635
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Voice as an interactional accomplishment in art making about social issues

ORCID Icon
Pages 594-629 | Received 09 Oct 2020, Accepted 12 Jun 2022, Published online: 20 Jul 2022

References

  • Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M.M. Bakhtin. University of Texas Press.
  • Bakhtin, M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. University of Texas Press.
  • Bell, L. A., & Roberts, R. A. (2010). The storytelling project model: A theoretical framework for critical examination of racism through the arts. Teachers College Record, 112(9), 2295–2319. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811011200907
  • Brown, A. L., & Palincsar, A. S. (1989). Guided, cooperative learning and individual knowledge acquisition. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 393–451). Earlbaum.
  • Calkins, L. M. (1991). Living between the lines. Heinemann.
  • Cherbow, K., & McNeill, K. (2022). Planning for student-driven discussions: A revelatory case of curricular sensemaking for epistemic agency. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2021.2024433
  • Cohen, C., Kahne, J., & Marshall, J. (2018). Let’s go there: Race, ethnicity, and a lived civics approach to civic education. GenForward at the University of Chicago.
  • Cotner, T. L. (2001). Why study classroom art talk? Art Education, 54(1), 12–17. https://doi.org/10.2307/3193888
  • Darts, D. (2006). Art education for a change: Contemporary issues and the visual arts. Art Education, 50(5), 6–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2005.11651605
  • Derry, S. J., Pea, R. D., Barron, B., Engle, R. A., Erickson, F., Goldman, R., Hall, R., Koschmann, T., Lemke, J. L., Sherin, M. G., & Sherin, B. L. (2010). Conducting video research in the learning sciences: Guidance on selection, analysis, technology, and ethics. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(1), 3–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400903452884
  • Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. The Penguin Putnam Inc.
  • Dewhurst, M. (2011). Where is the action? Three lenses to analyze social justice art education. Equity & Excellence in Education, 44(3), 364–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2011.591261
  • Dewhurst, M. (2014). Social justice art: A framework for activist art pedagogy. Harvard Education Press.
  • Eisner, E. (2002). The arts and the creation of mind. Yale University Press.
  • Ellsworth, E. (2005). Places of learning: Media, architecture, pedagogy. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203020920
  • Enyedy, N. (2005). Inventing mapping: Creating cultural forms to solve collective problems. Cognition and Instruction, 23(4), 427–466. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci2304_1
  • Erickson, F. (2006). Definitions and analysis of data from videotape: Some research procedures and their rationales. In J. Green, G. Camilli, & P. Elmore (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in educational research (3rd ed., pp. 177-191). American Educational Research Association.
  • Fisher, M. (2005). From the coffee house to the school house: The promise and possibility of spoken word poetry in school contexts. English Education, 37(2), 115–131.
  • Franco, M. J., Ward, A., & Unrath, K. (2015). Artmaking as meaning-making: A new model for preservice elementary generalists. Art Education, 68(5), 28–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2015.11519336
  • Freedman, K. (1994). Interpreting gender and visual culture in arts classrooms. Studies in Art Education, 35(3), 157–170. https://doi.org/10.2307/1320217
  • Freedman, K. (2000). Social perspectives on art education in the U.S.: Teaching visual culture in a democracy. Studies in Art Education, 41(4), 314–329. https://doi.org/10.2307/1320676
  • Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Herder and Herder.
  • Furman, M., & CalabreseBarton, A. (2006). Capturing urban student voices in the creation of a science mini-documentary. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(7), 667–694. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20164
  • Gadsden, V. L. (2008). The arts and education: Knowledge generation, pedagogy, and the discourse of learning. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 29–61. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X07309691
  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine.
  • Gnezda, N. M. (2009). The potential for meaning in student art. Art Education, 62(4), 48–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2009.11519029
  • Greene, M. (1991). Foreword. In C. Witherell & N. Noddings (Eds.), Stories lives tell. Teachers College Press.
  • Greene, M. (1995). Releasing the imagination: Essays on education, the arts, and social change. Jossey-Bass Publishers.
  • Gude, O. (2009). The 2009 Lowenfeld Lecture: Art education for democratic life. Art Education, 62(6), 6–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2009.11519039
  • Hafeli, M. (2000). Negotiating “fit” in student art work: Classroom conversations. Studies in Art Education, 41(2), 130–145. https://doi.org/10.2307/1320659
  • Halverson, E. R. (2007). Listening to voices of queer youth: The dramaturgical process as identity exploration. In M. V. Blackburn & C. Clark (Eds.), New directions in literacy research for teaching, learning and political action (pp. 153–176). Peter Lang.
  • Halverson, E. R. (2013). Digital art making as a representational process. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 22(1), 121–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2011.639471
  • Halverson, E. R., & Sheridan, K. M. (2014). Arts education and the learning sciences. In R. K. Sawyer Ed., Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (2nd ed., pp. 626–646). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519526.037
  • Halverson, E. R., & Sawyer, K. (2022). Learning in and through the arts. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 31(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2022.2029127
  • Harel, I., & Papert, S. (Eds.). (1991). Constructionism: Research reports and essays, 1985-1990. Ablex.
  • Haynes, D. J. (2002). Bakhtin and the visual arts. In P. Smith & C. Wilde (Eds.), A companion to art theory (pp. 292–302). Blackwell Publishing.
  • Hetland, L., Winner, E., Veenema, S., & Sheridan, K. M. (2013). Studio thinking 2: The real benefits of visual arts education (2nd ed.). Teachers College Press.
  • Holloway, D. L., & LeCompte, M. D. (2001). Becoming somebody! How arts programs support positive identity for middle school girls. Education and Urban Society, 33(4), 388–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124501334004
  • Jaber, L. Z., & Hammer, D. (2016). Learning to feel like a scientist. Science Education, 100(2), 189–220. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21202.
  • Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(1), 39–103. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0401_2
  • Jornet, A., & Roth, W.-M. (2015). The joint work of connecting multiple (re)presentations in science classrooms. Science Education, 99(2), 378–403. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21150
  • Kuttner, P. (2016). Hip hop citizens: Arts-based culturally sustaining civic engagement pedagogy. Harvard Education Review, 86(4), 527–616. https://doi.org/10.17763/1943-5045-86.4.527
  • Lemke, J. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Ablex.
  • Lensmire, T. J. (1998). Rewriting student voice. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 30(3), 261–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/002202798183611
  • Lynch, P. (2007). Making meaning many ways: An exploratory look at integrating the arts with classroom curriculum. Art Education, 60(4), 33–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2007.11651651
  • Matusov, E. (2007). Applying Bakhtin scholarship on discourse in education: A critical review essay. Educational Theory, 57(2), 215–237. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.2007.00253.x
  • Maxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Sage.
  • Millbrandt, M. (2002). Addressing contemporary social issues in art education: A survey of public school art educators in Georgia. Studies in Art Education, 43(2), 141–155. https://doi.org/10.2307/1321001
  • Mitra, D. (2001). Opening the floodgates: Giving student a voice in school reform. Forum, 43(2), 91–94. https://doi.org/10.2304/forum.2001.43.2.14
  • Nasir, N. S., Hand, V., & Taylor, E. V. (2008). Culture and mathematics in school: Boundaries between “cultural” and “domain” knowledge in the mathematics classroom and beyond. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 187–240. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X07308962
  • Pantaleo, S. (2012). Meaning‐making with colour in multimodal texts: An 11‐year‐old student’s purposeful ‘doing.’ Literacy, 46(3), 147–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-4369.2012.00664.x
  • Parker, E. C. (2014). The process of social identity development in adolescent high school choral singers: A grounded theory. Journal of Research in Music Education, 62(1), 18–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429413520009
  • Peppler, K., & Wohlwend, K. (2017). Theorizing the nexus of STEAM practice. In J. Katz-Buonincontro & C. Conway (Eds.), Arts education policy review special issue: Gathering STEAM (pp. 1–12). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2017.1316331
  • Peppler, K., Davis-Soylu, H., & Dahn, M. (2021). Artifact-oriented learning: A theoretical review of the impact of the arts on learning. Arts Education Policy Review, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2021.1925609
  • The Politics of Learning Writing Collective. (2017). The learning sciences in a New Era of U.S. Nationalism. Cognition and Instruction, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2017.1282486
  • Raney, K., & Hollands, H. (2000). Art education and talk: From modernist silence to postmodern chatter. In J. Sefton-Green & R. Sinker (Eds.), Evaluating creativity: Making and learning by young people (pp. 16–43). Routledge.
  • Rhoades, M. (2012). LGBTQ youth + video artivism: Arts-based critical civic praxis. Studies in Art Education, 53(4), 317–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/00393541.2012.11518872
  • Robinson, C., & Taylor, C. (2007). Theorizing student voice: Values and perspectives. Improving Schools, 10(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480207073702
  • Roth, W. M. (1996). Art and artifact of children’s designing: A situated cognition perspective. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5(2), 129–166. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0502_2
  • Rubin, B., Abu El-Haj, T. R., & Bellino, M. J. (2021). Civic reasoning and discourse amid structural inequality, migration, and conflict. In C. D. Lee, G. White, & D. Dong (Eds.), Educating for civic reasoning and discourse (pp. 245–272). National Academy of Education.
  • Sawyer, R. K. (2016). How artists create: An empirical study of MFA painting students. Journal of Creative Behavior, 50(1), 1–19 https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.136.
  • Sawyer, R. K. (2018). Teaching and learning how to create in schools of art and design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 27(1), 137–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2017.1381963
  • Sawyer, R. K. (2021). The dialogue of creativity: Teaching the creative process by animating student work as a collaborating creative agent. Cognition and Instruction, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2021.1958219
  • Schlemmer, R. H., Carpenter, B. S., & Hitchcock, E. (2017). Socially engaged art education: Practices, processes, and possibilities. Art Education, 70(4), 56–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2017.1317564
  • Sheldon, A. (1992). Conflict talk: Sociolinguistic challenges to self-assertion and how young girls meet them. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 38(1), 95–117.
  • Sheridan, K. M., Zhang, X., & Konopasky, A. W. (2022). Strategic shifts: How studio teachers use direction and support to build learner agency in the figured world of visual art. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 31(1), 14–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2021.1999817
  • Shor, I. (1992). Empowering education: Critical teaching for social change. University of Chicago Press.
  • Soep, E. (2006). Critique: Assessment and the production of learning. Teachers College Record, 108(4), 748–777. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810610800401.
  • Springgay, S. (2006). Embodying visual arts assessment through touch: Imag(e)ining a relational arts curriculum. In P. Taylor (Ed.), Assessment in arts education (pp. 135–151). Heinemann.
  • Sullivan, P., & McCarthy, J. (2007). The relationship between self and activity in the context of artists making art. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 14(4), 235–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749030701623698
  • Taylor, K. H. (2018). The role of public education in place-re making: From a retrospective walk through my hometown to a call to action. Cognition and Instruction, 36(3), 188–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2018.1460844
  • Tishman, S. (2016, September 16). How learners slow down with out of Eden Learn: Research insights and updates. [Project Zero blog post]. https://walktolearn.outofedenwalk.com/2016/09/16/how-learners-slow-down-with-out-of-edenlearn-research-insights-and-updates-part-1-of-2/
  • Toshalis, E., & Nakkula, M. (2012). Motivation, engagement, and student voice. In N. Hoffman, A. Steinberg, & R. Wolfe (Eds.), The students at the center series (pp. 1–42). Jobs for the Future.
  • Turkle, S., & Papert, S. (1992). Epistemological pluralism and the revaluation of the concrete. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 11, 3–33 https://doi.org/10.5642/hmnj.199201.07.08.
  • Ulbricht, J. (2005). What is community-based art education? Art Education, 58(2), 6–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2005.11651529
  • Uttamchandani, S. (2021). Educational intimacy: Learning, prefiguration, and relationships in an LGBTQ+ youth group’s advocacy efforts. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 30(1), 52–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2020.1821202
  • Vea, T. (2020). The learning of emotion in/as sociocultural practice: The case of animal rights activism. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 29(3), 311–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2020.1748036
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and speech. In R. W. Rieber & A. S. Carton (Eds.),The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky. Problems of general psychology, (Vol. 1, pp. 37–285). ( translated by Norris Minick). Plenum Press.
  • Wells, G., & Arauz, R. M. (2006). Dialogue in the classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(3), 379–428. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1503_3
  • Wilensky, U. (1991). Abstract meditations on the concrete and concrete implications for mathematics education. In I. Harel & S. Papert (Eds.), Constructionism: Research reports and essays, 1985-1990 (pp. 193–203). Ablex.
  • Williams, R. (2017). Being with and being there: Our enactment of wide-awakeness. International Journal of Education and the Arts, 18(3), 1–27. http://www.ijea.org/v18n21/.
  • Wilson, S. M. (1995). Not tension but intention: A response to Wong’s analysis of the researcher/teacher. Educational Researcher, 24(8), 19–22. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X024008019
  • Zander, M. J. (2003). Talking, thinking, responding and creating: A survey of literature on talk in art education. Studies in Art Education, 44(2), 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/00393541.2003.11651733
  • Zander, M. J. (2004). Becoming dialogical: Creating a place for dialogue in art education. Art Education, 57(3), 48–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2004.11653551

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.