811
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Pedagogical sensemaking during side-by-side coaching: Examining the in-the-moment discursive reasoning of a teacher and coach

&
Pages 171-210 | Received 17 Dec 2020, Accepted 17 Sep 2022, Published online: 09 Jan 2023

References

  • Allen, C. D., & Penuel, W. R. (2015). Studying teachers’ sensemaking to investigate teachers’ responses to professional development focused on new standards. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(2), 136–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487114560646
  • Bae, C. L., Hayes, K. N., Seitz, J., O’Connor, D., & DiStefano, R. (2016). A coding tool for examining the substance of teacher professional learning and change with example cases from middle school science lesson study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 164–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.08.016
  • Baldinger, E. E., & Munson, J. (2020). Developing adaptive expertise in the wake of rehearsals: An emergent model of the debrief discussions of non-rehearsing teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 95, 103125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103125
  • Ball, A. F. (2009). Toward a theory of generative change in culturally and linguistically complex classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 46(1), 45–72. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831208323277
  • Bannister, N. A. (2015). Reframing practice: Teacher learning through interactions in a collaborative group. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 24(3), 347–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2014.999196
  • Campbell, P. F., & Malkus, N. N. (2011). The impact of elementary mathematics coaches on student achievement. The Elementary School Journal, 111(3), 430–454. https://doi.org/10.1086/657654
  • Coburn, C. E., & Russell, J. L. (2008). District policy and teachers’ social networks. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30(3), 203–235. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373708321829
  • Derry, S. J. (2007). Guidelines for video research in education: Recommendations from an expert panel.
  • Dudley, P. (2013). Teacher learning in lesson study: What interaction-level discourse analysis revealed about how teachers utilised imagination, tacit knowledge of teaching and fresh evidence of pupils learning, to develop practice knowledge and so enhance their pupils’ learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 34, 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.04.006
  • Dyer, E. B., & Sherin, M. G. (2016). Instructional reasoning about interpretations of student thinking that supports responsive teaching in secondary mathematics. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 48(1–2), 69–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0740-1
  • Engle, R. A., Conant, F. R., & Greeno, J. G. (2007). Progressive refinement of hypotheses in video-supported research. In S. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 239–254). Erlbaum.
  • Gallucci, C., Van Lare, M. D., Yoon, I. H., & Boatright, B. (2010). Instructional coaching: Building theory about the role and organizational support for professional learning. American Educational Research Journal, 47(4), 919–963. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831210371497
  • Gibbons, L. K., & Cobb, P. (2017). Focusing on teacher learning opportunities to identify potentially productive coaching activities. Journal of Teacher Education, 68(4), 411–425. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487117702579
  • Gibbons, L. K., Kazemi, E., Hintz, A., & Hartmann, E. (2017). Teacher time out: Educators learning together in and through practice. NCSM Journal of Mathematics Education Leadership, 18(2), 28–46.
  • Gibbons, L. K., Kazemi, E., & Lewis, R. M. (2017). Developing collective capacity to improve mathematics instruction: Coaching as a lever for school-wide improvement. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 46(201500018), 231–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2016.12.002
  • Gibbons, L. K., Lewis, R. M., Nieman, H., & Resnick, A. F. (2021). Conceptualizing the work of facilitating practice-embedded teacher learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 101, 103304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103304
  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. AldineTransaction.
  • Goldsmith, L. T., & Schifter, D. (1997). Understanding teachers in transition: Characteristics of a model for the development of mathematics teaching. In E. Fennema & B. S. Nelson (Eds.), Mathematics teachers in transition (pp. 19–54). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Harbour, K. E., Adelson, J. L., Karp, K. S., & Pittard, C. M. (2018). Examining the relationships among mathematics coaches and specialists, student achievement, and disability status: A multilevel analysis using national assessment of educational progress data. The Elementary School Journal, 118(4), 654–679. https://doi.org/10.1086/697529
  • Harbour, K. E., & Saclarides, E. S. (2020). Math coaches, specialists, and student achievement: Learning from the data. Phi Delta Kappan, 102(3), 42–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721720970701
  • Horn, I. S. (2005). Learning on the job: A situated account of teacher learning in high school mathematics departments. Cognition and Instruction, 23(2), 207–236. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci2302_2
  • Horn, I. S. (2010). Teaching replays, teaching rehearsals, and re-visions of practice: Learning from colleagues in a mathematics teacher community. Teachers College Record, 112(1), 225–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811011200109
  • Horn, I. S., Garner, B., Kane, B. D., & Brasel, J. (2017). A taxonomy of instructional learning opportunities in teachers’ workgroup conversations. Journal of Teacher Education, 68(1), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487116676315
  • Horn, I. S., & Kane, B. D. (2015). Opportunities for professional learning in mathematics teacher workgroup conversations: Relationships to instructional expertise. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 24(3), 373–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2015.1034865
  • Jacobs, V. R., Lamb, L. L. C., & Philipp, R. A. (2010). Professional noticing of children’s mathematical thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(2), 169–202. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.41.2.0169
  • Jacobs, J. K., & Morita, E. (2002). Japanese and American teachers’ evaluations of videotaped mathematics lessons. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(3), 154–175. https://doi.org/10.2307/749723
  • Kavanagh, S. S., Conrad, J., & Dagogo-Jack, S. (2020). From rote to reasoned: Examining the role of pedagogical reasoning in practice-based teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 89, 102991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102991
  • Kazemi, E., & Franke, M. L. (2004). Teacher learning in mathematics: Using student work to promote collective inquiry. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7(3), 203–235. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JMTE.0000033084.26326.19
  • Kazemi, E., Ghousseini, H., Cordero-Siy, E., Prough, S., McVicar, E., & Resnick, A. F. (2021). Supporting teacher learning about argumentation through adaptive, school-based professional development. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 53(2), 435–448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01242-5
  • Kazemi, E., Gibbons, L. K., Lewis, R., Fox, A., Hintz, A. B., Kelley-Petersen, M., & Balf, R. (2018). Math labs: Teachers, teacher educators, and school leaders learning together from their own students. Journal of Mathematics Education Leadership, 19(1), 23–36.
  • Kraft, M. A., Blazar, D., & Hogan, D. (2018). The effect of teacher coaching on instruction and achievement: A meta-analysis of the causal evidence. Review of Educational Research, 88(4), 547–588. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318759268
  • Lampert, M. (2001). Teaching problems and the problems of teaching. Yale University Press.
  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/2804509
  • Lefstein, A., Louie, N., Segal, A., & Becher, A. (2020). Taking stock of research on teacher collaborative discourse: Theory and method in a nascent field. Teaching and Teacher Education, 88, 102954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102954
  • Levine, T. H., & Marcus, A. S. (2010). How the structure and focus of teachers’ collaborative activities facilitate and constrain teacher learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(3), 389e398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.03.001
  • Lord, B. (1994). Teachers’ professional development: Critical colleagueship and the role of professional communities. In N. Cobb (Ed.), The future of education: Perspectives on national standards in education (pp. 175–204). College Entrance Examination Board.
  • Loughran, J. (2019). Pedagogical reasoning: The foundation of the professional knowledge of teaching. Teachers and Teaching, 25(5), 523–535. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2019.1633294
  • Louie, N. L. (2017). The culture of exclusion in mathematics education and its persistence in equity-oriented teaching. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 48(5), 488–519. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.48.5.0488
  • Louie, N. L. (2018). Culture and ideology in mathematics teacher noticing. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 97(1), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-017-9775-2
  • Louie, N. (2020). Agency discourse and the reproduction of hierarchy in mathematics instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 38(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2019.1677664
  • McGatha, M. B., Davis, R., & Stokes Levine, A. (2017). Mathematics specialists: What does the research say? In M. B. McGatha & N. R. Rigelman (Eds.), Elementary mathematics specialists: Developing, refining, and examining programs that support mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 153–166). Information Age.
  • Munson, J. (2018). Responding to student thinking in the moment: Examining conferring practices and teacher learning in the elementary mathematics classroom [ Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Stanford University.
  • Natale, C., & Fosnot, C. T. (2008). Contexts for learning: The teachers’ lounge. Heinemann.
  • Neufeld, B., & Roper, D. (2003). Coaching: A strategy for developing instructional capacity. Aspen Institute Program on Education and the Annenberg Institute for School Reform. Available at https://www.annenberginstitute.org/
  • Odden, T. O. B., & Russ, R. S. (2019). Defining sensemaking: Bringing clarity to a fragmented theoretical construct. Science Education, 103(1), 187–205. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21452
  • Phillips, A. M., Watkins, J., & Hammer, D. (2018). Beyond “asking questions”: Problematizing as a disciplinary activity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(7), 982–998. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21477
  • Roth, W., & Tobin, K. (2004). Coteaching: From praxis to theory. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 10(2), 161–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/0954025032000188017
  • Russ, R. S., Sherin, B. L., & Sherin, M. G. (2016). What constitutes teacher learning. In D. H. Gitomer & C. A. Bell (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching (5th ed., pp. 391–438). American Educational Research Association.
  • Saclarides, E. S., & Harbour, K. E. (2020). A case of one-on-one coaching to differentiate mathematics instruction. Professional Development in Education, 5257(May), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2020.1756900
  • Saclarides, E. S., & Lubienski, S. T. (2021). Teachers’ mathematics learning opportunities in one-on-one coaching conversations. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 52(3), 257–300. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc-2020-0092
  • Saclarides, E. S., & Munson, J. (2021). Exploring the foci and depth of coach-teacher interactions during modeled lessons. Teaching and Teacher Education, 105, 103418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103418
  • Sherin, M. G. (2001). Developing a professional vision of classroom events. In T. Wood, B. S. Nelson, & J. Warfield (Eds.), Beyond classical pedagogy: Teaching elementary school mathematics (pp. 75–93). Routledge.
  • Sherin, M. G. (2002). A balancing act: Developing a discourse community in a mathematics classroom. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 5(3), 205–233. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020134209073
  • Sherin, M. G., Jacobs, V. R., & Philipp, R. A. (2011). Situating the study of teacher noticing. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 3–13). Routledge.
  • Sherin, B. L., & Star, J. R. (2011). Reflections on the study of teacher noticing. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 66–78). Routledge.
  • van Es, E. A. (2009). Participants’ roles in the context of a video club. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(1), 100–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400802581668
  • van Es, E. A. (2011). A framework for learning to notice student thinking. In Sherin, M. G., Jacobs, V. J., & Philipp, R. A. (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 134–151). Routledge.
  • van Es, E. A., Cashen, M., Barnhart, T., & Auger, A. (2017). Learning to notice mathematics instruction: Using video to develop pre-service teachers’ professional vision of ambitious pedagogy. Cognition and Instruction, 35(3), 165–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2017.1317125
  • van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2008). Mathematics teachers’ “Learning to Notice” in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(2), 244–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.005
  • Walkoe, J. D. K., & Luna, M. J. (2020). What we are missing in studies of teacher learning: A call for microgenetic, interactional analyses to examine teacher learning processes. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 29(2), 285–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2019.1681998
  • Watkins, J., Portsmore, M., & Swanson, R. D. (2021). Shifts in elementary teachers’ pedagogical reasoning: Studying teacher learning in an online graduate program in engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 110(1), 252–271. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20369
  • Yeh, C., & Santagata, R. (2015). Preservice teachers’ learning to generate evidence-based hypotheses about the impact of mathematics teaching on learning. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(1), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487114549470
  • Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.