and Brand Familiarity

References

• Alba, J. W., & Hutchinson, J. W. (1987). Dimensions of consumer expertise. Journal of Consumer Research, 13 (4), 411–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, W. E. (1993). The relevance accessibility model of advertising effectiveness. In A. M. Andrew (Ed.), Advertising exposure, memory and choice (pp. 49–88). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, W. E., & Lutz, R. J. (2000). An empirical test of an updated relevance-accessibility model of advertising effectiveness. Journal of Advertising, 29 (1), 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bansal, H. S., & Voyer, P. A. (2000). Word-of-mouth processes within a service purchase decision context. Journal of Service Research, 3 (2), 166–177.
   Google Scholar
• Beres, D. (2016, April 27). Here’s how much people trust Facebook. Retrieved from: https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/facebook-personal-data-poll_us_571fc867e4b0b49df6a96bf3
   Google Scholar
• Bonn, M. A., Kim, W. G., Kang, S., & Cho, M. (2016). Purchasing wine online: The effects of social influence, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and wine involvement. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 25 (7), 841–869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britton, B. K., & Tesser, A. (1982). Effects of prior knowledge on use of cognitive capacity in three complex cognitive tasks. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21 (4), 421–436.
   Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1979). Effects of message repetition and position on cognitive response, recall and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37 (1), 97–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, M. C., & Keller, K. L. (2003). Brand familiarity and advertising repetition effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 30 (2), 292–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celsi, R. L., & Olson, J. C. (1988). The role of involvement in attention and comprehension processes. Journal of Consumer Research, 15 (2), 210–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B. (1993). Influence. New York, NY: Harper Collins College.
   Google Scholar
• Constine, J. (2011, December 20). Facebook sponsored story ads to appear in the web news feed in 2012. Retrieved from: https://techcrunch.com/2011/12/20/sponsored-stories-news-feed/
   Google Scholar
• Dahlen, M. (2001). Banner ads through a new lens. Journal of Advertising Research, 41 (4), 23–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dembosky, A. (2011). Facebook to allow advertising in news feed. Retrieved March 16, 2017, from https://www.ft.com/content/a6e33c1a-2b7a-11e1-9fd0-00144feabdc0
   Google Scholar
• Dennis, A. R. (1996). Information exchange and use in small group decision making. Small Group Research, 27 (4), 532–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influence upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51 (3), 629–636.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dinev, T., & Hart, P. (2006). An extended privacy calculus model for E-commerce transactions. Information Systems Research, 17 (1), 61–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Facebook Terms and Policies (2017). Retrieve March 16, 2017, from https://www.facebook.com/policies/
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, S., Perrin, A., & Duggan, M. (2016). Social media update. Retrieved March 16, 2017, from http://www.pewinternet.org/2016/11/11/social-media-update-2016/
   Google Scholar
• Haugtvedt, C. P., Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1992). Need for cognition and advertising: Understanding the role of personality variables in consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates), 1 (3), 239–260.
   Google Scholar
• Herr, P. M., Kardes, F. R., & Kim, J. (1991). Effects of word-of-mouth and product attribute information on persuasion: An accessibility-diagnosticity perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 17 (4), 454–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, G. (2016). Moderating role of brand familiarity in cross-media effects: An information processing perspective. Journal of Promotion Management, 22 (5), 665–683.
   Google Scholar
• Invernizzi, F., Falomir-Pichastor, J. M., Munntoz-Rojas, D., & Mugny, G. (2003). Social influence in personally relevant contexts: The respect attributed to the sources as a factor increasing smokers’ intention to quit smoking. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33 (9), 1818–1836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, M. F. (1989). Task, situational, and personal determinants of influence processes in group decision making. In E. J. Lawler (Ed.). Advances in group processes (Vol. 6, pp. 87–105). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, D., Stasson, M. F., & Hart, J. W. (1999). Are the tabloids always wrong or is that just what we think? Need for cognition and perceptions of articles in print media. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29 (9), 1984–1997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, K. L. (1991). Cue compatibility and framing in advertising. Journal of Marketing Research, 28 (1), 42–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent, R. J., & Allen, C. T. (1994). Competitive interference effects in consumer memory for advertising: The role of brand familiarity. Journal of Marketing, 58 (3), 97–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent, R. J., & Kellaris, J. J. (2001). Competitive interference effects in memory for advertising: Are familiar brands exempt? Journal of Marketing Communications, 7 (3), 159–169.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, D. H., Sung, Y. H., Lee, S. Y., Choi, D., & Sung, Y. (2016). Are you on timeline or news feed? The roles of Facebook pages and construal level in increasing ad effectiveness. Computer in Human Behavior, 57, 312–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimmel, A. J., & Kitchen, P. J. (2014). Word of mouth and social media. Journal of Marketing Communications, 20 (1–2), 2–4.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, A. (1996). The logic of using inferential statistics with experimental data from nonprobability samples: Inspired by Cooper, Dupagne, Potter, and Sparks. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 40 (3), 422–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laroche, M., Kim, C., & Zhou, L. (1996). Brand familiarity and confidence as determinants of purchase intention: An empirical test in a multiple brand context. Journal of Business Research, 37 (2), 115–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, M. K. O., Shi, N., Cheung, C. M. K., Lim, K. H., & Sia, C. L. (2011). Consumer’s decision to shop online: The moderating role of positive informational social influence. Information & Management, 48 (6), 185–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, C. (2013). Persuasive messages on information system acceptance: A theoretical extension of elaboration likelihood model and social influence theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 29 (1), 264–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacInnis, D. J., Moorman, C., & Jaworski, B. J. (1991). Enhancing and measuring consumers’ motivation, and opportunity, ability to process brand information from ads. Journal of Marketing, 55 (4), 32–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, S. B., Lutz, R. J., & Belch, G. E. (1986). The role of attitude toward the ad as a mediator of advertising effectiveness: A test of competing explanations. Journal of Marketing Research, 23 (2), 130–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, S. B., & Spreng, R. A. (1992). How does motivation moderate the impact of central and peripheral processing on brand attitudes and intentions? Journal of Consumer Research, 18 (4), 519–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machleit, K. A., Madden, T. J., & Allen, C. T. (1990). Measuring and modeling brand interest as an alternative Aad effect with familiar brands. Advances in Consumer Research, 17, 223–230.
   Google Scholar
• Maurer, C., & Wiegmann, R. (2011). Effectiveness of advertising on social network sites: A case study on Facebook. In R. Law, M. Fuchs, & F. Ricci (Eds.), Information and communications technologies in tourism 2011 (pp. 485–498). Vienna: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Milne, G. R., & Gordon, M. E. (1993). Direct mail privacy-efficiency trade-offs within an implied social contract framework. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 12 (2), 206–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muehling, D. D., & McCann, M. (1993). Attitude toward the ad: A review. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 15 (2), 25–58.
   Google Scholar
• Ohanian, R. (1991). The impact of celebrity spokespersons’ perceived image on customers’ intention to purchase. Journal of Advertising Research, 31 (1), 46–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okazaki, S., Li, H., & Hirose, M. (2009). Consumer privacy concerns and preference for degree of regulatory control. Journal of Advertising, 38 (4), 63–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, D., Lee, J, & Han, I. (2007). The effect of online consumer reviews on consumer purchasing intention: The moderating role of involvement. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 11 (4), 125–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pechmann, C., & Stewart, D. W. (1990). The effects of comparative advertising on attention, memory, and purchase intentions. Journal of Consumer Research, 17 (2), 180–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., Brinol, P., & Priester, J. R. (2009). Mass media attitude change: Implication of elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In J. Bryant, & M. B. Oliver (Eds.). Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 125–164). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1981). Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches. Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1984). The effects of involvement on responses to argument quantity and quality: Central and peripheral routes to persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46 (1), 69–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.). Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 123–205). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Phelps, J., & Thorson, E. (1991). Brand familiarity and product involvement effects on the attitude toward an ad-brand attitude relationship. ACR, 18, 202–209.
   Google Scholar
• Pope, N. K. L., & Voges, K. E. (2000). The impact of sport sponsorship activities, corporate image, and prior use on consumer purchase intention. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 9 (2), 6, 96–102.
   Google Scholar
• Priester, J. R., & Petty, R. E. (1995). Source attributions and persuasion: Perceived honesty as a determinant of message scrutiny. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21 (6), 637–654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, T., Coyle, J. R., Lightfoot, E., & Scott, A. (2007). Reconsidering models of influence: The relationship between consumer social networks and Word-of-Mouth effectiveness. Journal of Advertising Research, 47 (4), 387–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, Y., Hur, W., & Kim, M. (2012). Brand trust and affect in the luxury brand-customer relationship. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 40 (2), 331–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spreng, R. A., & Page, T. J. (2001). The impact of confidence in expectations on consumer satisfaction. Psychology and Marketing, 18 (11), 1187–1204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suh, J.-C., & Yi, Y. (2006). When brand attitudes affect the customer satisfaction-loyalty relation: The moderating role of product involvement. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16 (2), 145–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundram, D. S., & Webster, C. (1999). The role of brand familiarity on the impact of word-of-mouth communication on brand evaluations. Advances in Consumer Research, 26, 664–670.
   Google Scholar
• Sweeney, J., Soutar, G., & Mazzarol, T. (2014). Factors enhancing word-of-mouth influence: Positive and negative service-related messages. European Journal of Marketing, 48 (1/2), 336–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, E. P., Kruglanski, A. W., & Spiegel, S. (2000). Attitudes as knowledge structures and persuasion as a specific case of subjective knowledge acquisition. In G. R. Maio & J. M. Olson (Eds.), Why we evaluate: Functions of attitudes (pp. 59–95). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., & Brown, S. A. (2001). A longitudinal investigation of personal computers in homes: Adoption determinants and emerging challenges. MIS Quarterly, 25 (1), 71–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warrington, P., & Shim, S. (2000). An empirical investigation of the relationship between product involvement and brand commitment. Psychology and Marketing, 17 (9), 761–782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar