Material syntonicity: Examining computational performance and its materiality through weaving and sewing crafts

References

• Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801–831. https://doi.org/10.1086/345321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2012). Matter feels, converses, suffers, desires, yearns and remembers: Interview with Karen Barad. In I. Van der Tuin & R. Dolphijn (Eds.), New materialism: Interviews & cartographie (pp. 48–70). Open Humanities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, A., & Eglash, R. (2013). cSELF (computer science education from life): Broadening participation through design agency. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies (IJWLTT), 8(4), 34–49. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijwltt.2013100103
   Google Scholar
• Bix, A. S. (2014). Girls coming to tech!: A history of American engineering education for women. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buchholz, B., Shively, K., Peppler, K., & Wohlwend, K. (2014). Hands on, hands off: Gendered access in crafting and electronics practices. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 21(4), 278–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2014.939762
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buechley, L. (2006). A construction kit for electronic textiles. In Proceedings of the 10th IEEE international symposium on wearable computers, Montreux, Switzerland (pp. 83–90). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Buechley, L., Peppler, K., Eisenberg, M., & Yasmin, K. (2013). Textile messages: Dispatches from the world of e-textiles and education. Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Cocker, E. (2017). Weaving codes/coding weaves: Penelopean mêtis and the weaver-coder’s kairos. Textile Cloth and Culture, 15(2), 124–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759756.2017.1298233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho, M., & Maes, P. (2009). Shutters: A permeable surface for environmental control and communication. In N. Villar & I. Shahram (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on tangible and embedded interaction, Cambridge, United Kingdom (pp. 13–18). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Corbett, C., & Hill, C. (2015). Solving the equation: The variables for women’s success in engineering and computing. American Association of University Women. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED580805.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Danish, J., & Enyedy, N. (2020). Constructing with and through the body. In N. Holbert, M. Berland, & Y. B. Kafai (Eds.), Designing constructionist futures: The art, theory, and practice of learning designs (pp. 245–254). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, M., & Davis, V. (2005). Mistaken ancestry: The Jacquard and the computer. Textile Cloth and Culture, 3(1), 76–87. https://doi.org/10.2752/147597505778052594
   Google Scholar
• de Freitas, E., & Sinclair, N. (2013). New materialist ontologies in mathematics education: The body in/of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 83(3), 453–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Freitas, E., & Sinclair, N. (2014). Mathematics and the body: Material entanglements in the classroom. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eglash, R., Bennett, A., O’donnell, C., Jennings, S., & Cintorino, M. (2006). Culturally situated design tools: Ethnocomputing from field site to classroom. American Anthropologist, 108(2), 347–362. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.2006.108.2.347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Essinger, J. (2004). Jacquard’s web: How a hand-loom led to the birth of the information age. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fanfani, G., & Harlizius-Klück, E. (2016). (B)orders in ancient weaving and archaic Greek poetry. In M. L. Nosch, M. Harlow, & G. Fanfani (Eds.), Spinning fates and the song of the loom: Use of textiles, clothing and cloth production as metaphor, symbol and narrative device in Greek and Latin literature (pp. 61–99). Oxbow Books.
   Google Scholar
• Fernaeus, Y., Jonsson, M., & Tholander, J. (2012). Revisiting the Jacquard loom: Threads of history and current patterns in HCI. In J. A. Konstan, E. D. Chi, & K. Höök. (Eds.), Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Austin, Texas, USA (pp. 1593–1602). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths, D., & McLean, A. (2017). Textility of code: A catalogue of errors. Textile Cloth and Culture, 15(2), 198–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759756.2017.1298308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harlizius-Klück, E. (2017). Weaving as binary art and the algebra of patterns. Textile Cloth and Culture, 15(2), 176–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759756.2017.1298239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harwood, D., & Collier, D. R. (2017). The matter of the stick: Storying/(re)storying children’s literacies in the forest. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 17(3), 336–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798417712340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hecht, M., & Crowley, K. (2020). Unpacking the learning ecosystems framework: Lessons from the adaptive management of biological ecosystems. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 29(2), 264–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2019.1693381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchins, E. (1995). How a cockpit remembers its speeds. Cognitive science, 19(3), 265–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivinson, G., & Renold, E. (2013). Valleys’ girls: Re-theorising bodies and agency in a semi-rural post-industrial locale. Gender and Education, 25(6), 704–721. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2013.827372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, A. Y., & Mazzei, L. A. (2012). Thinking with theory in qualitative research: Viewing data across multiple perspectives. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferies, J., & Thompson, K. (2017). Material codes: Ephemeral traces. Textile Cloth and Culture, 15(2), 158–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759756.2017.1298327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, S., Thiel, J. J., Dávila, D., Pittard, E., Woglom, J. F., Zhou, X., Brown, T., & Snow, M. (2016). Childhood geographies and spatial justice: Making sense of place and space-making as political acts in education. American Educational Research Journal, 53(4), 1126–1158. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216655221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kafai, Y., Peppler, K., Burke, Q., Moore, M., & Glosson, D. (2010). Fröbel’s forgotten gift: Textile construction kits as pathways into play, design and computation. In N. Parés & M. Oliver (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th international conference on interaction design and children, New York, NY, United States (pp. 214–217). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Kafai, Y., Lee, E., Searle, K., Fields, D., Kaplan, E., & Lui, D. (2014). A crafts-oriented approach to computing in high school: Introducing computational concepts, practices, and perspectives with electronic textiles. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 14(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1145/2576874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keune, A., & Peppler, K. (2019). Materials‐to‐develop‐with: The making of a makerspace. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 280–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keune, A., Yankova, N., & Peppler, K. (2021). Crafting human-material collaborative learning processes and technology advances. In N. Rummel,U. Hoppe(Eds.), Reflecting the past and embracing the future: International Society of the Learning Sciences (ISLS) Annual Meeting 2021 (pp. 193–196). Bochum, Germany: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Keune, A., Yankova, N., & Peppler, K. (2022). # Quiltsforpulse: Connected and shared socio-political activism through craftivism. Learning, Media and Technology, 47(2), 251–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keune, A. (2022). Fabric-Based Computing: (Re) examining the materiality of computer science learning through fiber crafts. KI-Künstliche Intelligenz, 36(1), 69–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-021-00747-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keune, A., Ruiz-Cabello, P., Peppler, K., Chappell, K., & Rowsell, J. (2022). Mapping posthuman methodological innovation in the study of learning. In J. Oshima, T. Mochizuki, & Y. Hayashi (Eds.), International collaboration toward educational innovation for all: International society of the learning sciences (ISLS) annual meeting 2022 (pp. 113–116). Hiroshima, Japan: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Keune, A. (2022). Performing algorithms: Weaving as promising context for computational learning. In J. Oshima, T. Mochizuki, & Y. Hayashi (Eds.), International collaboration toward educational innovation for all: International society of the learning sciences (ISLS) annual meeting 2022 (pp. 957–960). Hiroshima, Japan: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Koro-Ljungberg, M. (2015). Reconceptualizing qualitative research: Methodologies without methodology. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kuby, C. R., & Rowsell, J. (2017). Early literacy and the posthuman: Pedagogies and methodologies. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 17(3), 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798417715720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuby, C. R. (2017). Why a paradigm shift of ‘more than human ontologies’ is needed: Putting to work poststructural and posthuman theories in writers’ studio. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 30(9), 877–896. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2017.1336803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuntz, A. M., & Presnall, M. M. (2012). Wandering the tactical: From interview to intraview. Qualitative Inquiry, 18(9), 732–744. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800412453016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lachney, M., Babbitt, W., Bennett, A., & Eglash, R. (2019). Generative computing: African-American cosmetology as a link between computing education and community wealth. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(7), 1115–1135. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1636087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, S. T., & Wilensky, U. (2009). Crossing levels and representations: The Connected Chemistry (CC1) curriculum. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(3), 224–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-009-9152-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maynard, A. E., Subrahmanyam, K., & Greenfield, P. M. (2005). Technology and the development of intelligence: From the loom to the computer. In R. J. Sternberg & D. D. Preiss (Eds.), Intelligence and technology: The impact of tools on the nature and development of human abilities (pp. 29–54). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzei, L. A. (2013). Materialist mappings of knowing in being: Researchers constituted in the production of knowledge. Gender and Education, 25(6), 776–785. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2013.824072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehto, V., Riikonen, S., Hakkarainen, K., Kangas, K., & Seitamaa‐Hakkarainen, P. (2020). Epistemic roles of materiality within a collaborative invention project at a secondary school. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(4), 1246–1261. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Papert, S. (1993). The children’s machine: Rethinking school in the age of the computer. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Peppler, K., Keune, A., Wohlwend, K., Rowsell, J., & Goldstone, R. (2019). Posthuman perspectives on learning. In K. Lund, E. Lavoué, & G. P. Niccolai (Eds.), A wide lens: Combining embodied, enactive, extended, and embedded learning in collaborative settings: international conference on computer supported collaborative learning (CSCL) 2019, Lyon, France (pp. 1039). International Society of the Learning Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Peppler, K., Keune, A., & Thompson, N. (2020). Reclaiming traditionally feminine practices and materials for STEM learning through the modern maker movement. In N. Holbert, M. Berland, & Y. B. Kafai (Eds.), Designing constructionist futures: The art, theory, and practice of learning design (pp. 127–139). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pinkard, N., Erete, S., Martin, C. K., & McKinney de Royston, M. (2017). Digital youth divas: Exploring narrative-driven curriculum to spark middle school girls’ interest in computational activities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 26(3), 477–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2017.1307199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plant, S. (1995). The future looms: Weaving women and cybernetics. Body & Society, 1(3–4), 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X95001003003
   Google Scholar
• Rosiek, J. L., Snyder, J., & Pratt, S. L. (2020). The new materialisms and Indigenous theories of non-human agency: Making the case for respectful anti-colonial engagement. Qualitative Inquiry, 26(3–4), 331–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800419830135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosner, D. K., Shorey, S., Craft, B. R., & Remick, H. (2018). Making core memory: Design inquiry into gendered legacies of engineering and craftwork. In R. Mandryk & M. Hancock (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Montreal, QC, Canada (pp. 531–544). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Schoemann, S., & Nitsche, M. (2017). Needle as input: Exploring practice and materiality when crafting becomes computing. In M. Inakage & H. Ishii (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th international conference on tangible, embedded, and embodied interaction, Yokohama, Japan (pp. 299–308). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Sheridan, M. P., Lemieux, A., Do Nascimento, A., & Arnseth, H. C. (2020). Intra‐active entanglements: What posthuman and new materialist frameworks can offer the learning sciences. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(4), 1277–1291. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinclair, N., & de Freitas, E. (2019). Body studies in mathematics education: Diverse scales of mattering. ZDM, 51(2), 227–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01052-w
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. A., & Ivinson, G. (2013). Material feminisms: New directions for education. Gender and Education, 25(6), 665–670. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2013.834617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. A., & Hughes, C. (Eds.). (2016). Posthuman research practices in education. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Tedre, M., Sutinen, E., Kähkönen, E., & Kommers, P. (2006). Ethnocomputing: ICT in cultural and social context. Communications of the ACM, 49(1), 126–130. https://doi.org/10.1145/1107458.1107466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiel, J. J., & Jones, S. (2017). The literacies of things: Reconfiguring the material-discursive production of race and class in an informal learning centre. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 17(3), 315–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798417712343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiel, J. J. (2018). A cool place where we make stuff’: Co-curating relational spaces of muchness. In C. Schulte & T. Thompson (Eds.), Communities of practice: Art, play, and aesthetics in early childhood (pp. 23–37). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wargo, J. M. (2017). Rhythmic rituals and emergent listening: Intra-activity, sonic sounds and digital composing with young children. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 17(3), 392–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798417712573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilensky, U., & Papert, S. (2010). Restructurations: Reformulations of knowledge disciplines through new representational forms. In Proceedings of constructionism 2010, Paris, France (pp. 1–15).
   Google Scholar
• Wilensky, U. (2020). Restructuration theory and agent-based modelling: Reformulating knowledge domains through computational representations. In N. Holbert, M. Berland, & Y. B. Kafai (Eds.), Designing constructionist futures: The art, theory, and practice of learning designs (pp. 287–300). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wohlwend, K., & Thiel, J. J. (2019). From cutting out to cutting with: A materialist reframing of action and multimodality in children’s play and making. In N. Kucikova, J. Rowsell, & G. Falloon (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of learning with technology in early childhood (pp. 170–181). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wohlwend, K., Keune, A., & Peppler, K. (2019). We need it loud: Looking at preschool making from mediated and materialist perspectives. In M. Sakr & J. Osgood (Eds.), Postdevelopmental approaches to early childhood art (pp. 177–189). Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar