Productive failure and learning through argumentation: Building a bridge between two research traditions to understand the process of peer learning

References

• Anderson, C. G., Dalsen, J., Kumar, V., Berland, M., & Steinkuehler, C. (2018). Failing up: How failure in a game environment promotes learning through discourse. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 30, 135–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asterhan, C. S. C., & Dotan, A. (2018). Feedback that corrects and contrasts students’ erroneous solutions with expert ones improves expository instruction for conceptual change. Instructional Science, 46(3), 337–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-017-9441-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asterhan, C. S. C., & Schwarz, B. B. (2007). The effects of monological and dialogical argumentation on concept learning in evolutionary theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 626–639. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.6263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asterhan, C. S. C., & Schwarz, B. B. (2016). Argumentation for learning: Well-trodden paths and unexplored territories. Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 164–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1155458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asterhan, C. S, and Schwarz, B. B. (2009). Argumentation and explanation in conceptual change: Indications from protocol analyses of peer‐to‐peer dialog. N. M. Mirza Cognitive Science, 33(3), 374–400. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01017.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darabi, A., Arrington, T. L., & Sayilir, E. (2018). Learning from failure: A meta-analysis of the empirical studies. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(5), 1101–1118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vries, E., Lund, K., & Baker, M. (2002). Computer-mediated epistemic dialogue: Explanation and argumentation as vehicles for understanding scientific notions. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(1), 63–103. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1101_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe, C. (2010). Peer groups and children’s development. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Howe, C., McWilliam, D., & Cross, G. (2005). Chance favours only the prepared mind: Incubation and the delayed effects of peer collaboration. British Journal of Psychology, 96(1), 67–93. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712604X15527
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe, C., & Zachariou, A. (2019). Small-group collaboration and individual knowledge acquisition: The processes of growth during adolescence and early adulthood. Learning and Instruction, 60, 263–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapur, M. (2008). Productive failure. Cognition and Instruction, 26(3), 379–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000802212669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapur, M. (2010). Productive failure in mathematical problem solving. Instructional Science, 38(6), 523–550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-009-9093-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapur, M. (2011). A further study of productive failure in mathematical problem solving: Unpacking the design components. Instructional Science, 39(4), 561–579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-010-9144-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapur, M. (2014). Comparing learning from productive failure and vicarious failure. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(4), 651–677. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2013.819000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapur, M. (2015). Learning from productive failure. Learning: Research and Practice, 1(1), 51–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2015.1002195
   Google Scholar
• Kapur, M. (2016). Examining productive failure, productive success, unproductive failure, and unproductive success in learning. Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 289–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1155457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapur, M., & Bielaczyc, K. (2012). Designing for productive failure. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(1), 45–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2011.591717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapur, M., & Kinzer, C. K. (2009). Productive failure in CSCL groups. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(1), 21–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-008-9059-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, P. K., Portolese, A., & Jacobson, M. J. (2017). Does sequence matter? Productive failure and designing online authentic learning for process engineering. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(6), 1217–1227. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larrain, A., Freire, P., López, P., & Grau, V. (2019). Counter-arguing during curriculum-supported peer interaction facilitates middle-school students’ science content knowledge. Cognition and Instruction, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2019.1627360
   Google Scholar
• Larrain, A., Freire, P., Strasser, K., & Grau, V. (2020). The development of a coding scheme to analyse argumentative utterances during group-work. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 36, 100610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leitão, S. (2000). The potential of argument in knowledge building. Human Development, 43(6), 332–360. https://doi.org/10.1159/000022695
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loibl, K., & Leuders, T. (2019). How to make failure productive: Fostering learning from errors through elaboration prompts. Learning and Instruction, 62, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loibl, K., Roll, I., & Rummel, N. (2017). Towards a theory of when and how problem solving followed by instruction supports learning. Educational Psychology Review, 29(4), 693–715. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-016-9379-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loibl, K., & Rummel, N. (2014). The impact of guidance during problem-solving prior to instruction on students’ inventions and learning outcomes. Instructional Science, 42(3), 305–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-013-9282-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mugny, G., & Doise, W. (1978). Socio‐cognitive conflict and structure of individual and collective performances. European Journal of Social Psychology, 8(2), 181–192. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420080204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pathak, S. A., Kim, B., Jacobson, M. J., & Zhang, B. (2011). Learning the physics of electricity: A qualitative analysis of collaborative processes involved in productive failure. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(1), 57–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-010-9099-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1962). The language and thought of the child. Routledge. Original work published 1926
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, D. L., Chase, C. C., Oppezzo, M. A., & Chin, D. B. (2011). Practicing versus inventing with contrasting cases: The effects of telling first on learning and transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(4), 759–775. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinha, T., & Kapur, M. (2021a). When problem solving followed by instruction works: Evidence for productive failure. Review of Educational Research, 91(5), 761–798. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543211019105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinha, T., & Kapur, M. (2021b). Robust effects of the efficacy of explicit failure-driven scaffolding in problem-solving prior to instruction: A replication and extension. Learning and Instruction, 75, 101488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2021.101488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinha, T., Kapur, M., West, R., Catasta, M., Hauswirth, M., & Trninic, D. (2021). Differential benefits of explicit failure-driven and success-driven scaffolding in problem-solving prior to instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(3), 530–555. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar