What do correct answers reveal? The interpersonal and mathematical aspects of students’ interactions during groupwork in seventh grade mathematics

References

• Anderson, C. W., Holland, J. D., & Palincsar, A. S. (1997). Canonical and sociocultural approaches to research and reform in science education: The story of Juan and his group. The Elementary School Journal, 97(4), 359–383. https://doi.org/10.1086/461871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barron, B. (2000). Achieving coordination in collaborative problem-solving groups. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(4), 403–436. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS0904_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(3), 307–359. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1203_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, M. (1981). Systemic linguistics and discourse analysis: A multi-layered approach to exchange structure. In M. Coulthard & M. Montgomery (Eds.), Studies in discourse analysis (pp. 120–145). Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Bianchini, J. A. (1999). From here to equity: The influence of status on student access to and understanding of science. Science Education, 83(5), 577–601. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199909)83:5<577::AID-SCE5>3.0.CO;2-F
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, J. P. (2012). “She’s always been the smart one. I’ve always been the dumb one”: Identities in the mathematics classroom. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43(1), 34–74. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.43.1.0034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boaler, J. (2006). How a detracked mathematics approach promoted respect, responsibility, and high achievement. Theory Into Practice, 45(1), 40–46. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4501_6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchs, C., Butera, F., Mugny, G., & Darnon, C. (2004). Conflict elaboration and cognitive outcomes. Theory Into Practice, 43(1), 23–30. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4301_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, K. (2018). Status, equity, and group learning in middle school math: “I’m not that smart. Mid-Western Educational Researcher, 31(1), 67–104. https://www.mwera.org/MWER/volumes/v31/issue1/V31n1-Carter-VOICES-FROM-THE-CLASSROOM.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, A. (1993). Language and learning in school mathematics: A social semiotic perspective. Issues in Educational Research, 3(1), 35–46. http://www.iier.org.au/iier3/chapman.html
   Google Scholar
• Chizhik, A. W. (2001). Equity and status in group collaboration: Learning through explanations depends on task characteristics. Social Psychology of Education, 5(2), 179–200. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014405118351
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, P., Stephan, M., McClain, K., & Gravemeijer, K. (2001). Participating in classroom mathematical practices. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10(1/2), 113–163. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS10-1-2_6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, E. G. (1994a). Designing groupwork: Strategies for heterogeneous classrooms (2nd ed.). Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, E. G. (1994b). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543064001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, E. G., & Lotan, R. A. (Eds.). (1997). Working for equity in heterogeneous classrooms: Sociocultural theory in practice. Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, B., & Harré, R. (1999). Positioning and personhood. In R. Harré & L. van Langenhove (Eds.), Positioning theory: Moral contexts of intentional actions (pp. 32–52). Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• DeJarnette, A. F., & González, G. (2015). Positioning during group work on a novel task in Algebra II. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 46(4), 378–422. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.46.4.0378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeJarnette, A. F., & González, G. (2016). Thematic analysis of students’ talk while solving a real-world problem in geometry. Linguistics and Education, 35(1), 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2016.05.002
   Google Scholar
• DeJarnette, A. F. (2018). Using student positioning to identify collaboration during pair work at the computer in mathematics. Linguistics and Education, 46(1), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2018.05.005
   Google Scholar
• DeJarnette, A. F., McMahon, S., & Hord, C. (2020). Interpretations of slope through written and verbal interactions between a student and her tutors in Algebra 1. REDIMAT: Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 9(2), 121–146. https://doi.org/10.17583/redimat.2020.4242
   Google Scholar
• Eggins, S., & Slade, D. (1997). Analysing casual conversation. Cassell.
   Google Scholar
• Eggins, S. (2004). An introduction to systemic functional linguistics (2nd ed.). Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, A. B. (2007). The influence of reasoning with emergent quantities on students’ generalizations. Cognition and Instruction, 25(4), 439–478. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000701632397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engle, R. A., & Conant, F. R. (2002). Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20(4), 399–483. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532690XCI2004_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engle, R. A., Langer-Osuna, J., & McKinney de Royston, M. (2014). Towards a model of influence in persuasive discussions: Negotiating quality, authority, privilege, and access within a student-led argument. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(2), 245–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2014.883979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esmonde, I. (2009a). Ideas and identities: Supporting equity in cooperative mathematics learning. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 1008–1043. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654309332562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esmonde, I. (2009b). Mathematics learning in groups: Analyzing equity in two cooperative activity structures. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(2), 247–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400902797958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esmonde, I., & Langer-Osuna, J. M. (2013). Power in numbers: Student participation in mathematical discussions in heterogeneous spaces. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(1), 288–315. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.44.1.0288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fields, D., & Enyedy, N. (2013). Picking up the mantle of “expert”: Assigned roles, assertion of identity, and peer recognition within a programming class. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 20(2), 113–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2012.691199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firth, J. R. (1957). A synopsis of linguistic theory 1930–1955. In J. R. Firth (Ed.), Studies in linguistic analysis (pp. 1–32). Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Forman, E. A. (1996). Learning mathematics as participation in classroom practice: Implications of sociocultural theory for educational reform. In L. Steffe, P. Nesher, P. Cobb, G. A. Goldin, & B. Greer (Eds.), Theories of mathematical learning (pp. 115–130). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Francisco, J. M. (2013). Learning in collaborative settings: Students building on each other’s ideas to promote their mathematical understanding. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 82(3), 417–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9437-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González, G., & DeJarnette, A. F. (2015). Teachers’ and students’ negotiation moves when teachers scaffold group work during a problem-based lesson. Cognition and Instruction, 33(1), 1–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2014.987058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Good, T. L., Mulryan, C., & McCaslin, M. (1992). Grouping for instruction in mathematics: A call for programmatic research on small-group processes. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 165–196). Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. University Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. (1984). Language as code and language as behaviour: A systemic-functional interpretation of the nature and ontogenesis of dialogue. In R. Fawcett, M. A. K. Halliday, S. M. Lamb, & A. Makkai (Eds.), The semiotics of language and culture, Vol 1: Language as social semiotic (pp. 3–35). Pintner.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). An introduction to functional grammar (4th ed.). Hodder Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Harré, R. (1991). The discursive production of selves. Theory & Psychology, 1(1), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354391011004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasan, R. (2009). Wanted: A theory for integrated sociolinguistics. Equinox.
   Google Scholar
• Herbel-Eisenmann, B. A., & Otten, S. (2011). Mapping mathematics in classroom discourse. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 42(5), 451–485. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.42.5.0451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiebert, J., & Grouws, D. A. (2007). The effects of classroom mathematics teaching on students’ learning. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 371–404). NCTM.
   Google Scholar
• Hogan, K., Nastasi, B. K., & Pressley, M. (1999). Discourse patterns and collaborative scientific reasoning in peer and teacher-guided discussions. Cognition and Instruction, 17(4), 379–432. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532690XCI1704_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hohenwarter, M., Borcherds, M., Ancsin, G., Bencze, B., Blossier, M., & Tomaschko, M. (2019). GeoGebra. https://www.geogebra.org/
   Google Scholar
• Holland, D., & Lave, J. (2001). History in person. Enduring struggles: Contentious practice, intimate identities. School for Advanced Research Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. (1990). Cooperative learning and achievement. In S. Sharan (Ed.), Cooperative learning: Theory and research (pp. 23–37). Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (2000). Constructive controversy: The educative power of intellectual conflict. Change, 32(1), 28–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091380009602706
   Google Scholar
• King, A. (1991). Effects of training in strategic questioning on children’s problem- solving performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(3), 307–317. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.83.3.307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kostopoulos, D. (2013). The case of Mitchell’s cube: Interactive and reflexive positioning during collaborative work in mathematics. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 21(1), 34–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2013.790905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurth, L. A., Anderson, C. W., & Palinscar, A. S. (2002). The case of Darla: Dilemmas of helping all students understand science. Science Education, 86(3), 287–313. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langer-Osuna, J. M. (2011). How Brianna became bossy and Kofi came out smart: Understanding the trajectories of identity and engagement for two group leaders in a project-based mathematics classroom. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, 11(3), 207–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2011.595881
   Google Scholar
• Langer-Osuna, J. M. (2016). The social construction of authority among peers and its implications for collaborative mathematics problem solving. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 18(2), 107–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2016.1148529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langer-Osuna, J. M. (2017). Authority, identity, and collaborative mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 48(3), 237–247. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.48.3.0237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langer-Osuna, J. M., Gargroetzi, E., Munson, J., & Chavez, R. (2020). Exploring the role of off-task activity on students’ collaborative dynamics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(3), 514–532. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leander, K. M. (2002). Silencing in classroom interaction: Producing and relating social spaces. Discourse Processes, 34(2), 193–235. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326950DP3402_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Love, K., & Suherdi, D. (1996). The negotiation of knowledge in an adult English as a second language classroom. Linguistics and Education, 8(3), 229–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0898-5898(96)90023-6
   Google Scholar
• Martin, D. B. (2006). Mathematics learning and participation as racialized forms of experience: Afri- can American parents speak on the struggle for mathematics literacy. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 8(3), 197–229. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0803_2
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2007). Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause (2nd ed.). Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, C. (2006). What does social semiotics have to offer mathematics education research? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61(1/2), 219–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-5477-x
   Google Scholar
• Mulryan, C. M. (1995). Fifth and sixth graders’ involvement and participation in cooperative small groups in mathematics. Elementary School Journal, 95(4), 297–310. https://doi.org/10.1086/461804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• National Governor’s Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. http://www.corestandards.org/assets/CCSSI_Math%20Standards.pdf
   Google Scholar
• O’Halloran, K. L. (2005). Mathematical discourse: Language, symbolism, and visual images. Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Pace, J., & Hemmings, A. (2007). Understanding authority in classrooms: A review of theory, ideology, and research. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 4–27. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie, S. M. (2002). Student positioning within groups during science activities. Research in Science Education, 32(1), 35–54. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015046621428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rowland, T. (2000). The pragmatics of mathematics education: Vagueness in mathematical discourse. New York: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Staples, M. (2007). Supporting whole-class collaborative inquiry in a secondary mathematics classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 25(2–3), 161–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000701301125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staples, M. (2008). Promoting student collaboration in a detracked, heterogeneous secondary mathematics classroom. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11(5), 349–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-008-9078-8
   Google Scholar
• Swing, S., & Peterson, P. (1982). The relationship of student ability and small-group interaction to student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 19(2), 259–274. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312019002259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Langenhove, L., & Harré, R. (1999). Introducing positioning theory. In R. Harré & L. van Langenhove (Eds.), Positioning theory: Moral contexts of intentional actions (pp. 14–31). Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Ventola, E. (1987). The structure of social interaction: A systemic approach to the semiotics of service encounters. Frances Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Viechnicki, G. B. (2008). Grammatical processes of objectification in a middle school science classroom. Linguistics and Education, 19(3), 244–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2008.06.001
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, D., & Herbel-Eisenmann, B. (2014). Identifying authority structures in mathematics classroom discourse: A case of a teacher’s early experience in a new context. ZDM Mathematics Education, 46(6), 871–882. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0587-x
   Google Scholar
• Watson, J. M., & Chick, H. L. (2001). Factors influencing the outcomes of collaborative problem solving: An introduction. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 3(2–3), 125–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2001.9679971
   Google Scholar
• Webb, N. M. (1991). Task-related verbal interaction and mathematics learning in small groups. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22(5), 366–389. https://doi.org/10.2307/749186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, N. M., & Palinscar, A. S. (1996). Group processes in the classroom. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 841–873). Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, N. M., Farivar, S. H., & Mastergeorge, A. M. (2002). Productive helping in cooperative groups. Theory Into Practice, 41(1), 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4101_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, N. M., Nemer, K. M., & Zuniga, S. (2002). Short circuits or superconductors? Effects of group composition on high achieving students’ science assessment performance. American Educational Research Journal, 39(4), 943–989. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312039004943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, N. M., Franke, M. L., De, T., Chan, A. G., Freund, D., Shein, P., & Melkonian, D. K. (2009). “Explain to your partner”: Teachers’ instructional practices and students’ dialogue in small groups. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(1), 49–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640802701986
   Google Scholar
• Wood, M. B. (2013). Mathematical micro-identities: Moment-to-moment positioning and learning in a fourth grade classroom. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(5), 775–808. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.44.5.0775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 458–477. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.27.4.0458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahner, W., & Moschkovich, J. N. (2010). The social organization of a middle school mathematics group discussion. In R. Lesh, P. L. Galbraith, C. R. Haines, & A. Hurfurd (Eds.), Modeling students’ mathematical modeling competencies: ICTMA 13 (pp. 373–384). Springer.
   Google Scholar