The Effect of Sequential Structure in Charity Advertising on Message Elaboration and Donation Intention: The Mediating Role of Empathy

References

• Ariely, D., & Carmon, Z. (2000). Gestalt characteristics of experiences: The defining features of summarized events. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13(2), 191–201. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(200004/06)13:2<191::AID-BDM330>3.0.CO;2-A
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baberini, M., Coleman, C.-L., Slovic, P., & Västfjäll, D. (2015). Examining the effects of photographic attributes on sympathy, emotions, and donation behavior. Visual Communication Quarterly, 22(2), 118–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/15551393.2015.1061433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bae, M. (2019). Influences of identified victim images on processing fluency. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 31(3), 249–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495142.2018.1526740
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagozzi, R. P., & Moore, D. J. (1994). Public service advertisements: Emotions and empathy guide prosocial behavior. Journal of Marketing, 58(1), 56–70. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barraza, J. A., & Zak, P. J. (2009). Empathy toward strangers triggers oxytocin release and subsequent generosity. In S. Atran, A. Navarro, K. Ochsner, A. Tobena, & O. Vilarroya (Eds.), Values, empathy, and fairness across social barriers (pp. 182–189). New York Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04504.x
   Google Scholar
• Batson, C. D. (1987). Prosocial motivation: Is it ever truly altruistic? Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 20, 65–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, R. (2015). Individual characteristics and the arousal of mixed emotions: consequences for the effectiveness of charity fundrasing advertisements. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 20(2), 188–209. https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.1500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentley, J. P., & Thacker, P. G. (2004). The influence of risk and monetary payment on the research participation decision making process. Journal of Medical Ethics, 30(3), 293–298. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2002.001594
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodenhausen, G. V., Musswiler, T., Gabriel, S., & Moreno, K. N. (2001). Affective influences on stereotyping and intergroup relations. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Briñol, P., & Petty, R. E. (2009). Persuasion: Insights from the self-validation hypothesis. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 69–118). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, M., & Miller, N. (1987). Explanation of the relation between negative mood and helping. Psychological Bulletin, 102(1), 91–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrera, P., Muñoz, D., & Caballero, A. (2010). Mixed emotional appeals in emotional and danger control processes. Health Communication, 25(8), 726–736. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2010.521914
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrera, P., & Oceja, L. (2007). Drawing mixed emotions: Sequential or simultaneous experiences. Cognition & Emotion, 21(2), 422–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930600557904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celsi, R. L., & Olson, J. C. (1988). The role of involvement in attention and comprehension processes. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 210–224. https://doi.org/10.1086/209158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaiken, S., Liberman, A., & Eagly, A. H. (1989). Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In J. Uleman & J. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 212–252). Guildford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B., Baumann, D. J., & Kenrick, D. T. (1981). Insights from sadness: A three-step model of the development of altruism as hedonism. Developmental Review, 1(3), 207–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-2297(81)90018-6
   Google Scholar
• Cryder, C. E., Loewenstein, G., & Seltman, H. (2013). Goal gradient in helping behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(6), 1078–1083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cryder, C. E., London, A. J., Volpp, K. G., & Loewenstein, G. (2010). Informative inducement: Study payment as a signal of risk. Social Science & Medicine (1982), 70(3), 455–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.10.047
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickert, S., Sagara, N., & Slovic, P. (2011). Affective motivations to help others: A two-stage model of donation decisions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 24(4), 361–376. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillard, J. P., & Nabi, R. L. (2006). The persuasive influence of emotion in cancer prevention and detention messages. Journal of Communication, 56(1), 123–139.
   Google Scholar
• Dillard, J. P., & Peck, E. (2000). Affect and persuasion: Emotional responses to public service announcements. Communication Research, 27(4), 461–495. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365000027004003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duchowski, A. T. (2007). Eye tracking methodology: Theory and practice. Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, B. (2004). A theory of impact philanthropy. Journal of Public Economics, 88(9–10), 2159–2180. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(03)00037-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberg, N. (2000). Empathy and sympathy. In M. Lewis & J. M. Haviland-Jones (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (2nd ed., pp. 677–691). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Erlandsson, A., Nilsson, A., & Västfjäll, D. (2018). Attitudes and donation behavior when reading positive and negative charity appeals. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 30(4), 444–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495142.2018.1452828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escalas, J. E. (2004). Narrative processing: Building consumer connections to brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(1&2), 168–180. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1401&2_19
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escalas, J. E., & Stern, B. B. (2003). Sympathy and empathy: Emotional responses to advertising dramas. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(4), 566–578. https://doi.org/10.1086/346251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feeding America (2019). Understand food insecurity. https://hungerandhealth.feedingamerica.org/understand-food-insecurity/
   Google Scholar
• Fiedler, K., Nickel, S., Asbeck, J., & Pagel, U. (2003). Mood and the generation effect. Cognition & Emotion, 17(4), 585–608. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930302301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forgas, J. P. (2013). Don't worry, be sad! On the cognitive, motivational, and interpersonal benefits of negative mood. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(3), 225–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721412474458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredrickson, B. L., & Kahneman, D. (1993). Duration neglect in retrospective evaluations of affective episodes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(1), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.65.1.45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frijda, N. (1986). The emotions. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fultz, J., Schaller, M., & Cialdini, R. B. (1988). Empathy, sadness, and distress: Three related but distinct vicarious affective responses to another's suffering. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14(2), 312–325. 
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gengo, S., Pohlmann, A., & Steidl, P. (2013). Neuromarketing for dummies. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, J. H., & Wichansky, A. M. (2003). Eye tracking in usability evaluation: A practitioner's guide. In J. Hyona, R. Radach, & H. Deubel (Eds.), The mind's eyes: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movements (pp. 493–516). North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Gorn, G., Pham, M. T., & Sin, L. Y. (2001). When arousal influences ad evaluation and valence does not (and vice versa). Journal of Consumer Psychology, 11(1), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327663JCP1101_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grau, S. L., & Folse, J. A. G. (2007). Cause-related marketing (CRM): The influence of donation proximity and message-framing cues on the less-involved consumer. Journal of Advertising, 36(4), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.2753/JOA0091-3367360402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwald, A. G. (1968). Cognitive learning, cognitive response to persuasion, and attitude change. In A. G. Greenwald, T. C. Brock, & T. M. Ostom (Eds.), Psychological foundations of attitudes (pp. 147–170). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Griskevicius, V., Shiota, M. N., & Neufeld, S. L. (2010). Influence of different positive emotions on persuasion processing: A functional evolutionary approach. Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 10(2), 190–206. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018421
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haugtvedt, C. P., & Wegener, D. T. (1994). Message order effects in persuasion: An attitude strength perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 205–218. https://doi.org/10.1086/209393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, R., Brandt, D., & Nairn, A. (2006). Brand relationships: Strengthened by emotion, weakened by attention. Journal of Advertising Research, 46(4), 410–419. https://doi.org/10.2501/S002184990606048X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helson, H. (1964). Adaptation-level theory. Harperd & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Irwin, D. A. (2004). Fixation location and fixation duration as indices of cognitive processing. In J. M. Hendeerson & F. Ferreira (Eds.), The interface of language, vision, and action: Eye movements and the visual (pp. 105–118). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Isen, A. M. (2000). Some perspectives on positive affect and self-regulation. Psychological Inquiry, 11(3), 184–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Izard, C. E. (2007). Basic emotions, natural kinds, emotion schemas, and a new paradigm. Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 2(3), 260–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00044.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87(4), 329–354. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.87.4.329
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–292. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp, E., Kennett-Hensel, P. A., & Kees, J. (2013). Pulling on the heartstrings: Examining the effects of emotions and gender in persuasive appeals. Journal of Advertising, 42(1), 69–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2012.749084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, H. J., & Cameron, G. T. (2011). Emotions matter in crisis: The role of anger and sadness in the publics' response to crisis news framing and corporate crisis response. Communication Research, 38(6), 826–855. 
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kühne, R., & Schemer, C. (2015). The emotional effects of news frames on information processing and opinion formation. Communication Research, 42(3), 387–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650213514599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, A. (2006). Using the limited capacity model of motivated mediated message processing to design effective cancer communication messages. Journal of Communication, 56(suppl_1), S57–S80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00283.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavine, H., & Snyder, M. (2000). Cognitive processes and the functional matching effect in persuasion: Studies of personality and political behavior. In G. R. Maio & J. M. Olson (Eds.), Why we are evaluate: Functions of attitudes (pp. 97–131). Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Progress on a cogntiive-motivational-relational theory of emotion. The American Psychologist, 46(8), 819–834. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.46.8.819
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S., Winterich, K. P., & Ross Jr, W. T. (2014). I'm moral, but I won't help you: The distinct roles of empathy and justice in donation. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(3), 678–696. https://doi.org/10.1086/677226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Mackie, D. M., & Worth, L. T. (1989). Processing deficits and the mediation of positive affect in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(1), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.1.27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mano, H. (1997). Affect and persuasion: The influence of pleasantness and arousal on attitude formation and message elaboration. Psychology and Marketing, 14(4), 315–335. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(199707)14:4 < 315::AID-MAR2 > 3.0.CO;2-C
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchand, J., & Filiatrault, P. (2002). AIDS prevention advertising: Different message strategies for different communication objectives. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 7(3), 271–287. https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.185
   Google Scholar
• McKee, R. (2003). Storytelling that moves people: A conversation with screenwriting coach. Harvard Business Review, 81(6), 51–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McQueen, A., Kreuter, M. W., Kalesan, B., & Alcaraz, K. I. (2011). Understanding narrative effects: The impact of breast cancer suvivor stories on message processing, attitudes, and belief among African American women. Health Psychology, 30(6), 674–682. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025395
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merchant, A., Ford, J. B., & Sargeant, A. (2010). Charitable organizations' storytelling influence on donors' emotions and intentions. Journal of Business Research, 63(7), 754–762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.05.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, M., Brown, K., Morris-Villagran, M. M., & Villagran, P. (2001). The effects of anger, sadness and hapiness on persuasive message processing: A test of the negative state relief model. Communication Monographs, 68(4), 347–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750128070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, N., & Campbell, D. T. (1959). Recency and primacy in persuasion as a function of the timing of speeches and measurements. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 59(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0049330
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, J., & Sar, S. (2015). The influence of consumer mood state as a contextual factor on imagery-inducing advertisements and brand attitude. Journal of Marketing Communications, 21(4), 284–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2012.762421
   Google Scholar
• Nabi, R. L. (1999). A cognitive-functional model for the effects of discrete negative emotions on information processing, attitude change, and recall. Communication Theory, 9(3), 292–320. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1999.tb00172.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabi, R. L. (2003). Exploring the framing effects of emotion: Do discrete emotions differentially influence information accessibility, information seeking, and policy preference? Communication Research, 30(2), 224–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650202250881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabi, R. L. (2015). Emotional flow in persuasive health messages. Health Communication, 30(2), 114–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2014.974129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabi, R. L., & Green, M. C. (2015). The role of a narrative's emotional flow in promoting persuasive outcomes. Media Psychology, 18(2), 137–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2014.912585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Center for Charitable Statistics (2018). The nonprofit sector in brief. https://nccs.urban.org/project/nonprofit-sector-brief.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen. (2018). Millennials on millennials: US shopping insights in a new era. https://www.nielsen.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2019/04/millennials-on-millennials-shopping-insights-report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J. H., & Escalas, J. E. (2010). Easier is not always better: The moderating role of processing type on preference fluency. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20(3), 295–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2010.06.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen, G. D., & Pracejus, J. W. (2004). Integration of positive and negative affective stimuli. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(4), 374–384. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1404_7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, B., Hembrooke, H., Gay, G., Granka, L., Feusner, M., & Newman, J. (2004). The determinants of web page viewing behavior: An eyetracking study. In Proceedings of the 2004 Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications (pp. 147–154). ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/968363.968391[]
   Google Scholar
• Perrine, R. M., & Heather, S. (2000). Effects of picture and even-a-penny-will-help appeals on anonymous donations to charity. Psychological Reports, 86(2), 551–559. https://doi.org/10.2466/PR0.86.2.551-559
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 123–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60214-2
   Google Scholar
• Pieters, R., Wedel, M., & Batra, R. (2010). The stopping power of advertising: Measures and effects of visual complexity. Journal of Marketing, 74(5), 48–60. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.74.5.48
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pracejus, J. W., & Olsen, G. D. (2004). The role of brand/cause fit in the effectiveness of cause-related marketing campaigns. Journal of Business Research, 57(6), 635–640. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00306-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prestin, A. (2013). The pursuit of hopefullness: Operationalizing hope in entertainment media narratives. Media Psychology, 16(3), 318–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2013.773494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K. (2009). Eye Movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006), 62(8), 1457–1506. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210902816461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, M., & Wood, A. (2008). An investigation into blood donation intentions among non-donors. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 13(1), 31–43.
   Google Scholar
• Rosselli, F., Skelly, J. J., & Mackie, D. M. (1995). Processing rational and emotional messages: The cognitive and affective mediation of persuasion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31(2), 163–190. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1995.1008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russo, J. E. (2011). Eye fixations as a process trace. In M. Schulte-Mechlenbeck, A. Kuhberger, J. G. Johnson, & R. Ranyard (Eds.), A handbook of process tracing methods for decision research: A critical review and user's guide (pp. 43–64). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schaller, M., & Cialdini, R. B. (1990). Happiness, sadness, and helping: A motivational integration. (Vol. 2). The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schul, Y., Mayo, R., & Burnstein, E. (2004). Encoding under trust and distrust: The spontaneous activation of incongruent cognitions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(5), 668–679. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.5.668
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, N. (2012). Feelings-as-information theory. In P. V. Lange, A. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychologies. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, N., & Bless, H. (1992). Constructing reality and its alternatives: Assimilation and constrast effects in social judgment. Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/37.3.274-a
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (2007). Feelings and phenomenal experiences (2nd ed.). Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, L., & Seung, S-y. (2018). On measures of message elaboration in narrative communication. Communication Quarterly, 66(1), 79–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2017.1334682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherif, M., & Sherif, C. W. (1967). Attitudes as the individual's own categories: The social judgment approach to attitude change. In M. Sherif & C. W. Sherif (Eds.), Attitude, ego involvement, and change (pp. 105–139). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Skowronski, J. J., & Carlston, D. E. (1989). Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: A review of explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 105(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.105.1.131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Small, D. A., & Verrochi, M. M. (2009). The face of need: Facial emotion expression on charity advertisements. Journal of Marketing Research, 46(6), 777–787. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20618940 https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.46.6.777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storbeck, J., & Clore, G. L. (2005). With sadness comes accuracy; With hapiness, false memory Mood and the false memory effect. Psychological Science, 16(10), 785–791. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01615.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taute, H. A., McQuitty, S., & Sautter, E. P. (2011). Emotional information management and responses to emotional appeals. Journal of Advertising, 40(3), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.2753/JOA0091-3367400303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, M. M., Richards, A. S., Bessarabova, E., & Magid, Y. (2020). The effects of anger appeals on systematic processing and intentions: The moderating role of efficacy. Communication Reports, 33(1), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934215.2019.1682175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States Census Bureau. (2019). Income and poverty in the United States: 2018. https://www.census.gov/library/publications/2019/demo/p60-266.html.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, A. (2006). Advertising engagement: A driver of message involvement on message effects. Journal of Advertising Research, 46(4), 355–368. https://doi.org/10.2501/S0021849906060429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, C. L. (2008). Gender differences in responding to sad emotional appeal: A moderated mediation explanation. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 19(1), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.1300/J054v19n01_03
   Google Scholar
• Wedel, M. (2018). Improving ad interfaces with eye tracking. In K. L. Norman & J. Kirakowski (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of human computer interaction (pp. 889–907). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Wegener, D. T., Petty, R. E., & Klein, D. J. (1994). Effects of mood on high elaboration attitude change: the mediating role of likelihood judgments. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24(1), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420240103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegener, D. T., Smith, S. M., & Petty, R. E. (1995). Positive mood can increase or decrease message scrutiny: The hedonic contingency view of mood and message processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(1), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.69.1.5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. M., & Horowitz, T. S. (2004). What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5(6), 495–501. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1411
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodside, A. G., Sood, S., & Miller, K. E. (2008). When consumers and brands talk: Storytelling theory and research in psychology and marketing. Psychology and Marketing, 25(2), 97–145. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoo, J. H., Kreuter, M. W., Lai, C., & Fu, Q. (2014). Understanding narrative effects: The role of discrete negative emotions on message processing and attitudes among low-income African American women. Health Communication, 29(5), 494–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2013.776001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, L., He, Y., Chen, Q., & Hu, M. (2017). It's the thought that counts: The effects of construal level priming and donation proximity on consumer response to donation framing. Journal of Business Research, 76, 44–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar