142
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The Impact of Teacher Method of Delivery and the Marshall Hypothesis

, &
Pages 442-459 | Received 30 Apr 2021, Accepted 07 Sep 2021, Published online: 09 Nov 2021

References

  • Ahlin, E. M. (2021). A mixed-methods evaluation of a hybrid course modality to increase student engagement and mastery of course content in undergraduate research methods classes. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 32(1), 22–20. doi:10.1080/10511253.2020.1831034
  • Allen, M., Bourhis, J., Burrell, N., & Mabry, E. (2002). Comparing student satisfaction with distance education to traditional classrooms in higher education: A meta-analysis. American Journal of Distance Education, 16(2), 83–97. doi:10.1207/S15389286AJDE1602_3
  • Aoun, J. E. (2020, April 10). More than bricks and mortar: We can and must replicate online the vibrancy of campus life. Chronicle of Higher Education.
  • Atkins v. Virginia, 536 US 304 (2002).
  • Baxter, D. N., & Ely, K. (2020). Research in action: Student perceptions of active learning in criminal justice research courses. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 31(1), 141–154. doi:10.1080/10511253.2019.1684536
  • Beck, R. J. (2010). Teaching international law as a partially online course: The hybrid/blended approach to pedagogy. International Studies Perspectives, 11(3), 273–290. doi:10.1111/j.1528-3585.2010.00408.x
  • Bernat, F., & Frailing, K. (2015). Perfecting lessons learned for criminal justice online graduate education: Reflection, integration, and application. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 26(3), 330–353. doi:10.1080/10511253.2015.1036090
  • Bohm, R. M. (1989). The effects of classroom instruction and discussion on death penalty opinions: A teaching note. Journal of Criminal Justice, 17(2), 123–131. doi:10.1016/0047-2352(89)90005-6
  • Bohm, R. M. (1990). Death penalty opinions: A classroom experience and public commitment. Sociological Inquiry, 60(3), 285–297. doi:10.1111/j.1475-682X.1990.tb00146.x
  • Bohm, R. M. (2014). American death penalty opinion: Past, present and future. In J. R. Acker, R. M. Bohm, & C. S. Lanier (Eds.), America’s experiment with capital punishment (3rd ed., pp. 39–75). Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
  • Bohm, R. M. (2017). American death penalty opinion. In B. Robert (Ed.), Death quest (5th ed., pp. 444–477). CRC Press: Taylor & Francis Group.
  • Bohm, R. M., Clark, L. J., & Aveni, A. F. (1990). The influence of knowledge on reasons for death penalty opinions: An experimental test. Justice Quarterly, 7(1), 175–188. doi:10.1080/07418829000090521
  • Bohm, R. M., Clark, L. J., & Aveni, A. F. (1991). Knowledge and death penalty opinion: A test of the Marshall hypothesis. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 28(3), 360–387. doi:10.1177/0022427891028003006
  • Bohm, R. M., & Vogel, B. L. (2004). More than ten years after: The long-term stability of informed death penalty opinions. Journal of Criminal Justice, 32(4), 307–327. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2004.04.003
  • Boots, D., Mallicoat, S. L., & Wareham, J. (2018). Life or death: Using real-world case to assess student death penalty opinion. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 29(1), 39–61. doi:10.1080/10511253.2017.1341989
  • Brenan, M. (2020). Record-Low 54% in US Say Death Penalty Morally Acceptable. Politics. June 23, 2020.
  • Bucklew v. Precythe, 587 US (2019).
  • Cares, A. C., Hirschel, D., & Williams, L. M. (2014). Teaching about victimization in an online environment: Translating in person empathy and support to the internet. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 25(4), 405–420. doi:10.1080/10511253.2014.965407
  • Cox, A. K. (2013). Student death penalty attitudes: Does new information matter? Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 24(4), 443–460. doi:10.1080/10511253.2013.787638
  • Death Penalty Information Center. (2021). Accessed on 4/26/21: at: Executions by State and Region Since 1976 | Death Penalty Information Center.
  • Ellsworth, P. C., & Ross, L. (1983). Public opinion and capital punishment: A close examination of the views of abolitionists and retentionists. Crime & Delinquency, 29(1), 116–169. doi:10.1177/001112878302900105
  • Furman v. Georgia, 408 US 238 (1972).
  • Gilbert, M. J., Schiff, M., & Cunliffe, R. H. (2013). Teaching restorative justice: Developing a restorative andragogy for face-to-face, online and hybrid course modalities. Contemporary Justice Review, 16(1), 43–69. doi:10.1080/10282580.2013.769305
  • Glossip v. Gross, 576 US (2015).
  • Godoy, A. M., & Pfeffer, R. (2021). Student perceptions of online vs. face-to-face learning in criminal justice. In Information Resources Management Association (Ed.), Research anthology on developing effective online learning courses (pp. 1288–1302). USA: IGI-Global Publisher of Timely Knowledge. doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-8047-9.ch063
  • Gordon, J. A., Barnes, C. M., & Martin, K. J. (2009). Undergraduate research methods: Does size matter? A look at the attitudes and outcomes of students in a Hybrid class format versus a traditional class format. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 20(3), 227–248. doi:10.1080/10511250903200493
  • Guthrie, K. L., & McCracken, H. (2010). Teaching and learning social justice through online service-learning courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 11(3), 78. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v11i3.894
  • Hannay, M., & Newvine, T. (2006). Perceptions of distance learning: A comparison of online and traditional learning. Merlot Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 2, 1–11.
  • Harmon, T., Besch, R., Amendola, A. R., & Pehrson, N. (2016). Post-Furman death row exonerations and publicity in the news. Criminal Law Bulletin, 52(6), 1590–1619.
  • Harmon, T., & McCord, D. (2019). A statistical analysis of predictors associated with the dramatic decline in death sentences in the United States in the last two decades. Journal of Criminal Justice and Law, 3(1), 1–20.
  • Harmon, T., Falco, D., & Taylor, D. (forthcoming). The Impact of Specific Knowledge on Death Penalty Opposition: An Empirical Test of the Marshall Hypothesis. Crime and Delinquency.
  • Hicks, W. L. (2014). Pedagogy in the twenty-first century: An analysis of accelerated courses in criminal justice. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 25(1), 69–83. doi:10.1080/10511253.2013.853091
  • Jones, J. M. (2019, November 25). Gallup News. Politics. Americans Now Support Life in Prison.
  • Kennedy-Kollar, D., & Mandery, E. J. (2010). Testing the Marshall hypothesis and its’ antithesis: The effect of biased information on death-penalty opinion. Criminal Justice Studies, 23(1), 65–83. doi:10.1080/14786011003634480
  • Kunzelman, M., & Tarm, M. (2021, January 17). Trump’s execution schedule ends at 13. Northwest Arkansas Democrat Gazette. nwaonline.com
  • LaChapelle, L. (2014). Capital punishment in the era of globalization: A partial test of the Marshall hypothesis among college students. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 839–854.
  • Lack, K. (2013). Current status of research on online learning in postsecondary education. doi:10.18665/sr.22463
  • Lambert, E. G., Camp, S. D., Clarke, A., & Jiang, S. (2011). The impact of information on death penalty support, revisited. Crime & Delinquency, 57(4), 572–599. doi:10.1177/0011128707312147
  • Lambert, E., & Clarke, A. (2001). The impact of information on an Individual's support of the death penalty: A partial test of the Marshall hypothesis among college students. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 12(3), 215–234. doi:10.1177/0887403401012003003
  • Latzer, B., & McCord, D. (2011). Death Penalty Cases, Third Edition. Butterworth-Heinemann, Woburn, Ma.
  • Lee, G. M., Bohm, R. M., & Pazzani, L. M. (2014). Knowledge and death penalty opinion: The marshall hypothesis revisited. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 39(3), 642–659. doi:10.1007/s12103-013-9229-z
  • Legutko, R. S. (2007). Face-to-face or cyberspace: Analysis of course delivery in a graduate educational research course. Merlot Journal of Online Teaching and Learning, 3, 288–294.
  • Lord, C. G., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(11), 2098–2109. [Database] doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.11.2098
  • Mayzer, R., & Dejong, C. (2003). Student satisfaction with distance education in a criminal justice graduate course. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 14(1), 37–52. doi:10.1080/10511250300085641
  • McCord, D., & Harmon, T. R. (2017–2018). Lethal rejection: An empirical analysis of the astonishing decline in death sentences in the United States from 1994 to 2014. Albany Law Review, 81(1), 1–44.
  • Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., & Baki, M. (2013). The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teacher's College Record, 115, 1–47.
  • Meyers, S. A. (2008). Using transformative pedagogy when teaching online. College Teaching, 56(4), 219–224. doi:10.3200/CTCH.56.4.219-224
  • Nguyen, T. (2015). The Effectiveness of Online Learning: Beyond No Significant Difference and Future Horizons. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 11, 309–319.
  • Nollenberger, K. (2017). On-campus versus hybrid courses in a master of public administration program. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 23(1), 625–636. doi:10.1080/15236803.2017.12002273
  • Panetti v. Quarterman, 551 US 930 (2007).
  • Pelfrey, W. V., & Bubolz, B. F. (2014). Hybridizing Socrates: A hybrid approach to teaching graduate research methods. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 25(1), 34–53. doi:10.1080/10511253.2013.798422
  • Perlin, M., Harmon, T. R., & Chatt, S. (2019). A world of steel-eyed death: An empirical evaluation of the failure of the strickland standard to ensure adequate counsel to defendants with mental disabilities facing the death penalty. University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 53(2), 261–336.
  • Perlin, M., Harmon, T. R., & Wetzel, S. (2021). Man is opposed to fair play: An empirical analysis of how courts have failed to take seriously Atkins v. Virginia. Wake Forest Journal of Law and Policy, 11, 451.
  • Roper v. Simmons, 543 US 551 (2005).
  • Sandys, M. (1995). Attitudinal change among students in a capital punishment class: It may be possible. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 20(1), 37–55. doi:10.1007/BF02886117
  • Sarat, A., & Vidmar, N. (1976). Public opinion, the death penalty, and the eighth amendment: Testing the Marshall Hypothesis. Wisconsin Law Review, 17, 171–206.
  • Shachar, M., & Neumann, Y. (2010). Twenty years of research on the academic performance differences between traditional and distance learning: Summative meta-analysis and trend examination. Merlot Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6, 318–334.
  • Sitren, A. H., & Smith, H. P. (2017). Teaching criminal justice online: Current status and important considerations. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 28(3), 352–367. doi:10.1080/10511253.2016.1254267
  • Stack, S. (2013). Does discussion promote learning outcomes? Analysis of an online criminology class: Research note. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 24(3), 374–385. doi:10.1080/10511253.2012.758752
  • Stack, S. (2015). The impact of exam environments on student test scores in online courses. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 26(3), 273–282. doi:10.1080/10511253.2015.1012173
  • Thurgood, M. (2020). Transforming pedagogy in criminology. In D. Palmer (Ed.), Scholarship of teaching and learning in criminology (pp. 17–36). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-35158-8_2
  • Unnever, J. D., & Cullen, F. T. (2005). Executing the innocent and support for capital punishment: Implications for public policy. Criminology & Public Policy, 4(1), 3–38. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9133.2005.00002.x
  • Vidmar, N., & Dittenhoffer, T. (1981). Informed public opinion and death penalty attitudes. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 23(1), 43–56. doi:10.3138/cjcrim.23.1.43
  • Wright, H. O., Jr., Bohm, R. M., & Jamieson, K. M. (1995). A comparison of uniformed and informed death penalty opinions: A replication and expansion. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 20(1), 57–87. doi:10.1007/BF02886118

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.